Painting The White In White History

[Ainehi Edoro]

The History of White People is a genuinely absorbing book that uproots whiteness from its default position as the colorless race, as the invisible pallet against which all races are defined as colored and places it under the historian's clinical stare.

Read full article

[Ainehi Edoro]

The History of White People is a genuinely absorbing book that uproots whiteness from its default position as the colorless race, as the invisible pallet against which all races are defined as colored and places it under the historian's clinical stare.

Read full article

[Sampson Onwuka Iroabuchi]

@Ainehi Edoro

Your demonstration from the book is INCORRECT. I perused the book when I saw the first print, and the book is a relatively for Euro-centric history and timidly anti-black. I don't think you have read the book.

The caption and commentary mislead, and there is nothing organic about the living verdure that is Greek and European history in silhouette of general world history. As such, the posse of her White embouchure of world history is expected to exist only such is neither and never the case ab-initio, yet the vista of all White history, she pretends to reverse.

Disbuse your mind about this book

[Pooky]

Ainehi,

Isn't this something. I just read this book several weeks ago. The reading for me was quite tiresome. The book is academic. However, there is some great information and most importanly, it has great references for other books to read more on the subject. I give the book 4 stars because the writing style of the author is quite tiresome, but the content is good.

I highly recommend if you can get through it.

[topi]

@iroabughuchi

?

[natasha]

Yes,it seems my thoughts ring in other people's heart also.The whites seem to have no history from the cave age, they just sprang up from living and wearing dresses,how sweet! As custodians of history due to writing or other forms compared to the oral recount of especially Africans,what do you expect?

[natasha]

And who is that annonymous critic analysing what and what painter should have focused on? in her book?holymoses!

[Ramses Osiris]

A lot of incoherence in this piece. What exactly is he trying to say?