Nigerian Village Square Forum "The Square"

Go Back   The Village Square > Town Hall > The Main Square

Comment
 
LinkBack Thread Tools Display Modes
Old Jun 30, 2009 , 02:30 PM   # 1
Default United States Government Memo on Biafra



www.state.gov/documents/organization/53889.pdf

5 August 1969
MEMORANDUM
SUBJECT: Nigeria: The Federal Military Government's War
Aims vis-a-vis the Ibos

I . The Federal Government's War Aims
1. The federal government's immediate war aim is to
establish federal control over Biafra. The federal authori-
ties are willing to negotiate an end to the war, but we see
no indications that Lagos would be satisfied with anything
but a settlement on its own terms, including a renunciation
of secession by the Biafrans and the establishment of federal
authority--probably in the form of federal occupation forces--
over the whole of the former Eastern Region. The federal
government almost certainly would not accept General Ojukwu
in any leadership position, and many Nigerians might well
demand his death or imprisonment. There are no indications
that Lagos would consider granting the East-Central State
any special status in the federation. There is a remote
possibility that the Nigerians would consider adjusting the
East-Central State boundaries--possibly even to include a
seaport at the expense of the Rivers State.


2. Probably the most important long-range goal of those
now in control of the federal military government is that
of ensuring that no single tribe ever again dominates poli-
tics at the federal level.
Since the military coup of July
1966, power has been held by minority tribal elements from
the "middlebelt" area--the southern part of the former
Northern Region. At the time of the July coup, the middle-
belters had the support of the Hausa-Fulanis but this was
primarily because the coup was directed against the then
Ibo regime. The present aims of the middlebelters and the
Hausa-Fulanis coincide, but the minority tribesmen remain
determined to prevent domination of the government by the
Hausa-Fulanis.
In our view, an end to the Ibo problem
would almost certainly mark the beginning of serious poli-
tical differences between the minority tribesmen and the
Hausa-Fulanis.

3. The minority tribesmen now in control of the federal
government are not bent on genocide against the Ibos, and
the top leaders, like General Gowon, will probably take
great pains to prevent the massacre of Ibos if the federal
forces ever do overrun the Biafran enclave. It is almost
certain, however, that a federal victory would result in
anti-Ibo atrocities by front-line troops.
The extent of
these would probably depend on the manner in which the
federal victory was achieved. The war has already gone on
for so long and so much bitterness has built up on both
sides, however, that during the first few days after the
"liberation" there would probably be a fair amount of
retribution particularly against Ibo soldiers and probably
also against civilians. After this, Gowon and his senior
officers would probably be able to contain the atrocities.


II. Hausa-Fulani and Yoruba Intentions Toward the Ibos
4. There is of course no love lost between the Hausa-
Fulanis and the Ibos, and even before the first military
coup in January 1966 there was much pent-up anti-Ibo senti-
ment in the north. Over a million Ibos lived in the former
Northern Region, and because of their education and ambition,
they held the best jobs. The Hausa-Fulanis regarded the
Ibos as pushy, arrogant, treacherous, greedy, and of course
pagan. The depth of the anti-Ibo sentiment was demonstrated
during the September-October 1966 riots in the Northern
Region during which at least 7,000 and possibly twice that
many Ibos were killed.

5. These anti-Ibo feelings have probably become more
intense since the war, and especially as it has become
more and more difficult to explain the federal government's
inability to win a military victory. Left to themselves,
many, perhaps most, Hausa-Fulanis would probably punish
the Ibos severely for the secession, and given the means,
many northerners might well undertake a bloodbath of major
proportions.
Senior Hausa-Fulani officers would probably
try to avoid this, however, and Gowon and the army leaders
from the minority tribes would probably be able to contain
the northern troops who would come into contact with the
Ibos in the event of a federal victory. It is probably
worthwhile to note that thus far in the war there have
been no examples of what would happen if northern troops
gained control of areas of heavy Ibo population, because
the Ibos have evacuated their towns in the face of advancing
federal troops.

6. The Yorubas are also basically anti-Ibo. The
Westerners see the Ibos as rivals for the better jobs and
as cultural inferiors. Most Yorubas, however, probably
feel much closer to the Ibos in education and background
than to their northern brothers, and probably quite a few
Yorubas sympathize with the Ibo attempt at self-determina-
tion. We do not believe the Yorubas would engage in any
significant amount of atrocities against the Ibos.


III. The Ibo Elite
7. We do not believe that the military leaders intend
to eradicate the Ibo elite, but neither do we believe the
Ibos will be permitted to play any meaningful role in the
federal government for the foreseeable future. The federal
leaders almost certainly would not entrust any responsible
federal positions to the Ibos.
All the Lagos government
has so far promised is that Ibos would control the East-
Central State and that Ibos would be represented on the
Federal Executive Council. We believe representation in
the latter would probably be at best token, and that
although Ibo civilians might be permitted to hold posi-
tions in the state government, the federal government would
probably insist on federal occupation forces in Biafra.

8. It is difficult to see any peaceful resolution of
the problem of the Ibo elite if the federal government
regains control of Biafra. Federal leaders appear firmly
committed to the division of the former Eastern Region
into three states--a factor which has won considerable support
for Lagos among the Eastern minority tribes. If the Eastern
Region is so divided, the Ibo elite would be confined to a
very small, essentially rural area. These Ibos would not be
accepted with ease in the other two eastern states or the
Midwest State, and they would probably be afraid to move to
the northern states. The Western and Lagos States already
have a relative abundance of trained manpower among the
Yorubas. Under the best of circumstances the confinement
of the majority of the Ibo elite would provide significant
problems for neighboring states, and under the circumstances
which would prevail after the war, this situation would
probably be a continuing source of serious trouble.

http://maxsiollun.wordpress.com/my-book/

maxsiollun is offline   Reply With Quote
Old Jun 30, 2009 , 02:33 PM   # 1 (permalink)
Default Re: United States Government Memo on Biafra



Hmph! Interesting.

And another Village storm cometh..

Auspicious.

__________________
"Condoms aren't completely safe. A friend of mine was wearing one and got hit by a bus" - Bob Rubin.
Auspicious is offline  
Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!
Reply With Quote
Old Jun 30, 2009 , 03:53 PM   # 2 (permalink)
Default Re: United States Government Memo on Biafra



After reading this, I dare say, yet again that the Yoruba should apologise to the Igbo for their (Yoruba) lack of foresight at that time.

FSU is offline  
Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!
Reply With Quote
Old Jun 30, 2009 , 04:32 PM   # 3 (permalink)
Default Re: United States Government Memo on Biafra



The wrestler eventually succeeded in throwing the spirit to the ground but his (wrestler) knees have never been the same again.

Albany is offline  
Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!
Reply With Quote
Old Jun 30, 2009 , 06:55 PM   # 4 (permalink)
Default Re: United States Government Memo on Biafra



Do we have to pretend that we never knew about all this?

godfather is offline  
Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!
Reply With Quote
Old Jul 1, 2009 , 11:39 AM   # 5 (permalink)
Default Re: United States Government Memo on Biafra



After reading this, I dare say, yet again that the Yoruba should apologise to the Igbo for their (Yoruba) lack of foresight at that time.


Apology ko, depology ni!

The yorubas have no reason whatsoever to apologise to the igbos for refusing their(igbo) "liberation army" (sic!), latitude to run riot all over yorubaland.

I beg, don't hold your breath o, as you and your ilk ain't getting nada from the yorubas!

toksy is offline  
Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!
Reply With Quote
Old Jul 2, 2009 , 03:16 PM   # 6 (permalink)
Default Re: United States Government Memo on Biafra



But why bring Yorubas into this? The article is about Hausa/Fulani/Middlebelters and the Igbos. Yoruba was mentioned only in passing and the report even said the Yorubas are not likely to commit attrocities against the Ibos.

Let's not derail the thread, please!!

__________________
No condition is permanent. Love life, live life and enjoy life. Do not allow your background to keep your back on the ground.
Mikky jaga is offline  
Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!
Reply With Quote
Thanked by: Abraxas, Namio
Old Jul 2, 2009 , 04:56 PM   # 7 (permalink)
Default Re: United States Government Memo on Biafra



Mikky,

Were the Yoruba really aloof during the Biafra war? What were Awo, Adekunle Obasanjo's, etc roles in containing the Igbos?

FSU is offline  
Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!
Reply With Quote
Old Jul 2, 2009 , 06:41 PM   # 8 (permalink)
Default Re: United States Government Memo on Biafra



Originally Posted by FSU View Post
Mikky,

Were the Yoruba really aloof during the Biafra war? What were Awo, Adekunle Obasanjo's, etc roles in containing the Igbos?
No, No, No!! You are muddling things up again!! The US government Memo on Biafra is what we are discussing. It talked majorly of the roles of Hausa/Fulani/Middle Belt and the Ibos. Let's concentrate on that!

If you want to start a thread on the role of Yorubas in the Biafran struggle, you can open another thread, I will willingly join you there.

Thanks.

__________________
No condition is permanent. Love life, live life and enjoy life. Do not allow your background to keep your back on the ground.
Mikky jaga is offline  
Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!
Reply With Quote
Thanked by: Abraxas
Old Jul 2, 2009 , 07:24 PM   # 9 (permalink)
Default Re: United States Government Memo on Biafra



Originally Posted by Mikky jaga View Post
No, No, No!! You are muddling things up again!! The US government Memo on Biafra is what we are discussing. It talked majorly of the roles of Hausa/Fulani/Middle Belt and the Ibos. Let's concentrate on that!

If you want to start a thread on the role of Yorubas in the Biafran struggle, you can open another thread, I will willingly join you there.

Thanks.
Mikky,
The Yoruba (not Yorubas ) were not left out of the "memo" so I think discussing the role and intentions of the Yoruba in this context is quite relevant. We may however disagree with FSU on other grounds.

DeepThought is offline  
Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!
Reply With Quote
Old Jul 2, 2009 , 07:50 PM   # 10 (permalink)
Default Re: United States Government Memo on Biafra



Max,

You can sell and advertize your book all you want but starting internet war continually between Igbo and Yoruba create virtual blood on your hands.

Sometimes I want to fight and enjoy with fellow Nigerians on many topics but this ethnic internet war is not one of them everytime somebody gets bored. I have no fear of defending my ethnicity but not every week because somebody wants to make money on books. Please carry your trouble go make I enjoy small with my brothers and sisters or fight with them on other topics.

Namio is offline  
Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!
Reply With Quote
Thanked by: Abraxas, Albany, Mikky jaga, tonsoyo
Old Jul 2, 2009 , 08:13 PM   # 11 (permalink)
Default Re: United States Government Memo on Biafra



So what's new?

Liike Namio said let us ignore Max mischievous attempt at diverting people to his website and to sell his book, by continually bringing up these controversial issues. OK we don hia, we don read the memo, so what?

__________________
"People Are Not Achievers Because They Do Different Things, ........They Do Things Differently"
tonsoyo is offline  
Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!
Reply With Quote
Thanked by: Abraxas, Mikky jaga, Namio
Old Jul 2, 2009 , 08:37 PM   # 12 (permalink)
Default Re: United States Government Memo on Biafra



Originally Posted by Namio View Post
Sometimes I want to fight and enjoy with fellow Nigerians on many topics but this ethnic internet war is not one of them everytime somebody gets bored. I have no fear of defending my ethnicity but not every week because somebody wants to make money on books.

Good point, Namio !

I have noticed it too. Max is so fond of trying to pitch the Igbo against the Yoruba with the titles or contents of his articles. There is nothing wrong with bringing up these controversial issues, if the aim is to find a lasting solution to the many nagging issues that have contributed towards the current comatose state of things in Nigeria but i just have the impression that Max is often mischievous and must be laughing his head off when we gather here and start tearing each other apart over his articles.

I think it is better to ignore such articles in future !

Albany is offline  
Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!
Reply With Quote
Thanked by: Abraxas, Namio
Old Jul 3, 2009 , 12:17 PM   # 13 (permalink)
Default Re: United States Government Memo on Biafra



For those who think I post on NVS as part of some evil Machiavellian conspiracy to sell books - not so. You really give me far too much credit.

My aim is to inform, and bring critical and controversial materials from our past to the attention of the public, so that we can learn lessons from mistakes of the past and avoid repeating them in future. We do not do enough to preserve, or learn from our history.

The title of this thread is "United States Government Memo on Biafra". I did not mention the words "Igbo" or "Yoruba" anywhere in the thread title, nor did I comment on the contents of the US govt memo which I posted verbatim. The responses of those who immediately saw the memo as an opportunity for ethnic conflict says more about their own state of mind, not mine.

Americans discuss their civil war, Jews learn about the holocaust, the Russians learn about the battle of Stalingrad, the British discuss the Blitz. Is Nigeria the only nation on Earth where we are not allowed to discuss our history and where any attempt to bring historical info to light must be part of an evil plot to sell books?

maxsiollun is offline  
Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!
Reply With Quote
Old Jul 3, 2009 , 04:30 PM   # 14 (permalink)
Default Re: United States Government Memo on Biafra



Originally Posted by maxsiollun View Post
For those who think I post on NVS as part of some evil Machiavellian conspiracy to sell books - not so. You really give me far too much credit.

My aim is to inform, and bring critical and controversial materials from our past to the attention of the public, so that we can learn lessons from mistakes of the past and avoid repeating them in future. We do not do enough to preserve, or learn from our history.

The title of this thread is "United States Government Memo on Biafra". I did not mention the words "Igbo" or "Yoruba" anywhere in the thread title, nor did I comment on the contents of the US govt memo which I posted verbatim. The responses of those who immediately saw the memo as an opportunity for ethnic conflict says more about their own state of mind, not mine.

Americans discuss their civil war, Jews learn about the holocaust, the Russians learn about the battle of Stalingrad, the British discuss the Blitz. Is Nigeria the only nation on Earth where we are not allowed to discuss our history and where any attempt to bring historical info to light must be part of an evil plot to sell books?
Yup, good points up there.

Auspicious.

__________________
"Condoms aren't completely safe. A friend of mine was wearing one and got hit by a bus" - Bob Rubin.
Auspicious is offline  
Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!
Reply With Quote
Thanked by: DeepThought
Old Jul 3, 2009 , 04:43 PM   # 15 (permalink)
Default Re: United States Government Memo on Biafra



Originally Posted by maxsiollun View Post
For those who think I post on NVS as part of some evil Machiavellian conspiracy to sell books - not so. You really give me far too much credit.

My aim is to inform, and bring critical and controversial materials from our past to the attention of the public, so that we can learn lessons from mistakes of the past and avoid repeating them in future. We do not do enough to preserve, or learn from our history.

The title of this thread is "United States Government Memo on Biafra". I did not mention the words "Igbo" or "Yoruba" anywhere in the thread title, nor did I comment on the contents of the US govt memo which I posted verbatim. The responses of those who immediately saw the memo as an opportunity for ethnic conflict says more about their own state of mind, not mine.

Americans discuss their civil war, Jews learn about the holocaust, the Russians learn about the battle of Stalingrad, the British discuss the Blitz. Is Nigeria the only nation on Earth where we are not allowed to discuss our history and where any attempt to bring historical info to light must be part of an evil plot to sell books?
Max,
The people who discuss their history, do it under altruism, no personal interest. Max, you have a personal interest here, and that makes your position ungraceful.

Ewuro is offline  
Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!
Reply With Quote
Thanked by: DeepThought, Namio, tonsoyo
Old Jul 3, 2009 , 05:46 PM   # 16 (permalink)
Default Re: United States Government Memo on Biafra



Originally Posted by Ewuro View Post
Max,
The people who discuss their history, do it under altruism, no personal interest. Max, you have a personal interest here, and that makes your position ungraceful.
The people who discuss their history, do it under altruism
Thank you Ewuro, for having the ability to read the minds of all the people who discuss their history. Indeed , you're the true son of your father

Max, you have a personal interest here, and that makes your position ungraceful
My thoughts exactly.
Why the fellow should take a personal interest in matters that don't concern him (or any of us) is beyond me and certainly disgraceful

DeepThought is offline  
Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!
Reply With Quote
Thanked by: depirate
Old Jul 3, 2009 , 06:10 PM   # 17 (permalink)
Default Re: United States Government Memo on Biafra



Deepthought and Ewuro,

You both are catching on straw. Please deal with the topic and stop chasing Max about. He has been reporting and posting stuff on Nigeria's past for years and this is the first time someone accuses him of personal agenda?

Do you want to talk about the role Yoruba played during that period and how such roles can be modified to solve present-day problems? What is your opinion on the memo itself?

Max: you should not only be posting these things, you should have your own opinions too.

FSU is offline  
Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!
Reply With Quote
Thanked by: DeepThought
Old Jul 3, 2009 , 06:53 PM   # 18 (permalink)
Default Re: United States Government Memo on Biafra



Thanks for your post FSU. As you rightly point out, I have been writing and posting materials on Nigerian history for several years. This thread is just part of the same. To answer your question, at times I actually deliberately avoid posting on the more controversial topics precisely because I do NOT want to be accused of favouring one side or the other. You know Naijas...nobody is trusted as neutral.

I post these materials so that people have the relevant documents and info with which to base their arguments/make up their minds. We simply do not bother to record/review our history.

Currently on the first page of the Main Square there are threads entitled

"Why the Igbos Must Reject Glo"
Nigerian Muslims Want New Constitution"


Yet somehow oddly, people think there is personal interest or ethnic baiting in a benign thread entitled "United States Government Memo on Biafra"?

I think people on NVS are smart enough to know who the ethnic bigots on here are, who in the year 2009 are still totally incapable of rising beyond factional ethnic agendas and see ethnic conspiracies in everything. As I said before, their unfailing ability to swap ethnic insults on every thread - no matter the topic, exposes their own ethnic prejudices. They see ethnic bias and confrontation where there is none.

I will continue posting materials from Nigerian history in order to bring info to the public. I won't allow a few ethnic champions to derail me.

Originally Posted by FSU View Post
Deepthought and Ewuro,

You both are catching on straw. Please deal with the topic and stop chasing Max about. He has been reporting and posting stuff on Nigeria's past for years and this is the first time someone accuses him of personal agenda?

Do you want to talk about the role Yoruba played during that period and how such roles can be modified to solve present-day problems? What is your opinion on the memo itself?

Max: you should not only be posting these things, you should have your own opinions too.

maxsiollun is offline  
Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!
Reply With Quote
Thanked by: DeepThought, valteena
Old Jul 3, 2009 , 07:28 PM   # 19 (permalink)
Default Re: United States Government Memo on Biafra



Originally Posted by FSU View Post
Deepthought and Ewuro,

You both are catching on straw. Please deal with the topic and stop chasing Max about. He has been reporting and posting stuff on Nigeria's past for years and this is the first time someone accuses him of personal agenda?

Do you want to talk about the role Yoruba played during that period and how such roles can be modified to solve present-day problems? What is your opinion on the memo itself?

Max: you should not only be posting these things, you should have your own opinions too.

Obviously, I have to take lessons on satorical writing from Professor, Dr, Lawyer , Engineer Kenn. I was actually against Ewuro, I thought that was obvious.

Anyway to answer your question:
1. I think the Yoruba participation in the Civil war was regrettable but perhaps unavoidable given the circumstances at that time

2. Present day problems in Nigeria can be solved, but Nigerians will have to find the will to do so. And we have to want to be Nigerians too, not Hausa, Igbo, Yoruba, e.t.c Right now, we prefer to be anything but Nigerian. The majority of those who say they prefer to be Nigerians are lying thieves who benefit from the status quo and will like to keep it that way.

3. I doubt the authenticity of the "memo"

Thanks

DeepThought is offline  
Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!
Reply With Quote
Thanked by: Marin
Comment

Bookmarks

Tags
biafra, government, memo, states, united

Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is On
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On



All times are GMT +1. The time now is 12:22 AM.

Services : E-mail news | RSS Feeds | Podcasts
Links:   About the NVS | Contact Us | Terms of Use | Privacy & Cookies | Advertise With Us
All Rights Reserved. NigeriaVillageSquare.com





Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.4
Copyright ©2000 - 2009, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Search Engine Friendly URLs by vBSEO 3.3.0
Integrated by BBPixel ©2003-2009, jvbPlugin

Thread powered by GARS 2.1.9 ©2005-2006