|
I had a strong feeling of
bereavement when the pictures of the Asagba of Asaba, Professor Chike Edozien
appeared in some national dailies under obituary. It was after going through
the story that I realized it was another professor of science, Chike Obi the
renowned mathematician of international repute that died.
My sentiment was borne out of
the fact that the Asagba is one of detribalized traditional rulers in Nigeria
who does not discriminate amongst the residents in his domain from diverse
ethnic and religion backgrounds. I had witnessed, as a corps member in Delta
State a decade ago, how the revered traditional ruler provided the needs and protected
young corpers from other parts of the country serving in his province. During
Islamic festivals for instance, he hosted Muslim corpers from different states,
especially from the North to special feast and showered them with gifts. We
felt at home-away from-home through close interactions with him and his
fatherly roles in our lives. It was not surprising that some of us even went
ahead to cart away pretty spouses in marriage while other got automatic
employments in the Niger-Delta State. I was lucky too to have worked briefly in
Government House Asaba as a civil servant away from my place of birth and
origin.
Could we have bothered about
indeneship and federal character principles if similar gestures and respects as
mentioned above are replicated in our various communities?
The issue of indigene and
politics of state of origin which influenced the adoption of
federal character principles in our national polity has remained as contentious
as ever. Lately eyes brows have been raised on alleged lopsidedness in federal
appointments by various groups which pose a serious challenge to the new
Chairman of the Federal Character Commission, Professor Oba Abdulraheem Shuaib,
who was former Vice Chancellor of the University of Ilorin. He is being described
as a detribalized Nigerian who is also married to an Edo woman. Sometimes one
wonders if the sectional debate is not being manipulated by the elites to
sustain their hegemony and hoodwink ordinary Nigerians from facing the reality.
We have witnessed negative
effects of indigeneship/settlership imbroglio that alienate other Nigerians
from freedom in their host communities and even ancestral places. The painful
irony on this unnecessary dichotomy had resulted to bloody communal conflicts
among groups within the same geopolitical environments with attendant lost of
lives and properties. It is still fresh in our memory the Jukun-Tiv conflict in
the North East, the Zangon Kataf debacle in the North West, Plateaus
Hausa-Burom clash in the North Central, the Ife-Modakeke crisis in the South
West, the Umuleri-Aguleri conflict in the South East and Urhobo- Ishekiri
rivalry in the South South.
In some states not only were
the so-called strangers being denied the right to own businesses, build houses,
get employment, obtain scholarship and free medication, they are even taunted
like outcasts. And yet the governments of those localities benefit and survive
from the free monthly allocation from the federation account that is derivable
mostly offshore on criteria that include the population of the people in the
states including the so-called non-indigenes. Wont it be unfair to collect
extra revenue on behalf of people on the basis of population and yet deny them
equal right?
Since there is neither a historical
document to prove that Adam and Eve were created in any part of Nigeria nor is
there a record that a human germinated from the soil, the claim of origin of a
place is deceptive. We are all naturally settlers by virtue of our forefathers
emigration to the part of the world we now claim. While there are some
advantages over the application of federal character principles due to our
peculiarities as a nation of multi ethnic and cultural complexities, the issue
of indigenes and settlers should be reexamine and discarded if they are in our
laws. Citizenship and residency rights of all Nigerians in wherever they
are through economic empowerment and political rights should be encouraged to
promote rapid development of the communities they live.
Nigeria could adopt residency
rights for its citizens with some refinements by examining the conventional
process of acquisition of citizenship of a country through parents, place of
birth and naturalization to suit our peculiarities.
The basic requirement for
residency rights may include a stipulated years of residence in the
host communities, ability to speak the local language, intermarriage
consideration, community development, payment of taxes and other civic
responsibilities to entitle the person to all the rights and privileges of a
place he/she resides. These conditions will further encourage national
integration and reduce tension associated with ethnicity.
One of the glaring omissions
in the 7 Point Agenda of President YarAdua is non-inclusion of programme of
action towards national integration and cohesion for the promotion of national
unity and social citizenship.
In as much as the Federal
Character Commission is charged with the responsibilities of ensuring fair and
equitable distribution of posts in the public services throughout the
federation, its central concern should not be limited to appointments but also
to play statutory roles in fair and just distribution of economic amenities to
various communities in the country, even if from the controversial excess crude
account. This idea was shared by President Umaru Musa YarAdua at the
inauguration of the body. In his speech read by the Secretary to the Government
of the Federation, Ambassador Baba Gana Kingibe, he charged the Commission to
ensure equitable distributions of socio-economic amenities because they impact
more on the society than that of appointments which only benefit individuals.
He also urged the body to ensure effective and fair representation of women and
youths, the physically challenged and other disadvantaged groups in the
workforce.
Towards this background the
government should spread locations of industries, public institutions, security
and infrastructure evenly amongst the states, local governments and even wards
respectively that could create more job opportunities and development of such
areas. Likewise programmes of poverty-reduction and mass literacy should be
undertaken in the same patterns.
We can take a cue from developed
nations that have progressed rapidly through their culture of assimilation and
policy of integration where appointments are based on merit but development
efforts are spread evenly. In fact many Nigerians have been appointed, elected
into public offices abroad
in fact some of them even serve in the armed
forces in other nations. It may sound strange to sectional leaders to realize
that one of the great contenders for the presidency of the United States of
America in the present dispensation is Senator Barack Obama, a son of an
African Muslim. It is not about ethnic representations it is about whom the cap
fits to develop a nation.
While some states like Lagos
and Kano have shown good example in their deliberate policy of appointing and
electing non-indigenes into their respective public offices to give other
ethnic groups sense of belonging, lets hope that we would soon witness an Igbo
person as an elected senator from Sokoto, an Hausa as democratic governor of
Enugu, a Yoruba as a minister representing Borno, Ijawwoman as chairperson of
local government in Kwara, Kanuriman as a commissioner in Rivers and Fulani as
a Speaker of the State Assembly in Ogun. While the topmost post of the
president should go to a stateless Nigerian. Do I hear you say amen or you are
still debating my summation?
Yushau A. Shuaib
yashuaib@yashuaib.com
Wuye Estate, Abuja

|
Posted by Robot| 03.06.2008 22:42