Celebration of Iwus Insanity
Written by
Yinka Leo Ogundiran
Generally, insanity, or madness, is the popular term for
defining behaviour(s) influenced by mental instability. The purveyor of such behaviour
is regarded as insane if his conducts are at variance with expected and
commonsensical norms. In the Merriam-Webster dictionary, it is defined as a
deranged state of mind or lack of understanding.
Given the exudation of
putrid banalities and nauseating posturing of Maurice Iwu ever since he was
appointed to preside over INEC, especially his recent imbecilic gibbering in
the public glare concerning the April general elections, one can only make this
infallible deduction: Maurice Iwu is insane. The man has, no doubt, completely
lost his mind. His actions or inactions are nothing short of a man that is
mentally unhinged.
The April general elections in Nigeria
have been, by and large, from the Southern tip of South
Africa, down to the
landmass of the Americas,
Australia,
Asia and even the Soviet
Union of today, declared as the worst election ever in
the history of mankind. Universally, there has been no better euphemism to
describe the Nigerian general elections presided over by Maurice Iwu other than
failure.
Having been initially declared a "do-or-die"
affair by the curmudgeonly former president whose inauspicious tenancy at the
Aso-Rock expired on 29th May 2007,
Maurice Iwu dutifully made sure he made a success of that moronic declaration -
"do-or-die" affair. Imbued with a sense of absolute potency, or
indeed of a temporary ascendancy, the former president Olusegun Obasanjo, who
had initially woefully lost a bid to illegally elongate his tenure in office as
Nigeria's president beyond the specified time, was determined to show Nigerians
pepper for not allowing him to
continue his misrule, and he found a perfect instrumentality in a monstrously
unsightly rhinoceros called Maurice Iwu.
Yorubas have an idiomatic expression for Obasanjo's
barbarousness and tomfoolery of giving Nigerians a snake when they asked for
fish, "Kaka ki eku ma je sinsin, a fi shawa danu", meaning,
if a mouse cannot feed on sinsin, it
would rather make a mess of it. It needs to be stressed, however, that Obasanjo
indeed succeeded in achieving this sadistic feat but by taking advantage of
Maurice Iwu's criminal mindedness, obsequiousness and, ultimately, his
insanity.
All Local and foreign independent monitoring groups were
chagrined by the flagrant charade that Maurice Iwu moronically romanticized as
election. Even the committee of the most accomplished scholars under the
auspices of Nobel Prize winners, which included our own Wole Soyinka, was
befuddled by the abracadabra of Maurice Iwu's INEC and issued a statement repudiating
the elections in totality, and asking that the elections be re-conducted.
The position of some Nigerian professionals and
professors in Diaspora numbering about seventy was in unison with that of the
Nobel Laureates, in which they also issued a press statement denouncing the
do-or-die election presided over by Maurice Iwu as unacceptable. These
respectable professionals - the literary giant, Professor Chinua Achebe; the
renowned Howard University professor of Chemical Engineering, who is regarded
as the greatest data cruncher in the world, Bolaji Aluko; the Jigawa-born
professor of Mathematics who is the Director of the Institute of Industrial
Mathematical Sciences (IIMS) of the University of Manitoba, Abba Gumel and
others unequivocally called for the cancellation of this charade. Professor
Abba Gumel, especially, who is one of the greatest Mathematicians in the
history of black race, is still confounded by how Maurice Iwu added two plus
two without getting four.
But however, surprisingly, instead for Maurice Iwu to
remorsefully show sobriety for his grotesque incompetence and dismal failure
and bury his head in shame, he has been jubilating on one hand, and, on the
other hand, vituperating his critics in grandiose manner. He even vitriolically
rebuked some of his critics as insane for failing to see that the elections
were successful. According to him, the Nigerians demanding for credible
elections are unpatriotic alarmists, they are villains. Even though hundreds of
citizens of Nigeria
needlessly lost their lives in these do-or-die elections, Maurice Iwu has
remained defiantly stolid and obstreperous, saying, the April 2007 general
elections in Nigeria
were the most peaceful, free and fair!
Even recently, on October 16, this idiocy egregiously
egressed from his stinking mouth: I did everything for my country. If I am
asked to do it again, I will do it the same way because Nigeria
deserves the best!
What better evidence does anyone need to be convinced
that Maurice Iwu is a qualified and worthy candidate for immediate admittance
into Aro psychiatric hospital in Abeokuta
for urgent, intensive mental treatment?
But nonetheless his insanity, it has to be, at this
juncture, categorically emphasized that Maurice Iwu is not the only culprit
responsible for the criminal midwifery of Aprils electoral monster which threw
Nigeria
into utter lugubriousness. But he is more culpable than anyone else.
INECs sole function is largely clerical and
organizational. It is suppose to be an instrument for the articulation of
choice, not its own, but of the people it serves. It is meant to serve as an
impartial arbiter, one that declares when rules have been broken, and then
moves to redress such a situation, calling on the necessary instruments of the
state to enforce its mandate of impartial dealing. As expressly spelt out in
the statutes establishing its existence, INEC does not have any business
disqualifying candidates and invidiously giving leverages to the perpetuation
of political intrigues.
If at all, the only justification for INEC to intervene
in the self constituting process of a political party is if, ONLY IF, such
process runs contrary to its own base for existence which is none other than
the facilitation of the democratic process. Not only did Maurice Iwu
misinterpret this mandate, and hence perverted the very basis of INECs
existence, and thereby making him more inexcusably culpable than anybody else,
but he was actively appurtenant to the subversion of the democratic ethos which
INEC is meant to uphold. He disdained the electoral law he swore to defend.
For instance, Iwus partisanship to the PDP is not a
secret and, in the course of the electioneering, he made the disqualification
and frustration of its major contenders an art. When the PDP declared that the
Former Vice president Atiku Abubakar would not be allowed to contest the
presidential election, Maurice Iwu was the mercenary that was to make that act
of perfidy a possibility. Even when the court made it abundantly clear that
INEC lacked the power to disqualify Atiku Abubakar, Maurice Iwu thumbed his
nose at the court, saying, court judgement or no court judgement, Atiku
remains disqualified!
He demonstrated the same hideous intransigence in Anambra
State
where he, with a litany of jiggery-pokery, barred Governor Peter Obi and
ex-Governor Chris Ngige from contesting the gubernatorial election, and thereby
paving way for Obasanjos notorious factotum, Dr Andy Uba, to win in a
landslide. Not only did Andy Uba, an Oluwole Ph.D poseur, win in a landslide,
but he was, thanks to Maurice Iwu, said to have had more votes than the number
of registered voters in Anambra
State!
But thank goodness. The rejuvenated judiciary put paid to
Andys landslide by ruthlessly kicking him out of office barely two weeks he
usurped the gubernatorial seat of Anambra
State.
Like I once wrote in my piece
when some Ubas Rottweilers mindlessly laid siege on Professor Okey Ndibe for
making truthfulness his forte, He (Andy Uba) was kicked out like David Becham
kicked away the ball when he played that infamous penalty kick against Portugal
in Euro-2004 Nations cup!
The same judicial bravery was repeated in River
State
where Rotimi Amaechi, who was initially unjustly disqualified by Maurice Iwu,
was propelled to his rightful position as the governor of River
State
by the Supreme Court.
The apex of intrepidity so far demonstrated by the
judiciary has no example and we must remain thankful to these honorable men of
the judiciary for rekindling our democratic hope and political aspiration. The
Tribunals have fearlessly sacked three other governors who were criminally
allowed to coast to undeserved victory by Maurice Iwu. Innumerable Senators,
House of Representative members, as well as uncountable members of various
States Houses of Assembly, have been dismissed by the Tribunals, with more
assuredly expected to come.
Despite all these, Maurice Iwu still, like Obasanjo, dey kampe. Sometime last week, he
idiotically declared that the April 21 presidential election was far better
than June 12 1993 election,
in the sense that, the former led to transition from civilian to civilian!
When I read Maurice Iwu blathering this galling drivel, I finally gave up on
him but found succor in a Yoruba expression: Won ti sa si, meaning,
in that tradition of blame passing, that the enemies of the afflicted
individual have finally got through to him psychically and scrambled his
brains. Who can still argue that Maurice Iwu is not quite compos mentis?
Maurice Iwus odious madness always reminds me of a
prescription once made by Professor Thomas Lambo(of blessed memory). The then
Deputy Director of World Health Organization, Professor Thomas Lambo, once made
a witty proposition, but to which I most respectfully differ. Said he, inter
alia, all political leaders should be subjected to an annual psychiatric
examination while they remain in office.
Whilst I believe that, given the insanity that animates
some African leaders when they are in power and sensitive positions of
authority, there is a need to occasionally subject them to some kind of
psychiatric examination, I think that approach is a, to borrow an expression of
local wisdom, medicine after death. Like we have witnessed in the case of
Maurice Iwu, the monumental havocs wrecked by such madmen are always
incorrigible and irreversible. It is, I think, far better and safer not to
allow a mad bull into a China
shop in the first place.
Personally, I propose that this psychiatric examination
be made a preludial pre-condition before appointing or electing public officers
in Nigeria,
nay Africa. With my
proposition, I have no doubt that, in the future, we would have precluded the
recrudescence of being hopelessly beleaguered by yet another looney like
Maurice Iwu who is spirited to demonstrate and thereupon celebrate his
congenital insanity at the expense of our collective national dignity.
Yinka Leo Ogundiran
Presidency_yk@yahoo.com

|
Posted by Robot| 20.12.2007 21:07