20

Dec

2008

Willing Black Slaves, Unwilling White Masters! PDF Print E-mail
By Sunny Chris Okenwa
Willing Black Slaves, Unwilling White Masters! 

The gory history of slave trade is known worldwide by the victims (Africans) and the perpetrators (Whites). Every part has some reason to defend themselves even when the core issue at stake is indefensible: the brutal abuse of Blacks by their White slave masters to foster superior domination by exploiting the differences in power and knowledge then. Slavery, even today, evokes memories of fraud, of forced labour, of torture and of dehumanisation of the worst kind.

Historians worldwide are seemingly united in their damning conclusion that some gun-totting European slave traders, centuries ago, kidnapped millions of Africans from their homelands and forcibly transported them across the Atlantics to the Americas. The most dramatic tool of this singular suppression and subjugation is called the compass, a device used globally for navigation. Civilization was thus reduced to the human conquest in which the mighty dominated the weak with ease.

Historically speaking the slave merchandise started in August 1444 and spanned a whole four centuries exposing shamefully the depravity of human greed and wickedness which found its roots in differences in colour and race. The history of the African Diaspora traces its origin to the success of this most brutal displacement and unapologetic abduction of a particular race by the other in human history.

Today Africa still bears the scars of slave trade and remembers how the early whitemen defrauded history with superior intelligence at their disposal. Yet as we mourn the sad fortunes of our forebears (with majority forced to abandon their original names except the Kunta Kintes) we lament together the existence of modern-day slavery in today's troubled world. Without slave trade one wonders how Africa would have been faring with the best brains that were drained out of its continent.

An interesting report back home from Nigeria had it recently that four young boys (between the ages of 18 and 25) were involved in a stoling-away adventure in a ship sailing from Lagos to Spain. Armed innocently with some provisions and a pocket radio they 'hacked' into the ship using a hired boat. As the ship approached the Morrocan naval space, four days on, the boys ran out of food and drink and used hammer to raise alarm -- faced with starvation and fear of death.They were rescued and shipped back to Nigeria.

The Spanish crew were generous enough. They had an easy option of throwing the four 'Naija' boys overboard into the sea and continuing their voyage in peace. (Many a Nigerian had lost their lives this way with no one back home ever knowing about it!). The Spanish crew had to make a detour shipping the boys back to their point of departure incurring heavy losses in the process. The Nigerian local authorities that were on the ground to receive the 'deported' boys were talking about stiff penalties, talking tough as though they were alien to the protracted ubiquitous poverty in the land.

The future of the Nigerian youth is heavily compromised. That is why today armed robbery has become a national phenomenal business involving billions of naira. You have heavily armed fearless robbers (including women) holding a city hostage and going in and out of banks with ease. The police force, ill-equipped and compromised morally by corruption and mediocrity, look on helpless with some of them bloodied, sacrificed and killed. The situation is desperate as human life is reduced to worthlessness and the scramble for money a straight-forward battle between politicians and robbers.

In a nation that has no social security that takes care of the vulnerable and the old, in a nation that produces more poor folks than rich men day in day out it it is to be bemoaned that the natural richness God placed in our lands (oil) has translated to a curse. Nigeria, from all economic indices and indication, does not have any business being poor and sorrounded with more people growing poorer and few rich men growing richer. The failure of leadership has every reason to be blamed for this social abomination!

In the face of this social dislocation nothing more is desirable than a responsive leadership that knows what it entails to undertake a social revolution that targets the youths, the leaders of tomorrow. Sadly that leadership is far away from being established; with the current occupant of Aso Rock, Musa Umaru Yar'Adua, marrying more of his beautiful wife, Turai, than attending to crucial state matters, becoming more of a darling good husband than confronting head-on the hard issues of the day the ship of state sinks slowly at the hands of an indisposed President at the mercy of his doctors and Allah's benevolence.

The unsound health profile of President Yar'Adua is chiefly responsible for the unprecedented procrastination syndrome in Abuja. President Yar'Adua is held hostage by those Prof. Wole Soyinka, Nobel Laureate, described as "reprobates and recidivists latched to the ear of power". A potentially great nation that should be leading the black race to a 'paradise' lost is thus enmeshed in a survival tango with economy and politics.

There is no odd job a black man cannot be seen to be doing abroad to make ends meet. From refuge collection to morgue attendance (or dressing up dead bodies!); from cab driving to restaurant dish washing it is an old story of disguised second slavery.

If Africa and Africans matter so much in the global developmental equation, in the international politico-economic considerations what stops the West from doing justice to the African general worsening condition of penury? Why not the extension of the famous Marshal Plan treatment Europe generously received after the 2nd world war devastation? There ought to be a decisive solution to the wars, poverty, diseases, despair and chaos Africa is associated with.

Should a free and fair referendum be organized today in sub-saharan Africa (Nigeria and cholera-infested Zimbabwe for example) majority of the people would expressly vote for second slavery! They would prefer being shipped en-masse to Europe and America as voluntary slaves. Do you blame them? They would be better off whereever they are 'sold' out, their economic status better than the present case in their native lands where petty dictators and unruly rulers ruin their future and abandon them to a hopeless fate.

It was a tragedy without majesty yesterday! Today it is rather a pathetic case of willing black slaves and unwilling white slave masters.The future is terribly bleak indeed!

SOC Okenwa

soco_abj_2006_rci@hotmail.fr



Your Comments

Please make The Square an enjoyable experience for everyone by refraining from gratuitous ad-hominem contributions, defamatory comments and off-topic posting. Such posts will be removed.

User Avatar
RobotRobot is offline

 # 1 | 20.12.2008 23:51

Should a free and fair referendum be organized today in sub-saharan Africa (Nigeria and cholera-infested Zimbabwe for example) majority of the people would expressly vote for second slavery! They would prefer being shipped en-masse to Europe and America as voluntary slaves. Do you blame them? They would be better off whereever they are 'sold' out, their economic status better than the present case in their native lands where petty dictators and unruly rulers ruin their future and abandon them to a hopeless fate. ...Read the full article.

User Avatar
allaccessallaccess is offline

 # 2 | 21.12.2008 05:32


=Robot;302709>Should a free and fair referendum be organized today in sub-saharan Africa (Nigeria and cholera-infested Zimbabwe for example) majority of the people would expressly vote for second slavery! They would prefer being shipped en-masse to Europe and America as voluntary slaves. Do you blame them? They would be better off whereever they are 'sold' out, their economic status better than the present case in their native lands where petty dictators and unruly rulers ruin their future and abandon them to a hopeless fate. ...Read the full article.




Is it rocket science to see glaringly that the problem of Africa is not leadership but the people themselves, afterall are the leaders not handpicked (or allowed to rule) by the people?

why did "petty dictators and unruly rulers" not ruin the fate of the people of thailand or Romania? Because the people went out and ensured such leaderships don't last long. why Can your people not do the same? They are weak and stupidly frightened; a fearful people don't deserve better futures because he who dares wins.

Africans have no one to blame for their "hopeless fate", because if we follow the writer it would seem he expects manners to fall from heaven and that regardless of whether gangsters force their way into office in africa the people should expect GREAT leaderships from them.

I think SOME Nigerian article writers should be given courses on article writing because they make nonsense of common sense.

User Avatar
aguabataaguabata is offline

 # 3 | 21.12.2008 06:40

Hogwash! Africans captured their people and sold to the Arabs and then to europeans. We are more guilty than the europeans. One of the chiefs in my town (RIP) was sold into slavery by his father because as a boy he stole a piece of meat from his father's Ngiga (barbecue), luckily he was set free as an adult by his slave master. Women and children in those dark days could be abducted while working on the farms far away from settlements. Anytime we meet a black american we should be on our knees and ask for forgiveness, our ancestors have wrecked them psychologically, however they are making good progress.
You can not put economic migration in the same sentence with slavery

User Avatar
chaos.comchaos.com is offline

 # 4 | 21.12.2008 07:53

Just read the article. I wish the gun toting robbers can organise themselves into a fighting force and steal from the real thieves.

As for slavery, everyone played a part, including africans and europeans and arabs themselves.
Not sure i agree with all the best brains being drained out of the continent.
There are still great brains in the continent but nepotism and segregation, may not allow them to do what they know how to do best as they may be from the wrong tribe or wrong religion.

If anything, slavery should teach us of the evils of a disunited africa that can be open to exploitation and make us even more united but alas this is not happening.

With organisations like the EU, NATO, SEATO, schengen, and the others both in name and practice you can see othes protecting their own interest collectively.

when UK was at war with argentina, france had to stop selling missiles and arms to argentina as even though the french are not best friends to the UK, they knew what to do.

Hopefully we can learn to move on from this bad time in history. History should help us plan for the future not to keep wallowing in what cannot be changed.
If we cannot use negative history to better our continent, then we may as well cross it out of our lives and find something positive that would help us.

User Avatar
felixfelix is offline

 # 5 | 21.12.2008 14:55


Should a free and fair referendum be organized today in sub-saharan Africa (Nigeria and cholera-infested Zimbabwe for example) majority of the people would expressly vote for second slavery! They would prefer being shipped en-masse to Europe and America as voluntary slaves. Do you blame them? They would be better off whereever they are 'sold' out, their economic status better than the present case in their native lands where petty dictators and unruly rulers ruin their future and abandon them to a hopeless fate.


It was a tragedy without majesty yesterday! Today it is rather a pathetic case of willing black slaves and unwilling white slave masters.The future is terribly bleak indeed!



@SOC,

If Africans really prefer being shipped to Mongolia, Myamar, Nicaragua ,Nepal and Albania to be slaves again as you seem to suggest then we need to accept the fact that brainwashing is part of the problem here. Some of thse areas are not better than Accra, Abidjan , Luanda or even Abuja. I dont know the reason for the desperate attempt by some of us to accept hopelessness as an alternative to nation biulding/rebiulding. It is not like African states have been there for centuries as they are now. While it is very necessary for Africans to feel upset with the slow pace of socio-economic development in the continent, it is the contineous move to improve the situation there nomatter how small that will ultimately make the differece and not this endless rendition of self pity.



why did "petty dictators and unruly rulers" not ruin the fate of the people of thailand or Romania? Because the people went out and ensured such leaderships don't last long. why Can your people not do the same? They are weak and stupidly frightened; a fearful people don't deserve better futures because he who dares wins.



@Allacess
Your take is not just weak, it is horribly stuupid too! I dont know where you got your data to assert so noisely that Africans have been welcoming dictators without any form of resistance! Let me hammer it down your skull; there is no place in the world where the fight to topple one dictator or to rearrange one or many faulty political structures have led to endless rebellions, more fights, more deaths than in Africa atleast within the last 50 years!

Over 3 million died as Biafrans tried to create their own workable state free from the western prison called Nigeria! More than 5 million and still counting dead as Congolese confront the results of structural madness in their own land, nearly a million dead as dictators from Liberia, Sierra Loen and Guinea came face to face with peoples rebellion! Millions dead in Luanda, Zimbabwe, Sudan, Chad, CFR, Namibia, South Africa as one revolt after another is targeted at one despot or the other. But why do I bother to mention these to you? These are African lives not the more important Oyibo lives, so how will those count as far as you are concerned. But then the fact is that Africans have always dared! That is why blacks in South Africa can vote today, that is why colonialsm was chased away atleast on paper from Africa, that is why many dictators fro Idi Amin through Bokassa to Mobutu all died in exile! I know you are frustrated with the situation like many are, but dont allow that make you sound incohorent!



Anytime we meet a black american we should be on our knees and ask for forgiveness, our ancestors have wrecked them psychologically, however they are making good progress.



@aguabata

In all honesty, I cant comprehend what you are struggling to say here because the last time I checked, we shared the same ancestors with black americans. Does your logic suggest that they too should be "on their knees" when they see Africans since with the look of things their condition seem to be geting better these days when compared to say the guy in Zaki Biam? Maybe our ancestors also wrecked havoc on the "homebased", psychologically by not shipping us to the eldorado called the west...Moreover I am not yet anybodys ancestor, so how can I be rightly blamed for the atrocious events of the past centuries???. That my grand father excaped slavery is not enough reason to make me an accomplice of the man who sold anothers grandfather.:evil:



when UK was at war with argentina, france had to stop selling missiles and arms to argentina as even though the french are not best friends to the UK, they knew what to do.



@choas.com

Why is it so hard for you to reach a positive conclusion from a positive statement you made???:mad: From post to post you exhibit this infuriating trait to jugle facts just to arrive at your narrow conclusions..Who will help me drill it into your choatic skull that WEAK states are ALWAYS VULNERABLE to the MANIPULATIONS of MORE POWERFULL states??? Do you really understand how "contemporary international relations" work???

User Avatar
chaos.comchaos.com is offline

 # 6 | 21.12.2008 15:08


=felix;302892 >


@choas.com

Why is it so hard for you to reach a positive conclusion from a positive statement you made???:mad: From post to post you exhibit this infuriating trait to jugle facts just to arrive at your narrow conclusions..Who will help me drill it into your choatic skull that WEAK states are ALWAYS VULNERABLE to the MANIPULATIONS of MORE POWERFULL states??? Do you really understand how "contemporary international relations" work???



Believe me you will sound so much more convincing if you do not resort to silly childish name calling.
WEAK states are vulnerable.yes. Any reason why they are constantly always WEAK and most are in africa?
Was France /spain/ italy /japan not weak at some stage in their history. Are they still weak?
Your reasoning has just not come to any meaningful conclusion.

it also said enmasse to europe and america. not sure why you mention mongolia ,nepal, e.t.c a case of juggling to arrive at your own narrow conclusion perhaps?

User Avatar
felixfelix is offline

 # 7 | 21.12.2008 15:35


=chaos.com;302897>Believe me you will sound so much more convincing if you do not resort to silly childish name calling.
WEAK states are vulnerable.yes. Any reason why they are constantly always WEAK and most are in africa?
Was France /spain/ italy /japan not weak at some stage in their lives. Are they still weak?
Your reasoning has just not come to any meaningful conclusion.



Again, the same chaotic symptoms! Maybe you will do better when you start to reason with your brain and not your muscles! In one breadth you said that weak states are constantly weak , in another breadth you gave me some example of powerfull states that were weak at some stage i.e France/Spain/Italy/Japan....Then you sealed your utter confusion by asking me; "Are they still weak"? :confused1 You are going to compare the process that led to the emergence of France as a powerful nation state with "Lord" and Lady Lugards romantic confusion that led to the creation of Nigeria or the parthied policies that gave brith to Liberia, South Africa and Zim? Why are you desperate to compare oranges with granites???

You see why I said "your reasoning" in most cases are so choatic that they dont "come to any meaningfull conclusions"??? If Italy and Japan were weak at certain stages but are strong now, what makes you think that Ghana for instance is incapable of becoming strong at a certian stage of her evolution within the next decades if she is able to modify her structures as she seem to be doing , to meet the aspirations of Ghananians??? Oh, I forget, these Africans! Have you tried to research on the reasons why those states you mentioned were able to make a speedy recovery to assume the powerfull postion they are at now??? Have you looked at the structures of these states, the process that led to their emergence, their encounters with subjugation/colonialism/invasion/restructuring/neocolonialism/imperialism and try to juxtapose these indices with the experiences of these small band of western creations you cherish to villify as African states??? What is your argeument really??? That Africans are incapable of running a modern Government??? You should go and join Ian Smith and Botha if you really feel so strong about this view..

User Avatar
chaos.comchaos.com is offline

 # 8 | 21.12.2008 15:40

I can assure you that in 1945 japan was in a worse that than the african region.So was china. By 1970 they were vastly improved. yes they had loads of help and aid from their victorious conquerors but so did africa.
As you say how do i know if ghana will be better.
the truth is i do not know but since independence much of africa has been on a downward slide. the next year is worse than the previous and going by that reasoning. it is likely to get worse not better.
I do wish i am wrong but no one can assure anyone it will be better. even you can not

I really do not wish to call anyone names or say abusive things . if that is your intention, please let me know so i can bow out in peace. As usual fighting without reasoning seems to be the bane of african politics.
the same reasons these states became powerful are the very same reasons, africa does not want to implement.
One being leaders who rule for decades on end like the country is their personal property, until they are shot/ chased out of power.

if you know these reasons why the weak are now prosperous, can you tell us why these same reasons might/ might not work in africa?
As for state creation, poland, czech republic and a lot other states like hungary were also created much like african states.
By the dominant west. at the end of the first war, along partisan and apartheid lines.
they also created israel pretty much the same way and i do not see why the filthy, dirty stupid processes that created the african states. albeit sad, cannot work if we decide to move on and not dwell on the unfortunate circumstance and not be so bitter and twisted about it.

My argument is not africans are incapable, My argument is they have not done it so far, in about 50years.
If i am wrong i am open to be proved otherwise.
basically i am saying right now, is much of africa any better than it was at independence time?

User Avatar
felixfelix is offline

 # 9 | 21.12.2008 15:56


=chaos.com;302907>I can assure you that in 1945 japan was in a worse that than the african region.So was china. By 1970 they were vastly improved. yes they had loads of help and aid from theif victorious conquerors but so did africa.
As you say howdo i know if ghana will be better.
the truth is i do not know but since independence much of africa has been on a downward slide. the next year is worse than the previous and going by that reasoning. it is likely to get worse not better.
I do wish i am wrong but no one can assure anyone it will be better. even you can not

I rally do not wish to call anyone names or abusive terms. if that is your intention, please let me know so i can bow out in peace. As usual fighting without reasoning sems to be the bane of african politics



It is still choatic reasoning my friend! I dont have any intention of abusing you either, I am just stating the obvious facts! Let me point some out again for you. You said this:


I can assure you that in 1945 japan was in a worse that than the african region.So was china. By 1970 they were vastly improved. yes they had loads of help and aid from theif victorious conquerors but so did africa.



If this is not utter confussion , I wonder what it is! In 1945, how many African countries were independent??? Maybe no sub-sahran African country! You are going to compare an arrested development that was a colony with a civilsation that just suffered a war defeat and even had a benevolent victor to thank for helping her rebiulding process??? How can you in all sanity compare non existent African states of 1945 with a defeated super power that was Japan then???

You also dropped this atomic bomb:


not know but since independence much of africa has been on a downward slide. the next year is worse than the previous and going by that reasoning. it is likely to get worse not better.
I do wish i am wrong
but no one can assure anyone it will be better. even you can notthe truth is i do



You should know this is wrong! Absolutely wrong! That we bemoan our current circumstances in Africa does not mean we have not made some progres! We have! The problem here is that our little, snail speed progress comes short of the expectations of most Africans! In almost every feild many African states have made progress. Even Nigeria! How many universities were there in 1960? How many doctors, lawyers, engineers, administrators were there? Just a state in Nigeria today can provide more trained manpower than colonial Nigeria of 1959 gave us! How many kilometers of roads were there in 1960? How many are there today? How many airports even if the standarsd are poor? How many hospitals? How many registerd companies? How about the communication system of 1960 Africa compared to that of 2008??? My friend , progress was made!!! But surely they were too abysmall to elicit our gratifications but that is not enough reason to bemoan the demise of colonialism! These colonialist were there for over 200 years and they left us with charcters like king Leopold, Botha, Smith and co. Those 3 were as bad and demonic as Amin , Bokassa and Mobutu!

User Avatar
chaos.comchaos.com is offline

 # 10 | 21.12.2008 16:06

I agree with your final points. true but most of these roads/schools are not even built by africans.
phyiscal development is great. But personal standard of living, i am not so sure.

African states were not independent but the continent still existed. i am not comparing them to japan as a nation, i am comparing the nation building part, the acceptance that they needed help and the willingness to accept it. especially from their conquerors

if the emperor had said. get lost to everyone, we will do it on our own. they may not have been where they are today.
Maybe japan is not a fair comparison but i am sure you can see what i am trying to say.

Building roads, bridges . unis, is all good but the standard of living has only improved for very few and not to the majority of the nigerians.

True, development progress was made, which it can be argued is falling apart now but these have not improved the standard of living of various nigerians. in fact it has become more of a hazard to them.

We have aircrafts that are dodgy to fly, roads that are as much a death trap as the people who frequent them e.t.c
we have more doctors now that cannot perform to their best of their abilities for lack of funds.
police cannot enforce law through lack of equipment even though we have more of them.
 

Services : E-mail news | RSS Feeds | Podcasts
Links:   About the NVS | Contact Us | Terms of Use | Privacy & Cookies | Advertise With Us
All Rights Reserved. NigeriaVillageSquare.com