| Let me run the EFCC (2) |
|
![]() |
| Written by Sonala Olumhense | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Sunday, 20 January 2008 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
Let me run the EFCC (2) Sonala Olumhense
Last week, I applied for the chairmanship of the Economic and Financial Crimes Commission (EFCC). On account of some queries that have been raised since then, and the fact that the position has now been filled, the following are my thoughts about what I think would constitute a full war against corruption. My concern last week was with the EFCC, in terms of bringing economic criminals to justice. An effective EFCC is central to combating corruption in Nigeria because of the impunity with which Nigeria has been feasted on for nearly 50 years by wave after wave of highly-placed thieves and hypocrites. The effort to bring them to justice and retrieve what they have stolen must continue. That is the work of the EFCC, and it is a crusade that must be superintended by a fearless and determined Nigerian, someone with a sense of mission. By its nature, however, the EFCC operates with a rear-view mirror. It chases offenders. This is a serious responsibility because most of the people it has to combat are wealthy, politically-connected, and ruthless. That is no place for a man who just wants to put in the hours and collect his pension. By itself, the EFCC will not bring corruption under control in Nigeria. That is why the task of battling corruption is ultimately that of the leader of the country, in this case, President Umaru YarAdua. It is not clear that he understands this. The Act setting up the EFCC covers only one part of the challenge. If President YarAdua truly wants to fight corruption, our experience of the past two years clearly recommend that the EFCC and the ICPC be made independent of the executive arm of the government. It is instructive that for much of its existence, the EFCC has labored under the image of being a tool for harassing Obasanjos enemies. That is a prescription for a farce. The trouble with the challenge of corruption in our country is not just that we are corrupt, it is that our corruption has grown into a tree, with deep roots and heavy branches. It is probably the worlds most endemic. I cannot think of any other country where corruption took hold of the country as shamelessly and completely, and deeply. At one point last year, three of Nigerias top four citizens had grave corruption questions on their blotters; two of the top three now do. That is why even the tools and institutions we are using to fight corruption in Nigeria have such internal battles. Think NAFDAC. Think about the Nigerian press, where some publishers have been known to tell reporters to pay themselves (by accepting inducements). Think about 419, where the criminals steal victim information from the EFCC! If we are to make genuine and sustained progress in combating corruption, we must have a new law which focuses on deterrence. This is what has served such countries as Singapore, South Africa and Hong Kong so well. The law should provide for vigorous prosecution for people found guilty of corrupt practices, with heavy fines, property and financial seizures, and jail terms. In the government, the law should provide take the view that the higher the official concerned, the heavier the punishment. Administratively, a review must be ordered of the avenues of corruption in public life, and such opportunities blocked and periodically reviewed. Of particular interest to these new procedures must be that favourite Nigerian institution, the government contract. Nigeria is run on the basis of the awards and receipts of contracts. Trading in contractswhere a well-connected person receives a contract he has no skill or intention to execute, which he then sells to someone else who may yet sell it to anotherhas been practiced for decades. This ought to be outlawed, and people involved in it put in jail. Contractors found to have bribed a public officer should not only lose that contract, but also be prosecuted and his business investigated. The official, who received the bribe should also be retroactively disciplined, even if he is no longer in service; if he is still in service, he should be fired and prosecuted. A process such as this, if it is to be succeed, needs the assistance and credibility which only insiders can provide. It should therefore encourage and protect whistle-blowers with creative, productive methods. In every profession, endeavor or business, there are people who know what is going on but are helpless to do anything about it. They should be encouraged to participate without endangering their jobs, their lives or their families. Beyond this, it is important to encourage public service integrity and citizen integrity. We cannot claim to be fighting corruption while we ignore citizens of high integrity, no matter what they do. Indeed, I would suggest that during our National Day, the President recognizes citizens of integrity who have made important personal contributions. At state, business and professional levels, people should similarly be honoured. What this means is that anti-corruption combatants and reformists must be creative and foresighted. Not only must they must make educated preparation for a vicious backlash from powerful forces who have a lot to lose, they must anticipate how and where the proceeds of corruption may next be used, and work to frustrate it. Advance Fee Fraud is particularly interesting here. A true war against corruption in Nigeria must anticipate the sophistication of the next generation of 419ers. Unless that generation of scammers is prepared for, we may have serious problems over the next 10 and 20 years. Remember that Nigerians have already popped up in banking, investment and insurance fraud schemes in the United States. Those people are often deported to Nigeria, where they might resume their trade within the local financial system. If you think that is unlikely or difficultor likely to be difficultremember that Chinese hackers broke into the computers of the Pentagon last year and helped themselves to masses of data. Those hackers did not stop there; they also got into the networks of such huge military contractors as Lockheed Martin and Boeing. In commercial business, hackers lifted miles of customer information off the computers of TJX Companies, which owns TJ Maxx, HomeSense and Marshalls. What has that got to do with us? Consider that also in 2007, some cyber-crooks attacked the websites of some online businesses and anti-corruption campaigners. One of the businesses temporarily besieged was 419eater.com. Do you wonder who might have had an interest in shutting down a business that fights to shut down 419 operations? I would bet they were Nigerians, but would you have thought they had the expertise? My point is that if we do not crush 419 now and plan against the future, its practitioners could become the new drug lords and power brokers. Among other things, these people are capable of creating mayhem in the emerging Nigerian banking system, shutting it down for weeks and corrupting its data. They have the expertise to manipulate communications between the government and the oil companies. They could infiltrate and corrupt immigration, customs, police and judiciary records. And remember, if the Chinese could conquer the renowned computer security of the Pentagon from China, Nigerians do not need to be in Abule or Moshalashi to cripple the Central Bank. They do not need to be in Apapa to divert Oceanic Bank funds into James Iboris accounts. They do not need to be in Maitama to make it impossible for the government to pay civil servants, soldiers and policeman at the end of the month. The government should not be smug: remember how Russian hackers besieged the Estonian government last year? They used thousands of unsuspecting personal computers to overload government, banking and media websites. In a society such as ours, are we preparing for the people who can create anarchy and benefit from it without announcing a coup? Between those who have looted Nigeria blind and those who possess the technological expertise, that is where we are heading. If we are to get out of it, President YarAdua must commit himself to the war against corruption beyond its most basic level. He must bring new law,imagination, energy, courage into the process. Nobody can do it for him. He must lead the war because an army requires a general. Hopefully, he understands he must come out of hiding and slays the monster. If he does not, there is no place to hide in Aso Rock or Katsina. History will record him to be not only a coward, but an accomplice.
· sonala.olumhense@gmail.com
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Last Updated ( Thursday, 24 April 2008 ) | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| < Prev | Next > |
|---|
Services : E-mail news |
RSS Feeds | Podcasts
Links: About the NVS | Contact Us | Terms of Use | Privacy & Cookies | Advertise With Us
All Rights Reserved. NigeriaVillageSquare.com





Posted by Robot| 20.01.2008 11:11