| Leadership Without Guarantees |
|
![]() |
| Written by Sonala Olumhense | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Sunday, 24 August 2008 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
Leadership Without Guarantees By Sonala Olumhense Last week, Zambian leader Levy Mwanawasa died in Paris. He had suffered a stroke during the African Union summit in Egypt in June, and was taken to France. Mr. Mwanawasa was only 59. During his six years in office, his health was a national issue. Indeed, four months before the 2006 general elections, he suffered a minor stroke, which returned questions about his health to the front pages. But he was returned to office, and continued to change his country for the better. "He was a great leader," Kenneth Kaunda, the nation's former President, said. "People loved him. We all loved him. He did great things." Mr. Mwanawasa was an unusual African leader. In 2006 he actually ran his re-election on the basis of his economic record. The people of Zambia agreed with him. He said he would fight corruption, and he did so courageously and openly. That included his historic fight with his predecessor, Mr. Frederick Chiluba. Soon after he assumed office, he got the former president's immunity from prosecution lifted, accusing him of misusing millions of dollars of state funds while he was in office. That parliamentary process was upheld by the Zambian Supreme Court the following year. One of the charges against Chiluba was filed in the United Kingdom in 2005; he was accused of defrauding Zambia of $35 billion and hiding the money abroad. His policies were so successful that many developed countries were flocking to his support. And it is remarkable that this year, while many African leaders were hiding behind excuses about the situation in Zimbabwe, Mr. Mwanawasa was openly critical of the controversial election and the violence. As we sympathize with the people of Zambia, the parallels with the situation in Nigeria are astounding. As was the case in Zambia, our President is not in the best of health. And as had been the case in that country where Mr. Mwanawasa had been hand-picked to lead the ruling Movement for Multiparty Democracy by Chiluba; Umaru Yar'Adua was awarded Nigeria by then president, Olusegun Obasanjo. There, perhaps, the similarities end. While it must always been borne in mind that Yar'Adua has spent only one year in office, it is equally true that nobody in Nigeria is talking about how inspiring he is, or his impact. His biggest compliment is that he is slow. Now, that may not be such a bad thing to be accused of, particularly since federal officials claim that he is not being slow, but deliberate. The problem is that in a situation such as Nigeria's, "deliberate" is clearly a dangerous investment. The most obvious challenge is the war on corruption. While Mwanawasa was courageous enough to fight corruption even at the level of the man who brought him to power, Yar'Adua's war is a comedy. Recently, James Ibori, the former Delta State Governor and a man with a plethora of charges against him, was given his diplomatic passport. He traveled to two lavish parties in South Africa to mark his birthday. Another report said he went to China in a federal delegation to watch the Olympics. The most worrisome aspect of the comparison between Mwanawasa and Yar'Adua is in their definition of time. Mwanawasa approached his job as if he knew he had only a brief period to make a difference. That is why he is being celebrated worldwide as a democrat, humanist and anti-corruption champion. Zambians mourn the loss of his leadership, integrity, and nationalism. Yar'Adua, on the other hand, has approached the job as though it were a long distance race, a 26-mile marathon where the first 25 miles can be spent half-awake. Hopefully, the death of Mwanawasa reminds Yar'Adua of the falsehood of that assumption, and the fickleness both of life and power. The issue is not whether he might die; it is the impact he makes while he is certain he has the chance. When I speak of impact, I do not refer to words. Yar'Adua had made many a pronouncement about his beliefs and what he intends to achieve. The problem is that we have heard similar pronouncements from many a Nigerian leader; at the end of their tenure, they are so betrayed and so compromised they cannot walk around their own country in freedom like Kenneth Kaunda or Nelson Mandela. Instead they hide in fortresses behind their hypocrisy, armoured tanks, layers of armed guards, and dogs. In Yar'Adua's one year, he has not developed agriculture, like Mwanawasa did; instead, he has sewed questions. He has not convinced the public his anti-corruption war would admit of no sacred cows, like Mwanawasa did; instead, he seems comfortable with smoke and mirrors. Let us remember that Mwanawasa was in very poor health following a terrible road crash in 1991. Yet, that frail man it was that brought Zambia back from the road to ruin, conquering inflation, restoring the civil service, and controlling domestic debt and borrowing. And it was that man-his speech impaired-who spoke far better than orators on such issues as combating corruption, and the bigotry and short-sightedness of African leaders. The challenge before Yar'Adua is to remember what they say about good intentions and the road to hell. What Nigerians are being persuaded to accept, by his administration, is that his presidency will serve our nation thoroughly and competently when it gets off the ground. After one year, in a nation as dubious and complicated as Nigeria, that is hardly an ingenious argument. It completely neglects the question of the tone of the Yar'Adua administration. Yar'Adua said he would fight corruption, for instance, but he seems to have deliberately left out a zero-tolerance approach. That would explain why his "battle" seems to be in so much confusion. Hopefully, the President is beginning to recognize these contradictions. If not, then the problem is bigger by far than we first imagined. Whether a leader lives or dies, the truth is that Time does not, and cannot stand still. In the end, it is the most essential commodity of all.
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| < Prev | Next > |
|---|
Services : E-mail news |
RSS Feeds | Podcasts
Links: About the NVS | Contact Us | Terms of Use | Privacy & Cookies | Advertise With Us
All Rights Reserved. NigeriaVillageSquare.com





Posted by Robot| 24.08.2008 05:09