18 Jul 2009 |
|
Houses
The UK Experience Housing in the UK is dominated by one simple fact: there is simply not enough space in a country that crams over 60 million people in a country that’s less than a quarter of a million square kilometers in size. This means that housing in many areas is very dense, with high rise apartment blocks and terraced housing being very common. Even in the suburbs, completely detached houses are hard to come by. And needless to say, bungalows are an abomination. So expectedly, house prices tend to be higher than prices in the US. And even the sizes of rooms in these houses aren’t much to speak of – some are barely larger than a walk in wardrobe. The terraced housing and semi-detached houses that do exist seem to have been built according to some standard formula for entire streets. This means that there is not a great deal of variation in the external appearance, and it does lead to an appearance of dullness. I suspect that the dull effect is quite deliberate, as it is quite rare to see people paint their houses any colour other than beige, white, cream or grey. It could be that the idea is to complement the grey of the skies – I don’t know. Again because of the shortage of land, there tends not to be a great deal of new urban housing development. So what happens is that developers typically scour the place looking for old and decrepit buildings – not because they do historical preservation as a sideline, but because they’re interested in the land on which the building stands. And that’s why as soon as the building is acquired, the bulldozers move in, and before too long, you see billboards proclaiming that ‘stunning studio and 1-bedroom apartments’ will soon be ready to be sold ‘at prices starting from £999,995 ONLY’.
The US Experience Because of the ready availability of land (40 times more land with only five times more people), houses in the US can afford to be much more generous with space. And they are – with a vengeance. Even in urban areas where space is somewhat constricted, rooms in apartments (that’s right – ‘apartments’, not ‘flats’) are much bigger than in the UK. Rather than try to be economical with space in the city centre, US developer s just acquire more and more outlying land and build and build like ker-razy, sending the wave of suburbia rolling further and further into virgin land. It seems the pace of building can be as frenetic as it is, because it’s faster to build the timber frame housing that is used in the US. But it’s not just about the availability of space. The thing is, having a big house seems to be all part of achieving the supposed ‘American Dream’ and showing people in your social circle that you have ‘arrived’. Plus if you are acquiring stuff left, right and centre in pursuit of the Dream, you need to have a big house to put it all in, not so? Unlike the UK where blocks of housing seem to be put up along a section of streets, US developers will build a block of housing in a housing subdivision. This might be a housing community, or an apartment complex – I guess the equivalent in Nigeria might be housing estate. Such subdivisions might have their own semi private roads, and some might be gated outright so that the riff-raff can be kept out. The housing in these subdivisions tends to be quite varied - there are different appearances and different sized units, which makes quite a interesting view, except that those who live in the smaller units are now reminded of their lesser position. But hey, if everyone was content with their lot, what would happen to the pursuit of the American Dream?
Naija – UK or US? I don’t have to ponder too much about this. Observing the fancy architecture of big houses in Nigeria, I’m pretty sure that the experience in Nigeria would tend more towards what obtains in the US.
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||







Your Comments
Please make The Square an enjoyable experience for everyone by refraining from gratuitous ad-hominem contributions, defamatory comments and off-topic posting. Such posts will be removed.