14

Sep

2006

A Bolekaja Presidency (2) PDF Print E-mail
By Reuben Abati
14 September 2006
A Bolekaja Presidency (2)
By Reuben Abati

WHEN last week, I wrote under the title above - "A Bolekaja Presidency", I received a number of e-mails in which the respondents accused me of exaggeration and misconception; I was accused of being too hard on the Presidency. However, events of the last week have proven me right. What we are faced with is not just a fight, but full-blown warfare. It is a war about ego, distrust, power and the zero-sum nature of Nigerian politics. Both the President and the Vice President are leaving no stone unturned in the attempt to undermine each other, cancel out each other, and teach each other bitter lessons.

The relationship between both men is damaged beyond repairs. This tango will not end up on a winner-takes-all note; there will be many victims, and the Nigerian people may well be the main victims. It is a fight with many episodes, scenes, acts and actors. The unfolding drama is a box-office hit. Newspapers, reporting the interesting details are selling like hot-cake. I wouldn't be surprised if one of these days, someone in Nollywood prepares a movie out of this. But for now, a week after, I seek to act as referee, and attempt to explain how the gladiators are faring.

When the war began last week, some respondents to this column, especially on the Internet, were quick to argue that this was democracy at work. They pontificated that it is not unusual in either a Presidential or Parliamentary system for a President/Prime Minister, and his Deputy to disagree with each other, and even fight publicly or maintain malice. Franklin Delano Roosevelt (32nd American President, 1933 -1945) and his deputy, John Garner (1933 -1941) merely tolerated each other. Richard Nixon and Spiro Agnew were not the best of friends. President Clinton and Vice President Al Gore had their own problems as well. In Britain, at the moment, Prime Minister Tony Blair and Gordon Brown, Chancellor of the Exchequer, have been accusing each other in a fashion that bears comparison with the OBJ vs. Atiku case. In Ghana, Jerry Rawlings once had cause to slap his Vice President in the course of a Federal Executive Council Meeting. In South Africa, President Thabo Mbeki has been identified as the unseen hand behind the travails of former Vice President Jacob Zuma. In Malaysia, Dr. Mahathir Mohammed got his Deputy Prime Minister, Anwar Ibrahim labelled a sex pervert and a traitor and convicted for corruption, and sent to jail.

So many examples can be lifted from history and geography to justify why it is in the nature of men to disagree, and why power is a riddle with many sides to it, and how, in its presence, individuals may be compelled, unwittingly to express the baser aspects of their being. But one critical difference is that in the examples that the pragmatists are wont to cite, the power game is often about ideology, about differences in vision and approach, about a fight for the common destiny and how best to act as its custodian. In the present case in Nigeria, there is no high-ground in the OBJ-Atiku war. What seemed like a fight against corruption in the public interest has degenerated into a tell-it-all, you-wash-my-dirty-linen-in-public, I-wash-yours-too, you -Tarka-me-I-Daboh you, you-OBJ-me-I-Atiku-you kind of conflict. And the rhythm of the fight is at a feverish pitch, with higher notes being called forth in a responsorial-antiphonal manner.

From the details of the last week, we have seen how the two top men in charge of Nigeria and their errand boys manage their own affairs and ours too. Decorum has been thrown to the winds. Junior persons have been sent on errands to call the Vice President a thief and a liar. The Vice-President's spokesman, Garba Shehu has returned the charge in innuendo-laden rebuttals in which the President is thoroughly maligned. The sensibility of the public is being assaulted. The gross misconduct that is going on in the Presidency is enough reason for Nigerians to ask that both the President and his Deputy be reminded that they are holding the entire country to ransom. The danger is that their feud poses a major threat to our democracy.

It will be recalled that it was personal feud of this nature that brought the First Republic down, with a mutation of events that resulted in the civil war, and Nigeria's season of darkness (1967 - 70). The Second Republic also collapsed when the politicians could not resolve their differences. They ended up turning Nigeria into a House of War, and the soldiers intervened. The Third Republic also failed for a similar reason. The June 12 Presidential election was annulled because some highly placed persons at the time, including General Ibrahim Babangida did not want MKO Abiola as President. Now, this is the Fourth Republic and both President Obasanjo and Atiku are confirming the notion that Nigerian politicians do not learn from history, nor do they care enough about Nigeria. If the President and his Deputy cared enough about Nigeria, they would not place their personal conflicts above the nation's interest, as they now appear to be doing.

By Thursday, September 7, the Atiku Campaign Organisation had established its basic premises in the unfolding war. They argued that Vice President Atiku was being witch-hunted because of the long-standing feud between him and the President. They drew attention to the fact that the President has not forgiven the Vice President for seeking to upstage him in the 2003 PDP primaries, for opposing the elongation of tenure agenda, and for seeking to become Nigeria's President in 2007. They argued that the Administrative Panel Report and the EFCC report which both indicted the Vice President are contrived mechanisms for getting the Vice President impeached. The Presidency fired back. It challenged the Vice President to respond to the charges of abuse of public funds. By Friday, the Obasanjo camp had made it clear that it was not interested in the impeachment of the Vice President. Pro-Obasanjo stakeholders in the feud pointed to Section 137 (1) of the Constitution which states matter-of-factly that once an office-seeker has been indicted by an administrative panel of enquiry, or a tribunal, he is ineligible for election into public office.

In other words, the Obasanjo strategists had scored a bull's eye. President Obasanjo's plans to stop Atiku from succeeding him, an open secret by the way had been achieved. Observers, notably Chief Gani Fawehinmi, SAN, in a public statement declared Atiku guilty as charged; in addition, a candidate for impeachment and prosecution upon the expiration of his immunity, and a defeated Presidential aspirant. That was Round One - with the President's group as winner.

Act One Scene 2: The Atiku Camp immediately went back to the drawing board. Delay for them could be dangerous. They needed to find a quick and sure response to the Obasanjo move. By Monday, the country was informed that Vice President Atiku had decided to go to court to challenge the composition of the Administrative Panel that indicted him. He also claimed that he was denied his right to fair hearing. At this point, the judiciary had been dragged into the matter. Atiku's lawyers, seven of them, all SAN want the Court to bar the government from acting on the Reports of both the EFCC and the Administrative Panel of Inquiry which in their view have no basis in law. The case is in court. What role then would the judiciary play? Would it allow itself to be used one way or the other?

While the matter is being considered in the Court, even as far as the Supreme Court, would Atiku be in a position to run for President and thus circumvent Section 137 of the Constitution? In the OBJ-Atiku war, it is simply a case as they say of "cunning-man-die-cunning-man-bury-am". In the mean time, the Vice-President's spokespersons further accused the President of bad faith. They alleged that the President is merely deceiving Nigerians. They pointed to aspect of the EFCC investigation involving the President's aides which the EFCC and the Administrative Panel appear to have conveniently ignored. Again, Gani Fawehinm had a ready answer in this respect. In his 29-page commentary on the case, Chief Fawehinmi adopted a positivist approach focussing on the facts of the case. Except that this is not a strictly legal matter, but a case of political gladiatorship. This much became clear by Tuesday, September 12. Round Two: No winner, no vanquished.

Act One Scene 3: By Tuesday, newspapers reported that Vice President Atiku had suspended his vacation. Well, it wouldn't have made sense (would it?) for him to travel abroad at a time when his future is at stake. He had to lead the war in which he is the protagonist. And so Garba Shehu, the Vice President's Media Consultant sought to prove in a detailed statement that their camp is not talking about other robbers, but about the President as an accomplice, indeed as the mastermind of whatever wrong-doing the EFCC may be complaining about. He declared that instructions for withdrawals from the Marine Float Account were issued jointly by President Obasanjo and the Vice President, and that Bodunde Adeyanju collected money on behalf of the President. He also alleged that the President collected money from the Plateau State Government. The revelations were now becoming juicy. The Presidency tried to offer a rebuttal through Akin Osuntokun who was the Director of Media for the Atiku/Obasanjo Campaign Organisation in 2003. But it seemed as if the Atiku group had gained an upper hand in the war.

Act One Scene Four: By the following morning, Wednesday, September 13, the Presidency was smoking from all cylinders. Cheque withdrawals linking Atiku to withdrawals from the Marine Float Account flooded the newspapers. The cheque war had begun. The Presidency pointedly accused the Vice President of looting the Petroleum Technology Development Fund. It also offered a detailed account of its version of the President's involvement and interest in the case. Line by line, the President was portrayed as someone who was interested in probity and accountability. The legislature had also taken an interest in the matter. The House read the reports. The Senate chose to refer the reports to its Judiciary Committee and postponed deliberations for another two weeks. With the statement from the Presidency, released by Mrs Oyo, the Atiku camp was down on the score-board!

Act One Scene Five: By yesterday morning, Thursday, September 14, Atiku and his strategists had risen again. They bombarded the public with details of how the President, his aides, girlfriends (!) and institutions in which he has interest benefited from the Marine Float Account, and the PTDF. They announced: "There are cheques with over N100 million issued to IBAD Nigeria Limited, a construction company solely owned by Obasanjo from Fasawe's MOFAS TIB accounts" They added: "the President drew over N3 bn...".

It is easy to imagine that the Obasanjo camp is also busy working out its response to the latest attack from the Vice President. The Nation captured it all by declaring in its lead story: "What Obasanjo got from secret account, by Atiku" (September 14). The Punch highlighted the farcical dimension: "Atiku hits Obasanjo with cheque bomb". In the course of a week when planes could not fly, vehicles are grounded due to a strike by oil workers, the Presidency has been busy with a cat-fight. Not a word has been said about the strike; not an attempt has been made to address the people's interest. That the warfare in Aso Villa will be long and costly can be seen in the Presidency's announcement of new appointments.

Garba Shehu, the Vice President's Media Consultant has been defending his boss with a crusading spirit. This should be a moment when the President misses Femi Fani-Kayode who would have matched Garba Shehu, expletive for expletive. But the President demonstrating that he understands the art of war, has re-deployed Akin Osuntokun, until recently Managing Director of the News Agency of Nigeria, and a veteran of press wars, as Special Adviser on Political Affairs. Uba Sani has also been appointed Special Assistant, Public Affairs. The timing of both appointments is instructive.

There is also to all this, a spiritual dimension with a pro-Atiku group in Jigawa State declaring a three-day fasting period in support of the Vice President. This will end today with special prayers! Don't be surprised if some Christians also announce a three-day prayer vigil to protect the President against his enemies! Is this a measure how low we have sunk as a nation? The drama continues....


Your Comments

Please make The Square an enjoyable experience for everyone by refraining from gratuitous ad-hominem contributions, defamatory comments and off-topic posting. Such posts will be removed.

User Avatar
RobotRobot is offline

 # 1 | 14.09.2006 23:32

A Bolekaja Presidency (2)By Reuben AbatiWHEN last week, I wrote under the title ab...Read the full article.

User Avatar
WillyWilly is offline

 # 2 | 15.09.2006 02:22

Mr. Abati,

It is about Christmas and time you write that Obasanjo can be trusted to cut off an Igbo head or two to quell Nigeria's problem as you did few years back, maybe this time your Abeokuta brother wants the heads of not just an Igbo as your dark soul proposed but from every square kilometer in the country, so watch your back as yours is quite remarkable.

That you can pontificate after your heinous hate essays will be taught in schools as a commentary on our politicians who might be the only people below your despicable self.

User Avatar
AuspiciousAuspicious is offline

 # 3 | 15.09.2006 03:13

It is a bloody shame that some people bloviating as informed commentators (oh please!) on the Internet choose to continue the merciless campaign to malign others without restraint. For goodness sake, get over whatever past hangovers you have about this man and focus on the merits or demerits of the current topic he is talking about in this latest article!!! It is either you have something useful to contribute or move on!

What, on God's Green Earth, makes one lurch in with such an irresponsible and reckless opener as:

"It is about Christmas and time you write that Obasanjo can be trusted to cut off an Igbo head or two to quell Nigeria's problem as you did few years back--->That you can pontificate after your heinous hate essays will be taught in schools as a commentary on our politicians who might be the only people below your despicable self."


Anyone who is reading these words and agrees with me should be thankful that they don't have such hate, as evident in the words of the commentator that goes by the name Willy (and others like him), in them! The bigotry and hate in their words is, to say the least, SCARY! How can such people ever know happiness if they go around with such amounts of bile in them???

It is a statement of FACT when one states that Reuben Abati, as human and prone to errors like the rest of us as he is, NEVER sounds or reads as callous or hateful as those who accuse him of being a "despicable" person who writes "heinous hate essays". What, will they murder him if they have the chance? I mean..that is how people like Willy sound -
like people filled with murderous hate!

PLEASE NOTE: Not ONE word of Mr. Abati's latest essay was critiqued or commented upon in any way by Willy. The commentator in question, like others before him, simply came in to insult and to malign without leaving behind anything positive but his hate-filled commentary. Even if Abati has a past you must insult or hate him for, how about leaving proof of such in your commentary just so people will not see you as another "nattering naboob of negativism"?

I pray that no man's actions will reduce me or anyone I care for to the level of hate as personified by individuals like Willy. To Willy and others like him out there, debrief yourselves of prejudice and hate and all its associated vices. You will then find that life is a lot more fun and full of happiness and joy than what subsists. You may throw all that advice back in my face if you don't need it. I will understand.

Auspicious.

User Avatar
WaleAkinWaleAkin is offline

 # 4 | 15.09.2006 04:04

Oh Lawd............

We all dealt decently with a villager called Tony and here we are again with another one with the name Willy................too much hatred..............Ota poju enemy lo

Lets look at the platform on which Abati writes...............He works as a member of staff for a daily tabloid called GUARDIAN NEWSPAPER owned by a fellow Nigerian from DELTA STATE, the Chief Editor is also a Nigerian known as EMEKA ELUEM IZEZE, an Igbo man, the deputy Editor is a Yoruba man known as DEBO ADESINA.

Emeka Eluem Izeze is the Chief Editor, a position that supercedes that of Reuben Abati as chairman, Editorial board, if truly Abati has been writing about the Igbos in bad lights, i am very sure he would have been cautioned as the Chief Editor is Igbo. Anyway, i have been reading abati articles for a long time, i can categorically say that he is sound and of good journalistic behavioral attutudes......

Coming back to Bolekaja presidency 2, let the revelations continue as this may finally be the harbinger of peace that Nigeria and Nigerians needs.

Cheers,
Wale

User Avatar
edojiedoji is offline

 # 5 | 15.09.2006 05:01

I have seen and heard all sorts of ingenious arguments but I will want to stay on the issue at hand. What is before the court of public opinion is that Atiku has abused and misused his office. That is the point!

"The point is that certain monies were constitutionally entrusted on Mr. Vice President for PTDF. The monies were denominated in dollars and playing around with them for a while within the banking system has its direct private gains. The Vice President was more attracted to those private and personal gains than the necessary benefits to Nigerians. In administrative language, the funds were misappropriated but in street language the monies were stolen. This is one of the cases against him.

The argument that Mr.President is also guilty or even a bigger culprit does not make sense in this context. Mr. President’s day at the dock will surely come and we will celebrate it but the man in the dock now is Atiku and please, let somebody tell him to defend himself.

I do not think that any serious- minded Nigerian would want to believe that Mr. President is a saint and that he is fighting his anti-corruption war altruistically. No. We all know the game. What Nigerians want to know and the onus on Atiku is to disprove those allegations. Going to court to espouse his right is good but the better thing to do is to fight for an acquittal from the court of public opinion. Atiku may very well get a redress from a court of law but without a discharge from the court of public opinion, he is politically dead. Trading sleaze with Obasanjo does not make sense. If for anything, it reinforces perception and makes the case worse for him".

User Avatar
ANCIENTANCIENT is online

 # 6 | 15.09.2006 06:59

Willy's comment (the first on this thread) is in terrible bad taste.
Such exhibition of raw hate should not be condoned in a forum like this.
He owes all of us an apology.

Having said that, we must equally point out that Abati has since purged himself of his undiluted, crude Igbophobia. Like Ken-Saro Wiwa, he had thought that, perhaps, he needed some dose of anti-Igbo essays to capture the public space. Now, he has realized that he no longer needs to do that, and he has been trying to atone for his past indiscretions. He needs to be forgiven!

There was also the suspicion that he was enjoying the rebuttals he was attracting then from brilliant Igbo minds whom he never believed could take him serious enough to engage him in on the pages of the newspaper. It also looked like Abati could not just swallow the feeling around town that Ndigbo were the bright stars of Nigeria (given their rapid survival and ascendancy even after the thirty months of BIAFRA-Britain/America/Rushia/Nigeria genocidal, extermination project (also referred to by some people as the Nigeria Civil War), and so he felt called to cut them down to size. But he soon realized the folly of his misplaced zeal and sheath his blunt sword. He may have to continue to battle the ghosts of that infantile preference for a long time to come. No tears for him.

For all you care, Willy may just be an OBJ acolyte trying to influence the course of
comments on the article, which clearly does not do OBJ's image any good, since it is very clear that not even OBJ and his very succulent concubines believe his “cocktail of lies”. But I must hasten to say that in this regard, Willy is only trying to be an accurate imitator of the fellow that goes by the name of WALE AKIN, who once formed the habit of being the first to comment on any article, with the sole intention of influencing the course of comments.

Although, he failed most of the time, because of his inability to make sense, and muster the requisite capacity to sway people by powerful arguments, he still continued to do that, because of his exaggerated assessment of his abilities. I had thought that after one fellow on this forum cautioned him, that he would learn his lesion, but what has become clear is that I was really wrong in my expectation.

Reuben Abati is a columnist and Chair of the Editorial Board; at that level, there is a level of caution he can receive from his MD. Even if he is using the column to fight an ethnic war, there is no way Emeka Izeze can stop him; he can only give him friendly advise, and if that fails, he might advise the management to on the implication, and management may choose to ignore him. So, to say, as Wale did with dogmatic certainty, that if indeed, ABATI was writing anti-Igbo articles, that Izeze would have stopped him, is one bold way of advertising ignorance.

WALE AKIN also lacks discretion. In a debate of this nature in which his very name would easily depict where his interest would lie (rightly or wrongly) on the matter, he should exercised some restraint in coming out with his colourless, drab input, delivered with the same unintelligent authoritativeness that never ceases to annoy every right-thinking person on this forum. This is not to say that even a partisan Yoruba would not be able to ward off the effects of Wily’s missile on ABATI but WALE lacks what it takes to do that, and so, has merely portrayed his post as one those I-must-defend-my-brother comments. Nothing more, nothing less.

How can anyone who had ever known anything about Abati’s writing, and who is even claiming that he has read ABATI for years, deny that at some point Reuben was behaving like a licensed Igbo-basher! Well, only WALE AKIN can vomit such a clap-trap! And for all you care, to him, he has made the greatest point here!

User Avatar
thumwoodthumwood is offline

 # 7 | 15.09.2006 07:29

This general theme that since Atiku is in the dock now he should hung, drawn and quatered alone and Obj's day will come at some point etc. etc. is a very shallow and short sighted. Obj is/was part and parcel of whatever Atiku did/did not do/could have done etc.. If Atiku is found guilty, so is Obj and both should go down for it. There is no way that Obj could not have known about the goings-on in that fund right from the day the first check was written. We are even getting accounts of Obj's direct/inderct involvement in the operations of the accounts, yet people are making out as if Atiku is more guilty just b/c Obj fired the first salvo. If Atiku is to be indicted so must Obasenjo at the same time for and for the same offence. I wonder what Obj thought would be the outcome when he started down this route, abi has he never heard the addage: If you live in a glass house, don't throw stones habba!

User Avatar
gwobezentashigwobezentashi is offline

 # 8 | 15.09.2006 07:37


Atiku: Fasawe told Obasanjo of $6.7m deal with Jefferson 15/09/2006
By Gabriel Akinadewo, Group Political Editor

There seems to be no let-up in the battle of integrity at the Presidency, with the Vice President’s camp insisting yesterday that President Obasanjo knew about the $6.7 million deal between Jefferson and Otunba Oyewole Fasawe.

The President has sent a letter written by Jefferson to the Senate, saying the Congressman’s complaints prompted the probe that unearthed the alleged mismanagement of Petroleum Technology Development Fund (PTDF) money. The PTDF is under the supervision of the Vice President.

But the Atiku camp claimed yesterday, in a statement that portrayed Jefferson as a man of shady character, that the American wrote on June 9, 2004 – six months after Fasawe "had persistently put him (Jefferson) under tremendous pressure to refund his money or face legal action."

The Jefferson letter, the Vice-President’s camp said, was a blackmail by the American to escape the imminent legal action.

The Atiku Abubakar Campaign Organisation, in a statement entitled Jefferson’s letter to Obasanjo, setting the records straight, by its spokesman Garba Shehu, said:
"In his letter to the Senate Tuesday on the alleged use of PTDF funds in TIB to advance the political interest of Vice President Atiku Abubakar,President Obasanjo claimed to have been alerted by U.S. Congressman William Jefferson.

"The letter also claimed that the deposit was accessed by Otunba Oyewole Fasawe who used it in the pursuit of his business interests. The Atiku Abubakar Campaign will like to state that the President’s account regarding the sequence of events in this matter is typically, false. The facts of the matter are these:

"Otunba Oyewole Fasawe was invited by a senior official of his bank, Trans International Bank, TIB to meet certain investors at the 2003 Sullivan Economic Summit in Abuja who were seeking a Nigerian collaborator to bring a new American communication technology to Nigeria.

"Otunba Fasawe was thereafter introduced to U.S. Congressman William Jefferson who promised to facilitate the introduction of the American telecommunication technology to Nigeria.

"On the strength of assurances by the Congressman who was Chairman of the American house sub-committee on Nigeria, Fasawe applied for a loan facility from TIB, whose official alerted him of the investment opportunity.

"Otunba Fasawe thereafter transferred $6.7 million to iGate, the company introduced by Congressman Jefferson by January 2003.

"After waiting endlessly and Jefferson was not forthcoming with the equipment as promised, Otunba Fasawe sought the help of his friend, President Obasanjo to use his contact with the American government to get Jefferson to return his money. This is in addition to the persistent pressure on Jefferson and officials of iGate.

"Jefferson’s letter dated 9thJune 2004 was written six months after Fasawe had persistently put (him) Jefferson, under tremendous pressure to refund his money or face legal action. This also puts to question the claim that the president’s inquisition was prompted by the Congressman’s complaint and that the letter was the first time he knew about the matter. The truth is that Jefferson’s letter was prompted by the petition of Otunba Fasawe to President Obasanjo and President Bush of America.

"Jefferson could not validly complain of the source of the NDTV funds after keeping the money for six months.

"The letter from Jefferson was therefore, a blackmail to escape the imminent legal action by Fasawe who had become restless over his (now apparently) bad investment.

"It is noteworthy that President Obasanjo received the letter from Jefferson in June 2004 but did not deem it fit to cause EFCC to investigate the allegations until after the defeat of the Third Term Agenda in May 2006, more than two years after.

"It is also important to note that Congressman Jefferson whose integrity President Obasanjo believes to the point of engendering a national crisis has the following profile:

"He (Jefferson) is under investigation in the U.S. for collecting bribes to discharge his official responsibilities.

"He was caught on video collecting $100,000 dollar bribe from Mrs Moody, promoter of iGate.

"Jefferson, who collected $6.5 million from Otunba Fasawe to promote the new American telecommunication technology in Nigeria took Lori Mody, promoter of iGate to Vice President Abubakar, to upstage Otunba Fasawe from the business. If Atiku was part of the NDTV plot, will Jefferson be so stupid to solicit his help to upstage his own (Atiku’s) company?

"He is under investigation in the United States for collecting $3.5million from Lori Modi under false pretence.

"Although the $3.5 million was supposed to have been used to pay Fasawe off the business, Jefferson only paid $1.7 million.

"Jefferson collected $100,000 from Lori Mody and told her that he had passed same to Vice President Abubakar but the money was later found wrapped in a foil paper and hidden in his freezer.

"It is curious that Mr. President who is privy to these facts will attach any weight to the claims of Jefferson and desecrate the National Assembly by sending the blackmail paper to it."

Shehu also asked what he called relevant questions. They are:

"Does the Nigerian government have any responsibility to protect the interest of Nigerians around the world? How well has the government discharged this in the case of the $6.5 million held back in the hands of Jefferson? Should a Nigerian business lose $4.7million simply because the president has problem with a friend he quarrels with solely because he refuses his instruction to cut ties with a friend of 37 years and who happens to be his (Obasanjo’s ) deputy, Atiku Abubakar.?

"The EEFC report claimed that Atiku Abubakar is a part-owner of NDTV. Presidency claims Atiku collected money from Jefferson. Will Atiku collect money from Jefferson to promote his own (Atiku’s) business (NDTV) interests?

"If Atiku is part owner of NDTV, will he forward the letter from Jefferson which sought to promote iGate at the expense of NDTV which had invested $6.5 million in the business?"
Besides, the statement said:

"There is absolutely no relationship between withdrawals from the Mofas account in TIB and the PTDF deposits. The EEFC has merely assembled unrelated matters to create a false, predetermined and political end. We have said the EEFC report is a cocktail of lies and malicious fabrication. The Jefferson letter is another instance of the contrived scheme. In any case, the EEFC report claims that its investigation was at the instance of the FBI which requested its assistance in the investigation of Jefferson. President Obasanjo in his letter to the National Assembly claims that the EEFC investigation is at the instance of the Jefferson letter. Which of the two should we believe?

"Jefferson’s letter is a ruse, an after thought, and a contrived rope to tie the loose ends of the fabrications in the EEFC report. That it is dignified in a presidential correspondence is the height of desperation.

"Vice President Abubakar maintains his position that the MOFAS and Marine Flout accounts that the EFCC claim indict him over the PTDF deposits have nothing to do with the PDTF deposits in 14 banks, including TIB and ETB. Rather, both accounts just as two others maintained by Chief Emeka Ofor and the late Muhammed Waziri are special purpose accounts maintained by himself and President Obasanjo for their political and campaign activities.

http://www.thenationonlineng.com/newsdisplay.asp?id=390


TROUBLE SLEEP, YANGA GO WAKE AM


RA RA-RA RA, RA-RA-RA-RA-RA
RA RA-RA RA, RA-RA-RA-RA-RA
RA RA-RA RA

When Trouble sleep,
Yanga go wake am,
Wetin he dey find
PALAVER, HE DEY FIND
Palaver, he go get-e o
PALAVER, HE GO GET
Palaver

When cat sleep,
Rat go bite him tail,
Wetin he dey find,
PALAVER, HE DEY FIND
Palaver, he go get-e o
PALAVER, HE GO GET
Palaver

Tenant lost him job,
Him sit down for house,
He dey think of job,
Mr. Landord come wake am up,
He say, “Mister, pay me your rent”
Wetin he dey find
PALAVER, HE DEY FIND
Palaver, he go get-e o
PALAVER, HE GO GET
Palaver

My friend just come from prison,
Him dey look for work,
Waka waka day and night,
Police man come stop am for road,
He say, “Mister, I charge you for wandering”
Wetin he dey find
PALAVER, HE DEY FIND
Palaver, he go get-e o
PALAVER, HE GO GET
Palaver

Mr. Husband marry for church,
He make big party,
Then he start to spray
Because him love him wife,
Mrs wife come run away”
Bank manager run come,
He say, “Mister, pay me your debt”
Wetin he dey find, for Lagos e-o
PALAVER, HE DEY FIND
Palaver, he go get-e o
PALAVER, HE GO GET
Palaver

When Trouble sleep,
Yanga go wake am,
Wetin he dey find
PALAVER, HE DEY FIND
Palaver, he go get-e o
PALAVER, HE GO GET
Palaver, he go get-e o

When cat sleep,
Rat go bite him tail,
Wetin he dey find,
PALAVER, HE DEY FIND
Palaver, he go get-e o
PALAVER, HE GO GET
Palaver, he go get e-o


RA RA-RA RA, RA-RA-RA-RA-RA
RA RA-RA RA, RA-RA-RA-RA-RA
RA RA-RA RA

RA RA-RA RA, RA-RA-RA-RA-RA
RA RA-RA RA, RA-RA-RA-RA-RA
RA RA-RA RA

User Avatar
QuestionQuestion is online

 # 9 | 15.09.2006 08:13

Wale Akin,

Is Guardian a tabliod or a broadsheet?

User Avatar
kvin33kvin33 is offline

 # 10 | 15.09.2006 09:11

Nobody is surprised by Atikus "revelations". Atiku has not denied the accusations, he just thinks OBJ has no standing to probe him, that's his business. Nigerians are not naive, we know exactly what is going on.

OBJ will leave next year, Atiku should go with him. Nigeria is bigger than Atiku, heaven will not fall because Atiku is denied the presidency. The idea that this is somehow comparable to 1966, 1983, is a stretch to say the least. For your information, absolutely nothing has changed in terms of Atiku since your first "Bolekaja" write up. After one week of "revelations", the report is still in the Senate, the Code of Conduct bureau is about to take it up, the PDP angle is moving forward, he is still disqualified from contesting the elections pending his court case. So in short, Atiku has succeded in making a lot of interesting but non-exonerating noise, he has admitted so much sleaze even some he wasn't even accused of. Remember the old rule about holes, when you find yourself in one the first thing to do is STOP DIGGING. He has dug himself into a bigger hole than OBJ did -how ironic.

When they were stealing and chopping money, Atiku did not remember the masses, now you keep suggesting that somehow the people are losing sleep over this guys travails?? Come on. Atiku is a big boy, he should float or sink on his own, please the sun will still rise, nothing will happen to Nigeria! By the way, the real revelations will come when we start hearing about who killed Bola Ige, Harry Marshall etc Now Atiku should reveal those then I'll be really impressed.
 

Services : E-mail news | RSS Feeds | Podcasts
Links:   About the NVS | Contact Us | Terms of Use | Privacy & Cookies | Advertise With Us
All Rights Reserved. NigeriaVillageSquare.com