28

Dec

2007

Benazir Bhutto (1953 - 2007) PDF Print E-mail
By Reuben Abati
28 December 2007

Benazir Bhutto (1953 - 2007)
By Reuben Abati

THE killing, yesterday, of Benazir Bhutto, Pakistan's Prime Minister, from 1988 to 1990, and from 1993 to 1996, more or less marks the end of the Bhutto dynasty: one of the world's better known political dynasties. The Bhuttos like the Ghandis of India have suffered an endless cycle of good fortune, pain and hardship in their involvement in the politics of their country. The Bhutto dynasty had begun with the deceased's grandfather, Sir Shah Nawaz Bhutto a wealthy landowner who was one of the major sponsors of the creation of Pakistan in 1947. Her father, Zulfikar Ali Bhutto, Prime Minister of Pakistan in the 1970s, was accused of ordering the murder of a political rival following the coup that brought General Zia ul-Haq to power in 1977. He was imprisoned, and was later hanged in 1979. This had a profound effect on the then 26-year old Benazir Bhutto, She later wrote: "At that moment, I pledged to myself that I would not rest until democracy had returned to Pakistan."

Indeed, she devoted the better part of her public career, most energetically and courageously to the pursuit and advancement of the cause of democracy in Pakistan. Educated in Harvard, and Oxford, with a cosmopolitan taste, the ravishingly beautiful Benazir Bhutto was twice Prime Minister of her country during which period, she not only kept the Bhutto dynasty, and its place in Pakistani politics alive, but earned her spurs as a strong, outspoken and courageous woman. Her tenure and career were however characterised by too many peaks and valleys, as she suffered glory, persecution, exile, court trials, amnesty and now murder. She became Pakistan's first female Prime Minister in 1988, and thus emerged as one of the major reference points for the increased stature of women in public life. Commentators are wont to classify her among the class of women leaders whose pre-eminence in public life, especially the troubled terrain of politics, helped to advance the cause of women empowerment and gender equity. Others in this class include Golda Meir, Indira Ghandi, Bandranaike, Margaret Thatcher etc.

She came to power in 1988 after the death of General Zia ul-Haq in a plane crash and the return to democracy, but her tenure ended in 1990 amidst allegations of corruption. She was back as Prime minister three years later. But by 1996, after her second shot at power, Bhutto was again accused of corruption and money-laundering. Her husband, Asif Ali Zardari was particularly targeted, and he spent eight years in jail, even if he was not tried in court. Both Mrs Bhutto and her husband alleged that they were victims of political persecution, but whereas many were willing to give Mrs Bhutto the benefit of the doubt, her husband, better known as "Mr Ten Per cent" was generally regarded as greedy. In 1999, Mrs. Bhutto went into exile to escape prosecution, and lived in Dubai and London with her three children. In October 2007, President Pervez Musharraf granted her amnesty, prompting her return from exile to the country on October 18. There had been talks about return to democracy in Pakistan and a power sharing deal between the dictator and Mrs Bhutto in which Musharraf will be President and Mrs Bhutto, Prime Minister.

Her assassination by a suicide bomber at a political rally, yesterday, in Rawalpindi, a market town outside Islamabad shows how volatile the political situation in Pakistan is, and the continuing threat of violence that has turned that country into a murderous killing field. She was shot in the neck and chest as she got into her car by a suicide bomber who shot her first before detonating the bomb that he had strapped to his body. Twenty others were killed in the attack. This may sound odd, but there was a whiff of death-wish to Mrs. Bhutto's politics since her return to Pakistan on October 18. The Musharraf government had warned her about likely attacks on her by Moslem extremists. But she ignored the advice that she should travel less in the open and chose to test her popularity among the people. At her home-coming rally, a suicide bomb attack left 139 persons dead. In a country where there have been more than 40 suicide attacks this year alone, with more than 700 people dead, Mrs Bhutto defied her tormentors. "I put my life in danger and came here because I feel this country is in danger. People are worried. We will bring the country out of crisis," she had said.

But can we, legitimately, blame the dead? This fallen Daughter of the East was a child of passion, fired by enthusiasm and her commitment to making a difference. She provided a useful and necessary contrast in a society dominated by dogma and extremism. In a country where it is a mortal sin to criticise the President, Bhutto never failed to point out that Musharraf's ambition is to rig the proposed parliamentary elections scheduled for January 8. Musharraf's government had become unpopular. Bhutto's centrist Pakistan People's Party was billed to win a substantial part of the vote, alongside Nawaz Sharif's the Pakistan Muslim League.

Bhutto's uncommon courage is to be remarked upon. She knew that her life was in danger, she knew that terrorists and extremists had signed a contract on her life, but she refused to yield the ground to them. Her killers have dealt a deadly blow to the cause of democracy and human rights in Pakistan. Bhutto in death, is justifiably, a martyr. The Al- Qaeda, Islamic militants and the Taliban extremists had never hidden their hatred for her. Bhutto was an outspoken critic of terrorists and a major supporter of the war against terrorism. She had close ties to the United States and was unapologetically pro-West. She not only espoused socialist principles, as Prime Minister, she sought to improve the lot of women by promising to dismantle all barriers that hinder their freedom. Her killers may have stilled her voice, her party the PPP may now appear rudderless without a clear successor in sight, but Bhutto example will endure. It is Pakistan that now faces a sad day.

Her death will further heighten tension in the country, and should the parliamentary elections proceed as scheduled, there is no guarantee that it will be peaceful. Already, Bhutto's supporters are hurt and angry; yesterday as news of their leaders death spread, they burnt tyres and smashed glasses. This may be the beginning of a costly internal battle. The biggest threat in Pakistan today is the spread of extremism. The future challenge is to ensure a regime of peace and rule of law, made practically impossible by military misrule and the extremists within the national borders. Musharraf had retired as Head of the Army on Nov 6, but he suspended the Constitution and imposed an emergency rule which he lifted on December 15; a culture of dictatorship pervades the land which has provided a fertile ground for extremism. Before the killing of Benazir Bhutto, there had been well-founded fears about the prospects of democracy in Pakistan, yesterday's cowardly act of murder would seem to have confirmed the world's worst fears. Under the circumstances, the least that Islamabad can do is to postpone the parliamentary elections and allow emotions to cool down.

The run-up to the elections is in any case, marked by too many irregularities. The electoral register is poorly prepared, with many missing names and ghost names on the list. Voting centres are not properly defined in the parliamentary constituencies. Mayors campaign openly for government-backed candidates. The opposition is suppressed. Musharraf's ambition, it is clear, is to organise elections that can be considered okay by Pakistani standards, not international standards. The international community must not stand by and allow this to happen. The biggest tribute that can be paid in Benazir Bhutto's memory is to ensure that the transition to democracy in Pakistan, is not such that guarantees the continuation of a failed government, but an election that is an expression of the will of the Pakistani people. The US government in mourning Benazir Bhutto has left slip the diplomatic point that its loyalty is not to one individual, but to the people of Pakistan.

By standing up for democracy in Pakistan, instead of engaging in diplomatic double - speak, America would also invariably be standing up for one individual and her symbolism. In a piece in the Christian Service Monitor of December 10, 2007 titled "Why the World needs Democracy in Pakistan," Mrs Bhutto had written: "the international community must send a clear message that it will not be an accessory to this coming crime. It must not wait to see if the elections on January 8 are free and fair. It must insist on a minimum set of benchmarks to be met for the election to be recognised as free and fair. If the benchmarks are ignored, the International Community must be prepared to signal its displeasure to the Musharraf regime in specific, possible ways. Flared elections will worsen instability in Pakistan as civil society and political parties protest. Imposing international restrictions after the fact will be fruitless and only deepen anti-American sentiment."

However, the biggest crime that has now been committed is the murder of the author of these words. The Musharraf government has been most forthcoming with sweet words, describing Mrs Bhutto's death as a "national tragedy". Three days of national mourning have also been declared. Although nobody has claimed responsibility for her killing, fingers are already pointing in the direction of the religious fundamentalists in Pakistan. Her husband disagrees with this. What needs to be added nonetheless is that the Musharraf government which obviously stands to gain from Bhutto's exit, is not as innocent as it appears to be making out. Mrs Bhutto was killed in the midst of so-called heavy security yesterday. She was addressing a relatively small crowd of between 5, 00 and 10, 000 people. What was the security doing?

Besides, since her return, there had been no serious attempt by the government to provide her with adequate security. She was barred from using vehicles with tinted glasses, security at her home was scaled down, her complaints were ignored; in November she was placed under house arrest. Was she being set up for elimination, and deliberately turned into a moving target? Her mother, Begun Nusrat Bhutto; her brothers Murtaza, and Shanawaz, like her father and grandfather, all of whom played key roles in public life all pre-deceased her. Her exit marks the closure, for now, of a major chapter in Pakistani politics, and a terrible moment for Pakistan. She is the author of a book titled Pakistan: The Gathering Storm. Indeed now the storm gathers in Pakistan. Another book, her autobiography is titled "Daughter of Destiny". Indeed, she was.

 



Your Comments

Please make The Square an enjoyable experience for everyone by refraining from gratuitous ad-hominem contributions, defamatory comments and off-topic posting. Such posts will be removed.

User Avatar
RobotRobot is offline

 # 1 | 28.12.2007 10:28

var sbtitle6883=encodeURIComponent(Benazir Bhu...Read the full article.

User Avatar
Free PubliusFree Publius is offline

 # 2 | 28.12.2007 11:02

Here is a posted comment on the assasination of Bhutto:

"During the coming days many will be blamed and many may claim the blame for the killing of former Prime Minister Benazir Bhutto. But one government, more than anyone else, deserves blame: the United States government.

By befriending Ms. Bhutto, and appearing to send her back to Pakistan to do its bidding, Washington made her a target. She became a symbol of American neo-imperialism.

The Pakistan public has not supported the American invasion of Afghanistan or Iraq. Nor do Pakistanis support the government of President Pervez Musharraf, which has been propped up by Washington. And they certainly did not support the apparent American interference that Ms. Bhutto’s return indicated.

The ultimate responsibility for this new blood — like that of more than a million Iraqis and Afghans — is the United States government led by President Bush."


It is very, very unfortunate that this wife and mother was gunned down in broad daylight. It is clearly a further manifest evidence of how polarized Bush has rendered the world since his declaration of throwing America's military might around. Bhutto was killed because some people reasonably felt she would move Pakistan closer (than even Musharaf) to the US. And, that is clearly something not acceptable to the average Pakistani. Without a doubt, for any political leader in any largely Muslim country, American support and support by the average citizen are now mutually exclusive, regretably. Any Moslem leader close to the US can only remain so by authoritarian rule - the opposite of American preachings.

What makes this senseless killing particularly dire is that Pakistan HAS nuclear weapons and has been known to be willing to share it with others of similar bent. You can bet your last Naira that India, Pakistan's indigenous rival, is currently on razor-thin alert, watching as things evolve.

The mess the prodigal son George Bush continues to wreak on world affairs...

Free Publius

User Avatar
DeebeeDeebee is offline

 # 3 | 28.12.2007 12:56


=Free Publius;4294975951>Here is a posted comment on the assasination of Bhutto:

"During the coming days many will be blamed and many may claim the blame for the killing of former Prime Minister Benazir Bhutto. But one government, more than anyone else, deserves blame: the United States government.

By befriending Ms. Bhutto, and appearing to send her back to Pakistan to do its bidding, Washington made her a target. She became a symbol of American neo-imperialism.

The Pakistan public has not supported the American invasion of Afghanistan or Iraq. Nor do Pakistanis support the government of President Pervez Musharraf, which has been propped up by Washington. And they certainly did not support the apparent American interference that Ms. Bhutto’s return indicated.

The ultimate responsibility for this new blood — like that of more than a million Iraqis and Afghans — is the United States government led by President Bush."


It is very, very unfortunate that this wife and mother was gunned down in broad daylight. It is clearly a further manifest evidence of how polarized Bush has rendered the world since his declaration of throwing America's military might around. Bhutto was killed because some people reasonably felt she would move Pakistan closer (than even Musharaf) to the US. And, that is clearly something not acceptable to the average Pakistani. Without a doubt, for any political leader in any largely Muslim country, American support and support by the average citizen are now mutually exclusive, regretably. Any Moslem leader close to the US can only remain so by authoritarian rule - the opposite of American preachings.

What makes this senseless killing particularly dire is that Pakistan HAS nuclear weapons and has been known to be willing to share it with others of similar bent. You can bet your last Naira that India, Pakistan's indigenous rival, is currently on razor-thin alert, watching as things evolve.

The mess the prodigal son George Bush continues to wreak on world affairs...

Free Publius



Free Publius,

Just like we are wont to do in the "developing" world, we will again blame the West, George Bush, U.S., or any other such entity for the atrocities committed by another. Unfortunately, the suffering masses of the world's countries continue to be fooled. I guess the ideologies that impoverish billions of masses never should be blamed. I guess the murderous extremists in Al-Qaeda are "untouchable" in the blame game. I guess Benazir Bhutto's being a woman in a male-dominated country does not irk these Talibano-AlQaeda types. I guess the Mujjaheddin in Northern Nigeria, Niger and Sudan are not to blame. I guess Abacha, babangida, Obasanjo and all the thieving leaders of our country's past are never to blame. It must be someone other than ourselves.

I for one am fed up with this blame game. Can we at least fix our part of the guilt for our world's insanity? Can we collectively reject and condemn ideologies that seek to impose violence on the rest of us? Can we rightly focus our attention on ourselves rather than others? If the slave trade did not involve Africans selling their fellow Africans to White slave dealers, perhaps we would have received more respect. If Bhutto's murderers, whoever they may be, had any regard for their own flesh and blood, she should still be alive and well.

It may or may not be Al-Qaeda or other extremists that did this, but it is wrong to ascribe guilt to the west for every act of terror in the world. When we, like the Indians, the Japanese and others like them have, take our destiny in our own hands, we will be better positioned to rid ourselves of all colonial and western enslavement. until then, we remain oppressed.

We need to change our attitudes.

User Avatar
DeebeeDeebee is offline

 # 4 | 28.12.2007 13:01

One more thing: Even though Benazir Bhotto was seen to be "pro-western", she was much more popular than her political rivals. Just a little idea about how the "average" Pakistani felt. I have a feeling that the real "Average" Pakistani wants the same kind of life that the average American enjoys.

User Avatar
ZanderlexZanderlex is offline

 # 5 | 28.12.2007 14:15

In all honesty I really don't see why this nice lady should waste her life for nothing. My thinking is that she was blinded by the selfish support of George Bush and Co into foolhardy actions. I am wondering if it is really the place of women to be fighting this type of terrorist fight especially in a terrosist enclave like Pakistan. I doubt if I will ever let my mother,wife, sister or daughter venture into such a dangerous political situation as seen in Pakistan.

User Avatar
PalamedesPalamedes is offline

 # 6 | 28.12.2007 16:17

I agree with much of what is said in the article but, particularly, the fact that she was indeed a courageous woman. However, we must not forget the many collateral deaths--over 200 and still counting. Was all these deaths necessary so that one woman, who had been Prime Minister twice (and twice failed her people), could become a Prime Minister for the third time?

She returned to a Pakistan that is quite different from the one she had left; and the Americans (much hated in that part of the World) open support for her only made things worst.

In the fields of International Relations and diplomacy, the USA comes lowest in my estimation on competence among Western countries--I have been a keen watcher of International Relations since I was 15 years old. The Americans always make a double mess of any small local mess; they lack subtlety in diplomacy; often too rambo-ish; and wears the you-do-it-our-way-or-else attitude.

Similar case in point can be found in East Africa: Initially, most Somalians welcomed the Ethiopian armies, but all that changed when the Americans started bombing Somalians and opening backing Ethiopia-- and even claiming to have written the script. What was a small mess in Somalia has now become a big mess—thanks to the Americans.

Following the assassination, one would expect the Americans to shut-it but instead, on CNN, we hear from top official of the Bush Administration, how they had scripted the Pakistan political “wheeling and dealings” --what more reason do Al Queda need.

I hope President Yar 'Adua learns what American (open) support can do to one's health before he enters into any AFRICOM arrangement with them.

User Avatar
OnariOnari is offline

 # 7 | 28.12.2007 22:59

There is always someone to blame in our world...especially developing countries. No one including Al Qaida or whatever extremism they call them have any responsibilities for their failure to help their poor or develop their country other than to indoctrinate citizens.

When African leaders steal their country dry we blame the West, when we can not even clean our environment it is the West. We accuse the West today, tomorrow we have plate in hand begging for financial and economic help. When our leaders steal public fund they invest it in the West. When we can not even provide basic services like health, education, clean water etc we blame the West...Lets continue to play the blame game...

No one will solve our problem for us, except we agree to solve it ourselves.

For Benazir Bhutto, may her soul rest in the Lord. Some of us just look at her death like, it is her fault or why should she go back knowing very well that it is men dominated world and dangerous world. My take is in the words of Martin Luther King Jnr that " A man who won't die for something is not fit to live" Mrs Bhutto died for what she believed in and that I give her complete credit.


The import of her death means a lot to Pakistan, the country at the end of the turmoil of her death will come out stronger...this I strongly believe.

How I wish in Nigeria we have people like Bhutto who will lay down their life for the country.

User Avatar
M. AkosaM. Akosa is offline

 # 8 | 29.12.2007 00:04

May her brave soul rest in peace. A very brave woman indeed???

The worrying thing was how she made herself a loose canon, firing aimlessly and bravely in all directions. One may also wonder who actually killed her? Could there possibly be a conspiracy here? I mean if it is impossible to shut her up or contain her, then good riddance?

It was almost impossible for Musharraf to guarantee her security or state protection, as she felt brave enough to openly hold rallies, say out things that only the VERY BRAVE can dare speak in a country like Pakistan.
Given their Islamic identity and ties to the hardline muslim Arabs who are clinging on to them.

User Avatar
akuluounoakuluouno is offline

 # 9 | 29.12.2007 12:48

Palame and Free Publius, I owe one bottle of Isi Ewu and two plates of Gulder:D:D
Isay Gbam to your comments.

User Avatar
MAGNUUM777MAGNUUM777 is offline

 # 10 | 30.12.2007 02:36

All said, senseless killing is not good at at all. May her soul rest in perfect peace!

To Onari who quoted Martin Luthers, what are you waiting for, if you believe in such a quotation? They say a wise hero, is he that contunues to stand to fight.

My intent here is not blame the dead, but if the truth must be told, we are all going to die one day and we will die according to our destinies? Why do I think so?:

Here is a woman who has ruled two times and escaped death because it was not her time then. Here is a woman, whose father was killed as a politician. Our people say if a kid is not very tactful while asking about what killed his father, whatever killed the father will kill him(son) as well. For all the land mines and tenous political atmospheres in world in general and in Pakistan particularly, I think she was not "well protected" since she knew she was an oddity in her pronouncements against the establishments in Pakistan. At one time, she complained she did not get enough protection from Musharaff. If that is true, that meant she was afraid to die while making pronouncements that seemed otherwise. But if properly analyzed, anybody who is a politician who has observed how President JFK was assisinated in the USA should not ride in an open car no matter the druken popularity. Even the Pope rides in a bullet proof encasement(POPEMOBILE) while wavering to the crowd. If the POPE does that following the wisdom, why would a politician not defend herself at all times? My people say that anybody besieged by enemies is always defending his life at all times with no buts and no ifs because it is foolhardy to dare one's enemies.

The blaming game should stop with an understanding that she exposed herself so much for her enemies to get rid of her. Tthat was Gen. Murtala's mistake that caused his untimely death. With all the collatary killings from her first day back into the country, her academic, international and political exposure should have guided her to be a litle more careful than she was. No amount of protection could have saved her from a country as trigger-ready as PAKISTAN and no adviser should have convinced her to stand up in that SUV on that dangerous(fateful) day. Now that she is dead, look at the kind of turmoil and instability she has caused her nation. What for? So that she can prove that she's the toughest and most educated or most popular lady on earth? As humans, we must learn to guage our limitations because the "fly" without an adviser follows the coffin to the grave. I am sure others are learning something from her death.

It was her time to go and answer to Allah who wanted her more than the people of Pakistan. Again, MAY HER SOUL REST IN PEACE!
 

Services : E-mail news | RSS Feeds | Podcasts
Links:   About the NVS | Contact Us | Terms of Use | Privacy & Cookies | Advertise With Us
All Rights Reserved. NigeriaVillageSquare.com