23

Jul

2006

A Hotel For Dogs PDF Print E-mail
By Reuben Abati
23 July 2006

Two days ago, I received copies of a story that had been written by an AFP reporter, Virginie Montet, titled "Doggie Hotel opens: 23 dollars a night, television optional (Tues., July 18)." About ten Nigerians based in the United States sent the story to me. None of them added any comment, since the story speaks eloquently for itself. But the sub-text is that these Nigerians were, at the point of their contact with the story, confronted with the differences between our society and other countries. They were also probably envying the dogs in the story. It is about a five star hotel in Bethesda, Washington which attends to dogs as customers, and where ordinary dogs are treated to a life of luxury.

A society's level of development is best measured through the quality of life that is enjoyed by its people or animals. In many countries, social and human development is so established that the surplus in the hands of human beings is now being provided for animals who in terms of circumstances are moving closer to the level of being human. In the United States in 1996, as a guest in an American home, as guest of Stanley Meisler and his wife, Elizabeth Fox in their Washington home, I was confronted with the reality of how a dog in America can be better off than a human being in Africa. I was so shocked, I wrote about it in a piece entitled "A Dog's Life". Since then, it would appear that the American family dog has continued to make greater strides. Its quality of life has continued to rise in proportion to the prosperity of the American family, while in comparison, the human being in Nigeria has continued to go down the lower rungs of the human development index.

I believe that this is what our governments should worry about. It is not enough to talk about grand economic reforms and initiatives, the question is: where are we as a people in terms of human development? Nigerian governments at all levels love grand gestures. They like to launch programmes and appear on television. They like to erect buildings and award contracts. But elsewhere, the quality of governance is not measured by the number of buildings that a government erects, but the difference that is brought to the life of the people. When I wrote "A Dog's Life" in 1996, I had noted that the dog in the Meisler home had a room of its own, it was fed and cared for as if it were a human being, and then when it came down with the equivalent of a fever, Stanley took him to see a doctor and we later went to a pharmacy for dogs where we bought drugs and food for this privileged dog. Its owners were so concerned about its welfare, you would think they were caring for a biological child. Dogs in Europe and America go on holidays, they have special sporting competitions...and they are not necessarily owned by rich families, but ordinary people. Are we as Nigerians, as human beings living in this part of sub-Saharan Africa, better than that average dog in an American home?

Nigeria has the highest rates of polio, maternal morbidity and maternal mortality, measles, and VVF in the whole world. In the case of polio, we are the only country that is holding back Africa from recording an 80 per cent success rate in WHO's reckoning. Three years ago, a serving Minister in the Obasanjo government went to an international conference where he confessed that more than 70 per cent of the Nigerian population lives on less than a dollar per day, that is more than seventy per cent of our people live below the poverty line. A similar percentage of Nigerians lack access to potable water, healthcare, basic education and a secure life. Nigerian children face very difficult circumstances. What we face in spite of government's advertisement of its good intentions is a human development crisis. And it is through such little things that the crisis shows through: the failure of power supply, the desperation with which persons search for the extra buck, the spread of violence, corruption at all levels, and the general anger in the land.

This is what Embassy officials see when they refuse Nigerians visas to their countries. They see a people in search of a route of escape from this hell hole where human beings live dangerously. They think of an average dog in their home country, the quality of life that it enjoys, and they wonder about this Nigerian who is not even as privileged as an ordinary dog. They are forever wondering how we manage to survive in this kind of environment where there are no roads, no standards, no respect for the human person: when buildings are not collapsing and killing human beings, bridges collapse, footbridges give way...

Our governments have a duty to make sure that we get to a level where Nigerians would not have to compare themselves with dogs in America, Europe and Asia. When human beings in Nigeria begin to envy dogs in other lands, then that should tell us something about our lives. Virginie Montet reports:

"In the mahogany paneled lobby of the PetSmart PetHotel, which just opened in the Washington suburb of Bethesda, the pets' human "parents" line up to plunk down 23 dollars plus tax for each night their pooch stays. The doggie hotel is nothing like kennels of yore: in this inn there is lactose-free ice cream, indoor recreation, and for 10 more dollars a night, pooch can stay in a roomier "suite" with a television set showing an "animal related movie all day," said Vince Malanaphy, who manages the Bethesda PetsHotel. "It helps them to relax and to adjust as they are used to hearing TV at home," Malanaphy says.

In one "suite" a little white poodle named Bijou is lost in the embrace of Morpheus with "Little Nemo" and his cartoon friends swimming by in an eternal loop on the TV set. A stay at "Doggie Day Camp" without the overnight goes for 20 dollars the day. Half of the boarders come every day. "It's better than leaving them at home alone," said Cyra, one of the pet "mothers," as she drops off her Labrador and her poodle for Day Camp before running off to the office. Here "they can socialize," she said. For potty breaks there is a 20 square meter (215 square foot) "relief room" complete with a plastic tree. "For security reasons, no outdoor walking," says Malanaphy. Meredith, in charge of animal recreation, says that if dogs "are aggressive or play too rough, we give them a time out in a cage" for 15 minutes. "After twice, they get the message," she says.

The Bethesda site has room for 180 dogs and 26 cats. Cats stay in plexiglass cages known as "kitty cottages" for a mere 14 dollars plus tax a night, which includes 15 minutes of TLC -- Tender Loving Care, otherwise known as petting. The Phoenix, Arizona-based PetSmart Inc. launched the pet hotel concept three years ago and it is "the fastest growing sector" of the pet business, said spokesman Bruce Richardson. "Now we have 32 hotels; we anticipate 240 by 2010," he said. Gina Martin, a consumer retail analyst at Wachovia Bank, sees only growth in the pet care industry. "General spending for pets is growing at an extraordinary pace," said Martin. "There is a trend for the treatment of the pet as another human being." Americans spend nearly 40 billion dollars a year on their household pets -- 30 percent more than five years ago. The figure is close to what Americans spend on toys for children -- 48 billion dollars -- and more than twice the 17 billion spent on cosmetics, Martin said."

So, that is it. A hotel for dogs is the very height of a life of rationalization, and to those of us living in sub-Saharan Africa, we can only wonder about how unequal this world is. There are 32 hotels for dogs in the United States, run by PetSmart Inc. In many towns in this country, there is hardly a decent hotel where a human being can have a decent sleep. Americans are spending close to 40 billion dollars a year to maintain ordinary pets: that is more than the total budget of Nigeria per annum! In the US doggie hotel, a dog can spend a night in a suite for as much as 33 dollars plus tax and enjoy ice cream, watch television and receive tender loving care. The sum of 33 dollars is about N5, 000 at current exchange rate.

More than 70 per cent of the Nigerian population cannot boast of that amount in a day. It is in fact a little less than the monthly salary of a Nigerian Police Constable. And that Constable is expected to live on that amount, with his wife and children and still attend to extended family obligations and be happy enough to help protect life and property. An average Nigerian university graduate does not earn up to N5, 000 per day. To be so well-paid, you will need to have a job in the multinational companies. Every dog in the hotel above has access to a television set. The majority of Nigerians, who incidentally live in rural areas, have no access to television. In the cities, those who have television sets cannot enjoy them because there is usually no power supply.

The only ones in our society who can boast of as much, (or better) luxury as the dogs in the AFP story are privileged government officials and a few rich persons in our society. Some of these persons also probably keep dogs as pets. They may spend as much money on their dogs as Americans do, but that is an aspect of their lives that they dare not advertise. Here in Nigeria, life is so difficult for the average person, the only value that animals have is being the source of food. If any of those privileged American dogs were to show up in some parts of Nigeria, their owners may have to make special security arrangements for them. In Nigeria, a dog could be stolen and before the owner knows what is happening, that dog would have been chopped into pieces, and turned into a delicious pot of soup.

There are no laws or campaigns against cruelty against animals in Nigeria. Even if such laws exist, they may not be obeyed. Existing laws that forbid cruelty towards human beings are routinely disregarded even by government. Nigerians are therefore not worried about cruelty to animals, but cruelty to human beings. American dogs are taken to doctors' clinics; here in Nigeria veterinary medicine is not a very well established field of specialisation. Many of the graduates in that field are busy doing other things. How many families worry about healthcare for pets when persons are dying of diseases and ailments because they cannot afford to pay as much as N5, 000 or less to receive medical attention? The worst evidence of poverty is when a people are at the mercy of circumstances.

The quality of life in Nigeria is among the lowest in Africa. The only country that is behind us is Somalia. And Somalia is a failed country. Nigeria is rated among the 17 poorest countries in the world. The treatment of dogs may not be one of the standard indicators used for measuring the human development index in a country, but to the extent that it draws attention to the need to raise the capacity of the average Nigerian to live a normal and decent life, it is instructive as an illustration of subjective relative poverty. The relationship between man and animals is a reflection of the level of leisure in a society, in the absence of which man is no better than animals.

The consequence of poverty is that it forces a people to lose confidence, it drives them to self-pity, it forces them to compare themselves to animals in other lands. It is sad that there are many Nigerians today, who would rather be a dog in America than be a human being in Nigeria. Poverty is a disease; it perpetuates itself in many ways. The inability of government to address the crisis of island poverty in Nigeria and to ensure the evidence of economic gains in the lives of the people is the major paradox that the Obasanjo government would still have to resolve before it leaves office in 2007.



Your Comments

Please make The Square an enjoyable experience for everyone by refraining from gratuitous ad-hominem contributions, defamatory comments and off-topic posting. Such posts will be removed.

User Avatar
RobotRobot is offline

 # 1 | 23.07.2006 10:01

The quality of life in Nigeria is among the lowest in Africa. The only country that is behi...Read the full article.

User Avatar
ChineduChinedu is online

 # 2 | 23.07.2006 10:53

This is a welcome article, because it defines the basis of evaluation of government's performance. And simply, the only index of government's achievements and justification for its continuation is in how much its policies have improved the lives of the People. It isn't merely by considering the percentages by which the economy has "grown"; it isn't by settling some silly debts which do not translate in real events in the lives of the people; it isn't by inviting foreigners who have no regard for your People to run your key industries; it isn't by substituting the Nigerian people by the small <1000 strong and criminal "economic community" comprising the controllers of the Nigerian State; and it isn't by over-academising issues of the economy.
I hope that future discussions on the subject will increasingly reflect this somewhat underdeveloped discursive paradigm which squarely PUTS THE PEOPLE FIRST.

User Avatar
PicassoPicasso is offline

 # 3 | 23.07.2006 11:14


Here in Nigeria, life is so difficult for the average person, the only value that animals have is being the source of food. If any of those privileged American dogs were to show up in some parts of Nigeria, their owners may have to make special security arrangements for them. In Nigeria, a dog could be stolen and before the owner knows what is happening, that dog would have been chopped into pieces, and turned into a delicious pot of soup.



hahahahaha :D :D :D Dat one na im dem dey call 404 soup for Akwa Ibom :D

User Avatar
myhotbrainmyhotbrain is offline

 # 4 | 23.07.2006 12:06

Dear Mr. Abati;

Some of the ways you can help alleviate this poverty is by educating the public on the intention of government in regards to the impending lay-offs of 33,000 civil servants. The cost of wages and other emoluments is just too much on the Fed. Govt. budgets. Period!

My understanding is that majority of them have been found to be not desirable because of one thing or the other. Government also is paying them all of their entitlements including the re-trainning of those who desires for it. In addition, the rest of the civil servants have been slated to receive what is termed a "living wage" so that their salaries would be adequate for their immediate expenses and probably some savings too.

But as we have it now, Nigerians wants to eat their cake and still have it too. They wants Govt. to invest in infrastructures, keep overbloated ministries as well as pay a "living wage" and yet, what do we get in return? Same inefficiency and corruption that we have been getting all along. Same BS, same result!

Mr. Oshiomole and its Labour cohorts are threatning to strike again, just as they have been clogging the wheel of progress of the Nigerian Nation by demanding for adequate compensation without demanding for adequate responsibility from the civil servants in return. Nigeria is a Nation of about 120,000,000 or more people and civil servants are just a very minute amount of them, therefore, they should be informed that Govt. operations has to be streamlined and be efficient rather than be gulping a huge percentage of Nigeria's total expenditure with nothing good and tangible to show for it.

Like the Republican Party's Ideas in America, I am a full backer of "small government" and efficient civil service which would not take all of our resources and have nothing to justify its cost. There are other sectors like education, health and security which are begging for additional and adequate spending for the benefits of all Nigerians including the protesting civil servants.

Thank you.

Peace and Love.

myhotbrain

User Avatar
Ezeani MajestyEzeani Majesty is offline

 # 5 | 23.07.2006 14:27

Dear Dr Abati,

This story is really interesting. However, having addressed some salient issues on the responsibility of the government to the citizens, we can also view it from a different point.

In the US people are now becoming more attached to pets/animals than to human beings, even to themselves. That should raise some questions. We have seen how economically viable the country and her people are but what about their social structures? Why do they have the tendency to withdraw more to themselves, attaching human-like values to non-humans (including non living objects). Why is suicide commonplace when they wallow in such affluence? Because a dog does not console/feel at least as man does. There are some moral issues here too.

In Nigeria (and indeed in most parts of Africa), many people would feel better if they spend their money in more socially galvanising ventures. Many more have also made more than enough money for their own families (including dogs) but feel the responsiblity, not by compulsion, to the extended families, in-laws, friends, neighbours, colleagues etc. It is more African. The next argument is that there are no such people in need in the US(!). Yes, the government provides for all but what about social, psychological, emotional needs. Do they make out time for one another after attending to their dogs?

I suggest we hasten slowly in copying some of the rather confused ways of life in some of the Western and European countries. Pets are not bad but a caricature and abuse of humanity and human principles is not our way. I believe we are improving even economically and we (or our children) will eventually get there.

Majesty writes from Bournemouth, UK

User Avatar
ChineduChinedu is online

 # 6 | 23.07.2006 15:09

"I suggest we hasten slowly in copying some of the rather confused ways of life in some of the Western and European countries. Pets are not bad but a caricature and abuse of humanity and human principles is not our way. I believe we are improving even economically and we (or our children) will eventually get there."


Nobody has said that Nigerians should build hotels for dogs. The issue is that in some countries, animals have access to a better quality of life than human beings in Nigeria.

User Avatar
myhotbrainmyhotbrain is offline

 # 7 | 23.07.2006 15:10

Mr. Chinedu;




This is a welcome article, because it defines the basis of evaluation of government's performance. And simply, the only index of government's achievements and justification for its continuation is in how much its policies have improved the lives of the People. It isn't merely by considering the percentages by which the economy has "grown"; it isn't by settling some silly debts which do not translate in real events in the lives of the people; it isn't by inviting foreigners who have no regard for your People to run your key industries; it isn't by substituting the Nigerian people by the small <1000 strong and criminal "economic community" comprising the controllers of the Nigerian State; and it isn't by over-academising issues of the economy.
I hope that future discussions on the subject will increasingly reflect this somewhat underdeveloped discursive paradigm which squarely PUTS THE PEOPLE FIRST.





1) The settling of the debts is a welcome developments as it would free upto about $1B which has hitherto been used yearly for debt services, now would be used for additional funding for infrastructural development such as roads construction, education and health services provision. And this is why you would read in the news recently that Fed. Govt. awarded road contruction across Nigeria to the tune of N465 billion in the next couple of years; and upto $2 billion for power plants.

2) About foreigners running key industries: can Nigerians do it alone; why have they not done it prior to now; who's afraid of the foreigners; do we not live in a Global village?

3) Where do you yourself lives; didn't foreigners assisted and still assisting the developed world such as America and Europe develop and run their key industries?

4) So what, are you OYINBOPHOBIC or FOREIGNERPHOBIC; do your people not live in foreign lands and enjoy the fruits of their labors? How many foreigners have you encountered in America and Europe; how many did you encounter in Nigeria; what is the rate of development in these foreign places compared to Nigeria?

Chinedu; open your eyes and look around you and look around the world, what do you see: do you still think you are confined to your village or even Nigeria or Africa as opposed to the whole world wide global village?

So please, stop talking about foreigners this or foreigners that, we in Nigeria cannot live in isolation; we belong to the family of the human race, our aspirations are almost the same: to live free in comfort and happiness. Period!


Peace and Love.


myhotbrain

User Avatar
BLFBLF is offline

 # 8 | 23.07.2006 15:32

See,it is alright for Mr./Dr./Editor Abati to harp on reality as we all see it on the ground. I wonder what reaction this comparison would have elicited if the same article was written by a certain lady from Jamaica?Why don't you fellows just stop the stupid,infantile habit of speaking through both sides of your mouth. Just try to keep it real is all I am asking.

User Avatar
AuspiciousAuspicious is offline

 # 9 | 23.07.2006 15:50

In response to some comments here advising the author to educate
people about the benefits of government policies, I daresay that the
onus of "educating" the teeming masses of the latter effect of
government policies is NOT that of private citizens like Dr. Abati but
of the government itself.

A government that prioritizes the welfare of the general majority of
the people will always enjoy their support - even when the policies
are not as popular/easily understandable as
they should be. The key is the after-effect - the results - that justify
the sacrifices the people have been forced to make by their
representative government. That is what will earn the government
the trust of the people.

Time and time again, we have been forced to give upp things like
subsidy of petroleum products. According to those who know better,
like the President and his galleons of economic advisers, the monies
used for subsidies can be used for developing our infrastructure and
provision of important amenities - health, education, security, blah.

Is it too early to start witnessing the results of these sacrifices? I
say NO! Instead of positive results, what we later witnessed was an
attempt to con the rest of us by hook, crook, intimidation, bribery,
and hypnosis to elongate our Headmaster's mandate beyond the
limits of constitutional provisions. And where did all the alleged
money come from anyways? Perhaps from the subsidy? That's
anybody's guess.

Adams Oshiomole and the NLC implementation of government policies> have every damn right to
be distrustful of a let-down government. This government only gets
a pass mark when compared with FAILED governments that litter
our history as a nation. When judged on its own or when compared
with good governments everywhere, the government hardly gets a
pass mark.

If the Obasanjo administration had enough positive impact on the
lives of the Nigerian people, nobody would have to advise people
like Dr. Abati to be the mouthpiece of any government anywhere.
Adequate security for the lives and property of the people, less
state-sponsored intimidation of political rivals, much more better
roads and a down-to-earth/less arrogant government - all that
and more will win the hearts and minds of the people.

The best governments around the world put the interest of their
people first in every engagement. These governments do not
care if their position is "selfish" relative to that of other nations.
The idea is to please those who have entrusted their care into
government's hands. For the longest time, America continued
to subsidize the farming business of American farmers to the
dismay of the farmers from other parts of the world -
especially farmers from "poor" countries like Nigeria. How many
times have the so-called great countries taken unilateral positions
simply for the protection of their peoples' interest?

I say, away with these old-school leaders and their cohorts who
who have been in the picture for so long without much to show
for it! Plus the current government, who because of the feeble
gains it has so far made, allowed it 'successes' to get to its head
- enough to dare contemplate altering the constitution for its
selfish gains. What we need are new faces; a new breed of true
progressives with refreshing ideas that will take us on that path
of success that we all yearn for.

Anybody who stakes his or her reputation on the line to educate
anyone on behalf of the Obasanjo Administration is setting
him/herself up for a rude awakening. The government's history
speaks for itself.

User Avatar
vandoughvandough is online

 # 10 | 24.07.2006 03:16

Some of those dogs going into stews are rare varieties such as the Avongera Basenji that can yield up to $5,000.00 for the seller; Isn't it absurd that a fool would eat this asset?
 

Services : E-mail news | RSS Feeds | Podcasts
Links:   About the NVS | Contact Us | Terms of Use | Privacy & Cookies | Advertise With Us
All Rights Reserved. NigeriaVillageSquare.com