Home arrow Authors arrow Paul Adujie arrow Supreme Court of Nigeria Vs Corruption War
Supreme Court of Nigeria Vs Corruption War Print E-mail
Written by Paul Adujie   
Monday, 30 April 2007

The Supreme Court of Nigeria, in many ways, in attributes and qualities, is similar to the Supreme Court of the United States, in authority and, as the final adjudicating power or arbiter of all legal matters. The Supreme Court of Nigeria, has an unfettered power!

For lawyers, the Supreme Court is therefore, what St. Peters Basilica is to devout Catholics! The Supreme Court is to lawyers, what Mecca is to devout Muslims! The Supreme Court is revered and held sacred by all lawyers and I suppose, by all citizens as well. In essence, the Supreme Court is the ultimate, in legal matters in Nigeria.

As a Nigerian citizen and lawyer, I must confess that I hold the Supreme Court of Nigeria in awe! I owe it all the respect as a citizen of Nigeria. I trust the Supreme Court of Nigeria additionally, because it boasts of my former law teacher, Professor Niki Tobi, formerly the Dean of the University of Maiduguri’s faculty of law and a Deputy Vice Chancellor. Professor Tobi is brilliant law teacher and lawyer. He represents towering excellence!

He is a man of spotless character and unblemished integrity!

In the interest of full disclosure, Professor Niki Tobi made it possible for me to study law, I was bound to spend the rest of my life as an economist, perhaps with the Central Bank of Nigeria.

Professor Tobi’s presence among the current justices of the Nigeria Supreme Court, makes it a zillion times more difficult for me to criticize the soundness of the justices’ legal reasoning and conclusions! Let alone impugn the integrity of the members of Nigeria’s auspicious judicial institution.

Criticizing and faulting the recent judgments of the Supreme Court of Nigeria, I must do!

I have agonized about two recent decisions by the Supreme Court of Nigeria, first, that Atiku MUST be on the ballot! And it was one week to the elections! I felt that the Supreme Court of Nigeria appeared to have pandered to the public, pandered to the press and pandered to the political opposition! I thought that the Supreme Court of Nigeria would and should have abstained or reserved its decision on Atiku. The second case, is the one in which, the court is returning Joshua Chibi Dariye to Government House, Ray-Field, Jos in Plateau State! Why would the Supreme Court of Nigeria assist a known outlaw, to benefit from his crime? Why would the Supreme Court aid and abet Mr. Dariye in thumbing his nose at Nigerian laws and Nigerian peoples? This, despite Mr. Dariye’s known despicable and indecent behavior in London England? I quite understand that our court are required to deal with the cases before it, and that our courts are not required to take judicial notice of legal matters pending against Mr. Dariye in England. But all Nigerians and in fact, the whole world is aware of Mr. Dariye’s transgressions in the UK!

I am of course also aware that section 308 of the Constitution of Nigeria 1999, confers immunity from prosecution, on certain public officials in Nigeria. The Supreme Court is however aware that there were attempts to bring Mr. Dariye to justice, in Kaduna, by the EFCC. The EFCC complied with the rule of law, due process with fair hearing and all. It is the case that Mr. Dariye stole, pillaged and plunder Plateau State treasury with impunity, hiding under the cover of constitutional immunity. While he used and abused it as a cloak and a shield. He used and abused legal processes in Jos, Kaduna and now, Abuja! Mr. Dariye ought to have been damned by the Supreme Court of Nigeria.

But instead, the Supreme Court Justices, became activists, flame-throwing aggressive political activists! They became what one might call legislators, legislative acts in their judicial activism! Neither Mr. Atiku or Mr. Dariye was facing the death penalty! Why did the Supreme Court feel compelled to undertake extraordinary processes of accelerated hearings in some of these political matters?

Why did the Supreme Court of Nigeria fail to consider the national security implications of their decisions in these matters? Such as the risk of producing a deadlock or an impasse in the just concluded national election, because of Atiku? Why was Atiku’s “right” to be on the ballot, surpass and trumped the collective interests of 140 million Nigerians?

Why did the Supreme Court of Nigeria not consider the logistical nightmare that their decision would induce? Such as having to reprint and distribute millions of ballot papers, with Atiku’s name and picture on them? Why did the Supreme Court of Nigeria not consider the costs in money, materials and just logistics that INEC would be ensnared? A reading of some South African newspapers revealed last week, that some companies in South Africa contacted by Nigeria, to print elections materials, actually rejected such contract offers, due to the break neck speed the printing job required. The size and magnitude of the printing job was enormous! INEC and its printers had an unreasonable time constraints imposed on it by the Supreme Court of Nigeria in its efforts to please one man! Mr. Atiku!

Why would the Supreme Court of Nigeria become motivated and so moved, to engage in such speedy efforts? It was as if, the court was flexing its legal muscles as the justices decided, and agreed among themselves, and said, lets accelerated hearing this and that? Why would the Supreme Court engaged in acts or pronouncements to hurry the High Courts and to hurry the Courts of Appeal over these high profile political cases, and in particular, the Atiku cases?

Why did the Supreme Court of Nigeria behaved as if, it had a stake in the outcome of the Atiku cases? To the extent, that the Supreme Court was issuing letters, press statements and creating the appearance of pressuring lower courts over matters before lower courts, even before it was ripe for the Supreme Court? This is worrisome, especially, in the face of recent or not too distant history of accusations or allegations against some justices over “gifts” of cars etc. We have heard that President Obasanjo is a tight wad, while Mr. Atiku is a big spender, and Atiku gets, what Atiku wants?

Why would the Supreme Court of Nigeria, an objective, unbiased, neutral arbiter of matters before it, now appear to be in a hurry to hear Atiku’s case and certain similar cases? Why?

I personally ask all the whys, whys and WHYs, because I am aware that there are hundreds of thousands of Nigerians in prisons or detentions for wandering, for being unemployed or for not giving some errant police man a tip or for not apologizing for being poor. There also some Nigerians on death row, some of them do not deserve to be in prison or on death row! While corruptly rich politicians hire ten Senior Advocates of Nigeria to canvass their cases, forum shopping and all, with all their egregious indulgences!

Is the Supreme of Nigeria losing any sleep over prison congestion? Has prison congestion ever been a priority to those at the Supreme Court? Has prison congestion not existed for decades and decades? OK, the Supreme Court of Nigeria does not have all the men, materials, money and sundry resources to do a better job. But the Supreme Court seems to find resources speedily, when it concerns Atiku and the newly corrupt and rich politicians?

How about the poor unemployed, arrested and detained for nothing citizens?

Here is my one last why; Why is the Supreme Court not engaged in judicial activism regarding the poor who imprisoned endlessly or even without trial? How about miscarried justice, where someone is on death row for 14 years for an offence they never committed?

It is often said that a society is measured by its care or lack thereof, of its weakest citizens!

Joshua Chibi Dariye was impeached “imperfectly” after he was indicted in England for money laundry, money that was clearly stolen, pillaged and plundered from the people of Plateau State and Nigeria. Mr. Dariye, was accorded bail, as a “leader” of one of the thirty-six states or political subdivision that Nigeria is comprised. Mr. Dariye bolted! Justice is blind and impartial, justice is deaf to criminal charges against Mr. Dariye in UK?

He is a fugitive from the law, he is now about to benefit from his crime, because our Supreme Court, in almost robotic manner, insists, Mr. Dariye remains governor because he was not properly impeached or that he impeached in an imperfect manner? How about Mr. Dariye’s corruption? How about Mr. Dariye’s fugitive status? Imagine now, if a prisoner in Plateau State escapes from prison, would Mr. Dariye have the moral or even legal authority to seek retribution and punishments for such fugitive, prison escapee?

How about the fact that it is just one month before Mr. Dariye’s term in office expires? Did our Supreme Court have had to render judgment in Mr. Dariye’s case? Must Mr. Dariye resume office 30 days to the end of the term?

What exactly is the purpose of the law? I believe it is to serve society, to protect and preserve society, to have law and order and to serve as a clear arbiter of reward and punishment for conduct and misconduct in societal inter relationships. Law is not an abstraction or an academic exercise. These are unusual times and extraordinary times in Nigeria, we must use the laws to remove corruption, we must use the law at every opportunity, to remove the stumbling blocks and the clogs in Nigeria’s wheel of progress and great.

By some accounts, perhaps, by all accounts? corruption is the single biggest problem that has delayed, stunted and truncated Nigeria’s development, advancement and greatness.

Why then, would the Supreme Court literarily give Mr. Dariye and others like him, a pat on the back? Why would the Supreme Court help Mr. Dariye and other indecent public officials in Nigeria ingratiate themselves at the expense of our nation? Why would the Supreme Court of Nigeria facilitate Mr. Dariye spitting in our faces as he benefits from his illegal escapades? Why this legal “victory” to a fugitive? The Supreme Court avails itself to scumbags and scoundrels? This is not how to fight corruption! We must fight it, united!

All branches of all levels of our governments, the executive, the legislative and judicial branches of our federal and state governments, ought to be acting in concert and in unison to rid Nigeria of corruption. Corruption can only be eliminated and eradicated in tandem.

Nigeria’s national interests are at stake! No one can afford to continue to act as a mindless robotic machine, as if without a stake in the outcome of what happens to Nigeria, particularly, because of the scourge of corruption! What is the purpose of the law? I make bold to assert, that the law fosters better society. The law is the difference between stable and progressive societies and those other societies that are not. I want Nigeria to be a nation of laws! 




RobotRobot is offline 
Villager

avatar
 # 1

var sbtitle8099=encodeURIComponent(Supreme Cou...Read the full article.

Posted by Robot| 30.04.2007 16:14

Reply Quote



ikechijiikechiji is offline 
Villager

avatar
 # 2

Paul,

Let us start with the judicial oath:

I, ...... do solemnly swear/affirm that I will be faithful and bear true allegiance to the Federal Republic of Nigeria ... I will discharge my duties, and perform my functions honestly, to the best of my ability and faithfully in accordance with the Constitution of the Federal Republic of Nigeria and the law

The short answer to your questions about Dariye is the the case before the Supreme court was about impeachment not corruption!. You cannot use an illegal technique to achieve a legal objective. You cannot have six (or 8) leglislators impeach a Governor no matter how corrupt he is. If the case before the Supreme Court was about corruption, Dariye's guilt would more than likely have been affirmed. There was no activism there, just a simple interpretation of the constitution and the laws governing impeachment. Since you are a lawyer, you should tell us how Dariye's impeachment followed constitution and the law and the Supreme court's judgement did not!

I am not going to rehash Atiku's case but the Nigeria Bar Association, two Federal High court judges and other non-lawyers like myself read the constitution/electoral act and come to the conclusion that INEC did not have the right to disqualify candidates. The Supreme court agreed. Where is the activism in that?

If you are serious about fighting corruption, could you ask the Code of Conduct Tribunal to ask Andy Uba who much he declared in assets in 1999 when he joined OBJ's domestic group, how much he declared as income and paid in taxes to the Nigeria govt from 1999-2006 and his assets when he left govt. service.

Odego

Posted by ikechiji| 30.04.2007 16:47

Reply Quote



ajis15ajis15 is offline 
Villager

avatar
 # 3

I totally agree with you. Dariye and others like him should not be allowed to run the affairs of a people. But then, you have this dumb constitution that give immunity for criminal activity. To add salt to the injury, you have a morally challeged political class that did not deem it fit to change that part of the constitution. These are the same people crying fowl over election malpractices. See the man called Namani or whatever they call him, the one they want us to believe is an honorable man. Since he became the Senate President, has he touch that issue? No.

Paul it baffles me. The type of people we have roaming the street of our politcal future.

So you cannot blame the Supreme Court justices. You have to present a court indictment to remove a man from office. Since the man has immunity from criminal activity, you cannot remove him otherwise, and to complicate issue, you cannot get the equally corrupt members of the state assembly to remove him.

Posted by ajis15| 30.04.2007 16:50

Reply Quote



BobmanBobman is offline 
JJC

avatar
 # 4

This is rubbish. You sound like OBJ's son! Dariye's corruption is not the issue before the supreme court. The issue was that his impeachment was illegally undertaken and due process was not followed. They should follow due process to impeach any person, not take the law into their own hands under this guise of corruption. When Dariye is prosecuted for corruption I am sure the Supreme Court will do the needful and find him guilty, if he is guilty.

Posted by Bobman| 30.04.2007 18:25

Reply Quote



I Love NigeriaI Love Nigeria is offline 
Villager

avatar
 # 5

Dariye gets fresh impeachment notice - Hours after resumption
Isaac Shobayo, Jos - 01.05.2007

THERE is no respite yet for Governor Joshua Dariye of Plateau State as the state House of Assembly has commenced another impeachment process against him based on the directive of the state chapter of the Peoples Democratic Party (PDP).


This is coming barely 24 hours after the governor returned to office after last Friday’s Supreme Court ruling. Thirteen members of the Assembly have so far signed the impeachment notice.


Chairman, House Committee on Information, Honourable Paul Damar, said the 13 members who signed the notice were more than the required two-thirds needed to carry out the impeachment.


He explained that the 13 members were simply asking the Speaker of the House, Honourable Michael Dapianlong, to serve the governor with an impeachment notice after which the Speaker would ask the state Chief Justice, Justice Lazarus Dakyen, to constitute a panel to investigate the allegation against the governor.


Reacting to the ruling of the Supreme Court, the state chairman of the party, Chief Silvanus Lot, declared that the PDP in the state had directed the state Assembly to immediately initiate another impeachment process against Dariye as the case against him had been proven beyond reasonable doubt.


“Issues pertaining to the impeachment of Dariye have been proven beyond reasonable doubt. We, therefore, urge the members of the Plateau House of Assembly to immediately serve Dariye with impeachment notice and conclude same within one week,” he stated.


Chief Lot, in a statement issued in Jos said the PDP was a law-abiding party, adding that the Supreme Court had failed to take into consideration the implication of the reinstatement of Dariye on the fragile peace being enjoyed in the state. “The judgment gave preference to procedure over the grave exigency of peace especially coming barely a month to the end of the Dariye’s tenure, ” he said.


The PDP chairman said the party was, however, happy that Dariye had returned, adding that the governor would now account for his activities since the advent of his administration in the state. In a reaction to the moves to impeach the governor for the second time, the state government said the exercise was uncalled for in view of what the state had passed through in the past years and the ongoing peace efforts by citizens of the state.


The state Commissioner for Information, Mr. Yakubu Dati, told the Nigerian Tribune that those behind the impeachment moves did not want peace in the state and wondered why some people would be thinking of such three weeks to the end of the administration.


He added that by taking the initiative, those behind the moves were simply challenging the wisdom of the Supreme Court which faulted the earlier impeachment of Governor Dariye adding that it was unfortunate that some people were planning to heat up the polity in the state.


Dati called on the state lawmakers to join hands with Governor Dariye to ensure a smooth transition to the next government in the state, saying that the exercise would do nobody any good at the end of the day. Meanwhile, as Governor Joshua Dariye formally resumed office on Monday, his deputy, Chief Bot-Mang, refused to receive him to handover.


The governor has, however, fixed May 19 for local government elections in the state. Dati told the Nigerian Tribune that immediately the governor arrived in the state on Sunday, he notified his deputy to make himself available for the handing over at an emergency executive council meeting billed for 9:00 a.m. on Monday.


Dati said to the surprise of the entire members of the exco and the governor, Chief Bot-Mang refused to show up nor did he send a word for his absence. But the Chief Press Secretary to the Deputy Governor, Mr. George Pam, denied the position of the state government, saying that no word was sent to his boss regarding the arrival of Governor Dariye.


Pam told the Nigerian Tribune that the deputy governor, like any other citizen of the state, only learnt of the arrival of the governor on the radio, adding that Chief Bot-Mang was at his private resident in Dadin Kowa.


“There is nothing to hand over. Moreover, Chief Bot-Mang was not informed of the arrival of the governor, so how would he have performed the handing over? The deputy governor currently is not feeling fine, he is at his Dadin Kowa residence resting. He will go to the office at the appropriate time”


Addressing the people that thronged the Government House to pay him a solidarity visit, Chief Dariye commended the people of the state for their support for the rule of law and democracy. Chief Dariye declared that the state government would conduct local government elections into the 17 local government areas in the state on May 19, adding that the step was being taken in line with the arrangements he met before his arrival.


He, therefore, directed all the local government chairmen recently sacked by Chief Bot-Mang to return to their respective offices as transitional chairmen pending the time election would be conducted.


He, however, warned them not to execute new projects before the handing over date.


Governor Dariye also went to the state secretariat where he addressed civil servants who are on strike and assured them that his government would meet the labour leaders in the state to iron out differences.

Posted by I Love Nigeria| 30.04.2007 21:34

Reply Quote



Tunde meeeTunde meee is offline 
Villager

avatar
 # 6

Hi Mr. Lawyer Paul,

What will you as a judge conclude if you sit on a case of a man who shot and kill a thief? Let your conscience tell you that what is at stake is the rule of law and not any body's love for Dariye or his shameless act of embezzlement and later bail jumping on a foreign soil.

Posted by Tunde meee| 01.05.2007 09:53

Reply Quote



abayomi_komolafeabayomi_komolafe is offline 
JJC

avatar
 # 7

Paul,
Going by information available on the Supreme Court roll, you were called to the Nigerian Bar on November 17, 1984. You are therefore not only a Nigerian Citizen but also an officer of the Supreme Court of Nigeria. If you were simply campaigning for the current totalitarian regime of General Olusegun Obasanjo, I would have ignored your comments as I had in times past, but for you to impugn the integrity of our reverend Supreme Court - I think you need help. To a lawyer like you, I believe that what I'm about to share is trite but we cannot always trust human memory so I'll go over them as best as I can.

1. The Supreme Court is the ultimate authority of legal interpretation - not the Executive or the Legislature.
2. The pronouncement of the Supreme Court is binding on all.
3. The "logistical nightmare" of having Atiku Abubakar on the presidential ballot was not relevant to the matter before the Supreme Court and therefore had no bearing on the judgment. I wonder how you determined the "collective interests" of 140 million Nigerians and came to the conclusion that the judgment was aimed at pleasing one man.
4. Joshua Dariye's trial in England was irrelevant to the matter before the court and therefore had no bearing on the judgment to reinstate him as Plateau Governor.
5. The Supreme Court of Nigeria had been taken for a ride for too long by despots who have led our nation for almost eternity. I think we need to appreciate the caliber of Supreme Court Justices who have sat under the leadership of Salihu Belgore and Idris Kutigi - I have never seen a more glorious bench since the declaration of independence. History will remember them for good.
6. The Supreme Court has proved in recent landmark judgments that the 'rule of law" is alive and well in Nigeria - the absence is nothing but anarchy.
7. Also noteworthy is the judgment of the court in the matter of Rasheed Ladoja where the learned Supreme Court Justices under Salihu Belgore delivered judgment reinstating Governor Ladoja the same day they were addressed by Counsel.
8. The learned Justices ordered that Ifeanyi Ararume be put on the Imo Governorship ballot against the whims and caprices of our maximum ruler.
9. When did alleviation of poverty, unemployment and the likes fall under the jurisdiction of the Judiciary? Are they not under the "fundamental objectives and directive principles of state policy" enshrined in our constitution - the duties of the Executive under our maximum ruler who would rather be the Executive, Legislature and Judiciary at same time.
10. Please Paul I beg you, if you desire government patronage covet it discreetly and don't ridicule a noble profession to which you have been called.
Thank you.
Abayomi Komolafe

Posted by abayomi_komolafe| 01.05.2007 10:37

Reply Quote



beambollabeambolla is offline 
Villager

avatar
 # 8

i guess you told him deep but true

Posted by beambolla| 01.05.2007 11:07

Reply Quote



AuspiciousAuspicious is offline 
Villager

avatar
 # 9


=beambolla;172658>i guess you told him deep but true



Abi o, Beambolla!

Come jare let's hug and rejoice.:D

Mr. Komolafe done told it as it is..

May God deliver us from Paul's crazy love for Nigeria!

Auspicious.

Posted by Auspicious| 01.05.2007 11:59

Reply Quote



omo naijaomo naija is offline 
Villager

avatar
 # 10


=abayomi_komolafe;172651>Paul,
Going by information available on the Supreme Court roll, you were called to the Nigerian Bar on November 17, 1984. You are therefore not only a Nigerian Citizen but also an officer of the Supreme Court of Nigeria. If you were simply campaigning for the current totalitarian regime of General Olusegun Obasanjo, I would have ignored your comments as I had in times past, but for you to impugn the integrity of our reverend Supreme Court - I think you need help. To a lawyer like you, I believe that what I'm about to share is trite but we cannot always trust human memory so I'll go over them as best as I can.

1. The Supreme Court is the ultimate authority of legal interpretation - not the Executive or the Legislature.
2. The pronouncement of the Supreme Court is binding on all.
3. The "logistical nightmare" of having Atiku Abubakar on the presidential ballot was not relevant to the matter before the Supreme Court and therefore had no bearing on the judgment. I wonder how you determined the "collective interests" of 140 million Nigerians and came to the conclusion that the judgment was aimed at pleasing one man.
4. Joshua Dariye's trial in England was irrelevant to the matter before the court and therefore had no bearing on the judgment to reinstate him as Plateau Governor.
5. The Supreme Court of Nigeria had been taken for a ride for too long by despots who have led our nation for almost eternity. I think we need to appreciate the caliber of Supreme Court Justices who have sat under the leadership of Salihu Belgore and Idris Kutigi - I have never seen a more glorious bench since the declaration of independence. History will remember them for good.
6. The Supreme Court has proved in recent landmark judgments that the 'rule of law" is alive and well in Nigeria - the absence is nothing but anarchy.
7. Also noteworthy is the judgment of the court in the matter of Rasheed Ladoja where the learned Supreme Court Justices under Salihu Belgore delivered judgment reinstating Governor Ladoja the same day they were addressed by Counsel.
8. The learned Justices ordered that Ifeanyi Ararume be put on the Imo Governorship ballot against the whims and caprices of our maximum ruler.
9. When did alleviation of poverty, unemployment and the likes fall under the jurisdiction of the Judiciary? Are they not under the "fundamental objectives and directive principles of state policy" enshrined in our constitution - the duties of the Executive under our maximum ruler who would rather be the Executive, Legislature and Judiciary at same time.
10. Please Paul I beg you, if you desire government patronage covet it discreetly and don't ridicule a noble profession to which you have been called.
Thank you.
Abayomi Komolafe




Thank you, Abayomi, you read my mind.
Paul, are you sure you are a lawyer? are you indirectly accusing our honorable learnt men of corruption? what has the innocent people in prison got to do with the supreme court? as a lawyer, you supposed to know that a court only deal with case before it, and thereby laying down precedence. Atiku and other politicians cases deserved speedy hearing, because of the political implications (e.g. Al Gore vs Bush: US controversial 2000 presidential election). And since when did costs matters to Nigeria government? when they have they own selfish interests to pursue; you should say that to IBB (we have not recovered from the crisis, he plunged us into, in terms of money and lives). Abayomi have already stated it all, i don't need to.
OBJ and Iwu know exactly what they are doing. Please Paul the lawyer, if you have nothing sensible to write about, please don't bring try to stain the noble gentlemen at the supreme court with your dirts.

GOD BLESS NIGERIA AND AFRICA.

Posted by omo naija| 01.05.2007 12:47

Reply Quote


Last Updated ( Thursday, 24 April 2008 )
 
< Prev   Next >