11

Oct

2009

Obama Is Skittish About New York Democrats; Or Just Black Democrats? PDF Print E-mail
By Paul Adujie

Obama Is Skittish About New York Democrats; or Just Black Democrats?

Written by Paul I. Adujie

Lawcareer@gmail.com

New York, United States

The reader is familiar with clichés such as, 15 months is an eternity in politics; as well as, the staunch belief that so much can change within such an extended period time. And further, that all is fair politics; as all is also fair, in love and war! It therefore necessarily follows, that 15 long months before the forthcoming gubernatorial elections in the state of New York, is too long, upon which predicting precise outcomes can be ultra hazardous.

President Obama’s White House is said to have concluded that Governor David Paterson of the state of New York cannot within the gubernatorial election which is slated for more than 15 months ahead. This is so ironical in the most oxymoronic way, considering the fact that many have had the audacity and temerity, of writing off, a certain junior senator from the state of Illinois, as an upstart-non-starter, when he embarked on his storied run for the American presidency! But now, President Obama’s is said to have urged or even demanded, that Governor Paterson withdraw and remove himself from contesting the gubernatorial election, scheduled for next year November 2010; just as our president has been lukewarm-reluctant to endorse Comptroller Bill Thompson, the mayoral candidate on the plank of the Democratic Party.

Coincidentally, Messrs Paterson and Thompson are both persons of African descent just like President Obama himself, they are, trailblazers in their own rights. President Obama’s refusal to embrace these two gentlemen raises a red flag in American perceived racial progress. Mr. Obama ascension and spectacular rise to the ultimate political position in America is unsurpassed. But, it certainly, cannot be the case that Mr. Obama’s rise is seen and used as reason to foreclose current political aspirations of all other African Americans. All African Americans with requisite qualifications, experience and pedigree, that is, those with necessary antecedents, who seek public or political office, at municipal and state levels, during the pendency of Mr. Obama’s administration of four or eight years, as his fate may become, should not be told that the “quota” is filled and to forget it, because Mr. Obama is president. Or because Mr. Obama’s presidency does not want to offend or be in some people’s face, by campaigning in public or endorsing a qualified and competent African American, who, like Governor Paterson and Comptroller Thompson, have been political office holder, before anyone heard of our lovely President Obama.

President Obama’s presence and occupancy of American presidency, and tenancy, in the White House, is not, and cannot be, seen as mutually exclusive or contradictory, in terms, with the aspirations to political positions by other African Americans.

Let me be clear, I do not advocate that President Obama become partial and lopsided in his support for candidates who seek political positions, solely judged by the color of their skins. No! Instead, what we have observed and what is occurring in pattern-like manner, is Mr. Obama’s apparent shyness, timidity and timorous disposition, toward political candidates who are members of Mr. Obama’s own Democratic Party, who are at the same time, persons of African descent!

It certainly cannot be, that Mr. Obama’s only recourse, is to speedily distance himself, from members of his party, who are candidates for political office, just because such candidates are African Americans, and, as a consequence, Mr. Obama is weary at the thought of being seen as openly supporting a qualified African Americans, who are candidates for political offices.

It certainly cannot be the case, that the only way for President Obama to demonstrate his fair-minded reputation is to unnecessarily and even unfairly, distance himself from sundry African Americans who are candidates for political offices.

It is tad trite or trivial to restate here that, it is quite understandable that Mr. Obama continues to demonstrate through his pronouncements and actions, that he is president of the entire United States. And that, as such, he must not make pronouncements or take any actions, which might portray him as partial to Native Americans, African Americans, Latino Americans, American Jews, Irish Americans, Italian Americans or German Americans etc To do so will cheapen and undermine his presidency. It will be seen as is inappropriate, unconstitutional, or even illegal. President Obama, as such, must remain even-handed across the board, to all American citizens, regardless of their ethnicities and cultural backgrounds.

Haven restated the obvious, in the need for neutrality and objectivity in dealings with all segments of the American population, it must be made even clearer, that such efforts cannot and must not be in derogation to the interests and political aspirations of candidates of African descent. In New York, President Obama has directly and deliberately, in a calculated manner, displayed dealing a bad hand for negative outcomes in New York City mayoral contest, as well as the state of New York’s forthcoming gubernatorial contest in November 2010.

It cannot be that the only way for President Obama to accomplish these objectives is to marginalize, undermine and deny access and rides on Obama’s coattails to African American career politicians and careerists who predated President Obama in politics.

AIG, Bear Sterns, Lehman Brothers, Goldman Sachs, Citibank Citigroup, Chase Bank etc are premier American financial institutions, which have all been major players and as well as noticeable landmarks in New York City, a city which is alternatively known as the financial capital of the United States and even the entire world! These are also the corporations which form the bulk of New York City and state of New York tax base. This means that New York as the home of Wall Street and the stock exchanges and sundry financial institutions, have suffered a direct hit, and frontal depletion of city and state usually reliable tax base; hence, the city and state of New York, have had to endure higher unemployment rate and other various tangible and intangible economic and financial dislocations as a result of the global economic meltdown, in which the city and state of New York, have been the ground zero and epicenter, in the global economic depression.

Anyone with a modicum of intelligence would not and should not, blame President Obama for inheriting three wars. Mr. Obama is burdened with two foreign wars, and one domestic war. The wars in Afghanistan and Iraq, were not initiated by Mr. Obama, and yet, he is haven to expend time, energy and increasingly sparse and scarce American resources on these foreign wars. On the home front, Mr. Obama inherited and he is burdened with, an economy in shambles, through no fault of his. He has had to confront and fathom solutions to an American economy which was close to foisting upon America, a major catastrophe which almost drove America to the precipice. There was fear, at some point recently, of a replication the bread lines and other depressing indices of the Great Depression.

In view of the foregoing and despite my distaste for the Republicans, there were times in 2008 election season, during which I became sort of ambivalent about victory at the polls for the Democratic Party. I thought perhaps, it will be poetic justice for the Republicans to retain the White House, so that they retain the beguiling efforts of cleaning up the quagmire in Iraq, Afghanistan and the economic meltdown in the United States  and worldwide. This is so, in particular, as it must be remembered that the Republicans brought about these economic dislocations with Republicans’ bizarrely cavalier deregulation regimens. The Republicans preached and adopted a deregulation mantra, akin to operating a major highway or traffic artery without a traffic cop and traffic lights, while discounting the obvious risks of traffic chaos.

Ambivalence or not, on my part, Democrats won and Mr. Obama became president. And it is absurd and sublimely ridiculous to ascribe the challenges, which America currently faces, as Mr. Obama’s faults or as a consequence of ineptness! It is similarly absurd and utterly ridiculous, to blame the economic debacle, high rate of unemployment and depleted tax base, to which the city and state of New York is bedeviled on current political leaders of city and state of New York. As a corollary, it is equally absurd and ridiculous, to associate Governor Paterson and Comptroller Bill Thompson, with any faults or ineptness in the economic dire straits facing our city and state of New York!

It is my view, considering all these, therefore, that President Obama and his White House know more than I know and have attempted to explain above. These currently prevailing circumstances, clearly means that, they could have advisedly taken the above explanations to the electorates in New York City and the state of New York, seeking understanding and craving indulgences and prevail on the electorate; thus ensuring the election of Bill Thompson and the re-election of Governor Paterson respectively.

If President Obama campaigns in Virginia where Democrats are not the frontrunners and similarly campaigned and embraced Governor Corzine in neighboring state of New Jersey, in which Mr. Corzine struggles in the polls, why not do the same in New York? After all, Governor Corzine’s New Jersey Democrats have been suffering from self-inflicted almost mortal wounds and negative publicities, arising from plethora of criminalities, body-parts sale, pay-to-play bribes for contracts scandals involving the arrests and indictments of 44 politicians.

 Governor Paterson of New York does not suffer from any of these New Jersey type Chicago politics. Governor Paterson has no personal or political associate related controversies. And, the governorship elections for the state of New York is more than a year away, during which time, the state of New York’s economy would have, in all likelihood improved, with better labor or employment market situation, especially, if we trust President Obama’s federal government administration own forecasts!

But what has happened and still happening, is that President Obama and his White House, seemed to have made a lazily politically expedient calculation, which forecasts a painless jettisoning of both Messrs Paterson and Thompson. It is my view that President Obama and his White House would squander valuable capital, with New York electorate, with Obama’s calculated distance and ill-articulated default positions on Messrs Paterson and Thompson.

In the particular case of Governor Paterson, President Obama’s attempt to shove the legally blind governor, and first governor of the state of New York with disability, who is as well, a person of African descent, could actually be problematic for Mr. Obama in the future. Governor Paterson and his handlers could ensure that the governor remains in the gubernatorial race. The governor, his handlers and the rest of us, the electorate, could feel sufficiently offended, and then, rally the troops in support of the besieged governor during the next 15 months, to ensure his re-election. Governor Paterson’s re-election can actually be finagle, through the proper articulation of Mr. Obama’s purported snob, interference and usurpation of the governor and New Yorkers

In effect, Governor Paterson could still, rally New Yorkers to his side and corral his re-election, while carefully, thoughtfully and prodigiously, explaining the effect of the financial crises on city and state of New York’s tax base and the consequences of all that, on public finances and the correlative effect on public spending.

Governor Paterson and New Yorkers would have resoundingly repudiated all those who wanted to humiliate or usurp him and the state of New York electorate, 15 long months before the elections. And scuttle outside interferences in New York elections. Yes we can!



Your Comments

Please make The Square an enjoyable experience for everyone by refraining from gratuitous ad-hominem contributions, defamatory comments and off-topic posting. Such posts will be removed.

User Avatar
RobotRobot is offline

 # 1 | 11.10.2009 08:37

User Avatar
RoseRose is offline

 # 2 | 12.10.2009 08:27

I noticed these traits in Obama during the campaign and can list a number of red flags but he glaring shunning of Black newspapers was major IMO. After pledging they, too, would have access to him at one of their conventions he did a complete U-turn but it was not the same with white and latinos publications. Thankfully the public is truly wising up and there will be a resounding response at the end of the day! This columnist and plenty of others have long noticed this pattern of distancing himself from his most ardent supporters and it's about time we returned the favor in kind.

http://www.inthesetimes.com/article/3268/the_squandering_of_obama/

July 26, 2007
The Squandering of Obama
By Salim Muwakkil


Sophisticated African-American voters are expected to tolerate this perverse electoral tendency and squash their specific gripes for the good of the progressive whole. Obama’s progressive supporters often utilize this argument to push back black demands for specific campaign attention.

Many of us familiar with Obama hoped he would help put an end to the Democrats’ racial schizophrenia. Knowing him as a strong advocate of racial pride, with a deep knowledge of African-Americans’ liberation struggle, we thought Obama was perfectly cast as the candidate who could bring needed perspective to our racial dilemma. Our past conversations led me to believe he would seek that role as well.



http://www.inthesetimes.com/article/4750/the_post-racial_president/

August 24, 2009

The ‘Post-Racial’ President
Barack Obama navigates a world where color still matters.
By Salim Muwakkil


And on July 11, he angered many Pan-African activists and African-oriented academics with what they called a condescending speech delivered in Ghana. In that speech, Obama essentially lectured Africans to stop using a history of colonialism and imperialism as excuses for bad governance and economic failure today. Like the NAACP speech later that month, it was portrayed in the media as a “bootstrap” sermon, chiding Africans for their bad behavior.


User Avatar
RoseRose is offline

 # 3 | 12.10.2009 08:34

I'm sure if Joe Lieberman were a Black politician he would have been soundly rejected after the election. Something's not right with this picture! IMO the only purpose BO serves for people of African descent is mere window dressing.

User Avatar
I Love NigeriaI Love Nigeria is offline

 # 4 | 13.10.2009 12:42

Rose
I'm sure if Joe Lieberman were a Black politician he would have been soundly rejected after the election. Something's not right with this picture! IMO the only purpose BO serves for people of African descent is mere window dressing.

Senator Lieberman was traitorous to the cause of Democrats in the process which culminated in the election of President Obama. He betrayed his own party!

I suspect that Lieberman apart from being friends with Senator John McCain, must have also be motivated by George W. Bush pro-Israel policies and in effect, Liberman want the Republicans to continue such lopsided foreign policy... many had feared that President Obama would actually try to be "fair and balanced" in this area. But so far, there is no evidence of any grounds shifting.

President Obama seem to have "close" relationship with Mayor Bloomberg, who has done some good works in the education area... but, the mayor is a Republican and the president is a Democrat, whatever happened to party loyalty?

User Avatar
RoseRose is offline

 # 5 | 13.10.2009 13:34


=I Love Nigeria;395643>Rose Senator Lieberman was traitorous to the cause of Democrats in the process which culminated in the election of President Obama. He betrayed his own party!

I suspect that Lieberman apart from being friends with Senator John McCain, must have also be motivated by George W. Bush pro-Israel policies and in effect, Liberman want the Republicans to continue such lopsided foreign policy... many had feared that President Obama would actually try to be "fair and balanced" in this area. But so far, there is no evidence of any grounds shifting.

President Obama seem to have "close" relationship with Mayor Bloomberg, who has done some good works in the education area... but, the mayor is a Republican and the president is a Democrat, whatever happened to party loyalty?


I believe Bloomberg was similarly motivated as Lieberman on issues involving Israel so he kept his distance from Obama despite his repeated attempts to garner his endorsement. Also, Bloomberg knows deep down the presidency is one office he cannot purchase and it must gall him to no end. Israel is not budging when it comes to freezing settlements and Obama will never consider freezing the billions they receive annually no matter how they thumb their noses at the US. They are prepared to deliberately thwart all BO's efforts to bring peace to the region as that is the one thing too precious for him to take credit for.

Fear that Obama would actually try being fair and balanced towards Blacks is also why plenty of nonblacks denounced him from the beginning...so I guess he's trying to allay these feelings by treating Black politicians as stepchildren to the party.

User Avatar
denkerdenker is offline

 # 6 | 13.10.2009 13:53

wat a wonderful world...it gladdens my heart to observe complete desert of dis thread...abandoning it to dis two crazi creatures...let dem keep on eating their own sh-its!

User Avatar
RoseRose is offline

 # 7 | 15.10.2009 13:23

Obama's handlers seem to have taken note that voters are extremely displeased over his "skittishness" and lack of support for two major NY candidates who could use the same backing extended to other fellow Democrats. He has now reluctantly agreed to assist Bill Thompson with his lackluster/unenthusiastic vote of approval ads now that the election is less than a month away. It's sickening how easily Bloomberg can purchase even politicians with stars in their eyes.

Errol Louis is right on target re Mayor Bloomberg who claims he won't seek a 4th terms.


That's where Bloomberg is vulnerable, and why the race for mayor will surely tighten in these final weeks.

The mayor has brazenly purchased the shallow loyalty of too many people and organizations to credibly pass it off as a genuine referendum on his mayoralty. The roster of the bought-and-paid-for includes the Republican and Independence parties and a seemingly endless crowd of preachers and nonprofit managers who suckle at the bosom of Bloomberg's private largess.

"I'm not out there buying votes," Bloomberg said, drawing snickers.

 

Services : E-mail news | RSS Feeds | Podcasts
Links:   About the NVS | Contact Us | Terms of Use | Privacy & Cookies | Advertise With Us
All Rights Reserved. NigeriaVillageSquare.com