| Amala Politics vs. Gbegiri Electorate |
|
![]() |
| Written by Olukayode Akingbogun | |||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Sunday, 10 December 2006 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
Amala Politics vs. Gbegiri Electorate
By
My joy new no bounds on Thursday, 7th of December when I heard the news that the apex court in Nigeria, the Supreme Court had upheld the earlier judgement of the Appeal Court Ibadan division to nullify the impeachment of Senator Rashidi Ladoja by the G 18 National Assemblymen. In so far as I have no particular political sympathy for Ladoja, the issue at stake is far more consequential. A rape of our nascent democracy by a clique of greedy, self seeking and ill informed bums dressed up as politicians in Agbada, Buba and Sokoto should be a source of concern for all. That these same gang of I never chop rascals are still insisting that Ladoja should not dare come to Ibadan amounts to an affront on our judicial system, and should be treated as contempt of court.
When Ladoja was illegally impeached in January 2006, he sort to fight for justice in the law courts. As such, he vacated office immediately. While all this brouhaha persisted he and his loyal supporters continued to seek succour through the law courts which inadvertently resulted in his reinstatement on Thursday. This shows great political maturity, believes in the rule of law, justice and the sanctity of our constitution, one that his opponents lack in alarming magnitude. Taking stock of the pronunciations attributable to among others, the Attorney General and Commissioner for Justice in Oyo State who described the Supreme Court decision as nothing short of a mere academic exercise, all Nigerians must ask how such a person was able to reach such an exalted position. A person of Lanas standing in the society should be a source of hope for justice and fair play. Alas, Lana has demonstrated that for the sake of power and financial rewards he is ready to sell his soul to the devil at the expense of humanity. How can someone of Lanas standing in the legal profession claim that a Supreme Court judgement is not enforceable, when he has benefited from that very profession? Lana has forgotten the hand that has fed him (the legal profession must have been good to him to such an extent that he can occupy such an important position in life) all because some gangster politician has taken it upon himself to operate as the alpha and omega of Oyo politics.
Mr Diran Odeyemi on his own part claims that the Supreme Court had not asked Otunba Alao Akala to leave. I wonder what Dirans educational background is, but I will not be surprised if it turns out that he is in possession of some half baked, ill gotten degree from some sort of higher institution. This may therefore explain his inability to fully grasp the real implications of the Supreme Court decision. For his benefit, what the apex court is saying in effect is that Ladoja was not removed from office at all. Obviously the implication is that if somebody has not been removed from office, but has been prevented from carrying out his duties then they can return to continue such activities when clarifications have been concluded. This has obviously been done by the Supreme Court, and the wider ramifications are that Alao Akala should vacate his illegally occupied position and allow the bonafide governor to resume office. Alao Akala and his cronies are suffering from an age old illness synonymous with most African leaders Stay In Power At All Cost SIPAAC syndrome. Some of his lackeys are also exhibiting physical signs of dementia, or else they would have been able to grasp the true implications of something as simple as nullifying the impeachment of Ladoja. To shine light on an ill conceived idea that impeachment is unacceptable in our young democratic process, I make bold to say if an elected official has been proven to have committed some form of gross misconduct, this is acceptable. However, it is not acceptable for ignoramuses to create trumped up charges just so they can enhance their own inordinate ambitions and political relevance. The legislature by all means does have the right to instigate impeachment proceedings against errant officials, but in doing so they must follow all laid down procedures and due processes to the full letter of the law. Their inability to do this behoves it on the judiciary to prevent any conceived miscarriage of justice. The G 18 assemblymen by their actions and ignorance have shown to all in
This is where my grouse with the electorate starts. The level of poverty is
The people of
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Last Updated ( Wednesday, 23 April 2008 ) | |||||||||||||||||||||||||
Services : E-mail news |
RSS Feeds | Podcasts
Links: About the NVS | Contact Us | Terms of Use | Privacy & Cookies | Advertise With Us
All Rights Reserved. NigeriaVillageSquare.com





Posted by Robot| 10.12.2006 22:25