A Response To Governor Abdulkadir Kure Print E-mail
Thursday, 25 May 2006
By South-South Peoples’ Assembly of North America


Our attention has just been drawn to a publication in ThisDayonline of May 24, 2006, in which Alhaji Abdulkadir Kure, the Governor of Niger State, derided the caliber of presidential candidates from the South-South political zone of Nigeria. While the South-South Peoples’ Assembly of North America (SSPA-NA) does not subscribe to the concept of power shift or power rotation of any elective political office, we are however compelled to respond to the uncharitable remarks of Governor Kure toward the people of the Niger Delta states of Akwa Ibom, Bayelsa, Cross Rivers, Delta, Edo, and Rivers.  Recognizing Governor Peter Odili of Rivers State as a potential presidential candidate form the South-South, Governor Kure queried: “But then, who is Odili?” In answering his own question, he opined: “Yes, he has been a governor since 1999. But then, what is his performance?”  It is interesting to note that Governor Kure does not question the performance of his Northern colleagues who had declared their intention to contest for the presidency. In his view, there was no suitable candidate from the South-South to occupy the presidency as evident in his question: “Who from the South-South, who?”

We operate from the premise that only qualified; credible and incorruptible leaders should be elected and/or appointed to positions in government and industry.  But we condemn the arrogance of anyone, including Governor Kure, to make the type of remark he has made about Governor Odili and the entire South-South political elites.  It is this type of posture, anchored on xenophobia that has done so much damage to the fabric of Nigerian politics.  Given his esteemed position, particularly as a governor of one of Nigeria’s minority states, we expect Governor Kure to be able to rise above such level of politics.

We welcome his position that Nigerians “should insist on the right person under any given condition leading the country,” but wonder at his postulation when he declared:

“But if we agree to what I said, I assure you that the next president will come from the North, the one that will follow will also come from the North, and this trend will continue because it is a game of numbers coupled with the disposition of the people.”

There is no argument about politics being “a game of numbers.”  It is however instructive that, while Governor Kure is hiding under the alleged numerical superiority of the North as its guarantee to producing future Nigerian presidents, he fails to concern himself with the key qualities needed for the presidency. That to him is secondary.  His view that the North will rule Nigeria eternally is remarkably consistent with the agenda of prominent Northern politicians and ruling elites.  Muhammed Adamu had expressed this grand Northern design in 1997 (see “Nigeria: Hausa-Fulani must always rule: Rotational Presidency is Bullshit,” Sunday Concord, Lagos, April 13, 1997), when he argued that the Hausa-Fulani had the “tacit approval of God” to rule Nigeria. “No apologies to the Yorubas and Igbos,” he said.  And “thank goodness,” he declared, “the minorities are not in doubt about this matter.” He further dismissed the Igbos and Yorubas as mere “followers.” Adamu’s thesis and Governor Kure’s postulates underline the position of the Hausa-Fulani oligarchy in its quest for hegemony in Nigeria. Ahmadu Bello, the then Premier of Northern Nigeria, and the Sardauna of Sokoto, once stated in mid 1964 that the Otman Dan Fodio empire will extend to all parts of Nigeria - from the Sahara to the Atlantic.

From the Saduana of Sokoto to Muhammed Adamu to Governor Kure, we have a consistent policy of the Northern elite vis-à-vis its strategy on the acquisition of political power.  The architects of this strategy and their supporters are not concerned with the prerequisites of good governance and the construction of a genuine federal polity in Nigeria.  No. They just want power for the sake of power. They will continue to use their alleged superior “numbers” to impose a leadership on Nigeria, irrespective of the quality of that leadership.  For Governor Kure and his Northern group, the debate is not about federalism, jurisdictions of the federating units, policies, programmes, etc., but electoral NUMBERS.  To base the construct of a federal democratic polity on this element is a disgraceful commentary on the caliber of leaders in contemporary Nigeria.  By relying on falsified electoral numerical strength as a determinant for political power, rather than on the qualities of good governance responsive to the demands of the population, Governor Kure and his sponsors are emphasizing the reasons why Nigeria is regarded as a failed state.

The position of Governor Kure is representative of that of the Northern ruling elite.  It is precisely because of this position that we will continue to demand for the re-structuring of Nigeria as a truly federal polity, where the independence of the federating units will be recognized as fundamental to the survival of Nigeria.   Those that resist the re-structuring of Nigeria seem contend with keeping the people of the Niger Delta entrapped in a forced political system. Not until the federating units exercise exclusive jurisdiction over their natural resources under a genuine federal system in Nigeria, the instability of the polity will remain inevitable.


O. Igho Natufe, PhD.
Chairman, SSPA-NA

Clement Ikpatt
Secretary, SSPA-NA


RobotRobot is offline 
Villager

avatar
 # 1

By South-South Peoples’ Assembly of North AmericaOur attention has just been drawn...Read the full article.

Posted by Robot| 25.05.2006 19:49

Reply Quote



PaladesPalades is online 

avatar
 # 2

Maybe i read Mr. Kure's remarks differently..... But i believe he was referring to the person of Gov Odilli as unsuitable and not a competitive candidate in comparison to a Northern Presidential Aspirant.

Gov. Kure is only a politician. He can make statements in attempt to fool the "Southern opposition" they have created. We should not waste our time dwelling on nor dissecting his statements....


The main question now is: Who is a credible candidate from the South South?

Obviously, from Gov Kure's remarks on Odilli, he is not a competitive candidate from the South. Quote: "what is Odilli's performance???".

The South South must get to work fast and identify credible and competitive candidates who can run the affairs of Nigeria.
Lets put forward a good and credible candidate and see if Gov Kure dares make any silly comments.

Posted by Palades| 25.05.2006 22:41

Reply Quote



gwobezentashigwobezentashi is offline 
Villager

avatar
 # 3

Did the South South Senators represent their constituents, their stomach(s) or someone else?

SS Senators Apparent Voting Intentions

FOR 3rd TERM:
1 Osarhiemen Osunbor (PDP Edo)
2 Patrick Osakwe (PDP, Delta)
3 Effiong Bob (PDP, Akwa Ibom)
4 Ibiapuye Martins-Yellowe (PDP Rivers)
5 Lee Maeba (PDP Rivers)
6 Bassey Ewa-Henshaw (PDP Cross River)
7 Greg Ngaji (PDP Cross River)
8 Victor Ndoma-Egba (PDP Cross River)
9 Inatimi Rufus-Spiff (PDP, Bayelsa)

AGAINST 3rd Term:
1 Daisy Danjuma (PDP Edo)
2 Udoma Udo Udoma (PDP Akwa Ibom)

UNDECIDED/ALTERNATIVE to 3rd Term:
1 Itak Ekarika (PDP Akwa Ibom)
2 John Brambaifa (PDP Bayelsa)
3 Felix Ibru (PDP Delta)
4 James Manager (PDP Delta)
5 Victor Kashim Oyofo (PDP, Edo)
6 David Brigidi (PDP, Bayelsa)
7 John Azuta-Mbata (PDP, Rivers)

STATISTICS:
Total SS Indications = 18
Total SS Membership = 18
For 3rd term = 9 (50%)
Against 3rd Term = 2 (11%)
Undecided/Alternative to 3rd term = 7 (39%)
Margin of Error: +/- 1

Posted by gwobezentashi| 26.05.2006 03:19

Reply Quote



NnodiNnodi is online 

avatar
 # 4

Surely, when historians eventually analyse the political scene of Nigeria some decades from now, one of the most controversial questions would revolve on how much of Nigerian politics was based on inter-ethnoregional dynamics, and how much was based on a uniform one-nigeria, and thirdly the capacity of Nigerians to deceive themselves.

It seems to me that a comparison of the narratives of the different ethnic groups of Nigeria would readily show that only two groups have a narrative of independent existence: The Igbos are ready for an independent geopolitical and philosophical existence, while the Hausas display independent philosophical existence, but not necessarily readiness for a geopolitical independence. Between these two groups are a multitude of ethnic groups who have irrevocably surrendered their destinies to Nigeria, to put it simply. Their espousal of one Nigeria is not AT ALL a choice but a reflection of ongoing self-abdication because their narratives have lost critical streams of independent political existence, but still retain elements of independent socioculturality (with attendant quasi politicality). For this reason, they are not yet Nigerians in the complete sense, they aren't sufficiently identified with Nigeria yet, meaning that they must yield, for now, to the will of Igbos and Hausas who both do not suffer an attachment to Nigeria.

To explain the above paragraph more simply, the very fact that we are worried that power has been in the North for too long MEANS that we ascribe to the North the characteristics of a predatory OTHER. Also, the fear of predation by the Igbo is the same reason why they are denied the Presidency, so the Igbos and Hausas are the significant Others in Nigeria.

If more than 50% of southern senators voted for third term, and more than 50% northern senators voted against third term, it simply means indeed that the North has spoken. It isn't enough to simply look at the overall numbers of senators voting for or against TTA.

The glib narrative of one uniform Nigeria remains the personal (and ethnic) opinion of whoever refers to oneness of Nigeria in whichever medium. The killing of the third term ambition represents for the North an oppportunity to commandeer the Nigerian state and its resources. For the South, it should mean that an obstacle (Obj and his selfishness) to true southern political liberation has been removed, so that the work of rotating the presidency, or having a Southern President assume office next year, can begin in earnest.

Our narratives MUST embrace our ethnocultural varieties and imbue them with requisite and enshrined politicality, not pretend they don't exist, or wish them away, because they will never go away. Nigeria today is the result of restive and furtive inter-ethnic politics. We should find a way to come to a balance of powers if we are to develop

Posted by Nnodi| 26.05.2006 05:08

Reply Quote



pukpabipukpabi is offline 
Villager

avatar
 # 5

Nnodi,

I am not just kidding you; this is the most intelligent Nigerian political analysis I have read on this site. I pride myself as a political analyst. My friends call me "political junkie", but this is something else.

Reading your analysis, I have a feeling that you are well schooled in the study of politics. People like you should use the media to educate the people , and I am happy you are doing that. But, please do more.

Your article has made my morning.

Paschal Ukpabi, JD
Michigan, USA

Posted by pukpabi| 26.05.2006 07:36

Reply Quote



OmoNigeriaOmoNigeria is online 

avatar
 # 6

We must resist every form of bigotry.

Posted by OmoNigeria| 26.05.2006 12:25

Reply Quote


Last Updated ( Wednesday, 23 April 2008 )
 

Services : E-mail news | RSS Feeds | Podcasts
Links:   About the NVS | Contact Us | Terms of Use | Privacy & Cookies | Advertise With Us
All Rights Reserved. NigeriaVillageSquare.com