23

Apr

2009

Of Sausage Roll And Diaspora Cynicisms [Naija Trip Notes] PDF Print E-mail
By Moses Ebe Ochonu

Of Sausage Roll and Diaspora Cynicisms 

 By Moses Ochonu 

It was all going well, the biting, the chewing, the swallowing. Until I cracked a bone. I thought this was meat pie. It tasted like one. The label on the box says sausage roll. Oh, that explains it. Good thing I checked the box. I was about to explode into a rant about Nigerian airline food and extrapolate it into an indictment of an any-goes culture of mediocrity and incompetence. The label saved me that angst, which I can now deploy in more deserving directions. Sausage roll is a strange Nigerian culinary invention; a fancy name for what is basically a hybrid of a Nigerian-style meat pie and a cooked sausage. Why not just call it sausage pie then? It ate like a pie, looked like a pie. It didn’t look like a roll—it is shaped like a long hotdog, a baked hotdog with a crunchy crust. There is nothing in a name. Let’s just call it what its inventors intended for it to be called. Nigerians and their love of fancy labels! Welcome to Naija. 

The snack ate like meat pie, a poor imitation. Which explains why I was eating and assessing it as one before I saw the label. Before then I had wondered about the toughness, strange texture, and bizarre flavor of the meat in the pie’s inside. It was ground meat, but this wasn’t ground steak. I knew this and had begun to fume about the incongruity of its composition and its name. I was quick, I my mind’s preliminary assessment, to put it down to the Nigerian penchant for cutting corners and lowering quality for financial gain. Then I saw the label and it all made sense. The label explained the strangeness of the pie’s interior. I know what sausages are made of—the unmentionables of a cow’s anatomical assets, plus bone fragments of all shapes and toughness. Every body part is fair game in the sausage making business. So, seeing the label calmed my reflexive anger. As a sausage roll, it wasn’t bad. As a meat pie, it would be terrible. Let’s move on. It’s only a snack. 

I ate the rest of my sausage roll in a reflective calm, in a semi-bashful mood. Why was I in a hurry to blame my bone-cracking experience on the social narrative of Nigeria’s lack of standards? Why was I eager to extrapolate a commentary on Nigeria from a wretched sausage roll served on an airline? Aren’t airline meals and snacks supposed to be bad everywhere? I didn’t approach the sausage roll with an open mind because it was a Naija sausage roll. I was a little embarrassed. When I order a sausage in North America, I expect to crack a few bones in the chewing process. And if I encounter the occasional odd object I don’t extrapolate from it to comment critically on standards in North American culinary capitalism. Why didn’t I extend the same courtesy, the same expectational latitude, to its Nigerian cousin? Why would eating a sausage roll be a big deal unless I was trying to find an anchor for a pre-packaged critique, a metaphor for a preexisting resentment of the Nigerian rot? But you didn’t know that this was a sausage; you thought you were eating a meat pie. Had the sausage been left in inside the crust whole, you’d have figured it was a sausage and eaten it as a sausage, expecting and accepting its warts. These self-exonerating thoughts proliferated. The two sentiments dueled in me. Self-exoneration and self-critique displaced each other in my mind. Was I too quick to judge the Virgin Nigeria sausage roll? Was I coming to Nigeria with a judgmental, cynical attitude? Had I engineered a self-fulfilling prophecy? Would that hurt my return experience or help it? My Lagos-Abuja flight was consumed by these contemplations. Jetlagged, exhausted, and irritable, self-examination was the least appealing thing I wanted to engage in. But it persisted. 

How about the lady at the Virgin Nigeria counter, the one who checked me in? Had I been too quick to judge her? No. She probably deserved it. Folks, first of all, note that the concept of a connecting flight hardly exists in Nigeria. Arriving in Lagos from my base in the US, I had assumed that the airline staff would transfer my luggage to my local flight to Abuja, since I had booked both flights together and checked all the pieces all the way to Abuja. But the Nigerian in me would not trust the system to function the way it is supposed to. This is Naija, after all. Acting on a hunch, I waited by the conveyor belt. My two checked bags popped out in quick succession. My skepticism about Nigerian institutions was vindicated. I was right in my assumption about Nigerian exceptionalism. It saved me the stress of having my bags stranded in Lagos in a logistical limbo while I gleefully arrive in Abuja to expect them to exit the conveyor belt there. 

This inaugural encounter with Nigeria is probably responsible for my subsequent cynicism and descent into swift judgment. If I was right in assuming that Nigeria would be an exception to the connecting flight convention regarding checked luggage, my skepticism was not only justified, it was helpful. I dug in after that. From that point on, I expected and prepared for the worst. I expected folks who offered to help me with my luggage to be mindless extortionists, out to make a buck off another street-dumb returnee. 

No one will game me, I resolved. A man who innocently told me that Virgin was no longer housed at the international wing and offered to get me a taxi to get to the local wing was met with a cynical, mildly hostile stare down. Good natured and patient, he diligently directed me to the international desk of Virgin at the international wing, following behind to observe my encounter. 

When I got there and was told exactly what my new “friend” had told me, I was embarrassed, especially with him milling around. Did I walk almost half a block and take a bumpy elevator ride with my luggage awkwardly balanced on a malfunctioning cart just to confirm what I had been told? Why didn’t I believe and trust the man? This was one case in which my skeptical defenses brought embarrassment instead of relief, affirmation, and satisfaction. Oh well, at least I was right about the luggage situation. It was a tie. 

“Oga I told you. I just want make you see for ya self.” Was that supposed to ease my anxiety? I suppose that was his way of offering commiseration. This guy told me the truth and I dismissed him as a tout out for a quick swindle. Was my guardedness excessive? Was I judging too quickly, too harshly? More questioned flowed than answers, deepening my dilemma. Here was a guy who was offering help, for a reward, of course, and I wouldn’t even give him a chance to help me. 

It was a soul-searching first encounter. It was the reason I decided to wait for him for some annoying 15 minutes when he declared that he was going to get a taxi to take me to the domestic wing for my flight to Abuja. He arrived driving the taxi. I thought he was merely going to broker a deal for a taxi, not to drive the damn thing himself. My skeptical, conspiratorial mind spun several dark scenarios—all of which had the man doing bad things to me. Despite my misgivings, he beckoned and I followed. 

“How much?” Silence. Strategic silence. I knew the game. I knew both the street version. I also knew the academic/intellectual variety. Thank God I went back to school recently; double thank God I took that negotiation course. 

He was using the silence maneuver on me. He wanted to keep the fare a secret until we got to the local wing, so he could charge me what he wanted when he held all the cards, having delivered the service to me. He was in with a master. How much? How much, oga? I repeated it until I got an answer: “three thousand.” 

I had five thousand naira—a leftover from my last trip. What a savior it was proving to be. My stash helped pay for a cart at the arrival hall. And the N300 change I allowed the friendly cart guy to keep. I liked that he didn’t solicit it and showed a heart-felt appreciation when I offered it to him. The reserve cash helped fund my tip to the final gate guy (don’t know if he was customs or immigration—I suspect customs since we had already been cleared by immigration). The N500 tip brought a broad grin to his face. It felt strangely nice to tip the guy. He asked nicely, and didn’t make it a precondition for “releasing” me. In friendly banter he simply said: things hard here o! I knew what he meant, and I liked his friendly bluntness. Plus, he asked only after he had cleared me and had showed me impressive professional courtesy. 

I can understand that gesture of solicitation. Is it wrong? Technically it is. But folks are suffering here, and so long as they’re not trying to harass or humiliate me into giving them a tip or trying to invent complaints upon which to demand a bribe, I don’t mind dispensing small tips here and there. Such gestures won’t send me to the poor house. Anyhow, the guy was happy; I was happy and my entry into Nigeria felt good. Until his female partner soiled the happy encounter by screaming “Oga I dey here too o!” into my ear. I ignored her. I had tipped her boss, partner, colleague—whatever. There ought to be some sharing among these folks. I was disappointed by her rude solicitation, but overall, it had been a fairly smooth re-entry, except, of course, for the Delta/Virgin Nigeria mishandling of my luggage. 

Back at the taxi fare negotiation, I instinctively retorted: three thousand? Haba! 

“Oga I no charge you.” 

“Okay, two thousand; I no get enough cash.” 

“Oga dem dey change money for here o!” 

Ahhhhhh! Finally, the “he-lives-abroad-and-has- plenty-of-foreign-currency-to- change card. What took him so long? 

I remembered my negotiation course again. A hostile move deserves an identical response. I wasn’t going to cede the advantage to him in this game. In a statistical class game meant to assess our negotiating temperament, my answers to the questionnaire had given me away as a wimpy compromiser, afraid of striking a hard bargain or antagonizing my negotiating partner. I was a Y kind of person, and Y people lose a lot in win-lose negotiations. That was a disadvantage most the time in the negotiation dance, my professor had proclaimed. Since then, I have been trying consciously to cultivate the skills of a tough negotiator. Time to put practice to test. 

On this day, I remembered my professor’s indictment clearly. 

“Two thousand, take am, or I go call another taxi. I no get time to waste.” For those familiar with the XY negotiation game, that was an unadulterated X. 

“Okay oga, na because of you o! Na three thousand I tell my oga. Him go think say I chop one thousand.” 

Could be true; could be a lie. No matter. That was his problem to settle with his “oga.” I noticed that he was fuming throughout the short ride to the local wing, and he sneaked in the fare issue again when I tried to make small talk about Lagos, in a last, desperate effort to extract more money. Although I knew that it could all be one huge artistic production by a man used to surviving on his wits and Oscar-worthy acting skills, seeing him complain about the fare during the trip filled me with a strange satisfaction. I probably did get a bargain. Not bad for a returnee, huh? 

In addition to the fare, I gave the guy N200 for his help in directing me to the elevator and helping me fit my bulging luggage in it. I gave the guy who helped with my luggage at the local wing a small tip. My naira reserve, my personal “foreign” reserve, was going far here. The young man was nice and very helpful. And his appreciation again assuaged my Liberal guilt. That would buy a meal or two, I thought, a comforting and humble self-congratulation infecting me. 

By the time I got to the lady at the Virgin Nigeria counter. I had experienced Nigeria in all its bad and good glories. I was still skeptical but not cynical. I figured that with Nigeria skepticism is a helpful thing. Better for your skepticism to be confounded than for your optimism to be shattered. 

Anyway, the Virgin Nigeria lady confirmed my Lagos-Abuja flight. After which she said: your baggage is overweight sir. 

“How can that be?” 

“Your luggage is above our weight limit” 

“But I had no trouble checking them in at the other end” 

Slow typing on the computer. Hush-hush consultations with someone I assumed to be her

colleague. 

“Sir, your baggage is over the limit.” 

“That can’t be. I purchased this flight together with the international one. It’s one flight” 

“There’s nothing we can do, sir. You have to pay for the excess luggage.” 

By now I was fuming as I watched the baggage handler, a stocky young man, change the tags on the luggage. 

“Listen, these bags were approved and checked to Abuja in Atlanta, so I don’t understand why they would be over the limit here.” 

“They were not checked all the way to Abuja, sir” 

“They were; look at the tags.” 

“Do the tags say Abuja?” The query was directed at the baggage handler but she also looked at me as though she also expected an answer from me. No answer came, so she said to the handler: let me see the tags. The handler had, of course, discarded the old tags, but they were still on the floor, a glance away. 

“Oh sorry sir! You are right.” 

Then she turned to the baggage boy: why didn’t you tell me that they had Abuja tags already? Why did you remove them? Why did you make me print new tags for them? Why didn’t you check them? The boy took his humiliation in silence. 

But she was the one who checked the tags. And it was she who instructed the poor boy to replace the tags after printing and giving him the new Virgin Nigeria ones. 

I was incredulous to her act. It seemed like an extortion gone awry. I was on to her game, and her scheme had gone burst, and now she needed her poor subordinate to bear her shame. How mean! I wasn’t even supposed be re-checking these bags in Lagos. Virgin/Delta should have taken care of this. Yet she wanted to extort more payments from me; payments that would have gone straight to her pocket. 

I wasn’t certain, but my suspicion radar was alert. Her whole service reeked of a cheap plot to elicit some payments from me. Simply honoring my ticket wasn’t good enough for her. 

But was I reacting reflexively without giving the counter lady an empathetic ear? Was she genuinely unaware that the bags had been checked all the way to Abuja? Was her disappointment at the Baggage handler real? 

I’ll never know. One thing I do know is that once I got on the plane and I and my baggage were airborne, I felt a little guilty that I had perhaps judged the young lady too harshly, that I had raised my guards and skepticism too high, and, worse, that I was assessing her performance through that cynical lens. 

Maybe we Diasporans do come home with a certain haughty cynicism. It is not entirely our fault. We have to protect ourselves from excessive frustration. We have to expect the worse so we can celebrate the modestly good. Moreover, excessive optimism and highfalutin expectations may victimize us by making us vulnerable to our compatriots who want to take advantage of our exilic ignorance or relate with us unfairly on the basis of the social myths of exilic privileges.

I get all that. But at some level, skepticism is unrewarding to the returnee. Especially when it becomes the central organizing principle through which he (re)experiences Nigeria. And especially when it is not moderated by an open-minded enjoyment of the simple, silly kindness and goodness that one still encounters daily in Nigerians. 

Mrs. Akunyili and other apostles of rebranding say that all Nigerians are not 419 fraudsters. That’s a lazy repetition of the obvious. They also say that there is still some honesty in Nigeria. That’s an inane cop out. And such rhetorical declarations do not invalidate the pessimism and self-preservationist suspicions of Diaspora Nigerians. Not every Nigerian who approaches you wants to rob or brutalize you. But some do want to at least shortchange and extort you. That challenges your willfully naive fantasies of pan-Nigerian, pan-African brotherhood and solidarity. Bad experiences in the hands of home-based “brothers” stoke suspicion, irrational distrust, and even cynicism. 

Even so, there might be a pragmatic, happier median where you can celebrate the simple pleasures and rhythms of Nigeria while saving your gripe on the rot and leadership failures for more serious forums. The mistake I made is perhaps in allowing my view of the Nigerian leadership rot and of state failure to seep into my expectations in my encounters with people and things here. 

There ought to be a middle course that allows you to come to these encounters with an open-mind while simultaneously or, as occasion demands, expressing outrage at failures of leadership and followership in specific institutions and situations. 

I can’t say that I have found that median yet. But on this visit, I have decided that being angry at and suspicious of everyone and everything will rob me of the delight of homecoming. I will pick my fights wisely and express my gripes selectively, where the moral lines are clear and the stakes are high. 

I no longer care about the counter lady’s attitude, although I do think that if it was, as I suspected, a cover-up act, she owes her traumatized subordinate an apology— that is, if he wasn’t in on the act. That said, I have decided that judging her, or any other Nigerians I encounter, too harshly speaks more to my own anxieties and patriotic anger than it does to the imperative of correction and change. It is, for the most part, a misdirected resentment. Leadership failures in Abuja should not elicit in us an uncharitably suspicious attitude towards hardworking, if subtly complicit, citizens. Nigerians, even those who are compelled to engage in little trickeries for survival, do not deserve to have our anger at the Nigerian leadership dumped on them. At least not before we have given them a chance to prove themselves worthy of our respect. 

I will enjoy this visit. I’ll accept what I get, even if grudgingly, and challenge what I need to. I will navigate Nigeria this time with an empathetic but detached alertness, neither condemning nor praising. Simply savoring. I will approach Nigeria this time from a non-judgmental distance, observing as an invested neutral seeking both insight and substantive grounding for future critique. Perhaps I will enjoy my stay this way. I won’t let Yar’Adua and his ilk ruin my visit. Not this time. 



Your Comments

Please make The Square an enjoyable experience for everyone by refraining from gratuitous ad-hominem contributions, defamatory comments and off-topic posting. Such posts will be removed.

User Avatar
RobotRobot is offline

 # 1 | 23.04.2009 23:21

Of Sausage Roll and Diaspora Cynicisms By Moses Ochonu It was all going well, the biting, the chewing, the swallowing. Until I cracked a bone. I thought this was meat pie. It tasted like one. The label on the box says sausage roll. Oh, that explains it. Good thing I checked the box. I was about to explode into a rant about Nigerian airline food and extrapolate it into an indictment of an any-goes culture of mediocrity and incompetence. The label saved me that angst, which I can now deploy in more deserving directions. Sausage roll is a strange Nigerian culinary invention; a fancy name for what is basically a hybrid of a Nigerian-style meat pie and a cooked sausage. Why not just call it sausage pie then? It ate like a pie, looked like a pie. It didn’t look like a roll—it is shaped like a long hotdog, a baked hotdog with a crunchy crust. There is nothing in a name. Let’s just call it what its inventors intended for it to be called. Nigerians and ...Read the full article.

User Avatar
EjaEja is offline

 # 2 | 24.04.2009 03:48

In the interest of full disclosure, let me admit right from the beginning that I have a great dislike for the label "diaspora". To me, it is another evidence of this strange preference that 'educated' Nigerians have for adopting the cultural norms of others. For example, once upon a time, citizens of the USA developed a habit of referring to some of their Presidents by the initials of their compound name; so, they spoke of FDR (Franklin Delano Roosevelt), JFK (John Fitzgerald Kennedy), and LBJ (Lyndon Baines Johnson). So what did our hermit crab Naija intellectuals come up with? Well, we started with IBB (Ibrahim Badamasi Babangida) and moved on to OBJ - which, even though it made no sense, we still had to use because we had to call our President capital letters (because that is what hip people do...) - and, we now have UMYA (Umaru Musa YarAdua).

I pray to the Almighty that we never have a good and energetic President (with progressive ideas) called Sule Hammidu Isiaka Tobbogani....

Allow me to now explain why I actually dislike the label "Nigerian Diaspora":

The word "diaspora" is Greek in origin and was first used to label members of the Jewish faith who lived outside of the lands the Bible/Torah called Israel. And, though initially utilised by latter-day Greek speakers to describe those Israelites who had been scattered during the Babylonian conquest, the word re-gained widespread use in the 1930s amongst Central and Eastern European Jews. It should be noted that many of these were people who had never set a foot in the Middle East and, for many, the first language was German, Hungarian, Romanian, or any from the many languages of Central and Eastern Europe. And, while most were observant Jews, the ones whose sentiments caused them to speak most loudly about a need to return to the mythical ancestral lands were secular Zionists.

The main point to note is that the word "diaspora" was used to describe the descendants of emigrants. In other words, there is a difference between ones who are emigrants (i.e. first generation to leave the ancestral lands) and ones who are diasporans (i.e. the descendants of immigrants into a foreign land).

Going by this definition, the only ones who can be properly referred to as members of an African diaspora (and in fact the first ones to use the word to describe themselves) are those who are descended from those Africans that were forcibly removed from Africa during the centuries of the Trans Atlantic and Trans Saharan 'Slave' Trades. We might also add to those numbers now, the children of recently emigrated Africans who were born (and have come into adulthood) in lands foreign to their ancestors.

I repeat, first generation Nigerian immigrants to Europe and the Americas are not a diaspora; they are emigrants.

Why is this an important point to note? Well, a difference in mentality and comprehension is to be expected when we compare ones who were born and bred in a land and as such, used to its unique cultures and, those who, though having ancestral links to the land, were born and bred in another place where they were moulded by different customs and cultures.

This difference, depending on the gaps between the component parts of the moulding cultures, can be expected to cause a certain level of alienation in the returning diasporan that we would not expect to see in the returning emigrant.

What is of interest in the matter of Nigerians emigrants who have now self-labelled themselves as "diasporans" is how they seem to know at some deep level about this alienation and, how some consciously seek to manifest it in their ways of being when they return home or/and when they speak about Nigeria from foreign climes.

Why do Nigerians who, even though they only left the shores relatively recently, have this need to separate themselves from their compatriots by inventing a new label for themselves and then, adopting the alienated persona that goes with that label? One answer may be found in the dreaded suspicion that many have about Nigeria being a "failed State". Because, if Nigeria is a "failed State", then, Nigerians (by implication) are failures as a collective.

No one wants to be associated with a failure and, if you have the opportunity to dissociate yourself from that failure by putting the space granted by the label of "diasporan" between yourself and the "failed State", why not use it?

Anyway, WRT this very interesting article, the author should be commended for is his bravery and honesty. He probably knew that commentators (like myself..:wink:) would take him to task (and perhaps even upbraid him) for looking down on home-based Nigerians and, for coming at them armed with all types of scurrilous preconceptions. I am sure that he knew this and yet, he still expressed his real feelings in full. For this, he has to be commended because, his honesty gives us an opportunity to examine ourselves for a similar tendencies (WRT holding a type of preconceived idea about our fellow Nigerians) and, to ask the reasons why we persist with them.

User Avatar
BiafranPrincessBiafranPrincess is offline

 # 3 | 24.04.2009 08:39

A good read and very honest too which is all that is really required for any writing. Hmmmmn.... I think you are in a better position to appreciate Nigeria on this trip. I guess when we accept the country warts and all, it is sort of easier to see some of her glories, albeit, small as they may be. It also gives us a chance to truly offer practical solutions on a way forward.
Madam Akunyili and Co would do well to start the rebranding program at our airports and roads, it is our first reception centres to the world (Much like having a really dirty house and announcing to people that it is now clean....you may want to start with the living rooms and maybe bathroom.....)
Lets keep talking and doing our own bit, slowly and surely....

User Avatar
Ph3yPh3y is offline

 # 4 | 24.04.2009 15:06

Eja....one of the things that i forgot to ask you the other day we met was your GP when you were in our alma matter...cos i bow for all this your research you do....Plus the way you argue and even produce facts to support your points......am sure your middle name is something like iwelabi...

User Avatar
ozoodooozoodoo is offline

 # 5 | 24.04.2009 15:42

@Eja,


Why do Nigerians who, even though they only left the shores relatively recently, have this need to separate themselves from their compatriots by inventing a new label for themselves and then, adopting the alienated persona that goes with that label? One answer may be found in the dreaded suspicion that many have about Nigeria being a "failed State". Because, if Nigeria is a "failed State", then, Nigerians (by implication) are failures as a collective.



The above bolded part is the koko of the matter. Nation building is a team work. Nigeria is a failed nation. I, you and all other Nigerians, whatever your level, have failed. Now you can understand why we are usually accorded special reception at border posts all over the world, even in Burkina Faso, when we produce that our tarnished green passport to immigration officials. You, I and other Nigerians, whether resident within or outside Nigeria, need to take active part in turning the fortune of the country around if we are to earn the respect of other people.

User Avatar
ahbegoahbego is offline

 # 6 | 24.04.2009 17:16

A damn fine read! I enjoyed every little bit of it! The man's honesty is matched only by his perceptiveness and self-awareness. I look forward to reading even more scribblings from the pen of Moses Ebe Ochonu. Thank you, `robot` for this lovely article... :hail:

-----------------------------


=Eja;349658> ... I pray to the Almighty that we never have a good and energetic President (with progressive ideas) called Sule Hammidu Isiaka Tobbogani....

:lol:



The word "diaspora" is Greek in origin ...

Damned good point, about who are members of a diaspora and who are emigrants. I hadn't ever thought of it before. Thanks for pointing it out.

-----------------------------

Seems the intellectual activity of Mr Ochonu is a positive contaminant. Now, who's missing? ... ;)

User Avatar
GbollyGbolly is offline

 # 7 | 24.04.2009 18:19

I can understand that gesture of solicitation. Is it wrong? Technically it is. But folks are suffering here, and so long as they’re not trying to harass or humiliate me into giving them a tip or trying to invent complaints upon which to demand a bribe, I don’t mind dispensing small tips here and there. Such gestures won’t send me to the poor house. Anyhow, the guy was happy; I was happy and my entry into Nigeria felt good.

You did well in my opinion. You did not give under duress, but out of generosity of your heart.

User Avatar
farooqkperogifarooqkperogi is offline

 # 8 | 24.04.2009 18:39

Eja,

While your etymology of the word diaspora is correct, your appreciation of its contemporary uses is flawed. As all linguists know, no word is an immanent container of meanings; words, over time, acquire what grammarians call semantic extensions, and these extensions can sometimes be radically at variance with the etymology of the words.

For example, the word "decimate" originally meant "kill one in 10 of" (e.g. of mutinous soldiers). That meaning derives from the Latin origin of the word where "deci" denotes "one tenth of." However, in contemporary uses, "decimate" means "kill a large proportion of." The etymology of the word is lost in this semantic extension. Of course, as you would expect, this was originally met with stiff opposition from conservative semantic purists. But, as always, they lost battle. Now no one thinks of the etymology of "decimate" when they use it.

It is the same with the word "diaspora." The word is now more or less used as a synonym for "immigrant" or "emigrant" condition. In fact, in globalization studies, it denotes people who have been geographically displaced, who have been "deterritorialized." (For this extension of the usage of the word, see Arjun Appadurai's 1996 book called "Modernity At Large: The Cultural Dimensions of Globalization.")

Now, it is customary to distinguish "historic" and "contemporary" diasporas in globalization studies. From your example, African Americans and Afro-Caribbeans, etc would constitute the historic African diaspora and more recent African immigrants in the West would constitute the contemporary African diaspora.

It may interest you to know that, in fact, it is now perfectly legitimate to talk of diasporas within the same country in both contemporary and historic terms. We can legitimately talk about Nupe, Igbo, Ogoni diasporas, etc.

User Avatar
DeebeeDeebee is offline

 # 9 | 24.04.2009 19:42

Not to spoil the goodnaturedness of the previous posts, I just want to point out that words' meanings change with time. The word diaspora as used by the author of the original article is correct by today's definitions. I am of the opinion that those who use it to describe themselves are not necessarily being condescending; they are merely innocently using a sense of the term that has gained widespread acceptance.

Anyway, great article and great responses. Our prejudices should give way to a sense of brotherhood. Give average Nigerians the benefit of the doubt. Many of us are hardworking and honest. It's our leaders and a few other bad eggs that give the country a bad name.

User Avatar
Anioma777Anioma777 is offline

 # 10 | 24.04.2009 20:07

Very insightful and captivating article. Went down well with my glass of rose.

I dont think its a bad thing to approach Nigeria in a sceptical manner so long as it does not manifest into more Nation bashing. As much as I love Nigeria, I still would have the same approach as the writer. Its called survival and you need to be armed with your instincts wherever you go on earth.

Moses Ochuno....I say Bravo on a wonderful article:clap:

@Bianfranprincess

Nwanyi oma e bu amosu?....LOL.:D You took the words right out of my mind regarding where Dora Akunyili should start her rebranding project. Inwards is always where to start. Thanks for your post.
 

Services : E-mail news | RSS Feeds | Podcasts
Links:   About the NVS | Contact Us | Terms of Use | Privacy & Cookies | Advertise With Us
All Rights Reserved. NigeriaVillageSquare.com