24 Mar 2007 |
|
Why the April 2007 Elections might not hold - and what must be done for it not to be a fiasco by Mobolaji E. Aluko, PhD
Burtonsville, MD, USA Saturday, March 24, 2007 Introduction
I begin this essay with the following instructive excerpt from TheSun newspaper, credited to Prince Afegbua, acting national chairman of the NDP (National Democratic Party):
QUOTE The law provides for 500-600 voters per polling unit. INEC claimed it registered as much as 20-25,000 persons per registration centre. How does it intend to distribute the figure into the respective polling units when it has no facility to determine that? On election day, people will be roaming the streets, from
one mango tree to another in search of where to vote. And in a matter of hours, results will be announced in Iwu's bedroom, indicating a free and fair election with 101% attendance. You know electoral miracles are in large supply in Nigeria and since Professor Iwu is a miracle worker, it will be a good judgement to please his courtiers and their uncelebrated masters, at the expense of the people for whom the elections are meant."
UNQUOTE Compatriots, the above observation is the MAJOR problem that INEC is currently battling with right now, which is why, just a few weeks before April 14, no voters register has been released despite all the loud depositions of INEC to the contrary. Indeed, some names were pasted all over the country for VERIFICATION of names, but by now - and by law both on March 1 and within 60 days of the General Elections - the voter register should have been published for every one to see, and even CD/DVDs given to each political party.
Without people knowing what polling station is theirs, how do we ensure that people are properly accredited when they go to vote, WITHOUT going "from mango tree to mango tree" ? [Personally, I too was registered under a mango tree - but out of season ! :-)]
With the electronic registration that Iwu and his gang had insisted upon, the intial plan of 1 registration machine per 4 polling units had to be abandoned when there were not enough machines, and many of those that they had broke down. So they were happy to register any and all that came, without respect to what polling station that they would vote in. If the registration had been manual, then a polling station with registration book having the last line as 500 would terminate registration at that point.
Having more than 500 people register at any one polling unit was violation of Electoral Law No. 1.
Now that they have all been registered, where will they ACTUALLY vote? That is what inquiring minds want to know. Will they be able to vote in ANY polling station? Will the electronic validation machines have - on a DVD or flash disk - ALL the names of people in that ward, LOCAL GOVERNMENT, State, or in the whole nation? Or will there be a national database in the clouds somewhere that will have to be electronically accessed? If electronic access is required, what about if NEPA/PHCN strikes?
These are so many more questions than there are answers.
Without these questions answered, these upcoming elections will be a fiasco, no thanks to INEC chairman Maurice Iwu, who, due to his stubbornness, insisted in effect on electronic voter registration WITHOUT considering these other factors. He would have, on top of that, foisted electronic VOTING on us all if people had not INSISTED otherwise.
Rather than consider these logistics, he has spent his time on disqualifications and talking about "mind-sets" and election violence.
What to do?
We are headed for a fiasco unless:
1. .a hurried/iimmediate amendment to the Electoral law is done to permit more than 500 people who may have registered in any polling station or registration center to vote in any polling station of their choice WITHIN their local government.
2. local government databases are compiled as the basis of registration. You should be able to vote in ANY polling station in the local government that you registered at.
3. we insist that without further delay, INEC release the voters register/database that it has RIGHT now. After all, it has given a state-by-state breakdown of registered voters already: how did it get those numbers ?
http://nigerianmuse.com
4. no curfews on Election Day. Voters should be free to vote where they can within their local governments.
5. we have the Modified Open Ballot System (MOBS) of the June 12 variety, which enables people to first line up from 7 am to 10 am, and then vote from 10 am to 12 noon. This can be repeated from 1 pm to 4 pm, and voting from 4 pm to 6 pm. In fact, this is the ONLY system that will ameliorate the fiasco of 10,000 registered voters in a polling unit rather than 500 as required. This way, one can direct surplus voters to other polling units, and ensure that all vote within a specified period.
6. voting is extended to two days each. That is April 14/15 and April 21/22 to take care of the voters' crush that might happen in any given polling station.
7. INEC comply strictly with the provisions that all results will be ANNOUNCED on site and DISPLAYED on boards. INEC should go the extra mile of RECORDING each announcement and PHOTOGRAPHING each of
display board. The political parties polling agents will be wise to do the same - such evidence will come in handy later in the event of hanky-panky by Iwu's INEC.
I rest my case for now.
______________________________
THE SUN
NO TO ELECTION! By VINCENT UKPONG KALU Saturday, March 24, 2007 Acting National Chairman of the National Democratic Party (NDP), Prince Afegbua, has reiterated the commitment of the party to ensure that the general elections scheduled for next month do not hold. He says it is in the interest of both Nigeria and Nigerians that the elections are put off for the time being to enable the authorities to probably perfect the framework for such elections.
|
|||||||||||||||||||||







Your Comments
Please make The Square an enjoyable experience for everyone by refraining from gratuitous ad-hominem contributions, defamatory comments and off-topic posting. Such posts will be removed.