Home arrow Authors arrow Mobolaji Aluko arrow THURSDAY THOT: Barack Obama and the American Presidential "Race"
THURSDAY THOT: Barack Obama and the American Presidential "Race" Print E-mail
Written by Mobolaji E. Aluko   
Friday, 08 February 2008

 

 


 

                                                THURSDAY THOT:  Barack Obama and the American Presidential "Race"

 
 
by
 
Mobolaji E. Aluko, PhD
Burtonsville, MD, USA
 
 
February 7, 2008
 

 
For those of us who are not native born Americans - or are not Americans at all but just non-American, hyphenated-immigrants -  the period of elections in the United States is one of envy.  The drama, the money, the TV entertainment, the analysts, the elections'  freeness,  fairness and credibility writ large  - and particularly the absence of violence - are all enthralling.  If you are a citizen, come election day, you go to your assigned polling station - mine is a middle school walking distance from my home  -  hand your personal identification card (or its surrogate) to some old man or woman poll supervisor, who hands you some ballot paper and an electronic card,  and uses a wizened hand to direct you to where to vote in secret.   You do your patriotic deed - and that is it, usually all in fifteen minutes or less.
 
No pushing, no shoving,no shouting,  no police, no soldiers, no thugs.....
 
Then you return home to watch CNN or ABC or MSNBC as the results come in...to listen to talking Bill Schneider and David Gergen and George Stephanopoulos and Wolf Blitzer and Paul Begalla....
 
In my thirty years now living  in the USA, I have come to watch the presidential contests as I watch basketball or American football or baseball - only in the last quarter or bottom of the ninth inning.  I am not fully emotionally invested.   If you watch too early, you will be taken on an emotional roller coaster, because things can change so often for the most promising presidential candidates.  I remember Edmund Muskie (in February  1972) crying over a wrong allegation against his wife and hinting at bodily harm on the alleger if he were next to him - and he had to drop out of the presidential race for being such a sissy.  Gary Hart, who in the 1984 presidential race was an "enfant terrible" to establishment-man Walter Mondale almost like Obama is now to Hillary Clinton today,  dared the world in his second presidential run in 1988 race to come up with some mud against him - and a picture of a shapely woman (Donna Rice) on a boat on his lap immediately popped up, and sent him packing - in May 1987. Over-enthusiastic Howard Dean in January 2004 screamed in a speech on the campaign trail one decibel too high - and he had to return home for being "loud, peculiar and un-presidential."  John Kerry in his 2004 presidential bid was  dogged by a Swift Boat Veterans for Truth "unfit to serve" allegation,  and "flip-flop" characterizations and lost to Bush. However in October 2006, in speaking to some California students, Kerry jeopardized any future ambition to the presidency by missing one single word "us"-  "intellectually lazy....getting (us) stuck in a war in Iraq"  inferred to be describing the soldiers who were in Iraq rather the George Bush that he really meant.  He never recovered from the allegation of calling all such soldiers dumb despite many denials.
 
The Press and the (Gallup) polls can be so unforgiving....
 
Enter Barack Hussein Obama in 2008...
 
And he is holding up so far, knock on wood.  Beyond Super Tuesday of February 5, 2008, Obama currently has won more pledged delegates and more states than Hillary Clinton so far by all accounts, and has more total delegates (pledged + super) by some account. (See Appendix). On the Democratic side,  none of Black candidates Shirley Chisholm (in 1972) or Jesse Jackson (1984, 1988), or Carole Moseley-Braun or Al Sharpton (both in 2004) could boast of such a spectacular outing, nor could Independent candidate Lenora Fulani (1988, 1992) or Republican Alan Keyes (1996, 2000).

The USA is a nation of immigrants,  and all of its previous and current viable presidential candidates as well as presidents have been children of immigrants, who came either first voluntarily (either as plain old colonialists or as a result of economic oppression in home country), involuntarily (through slavery as Blacks did or indenture as many Chinese did), or finally, in more modern times voluntarily (as war or disaster refugees and/or to seek better economic and/or educational prospects  than  available in their  home countries.) 
 
But before the immigrants  came, what land that we now know as the USA today was populated only by those we call today Native Americans (or American Indians). So for me, until a Algonquin, Cheyenne,  Choctaw, Cree, Dakota,  Hopi, Mapuchi,  Miwok,  Navajo,  Nootka, Omaha, Pawnee,  Ponca,  Quecha, Shawnee, Sioux, Wi
nnebago Native American with, for example,  a Cheyenne name like "Hotuaekhaashtait  Howahkan alias 'Tall Bull with a Mysterious Voice' "  becomes president of the United States, we should not really clap. 
 
Their blood still cries out.

But the closest or most approximate prospect to that happening right now is Kenyan-born African-American of mixed race with a non-WASP(White-Anglo-SaxonProtestant) name like Barack Hussein Obama  - and we must celebrate it.  For those who support him politically,  they must work to make it happen beyond being just a mere prospect but a reality.  For us Africans-in-America with children born here, the added significance is even too obvious to elaborate upon.
 
Obama was bound to happen sooner or later, especially since the demographics of the USA have been "browning" over the years  - making the situation of only WASP Male Americans as President less and less a "sure-banker". So whatever it takes to make a "good" thing to happen in one's lifetime that encourages the reality of the EQUALITY of all mankind  should be celebrated, encouraged, embraced, promoted, speeded along.  Nothing is implied that the candidate must not be competent, just that it must be the content of his character and the competence in his deeds that must count,  and not the color of his skin or the carvings on his America-bound travel-boat.

As to whatever comments Barack Obama might allegedly have made about Africa or Nigeria in the process leading up to now  - whether on debt relief or on sanctions -  it is most likely that you and I as Africans have made worse comments.  So we would be the worst persons to indite him on those comments. On that score, we must come to equity with clean hands.

By the way, I intend to vote in the Maryland primaries next Tuesday February 12, 2008 myself and all other five voters in my family. 
 
Enough said.
 
 
 
APPENDIX
 
 ALWAYS CHECK
 
 
for most recent update

THIS UPDATE: February 8, 2008
Will be updated periodically


SUPER TUESDAY (FEBRUARY 5, 2008)  SYNOPSIS
Source:  http://www.cnn.com/ELECTION /2008/candidates/


Number of Delegates Needed to Win the Democratic Nomination: 2,025





Barack Obama wins  8 Primaries and 7 Caucuses so far:


Primaries:  GA  | CT  | MO |  UT | IL   |  AL  | DE | SC |
Caucuses:  MN | CO | AK  |  ID  | KA |  ND  | IA

February 6 Update: 732 Delegates:  Total 626 Pledged Delegates, 106 Super Delegates
February 7 Update: 741 Delegates:  Total 635 Pledged Delegates, 106 Super Delegates

February 8 Update: 937 Delegates:  Total 831Pledged Delegates, 106 Super Delegates


FUNDS TOTAL as of 09/30/2007
Raised:                    $80,256,427
Spent:                     $44,169,236
Cash-on-Hand:         $36,087,191

Provided by FEC



Hillary Clinton wins 11 Primaries and 1 Caucus so far

Primaries:  AZ | CA | NY | AR | MA | TN | NJ | OK | FL | MI | NH
Caucuses: NV

February 6 Update: 825 Delegates: Total: 632 Pledged Delegates, 192 Super Delegates
February 7 Update: 823 Delegates: Total: 630 Pledged Delegates, 193 Super Delegates
February 8 Update: 1,033 Delegates:  Total 840 Pledged Delegates, 193 Super Delegates

FUNDS TOTAL as of 12/31/2007
Raised:                    $118,301,659
Spent:                        $80,353,785
Cash-on-Hand:            $37,947,874

Provided by FEC



STATES STILL BEING PROCESSED

NM |




NOTE:

UNLIKE CNN [http://www.cnn.com/ELECTION/2008/primaries/results/scorecard/#D] , WHICH GIVES IT AS:

Obama -  937 delegates
Clinton - 1,033 delegates
Edward -    26 delegates


Total  - 1,996 delegates


MSNBC [http://www.msnbc.msn.com/id/21660914/] GIVES IT:

Obama -  861 Delegates
Clinton -   855 Delegates
Edwards - 26 Delegates


Total -    1,742 Delegates

 

STATE BY STATE DELEGATES


  

S/N

Date

(2008)

Primary

Or

Caucus

State

CNN

MSNBC

 

 

 

 

Obama

Clinton

Edward

Uncomm.

Obama

Clinton

Edward

Uncomm.

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

1

2/5

P

Alabama

21

23

0

 

25

23

0

 

2

2/5

C

Alaska

10

5

0

 

9

4

0

1

3

2/5

P

Arizona

27

33

0

 

25

31

0

 

4

2/5

P

Arkansas

8

35

0

 

8

25

0

 

5

2/5

P

California

164

217

0

 

163

207

0

 

6

2/5

C

Colorado

15

10

0

 

19

9

0

 

7

2/5

P

Connecticut

29

23

0

 

26

22

0

 

8

2/5

P

Delaware

9

8

0

 

9

6

0

 

9

2/5

P

Georgia

42

23

0

 

45

24

0

 

10

2/5

C

Idaho

17

3

0

 

15

3

0

 

11

2/5

P

Illinois

111

45

0

 

91

48

0

 

12

1/3

C

Iowa

18

18

14

 

16

15

14

 

13

2/5

C

Kansas

24

10

0

 

23

9

0

 

14

2/5

P

Massachusetts

44

61

0

 

38

55

0

 

15

2/5

C

Minnesota

51

27

0

 

48

24

0

 

16

2/5

P

Missouri

40

38

0

 

36

36

0

 

17

1/19

C

Nevada

14

14

0

 

13

12

0

 

18

1/8

P

New Hampshire

12

11

4

 

9

9

4

 

19

2/5

P

New Jersey

49

69

0

 

48

59

0

 

20

2/5

P

New Mexico

13

17

0

 

12

13

0

 

21

2/5

P

New York

94

177

0

 

93

138

0

 

22

2/5

C

North Dakota

12

5

0

 

8

5

0

 

23

2/5

P

Oklahoma

14

24

0

 

14

24

0

 

24

1/26

P

South Carolina

26

14

8

 

25

12

8

 

25

2/5

P

Tennessee

27

39

0

 

29

33

0

 

26

2/5

P

Utah

14

11

0

 

14

9

0

 

 

 

 

Totals

 905

 960

26

 

861

 855

26

1

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Notes:

  1. CNN information provided here is only of those that it has declared “Projected Winner” or 2nd or 3rd Place in states

already run..  It does not include Florida or Michigan where  no delegates are to be awarded due to those states’ Democratic Party rules’ infraction.  www.cnn.com/ELECTION/2008/primaries/results/scorecard/#D

2.        The MSNBC information are for the same states above for CNN.  www.msnbc.msn.com/id/21660914/

3.        The highlights in red are changes in figures since the last update

  1. If you catch any errors, please inform us at nigerianmuse@gmail.com .   Thanks.

 

NigerianMuse.com (Bolaji Aluko)

 


 



DEFINITIONS

PRIMARIES
Primaries are generally only open to party members. Democrats and Republicans vote for the candidate they want to be their party's presidential candidate. Republican and Democratic primaries do not have to be held on the same day.

CAUCUSES
Local party members get together for an evening of debate before deciding who they will support for their party's presidential nomination. The process is open for all to see and takes place in someone's home or a town hall rather than a voting booth

See: http://www.cnn.com/2008 /POLITICS/01/03/iowa.caucuses .101/index.html
for more  explanation of the Iowa caucus.

PLEDGED DELEGATES
Won by candidates in primaries and caucuses; pledge to support their candidates at the national conventions.

SUPERDELEGATES
Democratic officeholders and party officials guaranteed national convention seats; can support the candidate of their choice.




Compiled by NM

 


 

 

 




RobotRobot is offline 
Villager

avatar
 # 1

var sbtitle3260=encodeURIComponent(THURSDAY TH...Read the full article.

Posted by Robot| 08.02.2008 16:37

Reply Quote



fulanifulani is offline 
Villager

avatar
 # 2

Good article...

Obama is for real and I must confess I have been converted a supporter. I did not renounce my Republican part registration but I found myself drawn to him.

I have donated money and time to his campaign effort here in California. We were not able to deliver California for Obama but I was overwhelmed by the out pouring of support for him in Los Angeles county.

If you discount absentee ballots Obama would have carried California.

Posted by fulani| 09.02.2008 00:31

Reply Quote



ajis15ajis15 is offline 
Villager

avatar
 # 3

Thanks Prof. This thing is becoming real every minute. It would have become real, if you remove the prejudice of those wanna be Latinos who rode on blacks back for all their gains, but refuse to accept blacks when it really counts. Even if he does not win, he has raised the profile; he has given hope to children of immigrants. I pray he wins. More so, like somebody said: "America has proven its creed." I mean white America. God bless America.

Posted by ajis15| 09.02.2008 05:44

Reply Quote



katampekatampe is offline 
Villager

avatar
 # 4


Obama was bound to happen sooner or later, especially since the demographics of the USA have been "browning" over the years - making the situation of only WASP Male Americans as President less and less a "sure-banker". So whatever it takes to make a "good" thing to happen in one's lifetime that encourages the reality of the EQUALITY of all mankind should be celebrated, encouraged, embraced, promoted, speeded along. Nothing is implied that the candidate must not be competent, just that it must be the content of his character and the competence in his deeds that must count, and not the color of his skin or the carvings on his America-bound travel-boat.



I am sure it is not only the diversity that is making this happen, but rather it is the higher level of education and enlightnment of Americans. Gradually, we are witnessing people that have been socialised in a university environment thinking in a more rational fashion and with limited emotional cleavage to race or ethnicity. (Clinton's less educated army of voters confirms theory).

Yet, diversity is also education. The more you meet people of different cultures that are exceptional in social life, whether at work or in the classroom, it becomes easier for ideological constructs about race types to collapse. And the more you doubt your beliefs, especially those inherited from your parents or cultural environment, the more you are willing to take that leap of faith.

Nonetheless, I think America should continue opening doors that enables each child acquire the necessary education possible. It pays on the long run for its democracy since we now see that people are starting to vote based on values and on issues than it obtains in most other countries. It is amazing that the whites that live in gated communities , or in suburban communities that were created to keep the blacks out are the same communities endorsing Barack Obama .

It speaks to the issue that Obama 's rise in politics is not really about race per se, but more about self interest. It is about who can create the better society for me and my children.

Posted by katampe| 09.02.2008 08:52

Reply Quote



RAYNOSARAYNOSA is offline 
Villager

avatar
 # 5


Dear Prof,
I don't live in America one thing for the Obama or Clinton group/party to win.
Are Americans ready for a Female or Black President?

Posted by RAYNOSA| 16.02.2008 07:13

Reply Quote



DeepThoughtDeepThought is offline 
Villager

avatar
 # 6

Barak, Clinton, McCain ?
Republican or Democrate?

I think the Presidency is overated

I don't really think in terms of overall U.S policy direction, it matters that much who emerges as the next American President. The American system is now structured such that the impact of any one man, no matter what office that person occupies is minimal. So those who are hoping for radical change by Obama emerging as president will most likely be dissapointed.

For example, President Kennedy, idealistic and different as he was, and embodying change as he did, still had no choice but to continue with things like the Vietnam war he inherited, rattled the American sabre over the Cuban missle crisis. So here we are, 40 or so more years after the election of a maverick Kennedy, America is still doing what it did then.
Thus, Obama, regardless of what anyone who is hoping for immediate change will see, Obama, will have little choice but to continue with theIraqi occupation, America will still continue to violate SALT agreements, militarize space, will still recklessly stick its fingers in the affairs of any country it deems not in line with its interests ( provided that country is not China or Russia ) and continue to do all those things that damages its reputation in various parts of the world.

Thus , U.S policies will likely , for now and for the immediate future continue more or less as it has over the last 50 years regardless of Obama, Clinton or McCain.

The aforementioned not withstanding, in terms of domestic socio-cultural perceptions, if Obama is or was seen as the "other" in America, more so than a Kennedy, an Obama emerging as president does matters a lot and I think it would be a very , very good thing.

The election of an Obama may indeed open up and hasten even more positive possibilities. It will signify some change, especially a change in how American will begin to see themselves

However, greater possibility which this opens up, the more meaningful change which it will bring is in not just in how America sees itself but more importantly, B>in how American sees others,

Then and only then will the most important change of all occur and that is
How America is seen by others. But this is predicated and must be preceeded on how America sees others. Does America want to continue to operate in the old, ossified paradigms of the cold war, 18th Century ideologies of imperialism and exploitation? The "them" vs "us" mentality which has brough so much misery to mankind?
Or is it possible to transcend these old ideas and usher in a more egalitarian world view and eventually build bold new policies which fulfills the original lofty mandates of the UN which has now been perverted beyond recognition?

The sooner the Americans understand this, the better.

Then and only then will America truely become much more than it is now, And that would be a good thing.

If American policies , (which won't change right away, but which could, )in the long term change to one that is more friendly, more robust and matured to "others", perhaps, we will be able to look back to this moment and identify it as the time the foundation was laid when America truely began to identify with the rest of humanity and the whole world as one with itself?

Then and only then will the world be truely at peace and perhaps, then and only then will we truely have a unanimous and welcomed leader of the whole World and not the caricature of tyranny we have for now; a self proclaimed, self crowned leader of the boffonery acronym - "free" world.

Of course, that is assuming the world wants or cries out for a leader.

Opps, this is not the place or thread for the above!!!!

Posted by DeepThought| 16.02.2008 09:17

Reply Quote