The current and growing speculations about who the successors to President Obasanjo should be come 2007 are absolutely detestable and disquieting.    Many of the statements being made are not only premature, but palpably un-democratic.  It is as if the Nigerian electorate does not matter.   It is as if our votes do not count, rather that some mysterious elite "counts" vote in some smoke-filled chamber between certain selected candidates on our behalf, and that other Nigerians simply go through the motions of going to the polls in order to "seal" those selections.

More annoying are the arrogant claims that some people will not be "allowed" to succeed President Obasanjo, because he does not wish to make the same mistake as in 1979, when he handed over to Shagari, either because the president or his acolytes believe that those "disallowable undesirables" are corrupt, incompetent, or both. The critical question then is that if some one that "should not" succeed Obasanjo "miraculously" happens to do so – like what surprisingly happened in Palestine with the success of the Hamas Party - what will President Obasanjo or his acolytes do:   cancel the elections like Babangida did with the Abiola election of June 12, 1993? Plan a military coup or interim national government – as Babangida did in 1993, bringing in Sonekan?   Kill the successful candidate, as Abiola eventually was done in in 1998?  

Or what?

Are we ready for all that trouble again?  Don't we ever learn from the repercussions of such careless talk or actions?   Have we learnt anything from the third-term debacle?

I believe that in the coming 2007 elections, the Nigerian people should make it clear once and for all:   It is the PEOPLE of Nigeria who should – and will – determine the next President based FIRST on the assurance of free and fair elections, and SECONDLY from a slate of candidates, both worthy and possibly unworthy, from all nooks and crannies of the country.

So at this time, we should be talking about the CANDIDATES that Nigeria needs, not the President that Nigeria wants or needs, and certainly not those that the President want to succeed him.  Even then, we should be fixated not just on the Presidency, but be concerned for ALL levels of elected office.

TEN QUALIFICATIONS/CONDITIONS FOR THE CANDIDATES

(1)     success in earlier identical, similar or other endeavors.  For example, a qualified incumbent – that is, one not illegally seeking extension of term - should be able to defend his or her tenure fully and confidently. A vice-president or governor seeking higher office must be able to show with facts and figures what he did with the resources available to him in the lower office.   A newcomer cannot be a failure as a businessman, a student, a civil servant and so forth, and then expect citizens to give him their support for high office.

(2)     Existence of vision – the primary purpose for a candidate to seek an office is to "do something good" for those who elected him, not just power for power's sake, or because "it is the turn of my people."     A people-centered government should lead to long-term, widespread improvement in the human condition of the people.   The specification/implementation of means and strategies (legislation, policies, etc.) that will enable the mobilization and transformation of financial, material and human resources to provide services and products for the satisfaction of the physical and spiritual needs of citizens is paramount. A candidate must be able to share his unique vision for the new office.

(3)     ability to verbally articulate the vision – this is in order to demonstrate originality and personal commitment to the vision outlined, and to assure the voters that the outlined vision is not simply a borrowed one.

(4)     experience as a team player – this is in acknowledgement of the fact that these huge responsibilities of governance cannot be carried out alone, but must be in concert with others at various levels of executive, legislative and judicial capacity.

(5)     ability to lead a team – an elected person automatically becomes a leader of some sort  in society.   Hence a candidate must have demonstrated ahead of time some leadership qualities commensurate with the position that he is seeking.

(6)     transparency and openness – candidate must be prepared to anticipate and publicly answer all questions put to him or her about his finances and other assets, past political and personal life, and on all matters of conscience.   He must be prepared to publicly DEBATE other candidates.

The above qualifications should then be supplemented by the following conditions:

(7)     network of contacts – essentially, these are "references" (some of them might be pejoratively called "godfathers" or party/society "bigwigs")  on the candidate's character and personal integrity.   Others may simply be financial sponsors.  Voters should however be wary of the company that candidates keep and the self-seeking propensity and possibilities of such contacts.

(8)     party affiliation – a candidate, unless he is an independent, must be subject to party ideology and discipline, except on matters of conscience. Personal manifestos of candidates must be consistent with party manifestos, not substitutes for them, the occurrence of which is a recipe for the personalization of power and lack of continuity of policies.

(9)     campaign strategy – a candidate will have to reach voters and then convince them that the prima-facie conditions that he has satisfied place him above other   competitors in the race.

(10) money/finances – Money is always needed for travels, security, camp media adverts, campaign staff and "entertainment" of supporters, both actual and potential.   However, it is deliberately listed LAST here, rather than first, in order to limit its prominence, while acknowledging its importance in financing the efforts to get information about the candidate across to voters.  

EPILOGUE

"It's not the voting that's democracy; it's the counting" - Tom Stoppard.

Elections should be considered by all as sacred acts of modern democracy.   Thus, individuals who offer themselves up for elected office should be considered as candidates for the "priesthood" of democracy.   Consequently,  acts that violate elections – like thuggery and rigging (which is a theft of the collective will of people) – are sacrilegious desecrations worthy of condemnation by all.

Nigeria in 2007 has a unique opportunity to arrange for and obtain the freest and fairest elections in its history.   All citizens should in parallel work towards getting the best candidates, and also letting the people decide in free and fair elections without pre-judging the peoples' decisions ahead of time.