20

Jun

2009

Nzeogwu To Dimka - "The Best Book On The Period So Far" PDF Print E-mail
By Max Siollun

Written by Ohsee of Toronto, Canada

http://ecx.images-amazon.com/images/I/51NCIjVGxKL._SS500_.jpg 

"Oil, Politics & Violence - Nigeria's Military Coup Culture (1966-1976)", by Max Siollun

http://www.amazon.com/Oil-Politics-Violence-Nigerias-1966-1976/dp/0875867081/ref=sr_1_1?ie=UTF8&s=books&qid=1243780456&sr=1-1

http://search.barnesandnoble.com/Oil-Politics-and-Violence/Max-Siollun/e/9780875867083/?itm=2

In the West, considerations of truth and objectivity in history are seen in some quarters as marks of a lack of sophistication. In Nigeria, however, they are matters of life and death. People there die as a result of history forgot, of lessons not learned. Many people die.

Such questions loom large in Nigeria's violent political history of the first two decades after independence. The most problematic have been, what really happened during the first two coups and the resultant civil war? It is here that Nigerians need to know the truth, the whole truth and nothing but the truth, because such reliable knowledge has proved useful in the past. But most Nigerian histories of those turbulent times, are often clouded by the malodorous presence of ethnic chauvinism and hatred of the Other, and the need for self-aggrandizement. Many readers despaired of ever seeing an unbiased history from Nigerians themselves, and sought such objectivity from outsiders who often had little understanding of the subtleties of the Nigerian political milieu.

Thus Mr. Siollun's book about the first four coups (1966-1976) must be considered something of a miracle. Unlike prior writers on the topic from that country, the Nigerian-born historian successfully checked at the door the ethnic biases he surely must have, in order to combine the dispassionate objectivity of the outsider with the nuanced knowledge of the insider. The result is a truly insightful book that is highly accessible to the general reader. The book also has enough new information to serve as a starting point for future investigators who wish to tackle some of the issues in greater detail.

Mr Siollun, whose essays about the first two coups are familiar to those who visit Nigerian websites, has tackled the four coups sequentially, and shown how they are related in terms of personnel involved and lessons to be learned. For instance, some of the participants in the second coup--such as Babangida, Abacha, Yaradua, and Buhari--dominated Nigerian coup-making culture for thirty years. Mr. Siollun shows how failing to punish murderous putschists can and did come back to bite coup beneficiaries in the arse, since "unpunished coup plotters will re-offend. The coup plotters behind Nigeria's military regimes were repeat offenders--often with fatal consequences for themselves. They were men who lived life on the edge, snacked on danger and dined on death. For them, coup plotting was in the blood."

Mr. Siollun's summary of the pre-coup political situation is concise and lucid, and looks at the events in new ways. For instance, most people probably do not see the Nzeogwu coup as the second attempt at overthrowing the Balewa government by force. While many followers of Nigerian history may know that Awolowo--leader of the Action Group, one of the opposition parties in the First Republic--was jailed for treason in 1964, few are aware that it was not a trumped up charge, and that three decades later, Action Group General Secretary, S.G. Ikoku, confirmed that there was a genuine AG plot to topple the federal government.

Mr. Siollun is at his strongest where he skillfully cuts away the myths that have grown weed-like around the more controversial of those 1966 events. One of the more pernicious of these is the lie that the January 15 1966 coup was an effort at Igbo domination organized by the Igbos. Mr. Siollun demonstrates that there is a very strong case for seeing January 15 as an UPGA (United Progressive Grand Alliance) coup, or in other words, a second attempt by the South or southern political parties to wrest power from the North. By examining the national character of the Igbos, and the stereotypes that grew around their business activities, he carefully shows us the historical process via which the Igbos became the national scapegoat; we see how one section of the country practiced what he calls "transferred malice," where the Igbos were singled out for punishment during troubles in which they only played a bit part.

In this absorbing and fascinating work, there is a good deal of new and startling information: who knew that in private moments, the genial Ironsi, first military ruler, liked to refer jokingly to his fellow Igbos by the pejorative Northern term "Nyamiri?" We learn of the enormous family pressures on Northern officers and men after January 15 demanding vengeance for the Northern officers killed. The blood relationships between Northern People's Congress (NPC) politicians, and some of the July 1966 plotters are revealed--Inua Wada, defence minister in the Balewa government during the First Republic, was Murtala Muhammed's cousin, for example. We begin to understand the Machiavellian Ibrahim Babangida--military president from 1985 to 1993--better when we find out his closest friends were among the Dimka coup plotters of Feb 1976, a coup in which those very friends marked him for liquidation. We learn that Gen. Obasanjo wept when the poisonous chalice of leadership would not pass him by. Such brief character and biographical sketches of principal players inject life into the narrative, and make the historical protagonists more than just names on a paper.

The book of course has its flaws, some quite minor and perhaps fixable in later editions. The footnoting seems somewhat haphazard and sparse. To some, this may be considered a benefit, but it could be frustrating to the reader or researcher who wants to learn more by exploring sources. And one of the more vexatious things is that the footnoting, like Carlyle's History, "is silent where you most wish her to speak."

More egregious are the omissions and failures to explore some controversial areas. We do not know the extent of Lt. Col Adekunle Fajuyi's involvement in January 15 even though Mr. Siollun was involved a few years back in a debate about it with someone on the Internet who went by the moniker "Arthur Unegbe". Perhaps there is nothing to know or find out, but Mr. Siollun's complete silence--no discussion of rumours, or analysis of possibilities--is troubling. Also surely we could learn from a brief exploration of the contradictions in the public statements of Gowon's apologists and the actions of the man that suggest some foreknowledge of the July horrors? However, in light of the importance and intelligence of this work, it would be churlish to carp about these matters.

I admit to being skeptical before reading this work, expecting the typical tendentious and ethnically jaundiced approach that colours most Nigerian commentaries on the coups of 1966. What Mr. Siollun has given us rather is a deft, measured, and just examination of those tragic events, all done in very accessible prose. All Nigerians owe him a debt of gratitude. I wish I could find a way to get a copy into the hands of every educated Nigerian.

The Book can be purchased from:

Amazon - http://www.amazon.com/Oil-Politics-Violence-Nigerias-1966-1976/dp/0875867081/ref=sr_1_1?ie=UTF8&s=books&qid=1243780456&sr=1-1

Barnes & Noble: http://search.barnesandnoble.com/Oil-Politics-and-Violence/Max-Siollun/e/9780875867083/?itm=2



Your Comments

Please make The Square an enjoyable experience for everyone by refraining from gratuitous ad-hominem contributions, defamatory comments and off-topic posting. Such posts will be removed.

User Avatar
RobotRobot is offline

 # 1 | 21.06.2009 00:46

Written by Ohsee of Toronto, Canada In the West, considerations of truth and objectivity in history are seen in some quarters as marks of a lack of sophistication. In Nigeria, however, they are matters of life and death. People there die as a result of history forgot, of lessons not learned. Many people die. Such questions loom large in Nigeria's violent political history of the first two decades after independence. The most problematic have been, what really happened during the first two coups and the resultant civil war? It is here that Nigerians need to know the truth, the whole truth and nothing but the truth, because such reliable knowledge has proved useful in the past. But most Nigerian histories of those turbulent times, are often clouded by...Read the full article.

User Avatar
Anioma777Anioma777 is offline

 # 2 | 21.06.2009 04:43

Hmmmmm......sounds interesting and a nice plug for your book. I will purchase this book in a few weeks time. I like the final comment by the article poster about every educated Nigerin should have this book. I wish schools will cover this period of our history too.

User Avatar
akuluounoakuluouno is offline

 # 3 | 21.06.2009 08:32

Anioma, Villagers,

Nigeria had no history between 66 and 70:pray: History died in Nigeria and it will not be told until 2066 when, if there is any Nigeria, then the story of that era would be told.
So teaching young Nigerians Siollun's version may end up making them bad people bad country and good leaders :D which of course is more diabolical than good people, great country, bad leaders:D

User Avatar
Anioma777Anioma777 is offline

 # 4 | 21.06.2009 09:55

@akuluouno


Anioma, Villagers,

Nigeria had no history between 66 and 70:pray: History died in Nigeria and it will not be told until 2066 when, if there is any Nigeria, then the story of that era would be told.
So teaching young Nigerians Siollun's version may end up making them bad people bad country and good leaders :D which of course is more diabolical than good people, great country, bad leaders:D



I think you misunderstood me. When I say this period of history all accounts should be made available to the children and they can decide for themselves..not just Maxsiollun'r book. Yes I know its idealistic and wishful thinking as most Nigerians ( old and young ) lack the capacity to think logically or question things. You might be surprised in 2066 Nigeria could be a better place. It can only get worse until it gets better.

User Avatar
netotsenetotse is offline

 # 5 | 22.06.2009 06:49

@anioma777 and akuluouno


well i dont belong to your generation or the next but i've read both max's articles(thats actually wot made me join NVS sef) and i agree with anioma777 its important that my generation is aware of the past, there's this quote by George Santayana that says something like 'those that forget the past are condemned to repeat it' in our case it might not necessarily be wrt (with respect to)soldiers and coup but with leaders passing on the their lackeys and cronies, being aware makes you that much better at spotting what is really happening!

User Avatar
RanterRanter is offline

 # 6 | 22.06.2009 07:30

the link does not open for me......Opera intolerant?

User Avatar
Anioma777Anioma777 is offline

 # 7 | 23.06.2009 14:10

@netotse


well i dont belong to your generation or the next but i've read both max's articles(thats actually wot made me join NVS sef) and i agree with anioma777 its important that my generation is aware of the past, there's this quote by George Santayana that says something like 'those that forget the past are condemned to repeat it' in our case it might not necessarily be wrt (with respect to)soldiers and coup but with leaders passing on the their lackeys and cronies, being aware makes you that much better at spotting what is really happening!



I am of average intelligence, depending on what aspect of intelligence your measuring:D but I like the fact you understand the notion of not forgetting the past so as not to repeat it. I will add something extra which I think you already know. Sometimes the past even if you where not part of it, is not very nice its sad but my mother through her deeds and acts showed me that one must learn to let go and not hold grudges. It not easy but then again its not impossible.

User Avatar
maxsiollunmaxsiollun is offline

 # 8 | 30.06.2009 08:49

Guys, thanks for your comments. Just to let you know, I wrote the book in order to inform and educate - not to make money. I spent several years researching, traveling and flying all over the place to interview people, collect historical documents, and reading line by line through all manner of archives and documentation in order to get to the root of our history. The amount of time and energy I spent in preparing the book could itself be the subject of a book!

This is the most troubling period of Nigerian history and it is a tragedy that we do not do enough to learn and preserve our history. We know all about the American civil war, Pearl Harbour and the battle of Hastings, but not enough of us know our own history.

I wrote the book in a balanced way - just presenting the facts and allowing the reader to make up their own mind about the controversies covered. We owe it to our future generations to preserve the legacy of these critical times, so they do not repeat the mistakes of the past...
 

Services : E-mail news | RSS Feeds | Podcasts
Links:   About the NVS | Contact Us | Terms of Use | Privacy & Cookies | Advertise With Us
All Rights Reserved. NigeriaVillageSquare.com