|
Shall we
dance with the president?
By Levi Obijiofor
Friday,
17 August 2007
One of the
news stories that ought to catch our attention this week was the report
that the Presidency was planning to celebrate the first 100 days of
the installation of President Umaru Musa YarAduas government.
Already, as The Guardian reported three days ago, a committee
has been set up to oil the music drums, to prepare the meals and to
select the best wines. In all counts, the proposed celebration is unwarranted.
And I will explain why shortly. If he accedes to elaborate plans to
mark his governments first 100 days in office, at a cost yet to be
determined, YarAdua would have demonstrated that he is not immuned,
afterall, from the same virus that afflicts political and military leaders
in Nigeria so soon after they assume office.
Is a governments
survival in office for the first 100 days worthy of celebration? Perhaps
it is, in the context of the history of the recent national elections
and the rampant and audacious manner in which the elections were rigged.
The conquerors of our votes should be excused for planning to
celebrate their eminent victory. Just when YarAdua was beginning
to receive media commendations for his first few splendid decisions
and just when the nation was adjusting to a different style of people-oriented
government, the Presidency and the Information and Communications Minister
are proposing to dump a pot of political mess on YarAduas path.
YarAdua must resist the temptation to regale himself with the smoothly
choreographed achievements of his government. Celebrating the first
100 days in office is unnecessary, a waste of resources and a lousy
way of stamping ones authority on national problems.
A report in
The Guardian of Tuesday this week quoted Information and Communications
Minister John Odey as saying that YarAduas first 100 days in office
will be used to assess the impact of government on key sectors of
the economy, while the administration expects the media to highlight
both the things that the government is doing right and things it is
not doing correctly so that they could be addressed. Well, in that
case, lets start with the things the president is not doing right
because this farce called the presidents first 100 days in office
is a gratuitous distraction from serious national issues. This proposed
celebration of YarAduas first 100 days in office casts a huge
insult on voters who elected YarAdua on the expectation that he would
settle down to deal with huge economic and socio-political problems
that afflict the nation.
YarAdua
must demonstrate that he is a serious president, not a president that
promotes the epicurean philosophy of eating, drinking and merry-making
on the belief that our lives would expire after tomorrow. A president
who has been in office for just about three months should not be dancing
to the fawning adulation of wolves and pretentious fans who are hugging
the corridors of the presidential villa in search of favour, fame, contracts
and money. Celebrating the first 100 days in office is inappropriate
even if YarAduas government did not start the practice. It is
also profoundly unethical for a newly elected government to be patting
itself on the chest so early in its tenure.
The Information
and Communications Minister should be advised to reconsider his grandiloquent
plans. A government is judged not by ministers who serve in that government
but by the citizens who experience the impact of government policies,
as well as the appropriateness or inappropriateness of government decisions.
The right to evaluate a government must remain with the citizens. If
the Presidency and the Information and Communications Minister are obsessed
with popularising YarAdua, I would suggest they should organise open-day
forums in selected rural town halls across the country. The essence
of those public forums would be to enable YarAdua to actively engage
many citizens on a face-to-face basis in order to understand their concerns
and their assessment of his governments performance.
The public
forums should be conducted in selected rural centres because the rural
areas represent the heart and rhythm of life across the nation. Rural
dwellers are capable of providing YarAdua with an undiluted assessment
of how his government is travelling in the first few months of its four-year
term. If YarAdua and his ministers are interested in hearing unadorned
truth, the government should tour the rural areas to feel and share
the pains and the joys of the people who really represent the heartbeat
of the nation. Abuja might provide YarAdua and his ministers the
pristine environment they love to live in but life also exists outside
of Abuja. A government that is keen to receive an honest report card
on its performance should administer evaluation forms to people who
reside outside Abuja and the city centres.
It has been
said that YarAdua is a man who reflects deeply on a range of issues
before taking a decision. I endorse that practice. It has also been
said that YarAdua likes to attend to every argument with the forensic
skills of a coroner in order to determine the pros and cons. That should
be the hallmark of a wise leader. However, I find it hard to believe
that this is the same man who has allowed his ministers and advisers
to drag him into a project that is likely to sully the image of his
government so early in the day. YarAdua should instruct his ministers
and those agile party planners who are keen to celebrate anything to
shelve their plans for a celebration of the presidents first 100
days in office. There are more serious issues that require national
attention than jumping to dance music on the floor of the presidential
villa.
For example,
in the southeast corner of the country, in particular in the Niger Delta
region, regular bouts of gang fights, shootings and kidnapping have
become a part of the daily menu served to the residents of the region.
All these represent the unintended consequences of the governments
failure to resolve the festering crises in the region. Resolving the
crises in the Niger Delta and restoring peace and civil order to the
region should be in the priority list of the president. Other issues
that should command the priority attention of the president include
but are not limited to improvements in the economy, a genuine reduction
in the level of poverty, provision of medical infrastructure and medicines,
enhancement of the existing facilities in hospitals, and improvements
in the conditions of service of medical practitioners in the country,
provision of good roads, and effective supply of electricity across
the country. These are daunting challenges and no one expects the government
to fix the problems overnight. But they deserve presidential attention
nevertheless.
So far, YarAdua
has kicked off his presidency by undoing in a majestic manner some of
the errant decisions made by his predecessor. He has already cancelled
the dubious sale of the Port Harcourt and Kaduna refineries. He has
shown his respect for the judiciary by enforcing, for instance, the
Supreme Court judgment on the tenure of Anambra State Governor Peter
Obi. YarAdua has also put concrete meaning to the phrase full
disclosure: one of the first things he did on assumption of office
was to provide the public with a list of his assets and the value of
those assets. On the platform of history, YarAdua has promptly distanced
his government from his predecessors brusque and authoritarian style.
For example, he ordered four weeks ago the release of funds meant for
Lagos State local governments which were withheld impetuously by Olusegun
Obasanjo for more than four years in defiance of the Supreme Court decision.
Although YarAdua
has started on a slow but good note, he should be reminded that the
downfall of a government (in terms of public rating) can be much faster
than the rise of that government. He must not allow his ministers and
praise singers to switch his focus away from compelling issues of national
significance. One hundred days in office should not be regarded as a
valid global benchmark for assessing the performance of a government.
After all, there is no impeccable evidence to suggest that the flavour
of a governments effectiveness can be deciphered automatically within
the first 100 days of the governments tenure.

|
Posted by Robot| 04.10.2007 08:06