| Nigeria: A formula for failure |
|
![]() |
| Written by Levi Obijiofor | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Friday, 25 April 2008 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
Nigeria: A formula for failure TOO many metaphors have been used to describe the crisis of leadership in Nigeria, including the intractable nature of the country's problems. The most appropriate metaphor, in my judgement, is the one that depicts Nigeria as a mischievous, accident-prone child. The moment you wheel the kid out of the operating theatre, you discover there are a lot more injuries requiring urgent surgery. Where do you start to analyse the numerous problems that have overwhelmed this country for the past 48 years? Our problems are almost inoperable. The economy is in bad shape. Our healthcare system is bleeding profusely and needs urgent blood transfusion and a massive overhaul. The education sector is struggling to recover from the destructive consequences of years of federal neglect. Federal and state public service has been turned into private service. The agricultural sector has been abandoned. Today, everyone is complaining about the soaring prices of foodstuff and the inability of many countries to feed their population. Nigeria is one of those countries where hungry people far outnumber the rest of the population. It is a recipe for disaster. Here is the irony of our situation. Basic services such as electricity, good network of roads, drinking water and public housing long regarded as the undeniable rights of every citizen now constitute new age luxuries, available only to those who can afford them. The political system has defied all manner of electoral experiments and voting procedures. Our political arena has been hijacked by yesterday's men who want to remain relevant even as global events suggest they are a hopeless breed. In Nigeria, many politicians contest elections with the primary goal of enriching themselves or defrauding their country even before they have served half their tenure. Our political leaders expect to be served by their electors rather than serve their constituencies. Since independence in October 1960, we have watched a procession of military and political leaders grab television and radio microphones to promise us they have figured out the solutions to the nation's problems. Like experienced conmen, they have mastered the art of scamming an unsuspecting public. They know how to rouse a dispirited nation in times of despair. The harder and more determined they come for our votes, the less suspicious we are of their adulterated intentions. Every political or military leader who emerged on the national stage since independence (with the possible exception of Murtala Muhammed), came with a bag full of promises but left the stage with a bag full of unfulfilled promises. By the time the nation uncovered the counterfeit value of their promises, it had become too late to do anything. These deceptive apostles of national rediscovery would have stuffed their kits with ill-acquired national wealth and disappeared from the stage. For a country so blessed with human and natural resources, Nigeria has been so unfortunate. For the past 48 years, the country has had to contend with political comedians thrown at our faces by our own flawed political process. The problem with the country's underdevelopment does not rest solely with under-performance by purposeless political leaders. For nearly five decades since independence, we have had to accommodate military leaders who imposed themselves on us by their sheer ability to organise successful coups and threaten everyone with the barrel of their guns. Has it not been said that a nation deserves the leaders it gets? Yes, particularly self-appointed military leaders who were not given any electoral mandate to rule over us, not to mention politicians who emerged through rigged and contentious voting procedures. Since independence, the country has been denied genuine socioeconomic development such as improvements in the living standards of the people, provision of basic infrastructure, valuable healthcare system, effective network of air, sea, as well as road and rail transportation system, and efficient telecommunications network. Why has Nigeria become a country where virtually everything has ceased to work? Why does everyone carry mobile phones in their hip pockets even when network services are difficult to access? You criticise poor services offered by telecommunications providers and someone springs on your face with a trite reminder that, before the advent of mobile telephony, things used to be much worse. Why do we accept poor standards today on the basis that the past used to be worse than the present? It is this kind of creepy argument that tends to justify the way we are treated as second-class citizens by foreign businesses that make huge profits even in our own country. On a larger scale, the gradual collapse of Nigeria is indeed evidence of the failure of public and private institutions in the country. It is also proof of the failure of political leadership, including the failure of the public to stand up and hold the leaders accountable for their transgressions. Take a look at the decrepit state of federal roads (not to mention state owned roads) and you will realise the high level of the financial swindle that goes on unchecked at the federal and state levels. Every year, the Presidency announces with ceremony the stupendous amount of money that has been set aside for major capital projects in the country. At the end of the budget year, we do not hear about the completion of those projects. And no one accounts for the unused money. In the past eight years and beyond, billions of naira were set aside at the federal level for road construction and reconstruction across the country. More than eight years on, the existing roads look like obstacle courses deliberately set up to test drivers on how to overcome emergencies on our roads. Nothing much has happened to federal roads to suggest that the money allocated for road repairs has been utilised legitimately and appropriately. There is something spineless about a majority of the population. When people drive on bad roads and develop headaches or other forms of injuries, they whinge, curse, swear and shout but remain in their condition. Taxpayers are entitled to ask questions about how their money is being utilised at federal and state levels. Shouldn't we be asking questions about how the money voted for road rehabilitation has been used by federal officials? A report in The Guardian of Monday this week highlighted the terrible state of roads across the country. Federal Transport Minister John Okechukwu Emeka was reported to have expressed shock that over 80 per cent of the country's road system is still in bad condition in spite of the vast amount of money allocated for road reconstruction by the federal government -- past and present. The admission by the minister underlines public suspicion that money allocated for federal road projects has been hijacked or misused or redirected into some other projects that have nothing to do with road rehabilitation. This is certainly not a good indication of accountability or transparency in government. President Umaru Musa Yar'Adua has consistently described himself as a "servant-leader". It is a very good doctrine to adopt in a country ravaged by years of endemic corruption and abuse of office. As a "servant-leader", Yar'Adua should lead and encourage his ministers and other senior federal officials to develop a culture of accountability and transparency. He should develop a policy that compels federal ministers to conduct quarterly or monthly open forum in various parts of the country where these public officers are asked questions about their performance? Yar'Adua has started on a good note by insisting that all federal ministries and departments must return to the treasury, by the end of each financial year, unused money allocated to their ministries. The first victims of this presidential order are now in court. The bigger question is: would the legal sanctioning of former officials of the Health Ministry be a one-off federal policy show off or would Yar'Adua use it as a platform to underline his anti-corruption credentials? Time will tell.
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| < Prev | Next > |
|---|
Services : E-mail news |
RSS Feeds | Podcasts
Links: About the NVS | Contact Us | Terms of Use | Privacy & Cookies | Advertise With Us
All Rights Reserved. NigeriaVillageSquare.com





Posted by Robot| 25.04.2008 06:32