| Danjuma, the sole surviving Saint |
|
![]() |
| Written by Levi Obijiofor | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Friday, 29 February 2008 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
Danjuma, the sole surviving Saint THEOPHILUS Yakubu Danjuma, former Defence Minister and former Chief of Army Staff, knows how to stir controversy and draw attention to himself at a time when the nation was waiting anxiously for a verdict on the pile of petitions stacked against President Umaru Musa Yar'Adua's controversial election. Why Danjuma chose to speak at the time he did or what he aimed to achieve by his spiteful comments against some national leaders, including his so-called former friends and enemies (dead or alive), would remain fuzzy until the dust clears over the validity of the 2007 presidential election. The two events may not be closely related but some of the principal characters who received Danjuma's caustic comments are still fighting for their political future at the election petitions' tribunal and most probably also at the Supreme Court. Atiku Abubakar, Muhammadu Buhari and Umaru Musa Yar'Adua are contesting for the right to be crowned the valid and legal holder of the people's mandate to be president. It may take a while for the courts to unpack the maze of legal arguments in order to sort out the true winner from the pretenders. But the nation has been patient for the past 10 months and there is no reason why everyone can't wait till the Supreme Court has passed a final verdict. However, what cannot wait and what we must not allow to be swept away by the wind of time are the deleterious and uncorroborated assertions of Danjuma about his role in the army, his role in national politics and his interactions with national leaders. After reading the two-part interview published in The Guardian on Sunday of February 17 and 24, 2008, I wondered whether I had read one man's fictional and exaggerated accounts of national events. I also wondered about the motives behind the interview. I didn't have to wander and wonder too far. Here is why. Right from Danjuma's opening comments in the interview, you could see that the man wanted desperately to project himself in various ways: as a national hero and an infallible warrior; as the conqueror of the invincible Biafran forces during the Nigeria-Biafra war; and as the pillar of wisdom on which previous heads of state leaned for advice and national direction. If anyone wanted evidence that Danjuma's interview was driven by a number of self-serving objectives, the evidence exists in the man's own words. It is unimaginable that one man could talk so intensely about his relationship with national leaders, his in-depth knowledge of military politics, and his overriding love for his country and yet hardly admit that, in his previous capacities as Defence Minister and Chief of Army Staff, he made some fundamental errors of judgment. Danjuma didn't talk about his flaws because, as a super-human soldier and a folk hero in the army, he had no blemishes. Ironically, virtually everyone that Danjuma talked about suffered from human flaws or was weighed down with a baggage of human weaknesses. Here are examples. J.T.U. Aguiyi-Ironsi, former head of state, was not a brave soldier. Olusegun Obasanjo, the man with two masks, was the craftiest military politician that Nigeria ever produced. Alex Ekwueme, former vice-president under the government of Shehu Shagari, did not have leadership qualities and did not deserve to be Nigeria's president because Ekwueme committed the cardinal sin of refusing to approve the over-priced building plans presented to him by Danjuma and Chief Simeon Adebo, then chairman of the National Institute for Policy and Strategic Studies (NIPSS). Atiku Abubakar did not escape Danjuma's acid test of human character. In Danjuma's judgment, Atiku was an unforgiving politician, "one of the most vindictive politicians that exist today in Nigeria..." Umaru Musa Yar'Adua was dismissed as "a harmless but spineless president". Even Muhammadu Buhari, who received a sprinkle of praises from Danjuma, was described as "a very inflexible person..., he was too rigid, he was too inflexible to hold a political post". While Danjuma was hard and often vicious in his assessment of these national leaders, he never acknowledged that he had his own imperfections. This makes Danjuma the sole surviving Saint in Nigeria. He radiates the image of a man who is specially equipped with an over-abundance of wisdom. Unfortunately, Danjuma forgot a popular Nigerian proverb which states that when you point a finger of accusation against people, you should observe carefully how the other four fingers are pointing back at you. The image that Danjuma cut in the interview was that of a red-eyed vindictive man who was determined to wreak vengeance against some people. He often spoke as if people owed their lives to him, or, as if the nation owes him some kind of debt. His judgment of Ekwueme's leadership qualities was na�ve, too narrow-minded and extraordinarily selfish. His comments against Aguiyi-Ironsi depicted Danjuma not as a true nationalist or a loyal soldier but as a callous man whose activities are driven by tribal agenda. Danjuma's assessment of Obasanjo, his former colleague in the army and his two-time boss (both as former head of state and as an elected president), exposed the capricious side of Danjuma: first, as a man who should never be trusted and; second, as a man whose loyalty is as brittle as a chaff of wheat. Of course, Obasanjo has many flaws but why did it take Danjuma too long to discover Obasanjo's blemishes? And why did he choose to talk about them now? There is reason to question Danjuma's sense of judgment of human character. Perhaps at 70, we can attribute his inconsistencies to creeping senility. There are worrying cracks in the man's understanding of human nature because, on two occasions, Danjuma misjudged Obasanjo to be the best leadership candidate in the country. The first time was soon after the assassination of Murtala Muhammed and the second time was when Obasanjo came out of jail. Yet in the interview, Danjuma revealed that Obasanjo, his former hero, was a coward because he went into a long period of hiding after the assassination of Murtala Muhammed. Hear Danjuma: "I think it is public knowledge that Obasanjo fled on the day Murtala Muhammed was killed. He remained in hiding until the coup was aborted..." Danjuma's inconsistencies are too many. He admitted in the interview that he first believed in Obasanjo's skills as a military tactician because of the impressive war plan that Obasanjo drew and presented to aid the Nigerian troops to encircle and annihilate the remaining battalions of the Biafran army. It is curious that Danjuma should place his faith in a man whom he implied was a coward at heart and selfish too. When Danjuma described Obasanjo as "the most toxic leader that Nigeria has produced so far", he exposed the depth of his bitterness against Obasanjo and also his (Danjuma's) character flaws. How did Obasanjo whom Danjuma described previously as the best material for national leadership suddenly earn the inglorious title of the most poisonous national leader? Only Danjuma, in his infinite wisdom, can put a spin on that. Surely, Obasanjo has his faults, most of which he wears visibly on his shirt-sleeve. But to use the word "toxic" to describe one's former hero suggests the nature of the fire raging inside Danjuma's tommy. Danjuma's capacity to judge human character is erratic. By imputation, Obasanjo was the best national leader only when he served Danjuma's interests. Once Obasanjo ceased to serve Danjuma's interests, Obasanjo became, in Danjuma's views, a tribalist and a counterfeit version of a born-again Christian. Would any man ever satisfy Danjuma? Not by the way he spoke angrily against anyone he didn't like. If Danjuma were as forthright as he presented himself in that interview, he should have taken responsibility for (a). going against the mood of the senior military officers in the Supreme Military Council who did not want Obasanjo to succeed Murtala Muhammed; and (b). campaigning vigorously for the success of Obasanjo's presidential bid, soon after Obasanjo was released from jail. Only the gullible would read Danjuma's thoughts in that interview and conclude that the man was or is the sole surviving Saint in Nigeria.
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Last Updated ( Thursday, 24 April 2008 ) | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| < Prev | Next > |
|---|
Services : E-mail news |
RSS Feeds | Podcasts
Links: About the NVS | Contact Us | Terms of Use | Privacy & Cookies | Advertise With Us
All Rights Reserved. NigeriaVillageSquare.com





Posted by Robot| 29.02.2008 07:41