25

Oct

2007

REVEALED: How British govt. paid Ex-Ministers Okonjo-Iweala, Adeniji's salaries PDF Print E-mail
By Empowered Newswire
25 October 2007

Laolu Akande,  New York

A significant detail about the controversial dollar salaries paid to two Nigerian federal ministers during the Obasanjo administration has surfaced in New York with the disclosure by a United Nations Development Programme official that the British government made substantial contribution to the funds used to pay the ministers.

Both Dr. Ngozi Okonjo-Iweala and Chief Olu Adeniji, initially Finance and Foreign Affairs Ministers were approved for dollar-denominated salaries by the former President Olusegun Obasanjo on the strength of their previous international jobs,( the former as Vice President at the World Bank and the latter as a United Nations Special Representative) before they were named ministers.

Answering a question from this reporter at the UN last week about the UNDP trust fund which was used to pay the dollar salaries in Nigeria, the UNDP administrator Kermal Davis stated that "capacity-building covered not only procedures and computers, but also included skilled people in the Government and other public systems."

He said very poor salary structures in some countries made it extremely hard to retain skilled people, and the primary approach of the UNDP was support for civil service reform so that better salaries could be paid to retain skilled people within the system. 

Davis's assistant, Gilbert Houngbo, head of UNDP's Africa Bureau, to whom Davis directed the question on the Nigeria dollar salary saga added that the "trust fund was not funded with UNDP money, but by the Nigerian Government and one important national donor.  The UNDP merely managed the fund, which had been set up for a temporary period and then phased out."

It was confirmed that the national donor that the UNDP officials referred to was the British government's international development agency-Department for International Development, better known DFID. 

Investigations revealed that DFID which played a crucial role in working with Dr. Ngozi Okonjo-Iweala to set up a reliable database on Nigeria's foreign debt at the inception of her tenure as Finance Minister, contributed substantial funds to the payment of her $240,000 salary through DFID's contribution to the Trust Fund managed by the UNDP.

Houngbo added that similar capacity-building initiatives are currently on in Sierra Leone, Malawi, Liberia, Kenya and Ethiopia. He said matter-of-factly there are African experts abroad who should be encouraged to return home and help their countries. For instance he said there are more than 4000 Nigerian doctors in the US alone. 

But there were concerns expressed during the dollar salary controversy on whether a foreign source ought to be paying the salaries of Nigerian ministers. Questions were raised then on potential conflicts of interests that was inherent in such arrangements.

Davis noted that the UNDP had an approach to helping civil service reform that included facilitating the return of migrants.  One of the most important things one could do was to help such migrants return home or let skilled professionals stay in the country.

The UNDP administrator noted that in African countries "capacity-building, at both the local and national levels, remained the top challenge, and that was where the United Nations, including the UNDP, had a key role to play."

According to him the excellent leadership in the ministries of many countries was characterized by a new “can-do, results-oriented and pragmatic” attitude. But then capacity remained weak in terms of overall administration. He said the focus of the UNDP was on the capacity of African Governments to deal with the global economy and foreign investment, and to negotiate optimal contracts with foreign investors that were truly beneficial to their respective countries.

After joining the Obasanjo administration in 2003, Okonjo-Iweala was paid $240,000 and the then Foreign Affairs Minister Ambassador Oluyemi Adeniji was paid $120,000. Later in 2005, Dr. Ikemba Iweala, the former Finance Minister's wife disclosed that Okonjo-Iweala had stopped taking the dollar salary.  

DFID, the British government development is the arm of the UK Government that manages Britain's aid to poor countries and works to get rid of extreme poverty. Headed by a Cabinet minister, who is a senior minister in the UK Government. The agency prides its main duty as that of reducing poverty around the world, with two headquarters (in London and East Kilbride, near Glasgow) and 64 offices overseas. DFID also has over 2500 staff, almost half of whom work abroad.

Dr. Iweala had depended on DFID to help build a database to ascertain Nigeria's foreign debt and also to help move towards the negotiation of a deal that lead to the canceling of parts of the national debt. In 2006/2007, DFID claims that it had helped Nigeria to save about 850M Pounds which would now be spent on roads and power. That was made possible through its provision of technical assistance to the Nigerian budget office in order to improve the country's budget system.

Similarly the DFID said it spent about 1.05B Pounds in the same 2006/7 on poverty reduction in Africa, with special emphasis 16 priority countries on the continent including Nigeria.

 




Your Comments

Please make The Square an enjoyable experience for everyone by refraining from gratuitous ad-hominem contributions, defamatory comments and off-topic posting. Such posts will be removed.

User Avatar
RobotRobot is offline

 # 1 | 25.10.2007 08:46

Laolu Akande, New York
A significant detail about the contr...Read the full article.

User Avatar
WillyWilly is offline

 # 2 | 25.10.2007 11:00

http://www.newsweek.com/id/41885/page/4

President of Ecuador: Rafael Correa

Ecuador's new left- leaning president, Rafael Correa, studied economics at the University of Illinois. But since his Inauguration he's enjoyed little contact with Washington, and appears set upon economic policies that owe much to Venezuela's populist President Hugo Chávez. Last week Correa spoke to NEWSWEEK's Lally Weymouth about his vision for his country. Excerpts:

Weymouth:People want to know if you are as anti-U.S. as your rhetoric would indicate.
Correa: We have a lot of consideration for this great country. I lived here and have two academic diplomas from the University of Illinois. We would like to improve our commercial cooperation with the U.S.

Then why do you oppose the U.S.-Ecuador trade pact?
Because it will destroy our agricultural sector. Do you believe that free trade is positive for every country? That is a huge mistake. The most protectionist country in history has been the U.S. We believe in trade, but free trade is dangerous for countries like ours.

So, to build up your country, you have to be protectionist?
No, we have to use international trade smartly. Our country doesn't have a national currency—we have the dollar. If you don't have a monetary policy like Ecuador, you have to keep your commercial policy.

How close are you to Venezuela's Hugo Chávez? You invited him to your Inauguration and called him a close personal friend.
He is a very good friend of mine. we are building a national Ecuadorian project and don't accept any foreign intervention from either Venezuela or from the U.S.

Do you admire Chávez and think he has done a good job?
Yes, I think he's a very honest person—a clear leader, a very democratic president.

You are now calling for a new constituent assembly as Chávez did.
It's said that this will make the executive branch stronger.

In our country, the executive power is very weak. Here you have a much stronger executive power. The executive needs more power in order to lead the country.

Why have you said that you would not renew the U.S. lease on the base at Manta in 2009?
You are asking me why not. I am asking you why "yes."

Because it is used for anti-drug surveillance flights.
Ecuador is not a drug producer, and we have been very successful in our fight against drugs. So, why put a foreign military base in our country?

So you will not renew the lease?
Only if the United States allows us to put an Ecuadorian base in Miami.

You have spoken about either not paying or restructuring Ecuador's foreign debt.
We are going to pay the foreign debt as long as the situation in the country allows us to pay it. If we don't have enough money to pay the social claims in Ecuador, salaries, etc., and at the same time to pay foreign debt, our ethical and technical priorities are very clear. First, to attempt to face the national needs; later, the foreign debt.

Why did you invite Iranian president Mahmoud Ahmadinejad to your Inauguration? What do you think he can do for you?
They're going to open a commercial office in our country. It is a country with 80 million people and with oil. They need a lot of things that we can sell them. Why not sell to them?

User Avatar
ojembaojemba is offline

 # 3 | 25.10.2007 11:44

Anybody who does not know by now that Ngozi was simply an agent of the Paris and London club is a bit on the slow side, perhaps slower than the bungling dunce OBJ who touts the so called debt payment as one of his greatest achievements. The man was a huge embarrasment, those who know will tell you much he elicited laughter behind the scene whenever he showed up in one of those western capitals regurgitating the rubbish their paid agents had fed him. You can all see how much Nigeria has developed since the apostles of world bank economics forked over no less than $20b to London and Paris club, what a bunch of jokers!!

User Avatar
Toku.AToku.A is offline

 # 4 | 25.10.2007 11:55

Interesting write up, what can we say, but was it illegal?

User Avatar
Bode EluyeraBode Eluyera is offline

 # 5 | 25.10.2007 16:38

Afefe ti fe, a ti ri idi adiye. The cat has been let out of the bag. This news is not a surprise to me. More and more facts are now being revealed to prove that Iweala served the financial interest of the World Bank and western countries, at the expense of Nigeria. It's high time we woke up from our slumber and faced the bitter truth. And the bitter truth is that Iweala is traitor and not a hero, as we wrongly assume. Why would the British pay her salary if they did not have a personal interest? Undoubtedly, Iweala did a great damage to Nigeria's economy.

We should not be emotional or carried away by her recent appointment as World Bank director. And the award given to her recently by the United States. It's more a public relations award to continue fooling us, and for making Nigeria much poorer than a significant contribution to our economy. There are many well educated Nigerians who unfortunately have used their knowledge only to milk Nigeria dry or sell its economic interests for peanuts. Iweala's role in the debt negotiation will always be controversial especially for those of us who are well versed in Financial mathematics and economics in general. I have already written an article on this issue titled "Empowering Nigerian professionals in turning around the economy." (nigeriansinamerica.com) Below is an excerpt from the article concerning Iweala.


"...It was reported in the news that the finance ministry employed the service of a foreign consulting firm to negotiate our debts, and paid $100,000 a month for more than 12 months. In my opinion, these consulting companies including the one used by the federal government are parts of the networks; mentioned in Perkin's book, set up by foreign companies to exploit developing countries. Debt reduction negotiations is the prerogative of the finance ministry to carry out on its own.

The ministry should have searched for Nigerians well versed in this field to carry out the assignment.

By so doing, these Nigerian specialists will not only be given the opportunity to upgrade or add to their professional experience but, sensitive information concerning the nation's economy will be protected, and most especially, negotiation tactics and strategies to achieve a desired result will be intact.

I have no doubts that in my mind that if the former finance minister had taken her time to search well, she would definitely have found some Nigerians who are well qualified enough to carry out this job. And needless to say that, the job would have been done at a much cheaper rate; and this would have saved enormous amount of the taxpayers' money.

May I please ask at this juncture then why the hell has the federal government paid the former financial minister more than $200,000, if she still had to invite consultants at a sky rocket price.

Personally, I believe that the appointment of the former finance minister was a 'technical mistake' on the part of the federal government. Inviting a V.P. from the World Bank to negotiate debts owned to The World Bank or its subsidiaries created conflict of interests, and in my opinion, was 'technically wrong.' More over, Uweala did not resign from The World Bank but took a "leave of absence."

Moreover, paying the former minister monthly salary in dollars - that was much more than other ministers was immoral. It was like saying that she and her job were more important than other ministers - which I strongly disagree with. In my opinion, every ministry is important. I don't think that Uweala's job was more important than that of Prof. Dora Akunyili, who has escaped two assasination attempts and is risking her life every second in her battle to keep our country out of fake drugs. Her performance is overwhelming and she has saved millions of lives in her uncompromised war.

With my knowledge in finance, I really don't think that Uweala did something extra ordinary for Nigeria. She did not take part in wealth creation. All she did was to take the accumulated money from the oil reserve and transferred it to the accounts of our creditors.

The debt reduction too could be explained. Our creditors had made enough profit from the debts on the accrued percentage we paid in the past that even with the debt reduction, it was still a very profitable deal for them. Moreover, they understood too that if they don't collect their money now when we had it and OBJ is in power, they may never have such an opportunity again. After all, half bread is better than none. Thus, by giving us a debt reduction, our creditors were equally acting in their own interest.

I am convinced that there are a number of Nigerian professionals who are capable of achieving the same result like Uweala; and even better, but for the same pay like other ministers..."

User Avatar
Bode EluyeraBode Eluyera is offline

 # 6 | 25.10.2007 16:45

Afefe ti fe, a ti ri idi adiye. The cat has been let out of the bag. This news is not a surprise to me. More and more facts are now being revealed to prove that Iweala served the financial interest of the World Bank and western countries, at the expense of Nigeria. It's high time we woke up from our slumber and faced the bitter truth. And the bitter truth is that Iweala is traitor and not a hero, as we wrongly assume. Why would the British pay her salary if they did not have a personal interest? Undoubtedly, Iweala did a great damage to Nigeria's economy.

We should not be emotional or carried away by her recent appointment as World Bank director. And the award given to her recently by the United States. It's more a public relations award to continue fooling us, and for making Nigeria much poorer than a significant contribution to our economy. There are many well educated Nigerians who unfortunately have used their knowledge only to milk Nigeria dry or sell its economic interests for peanuts. Iweala's role in the debt negotiation will always be controversial especially for those of us who are well versed in Financial mathematics and economics in general. I have already written an article on this issue titled "Empowering Nigerian professionals in turning around the economy." (nigeriansinamerica.com) Below is an excerpt from the article concerning Iweala.


"...It was reported in the news that the finance ministry employed the service of a foreign consulting firm to negotiate our debts, and paid $100,000 a month for more than 12 months. In my opinion, these consulting companies including the one used by the federal government are parts of the networks; mentioned in Perkin's book, set up by foreign companies to exploit developing countries. Debt reduction negotiations is the prerogative of the finance ministry to carry out on its own.

The ministry should have searched for Nigerians well versed in this field to carry out the assignment.

By so doing, these Nigerian specialists will not only be given the opportunity to upgrade or add to their professional experience but, sensitive information concerning the nation's economy will be protected, and most especially, negotiation tactics and strategies to achieve a desired result will be intact.

I have no doubts that in my mind that if the former finance minister had taken her time to search well, she would definitely have found some Nigerians who are well qualified enough to carry out this job. And needless to say that, the job would have been done at a much cheaper rate; and this would have saved enormous amount of the taxpayers' money.

May I please ask at this juncture then why the hell has the federal government paid the former financial minister more than $200,000, if she still had to invite consultants at a sky rocket price.

Personally, I believe that the appointment of the former finance minister was a 'technical mistake' on the part of the federal government. Inviting a V.P. from the World Bank to negotiate debts owned to The World Bank or its subsidiaries created conflict of interests, and in my opinion, was 'technically wrong.' More over, Uweala did not resign from The World Bank but took a "leave of absence."

Moreover, paying the former minister monthly salary in dollars - that was much more than other ministers was immoral. It was like saying that she and her job were more important than other ministers - which I strongly disagree with. In my opinion, every ministry is important. I don't think that Uweala's job was more important than that of Prof. Dora Akunyili, who has escaped two assasination attempts and is risking her life every second in her battle to keep our country out of fake drugs. Her performance is overwhelming and she has saved millions of lives in her uncompromised war.

With my knowledge in finance, I really don't think that Uweala did something extra ordinary for Nigeria. She did not take part in wealth creation. All she did was to take the accumulated money from the oil reserve and transferred it to the accounts of our creditors.

The debt reduction too could be explained. Our creditors had made enough profit from the debts on the accrued percentage we paid in the past that even with the debt reduction, it was still a very profitable deal for them. Moreover, they understood too that if they don't collect their money now when we had it and OBJ is in power, they may never have such an opportunity again. After all, half bread is better than none. Thus, by giving us a debt reduction, our creditors were equally acting in their own interest.

I am convinced that there are a number of Nigerian professionals who are capable of achieving the same result like Uweala; and even better, but for the same pay like other ministers..."

User Avatar
OsibinaebiOsibinaebi is offline

 # 7 | 25.10.2007 18:20

I have always posited that iweala was a stooge of the western world. How do you pay the finance minister of the most populous country in africa in the name of charity???????? What disgust me most is when people shower enconiums on her as if she is a wonder woman. I never saw her as an extraordinary person , but someone who has stayed out in the west long enough and had made herself available as aready tool to exploit her own people. watch out, cos she successfully recruited Oby Ezekwesili into the train. i restate my preference for an indigenious dictator to a western stooge

User Avatar
truthsayer33truthsayer33 is offline

 # 8 | 25.10.2007 18:33

what is so surprising about this revelation?
We don't send troops to Sudan until the west can foot the bill....we won't tackle malaria or HIV until the UN or Bill Gates or Bono sends some money.
OBJ only started his pretend war against corruption when the German Chancellor told him he would not get debt relief until he cleaned up his act.
Ngozi was shunted out when she became too serious about improving Nigerian financial management and accountability.The governors and their looter friends would not stand for that.

User Avatar
OsibinaebiOsibinaebi is offline

 # 9 | 25.10.2007 18:40


=truthsayer33;2091813293>what is so surprising about this revelation?
We don't send troops to Sudan until the west can foot the bill....we won't tackle malaria or HIV until the UN or Bill Gates or Bono sends some money.
OBJ only started his pretend war against corruption when the German Chancellor told him he would not get debt relief until he cleaned up his act.
Ngozi was shunted out when she became too serious about improving Nigerian financial management and accountability.The governors and their looter friends would not stand for that.



NO NO NO, she was shunted out when OBJ wanted more than then west could allow him to steal. The west in pursuing their interest set a threshold to which they will turn a blind eye as OBJ looted. when OBJ now exceeded this threshold and it was begining to hurt their interest, IWEALA the STOOGE of the western world complained cos the west were not happy with the development. we all know that he who pays the piper dictates the tune. But baba Iyabo hell bent on looting without restrain and not caring if it affetced the western world shloved IWEALA out of the picture

User Avatar
nero africanusnero africanus is offline

 # 10 | 25.10.2007 18:41


=Willy;2091813082>http://www.newsweek.com/id/41885/page/4

President of Ecuador: Rafael Correa

Ecuador's new left- leaning president, Rafael Correa, studied economics at the University of Illinois. But since his Inauguration he's enjoyed little contact with Washington, and appears set upon economic policies that owe much to Venezuela's populist President Hugo Chávez. Last week Correa spoke to NEWSWEEK's Lally Weymouth about his vision for his country. Excerpts:

Weymouth:People want to know if you are as anti-U.S. as your rhetoric would indicate.
Correa: We have a lot of consideration for this great country. I lived here and have two academic diplomas from the University of Illinois. We would like to improve our commercial cooperation with the U.S.

Then why do you oppose the U.S.-Ecuador trade pact?
Because it will destroy our agricultural sector. Do you believe that free trade is positive for every country? That is a huge mistake. The most protectionist country in history has been the U.S. We believe in trade, but free trade is dangerous for countries like ours.

So, to build up your country, you have to be protectionist?
No, we have to use international trade smartly. Our country doesn't have a national currency—we have the dollar. If you don't have a monetary policy like Ecuador, you have to keep your commercial policy.

How close are you to Venezuela's Hugo Chávez? You invited him to your Inauguration and called him a close personal friend.
He is a very good friend of mine. we are building a national Ecuadorian project and don't accept any foreign intervention from either Venezuela or from the U.S.

Do you admire Chávez and think he has done a good job?
Yes, I think he's a very honest person—a clear leader, a very democratic president.

You are now calling for a new constituent assembly as Chávez did.
It's said that this will make the executive branch stronger.

In our country, the executive power is very weak. Here you have a much stronger executive power. The executive needs more power in order to lead the country.

Why have you said that you would not renew the U.S. lease on the base at Manta in 2009?
You are asking me why not. I am asking you why "yes."

Because it is used for anti-drug surveillance flights.
Ecuador is not a drug producer, and we have been very successful in our fight against drugs. So, why put a foreign military base in our country?

So you will not renew the lease?
Only if the United States allows us to put an Ecuadorian base in Miami.

You have spoken about either not paying or restructuring Ecuador's foreign debt.
We are going to pay the foreign debt as long as the situation in the country allows us to pay it. If we don't have enough money to pay the social claims in Ecuador, salaries, etc., and at the same time to pay foreign debt, our ethical and technical priorities are very clear. First, to attempt to face the national needs; later, the foreign debt.

Why did you invite Iranian president Mahmoud Ahmadinejad to your Inauguration? What do you think he can do for you?
They're going to open a commercial office in our country. It is a country with 80 million people and with oil. They need a lot of things that we can sell them. Why not sell to them?



when will my country get leaders such as this ,

just listen to this man then you will begin to get the impression of what a leader should be
 

Services : E-mail news | RSS Feeds | Podcasts
Links:   About the NVS | Contact Us | Terms of Use | Privacy & Cookies | Advertise With Us
All Rights Reserved. NigeriaVillageSquare.com