| Let Nigerians, not Noble Laureates do Nigeria’s Battle |
|
![]() |
| Written by Hakeem Babalola | |
| Wednesday, 30 May 2007 | |
|
I do appreciate the concern of 48 Noble Laureates including Nigerian Wole Soyinka, over their genuine statement criticising electoral fraud in
However genuine their intention, these eggheads should know they are meddling in the affairs of a people. Personally, I believe Nigerians should not let any foreign groups fight on their behalf. No matter how long it takes, Nigerians should endeavour to do the battle alone. In fact, I always feel insulted whenever I hear Project for
This is because all their efforts to feed
It is true there is globalisation but the word in its strict sense does not involve
Back to Nigerian issue, I think Wole Soyinka, first African Noble Laureate, and others like him are making a tactical error by relying on foreign organisations to fight our battle for us. When will Nigerian intelligentsia realised the fact that these organisations no matter how much they pretend do not love us? Even its obvious Obasanjo and his ilk love
How could you willingly give matches and petrol to someone who wants to burn you alive! How could you confined in someone you know as a parrot? How could you continue to jubilate or dine with people who have constantly shown themselves as your foes? Thats exactly what we did each time we invited these foreign organisations to showcase our battle.
We should not forget that foreign intervention was part of opposition that fought Abacha. What have we gained from such interference? Has it ended our sufferings? Did it stop Nigerian owners from killing Abiola, the acclaimed winner of a free and fair elections? In fact, foreign representatives were present when Abiola drank that tea of death. Has it helped us prosecute Babangida and other madcap? Nigerians should stop being naïve. Foreign encumbrance in the affairs of
Apparently, foreign organisations usually think about their own interest first. Anything they do for
Did they not transact business with Shagaris inept administration? Did they not accept Buhari/Idiagbon brutal regime? Did they not tolerate Babangidas blatant corruption? Did they not dine with Obasanjo during his wasteful eight years? Did they not provide save haven for corrupt Nigerian politicians? For example, why did the British foil an attempt to repatriate Umaru Dikko, a man wanted for corruption in those days? Why did the British or American government fail to tell Nigerian military that its abomination for military to take over?
Although the recent call for early elections in
If I may ask, why do they always interfere in our affairs while we cannot in theirs? Perhaps
Mahatma Gandhi once said that Indians should go naked if they could not produce clothes. But instead of going naked,
Pat Utomi almost captures my point when he wrote inter alia: it will be wrong as Nigerians often expect, that the task of saving Nigeria can be domiciled with some messiah or taken up by foreign powers, yet those foreign powers will do wrong not to acknowledge the desperate need for a change in the way things are done in Nigeria and perhaps provide support for such change effort by simply not pretending that all is okay.
copyright 2007 mysmallvoice@yahoo.com
|
|
| Last Updated ( Wednesday, 23 April 2008 ) |
Services : E-mail news |
RSS Feeds | Podcasts
Links: About the NVS | Contact Us | Terms of Use | Privacy & Cookies | Advertise With Us
All Rights Reserved. NigeriaVillageSquare.com



Posted by Robot| 30.05.2007 12:55