11 Dec 2008 |
|
I deliberately delayed this article in order to have time of saying BARKA DA SALLAH to all Muslims Ummah irrespective of the day individual celebrates his/her Sallah. To me, having collective response to my greetings will signify uniformity and unity of purpose by the answering Muslims. It is a piety that while Muslims all over the world have passed the position of internal divisions and disunity over simple Calentation of sighting of crescent to identify and mark the beginning of a new Islamic Calendar month, in Nigeria the divisions and illusions deepens. The announcement that Sunday 7th December, 2008 as Eid day by His Eminence Alhaji Muhammadu Abubakar Sa’ad the sultan of Sokoto and the president general of the Supreme Council of Islamic Affairs (NSCIA) has been greeted with rages of dissatisfactions from different quarters of the Nigerian Muslim community. This came about after the day declared by the sultan coincided with the day also declared by the Saudi Arabian Authorities as Arafat day. That is the day marking the completion of Hajj rites which normally precedes the Eid or Sallah day. The dilemma was that Nigerian Muslims were thrown into confusion over two important religious issues that involved both permissibility (Halal) and prohibition (Haram). The permissibility involves the people that accepts the sultans verdict with good faith and act accordingly. Such people will slaughter their rams on that day (Sunday) but will surely loose the highly recommended reward of fasting on the day of Arafat. While the second category that kicked against the Sultan’s Fatwa will surely be trapped into the forbidden area of fasting on the day of Eid, which is categorically pronounced as forbidden in Islam. The bone of contention lie with the former that slaughter his offered sacrifice on the Sultan’s declared day, if It turns to be the Arafat day preceding the actual Sallah day. His sacrifices could be termed to have being made prior to the stipulated time. There by rendering the made sacrifice void. For the later, the rule states that he is within the sphere of permissibility to offer his sacrifice 3 days after the stipulated Eid day. The Sultan’s Fatwa has been criticized well over by the majority of the Muslim Ummah. Some argued that similar Fatwa has once been issued by the late Sultan, Muhammadu Maccido of blessed memory. But in those days, people have little awareness of the rules of religious duties. More so, that the leadership pattern was a military dictatorship which harbour many unpopular verdicts. But in a democratic dispensation, popular supremacy must dictate the direction of events. Especially where the religious rights clearly and properly permits discretion and allow choice (Ikhtiyar). The Sultan’s verdict has been a monumental error that should have been followed with caution before being pronounced especially at this crucial moment that the Muslim Umman needs a binding factor that could iron out all partial differences towards forming a formidable unity that could be accepted by all. However, even within the pronouncement of the verdict, the Sultan could have withdrawn the verdict in favour of a more unifying and acceptable one. What does it cost him for the reverse of such infamous verdict that could only threaten and widen divisions among Muslim Ummah. The crux of the issues is that the verdict had invariably affected the unity of the Muslims and at the same time proved the discrepancies that existed in the sighting of new crescents especially that of the Ramadan which has been very controversial over the years. It has also given room to realize certain loopholes existing within the leadership of the Muslim Ummah, which prior to this time were seems to be filled up. Such includes the refusal of the Borno emirate to abide by the Sultan’s order despite its significant role within the traditional encomium. The first significant error made by the well groomed ex-military man Sultan, to whom I have much reverence and respect, was his oversight in using the recommendations of a Sokoto based committee of Juma’at Mosques Imams headed professor Gwandu to issue out a Fatwa or verdict of a National importance. His Eminence should have called and craved the indulgence of the Supreme Council of Islamic Affairs (NSCIA) or the Council of Ulama to debate on the issue before arriving at his decision. This was what made the Fatwa to look more of a military order than counseling. The second paramount objective in deferring the Sultan’s verdict was in line with Muslim unity, which should have come first. The majority of Muslims fall within the aforementioned categories. Thereby trapped between permissibility and forbidden. Had the verdict of His Eminence took cognizance of the disunity such verdict could crave among Muslims. Its deferment could have been ideal in such situation Prophet Haroun (AS) once defer preaching against idol worshipping in fear of craving disunity among Prophet Musah (AS) people, and this could have served as a proper example to His Eminence. The primary function of leadership is to give direction, and in order not to be derailed by individual thoughts, the Prophet upon all his perfections was ordered to heed popular advice. His eminence is also reminded of the fact that unless proper consultations are made possible. The issue of sighting of new crescent has now being aggravated to another dimension. However, there is every need for general awareness on the reasons, why and what prompted the controversial Fatwa. If an elite newspaper, with all it takes to investigate, understand, analyze and criticize public affairs, could limit its editorials confined within the boundaries of cautioning His Eminence over the Fatwa several years ago. And still reproduced the same stand today; then something must have been wrong somewhere. Upon all the exaltness of the throne, there is no sanctity that professes total infallibility of the occupant of the throne. Therefore, it is my candid opinion that His Eminence will carefully analyze the current situation and come up with a proper solution to the current predicament with the inputs of all stakeholders. This may reduce the present tension and the unwarranted and avoidable disunity among the Muslims widen by the infamous verdict. On the other way, His Eminence should also guide in future, against unilateral decisions especially over crucial matters that affect the Muslim Ummah without due process. Lastly, I implore Allah’s guidance over the affairs of Muslim under the leadership of His Eminence Alhaji Muuhammad Sa’ad Abubakar the Sultan of Sokoto and commander of the faithfuls. Ahmad Salisu P.O.Box 14150 Kano 08033181723
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||







Your Comments
Please make The Square an enjoyable experience for everyone by refraining from gratuitous ad-hominem contributions, defamatory comments and off-topic posting. Such posts will be removed.