02

May

2008

Stop harassing Nigerians – Demand for UK Immigration to respect the right of Economic Migrants PDF Print E-mail
By Dr. Sola Martins

With over 3,000 Nigerians calling for the boycott of British Airways over the maltreatment of 135 Nigerian passengers and Ayodeji Omotade on March 27, 2008 onboard BA flight bound for Lagos (Nigeria) from Heathrow, London, the battle-line seems to have been drawn and affecting relationship with other British departments.

Mr. Ayodeji Omotade was arrested for speaking to officials restraining an illegal immigrant that was shouting for help and not only was he taken off the flight, he was charged to court. The aftermath of the whole saga is the tension that this latest incident is generating in the Nigerian community. Was Ayodeji wrong to ask or make enquiry about what was happening? Was the treatment of Ayodeji Omotade by British Airway justified? Was the manner the illegal immigrant was handle justified in the eye of the law?  The UK policy is clear about the restrain of persons subject to removal:

“…The use of such restraints is authorised only according to strict guidelines. In using restraints, the safety and security of the detainee and the safety of the escort and the public are the foremost considerations. Only escorts who have had training in their use and who have Enforcement Instructions and Guidance undergone an approved first aid course may use mechanical restraints, and under no circumstances may any restraints be applied to the upper body, neck or head of the detainee. In considering whether to obtain authority to use restraints, escorts must consider whether there are reasonable grounds for believing that an unrestrained detainee may use violence or seek to abscond, taking his history into account. Escorts must also ensure that there are no medical reasons why restraints should not be used. Whilst on board a ship or aircraft the escort will be acting under the authority of the master/commander of the vessel and the use of any form of restraint must be with his explicit agreement, although once again under no circumstances may any restraints be applied to the upper body, neck or head of the detainee…” (Home Office Detention Policy).

According to Mr Ayodeji’s account of the incident, he heard “... noises from an individual being forcibly restrained but who was not visible because some police officers and some plain clothes people held him down. The noise continued for more than 20 minutes and I was concerned because the individual was screaming in agony and shouting in pidgin English "I go die" meaning, I will die. I pleaded with the officers not to kill him and my exact words were "please don't kill him" If this account is true, then the UK Border Agency and British Airways should be investigated for the mistreatment of the detainee in their custody. The law is quite clear that strict rules should be applied when restraining individuals subject to immigration rules.

However, Nigerians seem to be treated harshly and with impunity by the British authorities for many years without any action or protest. Just shortly after the May 2007 election, Nigerian Foreign Affair Permanent Secretary was delayed at Heathrow whilst he was in the United Kingdom to meet with his UK counterpart and there are horrible accounts of officials speaking to Nigerians rudely and using dogs to search their bags, something they would not do to the Americans or Saudi-Arabians.

Though, Mr Ayodeji has called for a front-page apology in a national Nigerian daily newspaper to all passengers on flight BA0075, a written apology and appropriate compensation, the Airline is still not moved by the threat of “worldwide boycott of British Airways by Nigerians,".

In response, British Airways said: "Police were called to the BA75 service to Lagos on 27 March after a large number of passengers became disruptive. Many were removed. We take any threats against our crew or passengers very seriously and this kind of behaviour will not be tolerated."

It is time to stop the mistreatment of Nigerians by the British authorities and many Nigerians were pleased to read in one of Nigeria popular papers (Nigeria Tribune) that the Federal Government is investigating the concerns raised by Nigerians.

However, the situation is so tense that many Nigerians overseas are hoping that their government would make them proud by going an extra mile to prove that Nigerians were unhappy. During a call-in show on Naija FM 101.1 in London, the caller wanted the senators to summon the British Ambassador for an explanation and also hoping that the Nigeria High Commission in the UK would write to the Home Secretary, Jacqui Smith, to request for an official investigation into the removal of 136 Nigerians from the BA flight on the 27th of March 2008.

Many foreign analysts of Nigeria press are surprised that many news editors have refused to push on the matter, which is quite unfortunate. “Are they true upholders of Nigeria’s pride” was the question my white work-colleague asked me during a tea-break at work. I was too angry to respond because I know the UK newspaper would not tolerate that type of insult from any country or corporation.

Dr Sola Martins
Freelance Writer (UK)
angel.sola73@yahoo.com 
 



Your Comments

Please make The Square an enjoyable experience for everyone by refraining from gratuitous ad-hominem contributions, defamatory comments and off-topic posting. Such posts will be removed.

User Avatar
RobotRobot is offline

 # 1 | 02.05.2008 16:57

With over 3,000 Nigerians calling for the boycott of British Airways over the maltreatment of 135...Read the full article.

User Avatar
aguabataaguabata is offline

 # 2 | 02.05.2008 17:20

Their is a subtle gag on the nigerian press, one of the biggest banks in nigeria has been fined 15million dollars in the united states for illegal money transfers and the nigerian press has kept mum. The bank is the New york branch of UBA, why arent they shouting for the sources of the wire fraud to be investigated. UBA has quickly made a single payment for the fine and accepts responsibilty though blaming its past board of directors. Most papers are opinionated and you have to read across the different daily to get a balanced view. Though the press are free to support rightist or leftist agenda the press in Nigeria are neither rightist or leftist but rather lean on political interests. The press doesnt need freedom now, they have enough freedom to be more assertive, they need to grow more as an institution.

User Avatar
ParadisevogParadisevog is offline

 # 3 | 02.05.2008 18:01


=aguabata;4295013168>Their is a subtle gag on the nigerian press, one of the biggest banks in nigeria has been fined 15million dollars in the united states for illegal money transfers and the nigerian press has kept mum. The bank is the New york branch of UBA, why arent they shouting for the sources of the wire fraud to be investigated. UBA has quickly made a single payment for the fine and accepts responsibilty though blaming its past board of directors. Most papers are opinionated and you have to read across the different daily to get a balanced view. Though the press are free to support rightist or leftist agenda the press in Nigeria are neither rightist or leftist but rather lean on political interests. The press doesnt need freedom now, they have enough freedom to be more assertive, they need to grow more as an institution.



Don't mind dem. No brown envelope, no sensation!

User Avatar
ebiasainebiasain is offline

 # 4 | 02.05.2008 20:10

Can you imagine a president, General (rtd) Ahmadu Buhari taking that nonsense
from the British Airways? I don't think so. The BA and the British govt. know too
well the inferiority complex of our leaders and how most of their ill-gotten wealth is
tied up in most European banks. Tell me why Yar'Adua and any Nigerian govt. official
for that matter will take any meaningful action against BA? Personally, I am for the
Oyibos to maltreat any Nigerian official found within their borders! As long as Nigerian
officials come to realize that no matter the amount of their ill-gotten wealth in British or
European banks, they'll not be immuned from being frog-jumped, slapped or verbally
abused, then, and only then that Nigerian leaders will wake up. I say, 'wake up' with
some reservations. Even when Ghana was still struggling under Rawlings, the British
wouldn't have dared to treat Ghanaians like the way Nigerians were treated by BA
recently. It just goes to show how far we have fallen!

User Avatar
AISAGBON OMOGIADEAISAGBON OMOGIADE is offline

 # 5 | 03.05.2008 10:57

A leader whose health is seriously failing,who was almost flat on his stomach in prostration for George Bush of the US and a leader who openly called on the UK authority to help train his police force for him will not have the guts and courage protest the inhuman treatment and disgrace the arrogant british security agents give to Nigerians.
"He who feels it knows it"The Nigerians in diaspora should rise to this occassion and bring the B A authority to where it should belong-zoo

User Avatar
Koffi EnenmmuoKoffi Enenmmuo is offline

 # 6 | 05.05.2008 06:42

I really feel sorry for all of you..........nigerians ko..

As far as I am concerned, nigerians should be recieved at airports in cages..like monkeys that they are!!!!

You have not complained at how fellow innocent nigerians are treated in nigeria and you want to be respected abroad for WHAT!!

WHO told you that respect is not earned!!!

You guys are really delusional.......

A citizen of Botswana will not be treated in the same...way

Now I wonder why!!!!

Direct your anger to right place........nigerians leave the British alone.......this has always been the problem!!

User Avatar
DewdropsDewdrops is online

 # 7 | 05.05.2008 17:35




I really feel sorry for all of you..........nigerians ko..

As far as I am concerned, nigerians should be recieved at airports in cages..like monkeys that they are!!!!

You have not complained at how fellow innocent nigerians are treated in nigeria and you want to be respected abroad for WHAT!!

WHO told you that respect is not earned!!!

You guys are really delusional.......

A citizen of Botswana will not be treated in the same...way

Now I wonder why!!!!

Direct your anger to right place........nigerians leave the British alone.......this has always been the problem!!






Thank you very much. Botswana is too far. Try Seme citizens.

I would rather be "maltreated" by any other race or citizen of any other country than Nigerians. They are wicked even to themselves!

User Avatar
tonsoyotonsoyo is offline

 # 8 | 05.05.2008 20:38

I have serious problem with the treatment meted out on Ayo Omotade, because he was singled out for oppression. But I do not see anything wrong in removing those 135 passengers. If I were a Captain of a flight, I will not be caught airborned with 135 angry passengers.

The same thing could have happened anywhere in the whole world especially in the USA. You can be removed from an airplane in the US just for talking too loud. Air safety is paramount. I do not see how the flight that is headed for Lagos could have continued when all the Nigerian passengers 135 of them, have been removed, I therefore think that the flight must have been grounded.

I think the price of missing that particular flight, (since a new provision was later made) is a price that the Nigerians have to pay for standing up for a fellow Nigerian.

Like the saying goes here in the USA - Freedom is not free

They achieved one thing, and that is the fact that the poor deportee was not deported in that same position with the Nigerians inside.

User Avatar
DewdropsDewdrops is online

 # 9 | 06.05.2008 10:24

Stale news!!!!
 

Services : E-mail news | RSS Feeds | Podcasts
Links:   About the NVS | Contact Us | Terms of Use | Privacy & Cookies | Advertise With Us
All Rights Reserved. NigeriaVillageSquare.com