Effects of Divorce on Children Print E-mail
Written by Rita Gonyok   
Thursday, 10 July 2008

Divorce is a very painful phenomenon which negative effects not only affect the divorcees but also the children from such marriage. Unfortunately more attention is given to the couple instead of the children. As much as hurtful the break up may be to the couples, children from such homes end up into criminal activities. These problems that the children develop are not always obvious, and do no always come to the surface immediately after the separation.

Divorce affects children differently, depending on their gender, age and stage of development. Their world, their security and their stability seem to fall apart when their parents go their different ways.

Following are universal responses that researchers have found among children of divorce.

Researchers have found out those children from divorced parent worry that their parents don't love them anymore and they feel abandoned. They have strong feeling of being divorced too. In fact they feel powerless and helpless because they can't get their parents back together. They are angry although they may not express their anger. They often feel they are at fault believing they might have been the cause.

They grieve. Divorce is a loss in the lives of children and parents. They experience a grieving process very similar to mourning a death. They also experience conflicts of loyalty.

Their behavioral pattern ranges from very mild behavior, such as difficulty in sleeping, to extremely destructive behavior, such as suicide, drug addiction and taking to violence.

Other behaviors may include problems in school, nervous habits, repetitive physical behaviors, and regressive behaviors such as bed-wetting, fears, and taking solace in undesirable pastime to wreck their future. Children may become clingy and whiny and they may need greater understanding of their moods and behavior. They have a greater need to be nurtured.

They may think they have to "take care" of their parents. Giving up one's childhood to care for emotionally troubled parents is a widespread characteristic in children of divorced family.

These behaviors are common for children experiencing divorce. There is a false assumption children are "naturally resilient" and can "get through" a divorce with little or no impact on their lives. Instead, they need support systems and individuals to help them during the transition. Depression is a major effect that divorce has on children. This is not necessarily something that occurs during the divorce, but has major effects on the later life of the child. It has been observed that a high level of marital conflict experienced during childhood has been linked to more depression and other psychological disorders in young adults there are also many social effects that divorce has on children.

There are also many social effect divorce has on children, the child often feels unconnected to his or her peers. He or she feels unable to make or maintain friendships and complained about being unconnected’ to [his or her] peers, compared with those reporting lower levels of family conflict during childhood. The child tends to act in ways that are considered not socially acceptable, distancing themselves from their peers.

Children incorporate repertoires of angry, impulsive, and violent behavior into their own behavior as a result of observing their parents’ responses to frustration and rage. This is something that many children that witness the divorce of their parents go through. The child naturally looks to his or her parent or parents for the example of how to handle certain situations and emotions. During a divorce there is much anger and aggression that is expressed by one or both parents of that child. This is not healthy for the child to witness for several reasons.

Other effects of divorce on children include anxiety and poor self-esteem more aggressive and impulsive and to engage in more antisocial behaviors, Young adults whose parents divorced during childhood, have more pregnancies outside of marriage, and earlier marriages , poorer marital relationships, increased propensity to divorce, and poorer socioeconomic attainment.

As much as divorce is an evil necessity when love is lost, the rate of the incidences can be reduced through better understanding of couple during their period of courtship. Even though couple during such courtship may be hiding their true color or pretend on their personalities, further enquires from reliable sources on the partners may be desirable.

Marriage is not a bed of roses; there is always the heat of up and down. Once conflict creeps in, it is advisable for the couple to consult their religious leaders or marriage counselors. It becomes necessary to advise parents to think about the future of their kids and avoid incidents that could generate to split-up.

Rita Gonyok (youth corper)

National Press Centre

Abuja

 




RobotRobot is offline 
Villager

avatar
 # 1


Divorce is a very painful phenomenon which negative
effects not only affect the divorcees b...Read the full article.

Posted by Robot| 10.07.2008 11:42

Reply Quote



DewdropsDewdrops is offline 
Villager

avatar
 # 2


=Robot;4295068140>Divorce is a very painful phenomenon which negative
effects not only affect the divorcees b...Read the full article.

Divorce is a very painful phenomenon which negative effects not only affect the divorcees but also the children from such marriage. Unfortunately more attention is given to the couple instead of the children.

As much as hurtful the break up may be to the couples, children from such homes end up into criminal activities.

These problems that the children develop are not always obvious, and do no always come to the surface immediately after the separation.



Talk about hasty generalizations. This kind of logic has not bearing in modern day society. Only with biased/unexposed minds can this hold water. What of adopted children that never even knew their parents?


It is better to have one "sane" loving parent, than to have two dysfunctional ones under the same roof.

Sometimes divorce is a blessing in disguise especially if there is emotional or physical abuse. No one should live under the same roof with an abusive spouse.

Another ground for divorce is infidelity. . .no one should have to risk contracting a deadly disease from a "polygamously" inclined spouse or a philandering spouse.

For these 2 reasons. . . I will welcome divorce anyday. . .no ifs, ands or buts!:cool: I don't really care what the so called holy books say. . . not a religous jihadist. . .just common sense.

Children from divorced homes sometimes turn out better than those from so-called "nuclear' families. I think it is a 50/50 chance that a kid might get screwed up regardless of the family set up.

Many families without divorce have too many "cracks" in them to salvage that make those from divorced set ups look like pieces of cake and ice cream. These range from incest, domestic abuse, alcoholism, drug abuse to emotional and physical abandonment.

Never judge a book by it's cover.

Polygamous homes are worse than those from the divorced set ups in my opinion. There is not greater sin against the institution of marriage that polygamy. Infact I will bless same sex unions anyday before I endorse polygamy.

The reason children are often screwed up is a combination of factors and divorce is only a small part of it. Look around you. More psychos come from non divorced homes that divorced homes.

Go figure. . . what a fallacy!
_________________________
_________________________
STAYING MARRIED FOR THE CHILDREN'S SAKE?



http://www.professorshouse.com/family/relationships/staying-married-for-childrens-sake.aspx


The question of staying married for the children’s sake is equivalent to asking, is it about you or is it about them? In the scheme of things, who comes first? And on an emotional level, whose feelings are more fragile?

Whose future is it anyway?

At the time you tied the knot, wore the ring, threw a grand reception and escaped to one of the most expensive destinations of the world, you were convinced that getting married was the best decision you ever made. It was the beginning of a beautiful life filled with love, blessed by society and supported by friends and family.

Truth is, marrying the chosen one made you drunk with happiness. That’s why they say weddings hold so much magic, and that love conquers all. The honeymoon was unforgettable, the house buying threw you in a state of joyous frenzy and the adorable children you bore brought more happiness into your home, warming your heart and soul. Being a parent for the first time deserves poetic narration, but you know deep down that nothing – no one – can truly capture the ecstasy that ran in your veins when your first born arrived. A new you, a changed status, and exciting plans for the future.

Then… somewhere along the way, something changed.

You begin to wonder why the same feelings of happiness years ago now elude you – cruelly revealing that this thing called happiness is strictly ephemeral, a passing stranger in the night. One day you felt like Cinderella, convinced that you would live happily ever after, but all that was only an illusion. A bait. A trap. And you fell for it.

If we were to examine and dissect life into sequential stages, what follows after spouses discover that love and marriage do not go together like a horse and carriage – that it is just an old wives’ tale used to trick the young and innocent?

In contemporary societies, divorce would appear to be the next logical step. For childless couples, this may be the best and quickest solution because let’s face it, we need to get on with our lives. Our personal agendas are brimming with plans, hopes and dreams that a failed marriage should not spoil.

But when there are children…
Staying married for the children’s sake is a burning question that divorcing couples have to grapple with.

Granted, there’s no point staying together when husband and wife no longer love each other but when children are concerned, the dynamics are different.

Regardless of their age, children are profoundly affected by the divorce of their parents. Survey after survey unravels a precarious situation that children have to deal with when their parents’ lives change course dramatically. Because of the uncertainty and insecurities triggered by the split-up of their parents, children are forced to adjust to their new circumstances. It is this constant adjusting that puts a strain on their psyche – especially highlighted when each parent falls in love with another person and moves into a living arrangement. The mental confusion forces the children to what psychologists refer to as “negotiating their own relationships.”

One observation is common: a good number of these children remain single late in life or are simply not interested in married life. Many of them do not want children, some of them expressing the fear that they don’t want their children to have the same growing up pains they had when they were young and exposed to their parents’ conflicts. These facts were revealed by Mark Fine and John Harvey in their book Children of Divorce: Stories of Loss and Growth (2004), citing the works of Wallerstein et al who monitored 131 children in California for 30 years whose parents had divorced.

Staying Married for the Children’s Sake - Not If…We’ll face the issue head on: should couples stay married for the children’s sake?

Our answer is yes, but we have to qualify that yes answer. This is our take:

If husband and wife are educated and responsible human beings, there must be a willingness on their part to stop thinking of their unhappiness and concentrate instead on the happiness of the children.

Circumstances change, however, and because of these changes, individuals are deeply affected. You may have heard friends and family speak of incidents that forced couples to divorce.



Yes, we have to think of the children first and foremost, but when life turns out to be a living hell for couples, they must be given the chance to “bail out” of the marriage so as not to drag the children into the drama.


An example is when the husband has a history of physical and sexual abuse, or if the woman has had drug problems in the past. There’s no reason why young, innocent children have to be exposed to a string of negative events. In one real life example, a friend had an uncle who was addicted to video lottery terminals. Going from the occasional gambling stint, he graduated into heavier stakes, unable to control his betting impulses. How did his story end? You guessed right. He lost everything: a beautiful wife, adorable kids and a home that was the envy of the neighborhood. This man has gone into hiding and his family doesn’t know of his whereabouts.

Another example is when an individual’s cocaine habit causes the family’s fortunes to disappear. People who take drugs for pleasure think that their habit won’t go past the occasional joint, but just as smoking cigarettes is addicting, the same is true for heavy drugs. In fact the addiction can be much worse. Individuals destroy themselves and their families so that the other spouse has no other recourse but to leave the marriage in order to save the children from this traumatic reality.

Verbal abuse is tantamount to mental torture. When a spouse constantly belittles the other, reducing that person to a human being with no self-esteem, then it’s time to bail out of the marriage. Health concerns are also trigger factors for spouses to fall out of love for each other. When husband or wife puts on considerable weight and does NOT do anything about it, it puts a lot of pressure on the family.

Religious fanaticism is another reason. When religious beliefs get in the way and could endanger the lives of loved ones, what can one do? A clear example of this is when certain religions condemn blood transfusions. The wife of an individual we knew went into an epileptic seizure and would not agree to a transfusion because of her religion, but it was forced upon her by family members. No need to say it saved her life. Religious fanaticism is deplorable especially if it affects those around you.



Bottom line: while we have no right to rob children of their innocence and youth and force them to become adults abruptly because their parents have split up, we should also bear in mind that there are situations that fall outside the realm of choosing between the happiness of the children or the happiness of the husband and wife.

If the situations we mentioned above do not exist in a marriage, then couples must stay married for the sake of children. Dialogue should take the place of fighting and confrontation.


Divorce is all about the children
When two people divorce, it immediately creates a void in children’s lives. How large or deep that void is depends on certain factors. One would be the genetic elements that constitute their personalities, another would be the degree of love and affection for both parents or a particular attachment to one, or still, the emotional absence of parents who were too preoccupied with their own troubles to notice what the children were going through.

Some people will argue that there are cases where children of divorced parents have benefited from the separation because the sudden change in their home life teaches them the value of independence and resiliency.

Independence and resiliency are wonderful traits, but at what cost?

Do children grow and become stronger emotionally because of divorce? On the surface it may seem that way, becoming shining examples of why divorce is a necessity. But what lies beneath it all? The effects of the divorce may lie dormant in them for years, but how can we predict when they will explode later into adulthood when they themselves become parents?

Children of divorced parents carry the emotional scars forever. As they develop into adults, they will continually attempt to resolve issues that they faced years before: do most marriages end up sour? Where do I belong? How does one define family? How many families must I be loyal to? Why do I have to go back and forth two houses when it was so much easier when mom and dad loved each other?

Depending on how painful the injury inflicted by divorce is, children of divorced parents have a higher risk of turning delinquent and to perform poorly in school. They experience serious emotional and social problems making them feel that they’re alienated from the rest of society – social outcasts who ought to be ashamed that their parents are divorced. There’s also the depression factor to contend with.

Verdict: Couples should stay married for the children’s sake
Again, we emphasize: if there is no domestic violence or drug/alcohol abuse, couples should stay married for the children’s sake. The family is the basic social unit of society. We need strong, solid families if we want a strong country that’s inhabited by people who are emotionally stable and have no ghosts in their closets. We want human beings who can rise to the occasion – in good times and in bad – not people who have a tendency to throw in the towel at the slightest disruption.
More importantly, we want human beings who can look beyond their own problems so that the children they’re raising in this world can do the same later on in their lives when faced with the same frustrations. Communities need productive citizens who dedicate their time and effort for the common good, who will shed off a bit of their individualism so that society can have one more solid family to add to its roster.

Marriage has, and will always be, a commitment between two people. It would be reassuring to know that we have no intention of eroding this sense of commitment in any way.



I don't think staying married for the sake of the children solves any problem. I will not do that especially if the father is irresponsible and his presence in the kids' lives poses more of threat than anything else. How can I live under the same roof with a man I cannot stand? Impossible!

Bottom line. . .every case needs to be evaluated separately for the best outcome for EVERYBODY, not just the kids!

Realistically speaking, no body divorces for the fun of it. The factors that bring about divorce are many and too bad everyone has to suffer from the consequences of divorce by living lives full of regret.

As long as there are marriages. . there will be divorce. The only problem is how to pick up the pieces of the broken glass. Not much anyone can do about that then.

Posted by Dewdrops| 11.07.2008 03:35

Reply Quote



emenanjoemenanjo is offline 
Villager

avatar
 # 3

Fantastic piece from a corper. Those who have ears let them hear and there are none so deaf as those who have refused to hear.

Not only that, your article is supported by solid research findings in social sciences. Kudos and God bless you. The article is not saying there should not be divorce but the emphasis is on its effect on children and not on adults who have decided not to control their sefish desires.

Posted by emenanjo| 11.07.2008 17:27

Reply Quote



philipikitaphilipikita is offline 
Villager

avatar
 # 4


=Dewdrops;4295068434>Talk about hasty generalizations. This kind of logic has not bearing in modern day society...

...Children from divorced homes sometimes turn out better than those from so-called "nuclear' families. I think it is a 50/50 chance that a kid might get screwed up regardless of the family set up.




Drewdrops, you have made a hasty generalization also. You just have a hatred for polygamy. There's a 50/50 chance that a kid might get screwed up regardless of the family set up (whether single parent, polygamous, or monogamous).

You seem too carried off by the western construct of marriage as one-man-one-woman. That is their own. We have a culture of polygamy rooted in Africa. Times are changing, but I am not so carried away as to demonize polygamy. There is nothing wrong with polygamy, as much as there's nothing wrong with monogamy. There is everything wrong with people who in any kind of marriage, who are unable to manage their conflicts.

It is a fallacious generalization that more conflict exists within polygamous families.
Tell me about 10 troubles in poligamous homes and I will give you 10 worse troubles in nonogamous homes. They harm to social stability is the same.

I fully agree with you on all the views except what I have said up here.

Posted by philipikita| 12.07.2008 01:05

Reply Quote



LovenestLovenest is offline 
Villager

avatar
 # 5


=philipikita;4295068886>Drewdrops, you have made a hasty generalization also. You just have a hatred for polygamy. There's a 50/50 chance that a kid might get screwed up regardless of the family set up (whether single parent, polygamous, or monogamous).

You seem too carried off by the western construct of marriage as one-man-one-woman. That is their own. We have a culture of polygamy rooted in Africa. Times are changing, but I am not so carried away as to demonize polygamy. There is nothing wrong with polygamy, as much as there's nothing wrong with monogamy. There is everything wrong with people who in any kind of marriage, who are unable to manage their conflicts.

It is a fallacious generalization that more conflict exists within polygamous families.
Tell me about 10 troubles in poligamous homes and I will give you 10 worse troubles in nonogamous homes. They harm to social stability is the same.

I fully agree with you on all the views except what I have said up here.



Ever since she read that one Emenanjo article titled: WHAT DO WOMEN REALLY WANT? This "Dewdrops" has been behaving true to what that article was postulating--running her acidic 'mouth' like tap water.If he is not calling the guy names for presenting his observation based on facts, she is busy rigmaroling running away from those facts. Could someone in NVS tell her to stop name-calling and address the issues raised. Haba!

Posted by Lovenest| 12.07.2008 04:48

Reply Quote



DewdropsDewdrops is offline 
Villager

avatar
 # 6


=philipikita;4295068886>Drewdrops, you have made a hasty generalization also. You just have a hatred for polygamy.

There's a 50/50 chance that a kid might get screwed up regardless of the family set up

(whether single parent, polygamous, or monogamous).

You seem too carried off by the western construct of marriage as one-man-one-woman. That is their own. We have a culture of polygamy rooted in Africa. Times are changing, but I am not so carried away as to demonize polygamy. There is nothing wrong with polygamy, as much as there's nothing wrong with monogamy. There is everything wrong with people who in any kind of marriage, who are unable to manage their conflicts.

It is a fallacious generalization that more conflict exists within polygamous families.

Tell me about 10 troubles in poligamous homes and I will give you 10 worse troubles in nonogamous homes. They harm to social stability is the same.

I fully agree with you on all the views except what I have said up here.



Thank you for agreeing with some at least. Live and let live!!!!
_________________________
_________________________

=Lovenest;4295068926>Ever since she read that one Emenanjo article titled: WHAT DO WOMEN REALLY WANT?

This "Dewdrops" has been behaving true to what that article was postulating--running her acidic 'mouth' like tap water.

If he is not calling the guy names for presenting his observation based on facts, she is busy rigmaroling running away from those facts. Could someone in NVS tell her to stop name-calling and address the issues raised. Haba!



Thank you for your advice even though it is with an "unsound confused" state of mind. You can't even determine if I am male or female. Are you insinuating that I am a hermaphrodite? :smile:

Live and let live please. . . . . everything does not have to be a "fighting" matter. Those are my views and you are free to comment on them. I however have the right to reply you too.

I only insult those who insult me first, especially chauvinistic male pigs who do not respect my rights as an EQUAL PARTNER in any level of engagement in this world or the one beyond. I will deal with you squarely if you attempt to go that route, so watch yourself kiddo. I really do not care for male egos ok? This is your last warning or I will gladly whoop your ar$$ in the dumpster!:cool:

Posted by Dewdrops| 12.07.2008 09:29

Reply Quote



chudi97chudi97 is offline 
JJC

avatar
 # 7

Brilliant article!!

Posted by chudi97| 12.07.2008 13:58

Reply Quote


 

Services : E-mail news | RSS Feeds | Podcasts
Links:   About the NVS | Contact Us | Terms of Use | Privacy & Cookies | Advertise With Us
All Rights Reserved. NigeriaVillageSquare.com