17 May 2008 |
|
|
Bank robbery has been a major source of social concern in Nigeria for more than a decade. It has gone from the reported fifteen Lagos banks that were robbed in the year 2000 to a national problem. Despite government attempts to stem the tide, available statistics show the problem to be on the rise instead of abating. The siege imposed on the society by these daring and senseless robbers and the general sense of insecurity prevailing in the country serve as the rationale for this discourse. Bank robbery falls within the remit of crime, albeit a violent one. It is a form of robbery that has as its main victims, premises where raw cash remains the major instrument of interaction. As understood in Nigeria, it is armed robbery with banks as its victims. Perhaps this discourse will serve a good purpose by analysing the causative factors of crime and hence armed robbery and looking at the effectiveness of currently prescribed methods of curtailment. The aim is to show the futility of deterrence as a social prevention and to highlight the need to tackle the myriad social problems that continue to breed crime and criminals in our society. Efforts to control abnormal social behaviour, including crime have historical antecedents and date back to the ancient Babylon’s Code of Hammurabi about 4000 years ago. A connection was established between crime and sin by settlers in North America in the seventeenth century. It was then believed that evil spirits possessed those who did not conform to the social norms or follow societal rules. This is a belief that may still have followers in Nigeria of today. However, by the dawn of the twenty-first century, a combination of biological, psychological, social and economic factors have been identified as the factors responsible for crime. These factors remain true in the Nigerian scenario and a typical criminal usually combines two or more of these factors. For simplicity, the aetiological factors could also be broken down into three main categories – economic factors/poverty, social environment and family structures. Economic factors encompass the theory of wants or deprivation. Poverty is not only the lack of financial resources, but also manifests as lack of educational opportunities, lack of meaningful employment options, poor housing, lack of hope and prejudice against persons living in poverty. In the Nigerian situation, economic factors remain very relevant in the social analysis of crime. They are pervading problems that have not been seriously tackled in our Neolithic system of governance and priority scale. In a country with teeming millions of illiterates and unemployed, the social catalyst for violent robbery needs no other ammunition. These economic factors conveniently link up with significant factors in the social environment. Normally, the social factors mirror to people communal (or societal) set of values and priorities. Identified social root causes of crime include inequality, lack of equalitarian power sharing arrangement, lack of support to families and neighbourhoods, inaccessibility to social services, lack of communal leadership, low value placed on children and individual well-being and the over-exposure to modern means of recreation and communication (for example, television and internet) with their corrupting influences. The relevance of family in the causation of crime relates to its unique role in helping to raise healthy and responsible members of the society – the children. Dysfunctional family conditions contribute to future delinquency. Thus family factors include parental inadequacy, parental conflict, parental criminality, lack of adequate family communication, abuse and neglect of children and family violence. Parental criminality provided a very interesting area of social research in the eighties. While searching for the origins of antisocial personality disorders and their influence over crime, adopted children and twins were studied. It was found that identical twins with similar genetic make-up were twice as likely to have similar criminal behaviour as fraternal twins who do not share similar genetic identity. It was also found that adopted children had greater similarity of crime rates to their adoptive parents. All these suggest a genetic basis for some criminal behaviour. Crime prevention must focus on improvements in all three areas (economic, social and family factors). Analysis of the situation in Nigeria showed that prevention so far has failed to tackle the analysed root causes of crime but rather rests solely on punishment as a form of deterrence. The theory of deterrence is based on the idea that the threat of punishment must be severe enough to counter the benefits or pleasures that the criminal would receive from the crime. Also, the punishment must be administered swiftly so that potential criminals will see a clear cause and effect relationship between the crime and the punishment. When punishment deters potential criminals from committing crimes, it is called “general deterrence.” There is another kind of deterrence called “specific deterrence.” This refers to the inability of convicted criminals to commit further crimes as a result of their punishment. There is no doubt that capital punishment serves as a specific deterrent: the executed criminal will never kill again. However, experts and lay men have long debated whether capital punishment is actually an effective solution. This poser remains very relevant in the Nigerian context. So many decades of public executions of armed robbers have failed to stem the tide of this malignant and endemic social malaise. Even choosing the option of executing robbers in their local government areas, as obtained in some states, has not shown a remarkable deterrent force. The weakened argument for capital punishment led to the reformation of the death penalty in Europe and Latin America. Venezuela in1853 and Portugal (1867) were the first nations to abolish death penalties. Britain abolished death penalties in 1965. The United States remains the only Western country yet to abolish the death penalty. The futility of the death penalty was not totally lost in Nigeria as a debate on it was started some years back. This was during the tenure of Akin Olujimi as Justice Minister. Ultimately, the solution to the menace of armed robbery lies in addressing the identified root causes. This entails the provision of good government, mass employment, adequate housing for all, enhanced social structures and facilities in the context of a strengthened and functional family system that emphasises the importance of proper child rearing. The solution also requires a re-defined sense of social priorities, something akin to a form of national re-orientation. Our youths need to learn not to worship money at all costs. As a people, we need to learn to develop contempt for unexplained wealth. We need to tackle the hydra-headed problem of corruption in our body polity. We need to sanitise our system of governance such that elected leaders would truly see themselves as servants of the people and not abuse their positions to accumulate wealth, as currently obtains in most state assemblies and the national assembly. Governments (at both federal and state levels) need to commit to the creation of jobs for the suffering citizens. This is a sensitive time in the history of Nigeria to raise awareness on a solution that has failed to yield a positive response. Perhaps if we remove sentiments and sit down as a people, we might be able to see the merits of this discourse. The suggestion is not one of not prescribing punishment for offenders, but rather a call to address root causes and seek a solution to a problem that has failed to cease. No matter the punishment, solution can only be found when the root causes are addressed. It is high time the issues of social deprivations and political instability were addressed. The benefits of good governance benefit the populace in various ways, both subtle and tangible. oluseguncs@yahoo.co.uk
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||







Your Comments
Please make The Square an enjoyable experience for everyone by refraining from gratuitous ad-hominem contributions, defamatory comments and off-topic posting. Such posts will be removed.