30

Jun

2008

Ijeoma Nwogwugwu’s Myopic Myopia PDF Print E-mail
By Dodo Tsuliyan Dodo

Dodo Tsuliyan Dodo

Are Niger Delta militants criminals? Are we being faced with an issue of common criminality or a socio-political conflict in the Niger Delta? I ask this because of a very misguided write up by one Ijeoma Nwogwugwu, a pervasive market economic ideologue who enjoys regularity of column space in the popular back page of Thisday Newspaper.

Ijeoma regularly writes “Behind the Figures” on the back page of Thisday on Mondays. “Behind the Figures” is very good at projecting the market ideology, which often contends that government should hands off everything, abandon its responsibility and leave the country’s economy in the hands of private market forces.

Ijeoma is excellent in projecting her markets-only economic ideas. But each time she delves into socio-political issues, she shows gross and disgraceful misunderstanding of the complexities and dynamics that constantly characterize the existence and progress of communities and societies. She is little versed in political and social causal analyses.

It may not be ignorance; I think Ijeoma could well be a front for profit interests in the oil sector. Interests that care less about anything, but profits.

By her own admission, Ijeoma decided to become politically incorrect just for the mere reason of being “sick and tired of being politically correct”. I wonder what this hyper-capitalistic ideologue means by “political correctness”, within the context in which she called on the government to go to war with Niger Delta “criminals”.

Blinded by straight and absolute economic and legal logic, Ijeoma has declared that the Niger delta conflict should be seen as criminal. No more. No less. The military should be unleashed on the “criminals” to finish them off, so that oil will continue to flow for our kleptocratic ruling elite to continue their looting.

In a fit of contradiction, Ijeoma admits the long history of underdevelopment and absence of (local) participation in the exploitation of the resource in the Niger Delta, but fails to see any link between these historical, social and political factors that continue to feed “criminality”.

She wrote, “Armed thieves and bandits of all shades are conveniently hiding under the excuse of underdevelopment and greater participation in the exploitation of the abundant hydrocarbon resources found in the region to hold the country to ransom. In reality, they have used that as a ruse to carry on their nefarious activities of illegal bunkering and taking hostages in exchange for cash.”

Does underdevelopment exist in the Niger Delta or not? Are the people of the Niger Delta not excluded from participating in the exploitation of the resource under their land or not? The tragedy here is that Ijeoma fails (is this out of deliberate or genuine ignorance?) woefully by thinking “criminality” evolves on its own, without any causal links to historical, economic, political and social factors.

In tracing the history of the conflict, Ijeoma also callously neglects the full trajectory of the Niger Delta issue from the very on-set. It is an assault to our sensibilities to neglect very important events in analyzing the Niger Delta issue. She said “No section of the Niger Delta has been left unscathed by the felony that has gone on unchecked for almost four years.”  Four years? Why should someone criminally attempt to shorten history of the Niger Delta conflict to only the past “almost four years”?

What led to this “felony”? Or did the Niger Delta crisis begin only four years ago? Has Ijeoma ever heard of Isaac Adaka Boro that raised very valid concerns of the economic exploitation of the Niger Delta, particularly the Ijaws? Has she ever heard of Ken Saro Wiwa, who was murdered more recently for championing the cause of the Ogonis?

Ijeoma totally had no reason to also see the infamous role of government and government powers, from the Presidential order of the wiping out of Odi in 2000, to the open arming of cults by the various Peoples Democratic Party (PDP) state governments from 1999 to date. The same federal government is courting a well known militant in a divisive tactic that can only extend the conflict indefinitely.

Ijeoma claims her own village in Imo State also produces oil: “Poverty is also widespread there. The two oil fields in the area probably produce some 60,000 – 80,000 barrels per day combined and have done so for almost 40 years… Yet, it was not until recently that we got one or two roads, some electricity, a primary healthcare centre and a couple of school blocks. But none of these amenities were built for my community by the federal or successive state governments.” Meaning the amenities were all provided by some oil company.

She is happy for her poverty infested village because of “one or two roads” build by an oil company that has exploited her community of about 100,000,000 barrels of crude in 40 years. May God remove this kind of rogues who think people should jubilate over peanuts thrown at them! The likes of Ijeoma are the ones that stunt the development of their people by keeping them perpetually uninformed or half-informed.

Well, in spite of the likes of Ijeoma, her community will one day catch up with the same level of consciousness that is driving MEND and other militants in the Niger Delta.

Two options exist: either Ijeoma and the “criminals-in-Niger-Delta” theorists (including the PDP government) wake up and address the issues by giving the Niger Delta People their dues, or continue to wallow in their myopia and unleash their “military might” on the “criminals”, wake up one day and there is no shell or chevron to drill and export crude, which would mean an end to awoof money to steal.

I would rather they continue in their myopia, so that every eye would soon shine with the impending doom. I am not from the Niger Delta, but that cheap money to my state and local governments every month is impoverishing my people.



Your Comments

Please make The Square an enjoyable experience for everyone by refraining from gratuitous ad-hominem contributions, defamatory comments and off-topic posting. Such posts will be removed.

User Avatar
RobotRobot is offline

 # 1 | 30.06.2008 09:52

Are Niger Delta militants criminals? Are we being faced with
an issue of common criminality or a...Read the full article.

User Avatar
yashuaib1yashuaib1 is offline

 # 2 | 30.06.2008 11:55

What do yoiu expect us to call the Niger Delta militants if not criminal whose criminality and violence have been consistently unleashed on innocent souls including their own people... the Ijaw leaderes, women, children etc. They all want to play the gimmicks and become some heroes of sorts to be worship..to be invited to Abuja... to negotiate... to dine and wine in the name of the truly pauperised Niger-Deltans living in abject poverty through the squanderrmia of some of their leaders.

The militants behave like robbers with their illegal acquisition of fire arms, sophisticated weapons, act more like fraudsters with their fraudulent disposition claimin they fight for their people, while it is fighting for theior pockets. As bunkerers in colloboration with their foreign accomplices, they engage in treasonable offence by using highly sophisticated equipment to undermine the national security and intergrity.

AND GUESS, ABOVE ALL THESE, THEY CLAIM THEY ARE SHORTCHANGED IN THE FEDERATION WHEN THEIR STATES AND LGCS RECEIVE HIGHEST MONTHLY ALLOCATION FROM THE FEDERATION ACCOUNT than several many states put together. Please check this figures from the Economic Confidential magazine:
Disbursement of $2billion t...
How They Share N892bn in Ma...

It is only the illiterates and gullible public would the so-called militants can fool which their childish propaganda and unbecoming aggression against Nigerians and other foreigners.

WHAT DO THEY WANT?


YAShuaib

User Avatar
allaccessallaccess is offline

 # 3 | 30.06.2008 12:55

Dodo Tsuliyan Dodo,

You Sir deserve to be congratulated for this amazing piece of write-up, My only concern is: Did you email this article to this Ijeoma person? they deserve to read this and may just learn something that will cure that diarhea or myopia.

as for the mallam above his comments can be ignored; he is a product of free mecca trips and allocation to his muslim enclave courtesy of the oil produced in the Niger Delta.

User Avatar
philipikitaphilipikita is offline

 # 4 | 30.06.2008 13:29

@yashuaib1:

Well, I don't totally agree with the writer...but let's face facts objectively and fairly...even you wrote "What do yoiu expect us to call the Niger Delta militants if not criminal whose..."

Militancy as an adjective is defined in Dictionary.com as "vigorously active and aggressive, esp. in support of a cause". A militant is a fighter for a cause!

Contrast that with a "criminality" which is "the state of being criminal" or "a criminal act or practice"... A criminal is one who is guilty of a "crime". A crime is "an action or an instance of negligence that is deemed injurious to the public welfare or morals or to the interests of the state and that is legally prohibited"

The difference here is that there is no common "cause" in a crime. That is why police and legal authorities are responsible for apprehending criminals, not the military. That the government is often amassing its weak military machine to hit hard at the militants goes to proof that they are more than common criminals.

Why can't government send the police after the militants, if they are common criminals, why ask them to "cease fire" because they want to negotiate with them? So they have a genuine cause.

I guess the government needs to be straight and stop playing the ostrich.

User Avatar
yashuaib1yashuaib1 is offline

 # 5 | 30.06.2008 13:54

Philikita,

While I thank you for, at least sharing the same view with me in this platform for the first time, I regret obvious spelling and grammatical mistakes when I just submitted the posting without cross-checking. Nevertheless I stand by the theme, points and views in my submission.

For ALLACCESS, I wont say anything now than to say he is among the.....

YAShuaib

User Avatar
philipikitaphilipikita is offline

 # 6 | 30.06.2008 14:24


=yashuaib1;4295063012>Philikita,

While I thank you for, at least sharing the same view with me in this platform for the first time, I regret obvious spelling and grammatical mistakes when I just submitted the posting without cross-checking. Nevertheless I stand by the theme, points and views in my submission.

For ALLACCESS, I wont say anything now than to say he is among the.....

YAShuaib



My broda:
Do we share the same view? I don't think so. I tried to disagree with the wholesale labeling of militants as common criminals. I believe militants have a cause; Criminals don't. Read my post again. The government is playing the ostrich. If Abuja thinks this is criminality, why call them to negotiate?
The militants have a valid reason for their madness. That MUST BE APPRECIATED without equivocation.

User Avatar
lionkinglionking is offline

 # 7 | 30.06.2008 14:43


=yashuaib1;4295062955>

WHAT DO THEY WANT?


YAShuaib



A return to the derivation principle of 50% to the regions/states under the 1960 and 1963 constitutions of Nigeria i.e. when the revenue came from groundnut , cocoa and palm oil .

Any problem with that?

User Avatar
OnariOnari is offline

 # 8 | 30.06.2008 15:45


=yashuaib1;4295062955>What do yoiu expect us to call the Niger Delta militants if not criminal whose criminality and violence have been consistently unleashed on innocent souls including their own people... the Ijaw leaderes, women, children etc. They all want to play the gimmicks and become some heroes of sorts to be worship..to be invited to Abuja... to negotiate... to dine and wine in the name of the truly pauperised Niger-Deltans living in abject poverty through the squanderrmia of some of their leaders.

The militants behave like robbers with their illegal acquisition of fire arms, sophisticated weapons, act more like fraudsters with their fraudulent disposition claimin they fight for their people, while it is fighting for theior pockets. As bunkerers in colloboration with their foreign accomplices, they engage in treasonable offence by using highly sophisticated equipment to undermine the national security and intergrity.

AND GUESS, ABOVE ALL THESE, THEY CLAIM THEY ARE SHORTCHANGED IN THE FEDERATION WHEN THEIR STATES AND LGCS RECEIVE HIGHEST MONTHLY ALLOCATION FROM THE FEDERATION ACCOUNT than several many states put together. Please check this figures from the Economic Confidential magazine:
Disbursement of $2billion t...
How They Share N892bn in Ma...

It is only the illiterates and gullible public would the so-called militants can fool which their childish propaganda and unbecoming aggression against Nigerians and other foreigners.

WHAT DO THEY WANT?


YAShuaib



Yashuaibi,

Your thinking that the allocation of just eight years ago was just the starting of the problem of the Niger Delta remains a myopic opinion and look like a more illiterate conclusion than you claim.

If actually you are literate enough as you claim here you could have taken your time to research the root problem of the Niger Delta way back to the time Nigeria started as an independent nation.

In as much as some of the activities of the Niger Delta militants are criminal in nature, who are the people who make the environment fertile for Criminal activity?...Are these militants more criminal than elected officials from both North, south, East and West pocketing the money meant for their people and call themselves leaders.

At all times people like you Yashuiabi is always like the Nigerian system, build the house from the roof...I bet you you have never stepped your two legs in the area called Niger Delta, if you have you will understand what is going on...it is fun sitting at your computer and draw up conclusions and make spurious accusations. Take a trip to the Niger-Delta...dont end up in Port Harcourt, calabar, Uyo, Warri, take a boat trip..then people will listen to you.

"The truth is that we have 40 to 60 percent of the criminals in Nigeria in Abuja alone...if you are in doubt find out where the greater percentage of the countries revunue is been stolen by who and where?"

It is wisdom to know where we are coming from to arrive at our destination. Until Nigeria go back to the beginning and start to retrace their steps, the country will continue to remain a failed state.

User Avatar
yashuaib1yashuaib1 is offline

 # 9 | 01.07.2008 07:40

Well I am not just responding from a particular cocoon. I was in most of the Nigerdelta remotest communities and indeed worked there. Quite sure there are many many nice and good people in those places. In fact take it or leave it, I lived, slept, ate, drank and related closely in what some would call dreaded places. In fact I was employed as a civil servant in dat region. Read my Indigeneship and Federal Ch...

Unfortunately some of you here judge people by their names instead reading the messages.
What I know are stated below:

a. Niger Delta region receives highest allocation of revenue from the Federation Account enough to make each individual based on their population, Naira Millionaires

b. Some Niger Delta states that receive extremely low revenue like Cross River State(which has the cleanest city, calabar) live happily and peacefully than their RICHEST Neigbours

c. Most of the so called leaders of youth militants have local and foreign collobarators in oil bunkering, a multionational syndicate that even influence and manipulate international oil prices

d. Some of their community leaders are aware of the undesirable activities of those militants and enmcourage them so that they partake in negotiation to share the booty.

e. Revenue meant for development of the states are utilised by their government to pay ransoms and some of the officials are happy too because their get their cut from the deal.

f. Considering the huge allocation with little or nothing to show for development in the areas, militants and their political leaders knows what they are doing in selfish accumulation of wealth to the detriments of their peace-loving innocents people

g. Funny enough while other regions use the little that come to them to develop their areas and tital peace deviod of kidnapping, invansion and high level robbery, the game plans of their behind the scene leaders is known to all.

h. While truly there are innocent and poor citizens in those regions some of the militants are so wealthy that they can purchase sophisticated arms enough to develop those communities

i. Most of their political leaders, there are several example/ reference of looting of the treasury expanded to purchase extremely fabolous and elegant mansions, customised and armoured vehicle, designer and bullet-proof vest around the world, their total wealth if put together is enough to build big towns from the scratch.

j. There are underground moves by different parties to undermine the national security just to becoming beneficiaries of childish and untenable illusion that prompted civil war in the 60s. For instance the MASSOB camp believes if there should get a new republic, Niger Delta would be part of them, ignoring that the demarcation of regions by previous administration is to ensure that no particular tribe or ethnic group could dominate any region not to talk of becoming a dominant power (shaking my head as I cackle with laughter).

By the way can we guess: Which regions are most lawless with regular infighting amongst their leaders, where their youths are deliberately trained by the elites to become vagabonds and thugs, where the children of their public officers and the rich travel abroad to school; where they have little regards and respects to their elders; where they make noise to attract attention and make big BUCKS...etc...

My last word:
I may sound emotional and provocative, I am passionate about a united Nigeria where tribe and ethnicity are not the yardstick of attaining greatness but on how much we love ourselves.

YAShuaib
Still a Nigerdelta from the North

User Avatar
lionkinglionking is offline

 # 10 | 01.07.2008 08:41

yashuaib,

thanks for all those your pious sentiments above. however nothing you've said changes the historical fact that under the 1960 and 1963 constitutions, derivation formula was 50% but today under the 1999 constitution, it is 13%

now i ask you, yushaib, do you think it just and fair that when cocoa, groundnuts and palm oil were the main revenue sources, derivation was 50% but now that it is oil, it is 13%?

tell me, do you honestly think that this is morally correct?
 

Services : E-mail news | RSS Feeds | Podcasts
Links:   About the NVS | Contact Us | Terms of Use | Privacy & Cookies | Advertise With Us
All Rights Reserved. NigeriaVillageSquare.com