|
Coming
at the backdrop of a flurry of meetings between the President, Umaru
Musa YarAdua and the discredited ex-governors, the recent announcement
by the Presidential spokesman, Segun Adeniyi that the
EFCC, the ICPC and the Code of Conduct Tribunal can only try suspects
with the consent of the Attorney-General of the Federation and Minister
of Justice have left sceptical Nigerians wondering about what YarAdua
may be up to.
Last week, three prominent Governors including Orji Uzor Kalu of
Abia
State and James Ibori of
Delta
State were reported to have met YarAdua at Aso Rock. The presidency acknowledged that such a meeting took place.
Kalu
is currently being prosecuted by the EFCC for fraudulently
misappropriating billions of Naira of Abia State money while James
Ibori is being investigated by the London Metropolitan Police for Money
Laundering and corrupt enrichment his
UK assets have already been frozen by a
UK court.
Nigerians had wondered at the propriety of such a high profile meeting between suspected criminals and the President. In the
UK, such inappropriate meeting would have caused such an outcry that the concerned officials would be forced to resign.
Facts emerged that the three former governors tried to convince YarAdua to make the EFCC ineffective. The
Punch reported last week that the ex-governors had during their visit
to the President on Wednesday, advised him to remove the EFCCs power
to prosecute suspects of economic and financial crimes. The former
governors had been there to see the President about the need to save
them from prosecution and pressurised the President to transfer the
power of the EFCC to prosecute to the Attorney-General of the
Federation.
Are
we surprised then when a few days afterwards the President curtailed
the powers of the Economic and Financial Crimes Commission (EFCC) and
the Independent Corrupt Practices and other Related Offences Commission
(ICPC) to prosecute offenders?
If a witch cried in the night, and the baby died in the morning, one could easily see the connection!
The presidential
spokesman Segun Adeniyi must be speaking tongue-in-cheek when he
declared that "The decision to enforce the powers of the
Attorney-General was solely motivated by President YarAdua respect for
due process and the rule of law and not by any desire to shield anybody
from criminal prosecution
That the Attorney General of the Federation
exercises powers conferred on him pursuant to Section 43 of the EFCC
Act 2004 to make rules or regulations with respect to the exercise of
any of the duties, functions or powers of the EFCC" And that the
President merely granted the Attorney-Generals request for better
co-ordination of the law enforcement agencies to avoid multiple
criminal prosecutions as being currently done by the EFCC, ICPC and the
Code of Conduct Bureau in respect of the same offences.
Nigerians
would be right to suspect that the Presidents directive "is a
deliberate ploy to stop the planned prosecution of some sacred cows
among corrupt public officers".How
I pity our own Segun Adeniyi at his feeble attempt to rationalise a
very unwise and unpopular decision - to say the least - which he would
otherwise have deployed his pen to castigate.
The Supreme Court in Osahon versus the Federal Government of Nigeria (FGN)
had already ruled that the police and other investigation agencies did
not require the fiat of the Attorney-General before initiating criminal
prosecution
This
Presidency that claims to abide by the rule of law may therefore be
acting in contravention of settled law and due process as this
directive might be deemed illegal in a matter already settled by the
Supreme Court.
By
this directive the president is castrating the EFCC as the commission
would be incapacitated in its efforts to fight corruption. If
you want to kill the commission, remove its powers, tell its officials
to concentrate only on investigations while the Attorney General does
the prosecution.
The Attorney General is just a politician appointed by the President, and he can or may be manipulated. The
Independent Corrupt Practices and Other Related Offences Commission
appear not to be very effective over the years in bringing criminals to
justice because they lack the power to prosecute. The power to prosecute was very critical to any crime-fighting agency. Where
anti-corruption war was stymied, it was because the crime-fighting
agencies lacked power to prosecute after their investigations.
If YarAdua removes the power to prosecute from the EFCC, he should be aware of public opinion on the need to completely put
Nigeria
on a fresh path by dealing a heavy blow on corruption among public
officers. Instead of castrating the EFCC, the Presidency would rather
advise the Attorney-General to file nolle prosequi in respect of cases filed by EFCC against his favourite former governors especially those that reportedly bankrolled his presidential campaign!
The
story of poor Nigerians have been one of expectations raised and
mercilessly dashed to pieces, of missed opportunities, disappointed
hopes and exploitative posturing.

|
Posted by Robot| 07.08.2007 09:41