Home arrow Authors arrow Danny Elombah arrow Please Stop This Charade!
Please Stop This Charade! Print E-mail
Written by Daniel Elombah   
Monday, 16 April 2007

“We hold these truths to be self-evident, that all men are created equal, that they are endowed by their Creator with certain unalienable Rights that among these are Life, Liberty and the pursuit of Happiness. — That to secure these rights, Governments are instituted among Men, deriving their just powers from the consent of the governed, — That whenever any Form of Government becomes destructive of these ends, it is the Right of the People to alter or to abolish it, and to institute new Government, laying its foundation on such principles and organizing its powers in such form, as to them shall seem most likely to effect their Safety and Happiness. Prudence, indeed, will dictate that Governments long established should not be changed for light and transient causes; and accordingly all experience hath shewn that mankind are more disposed to suffer, while evils are sufferable than to right themselves by abolishing the forms to which they are accustomed. But when a long train of abuses and usurpations, pursuing invariably the same Object evinces a design to reduce them under absolute Despotism, it is their right, it is their duty, to throw off such Government, and to provide new Guards for their future security

With these immortal words, The American Colonies declared their independence from the suffocating domination of the empire of Great Britain in July 4, 1776 .

For the past 8 years, the Nigerian masses endured with patient sufferance, the humiliating arrogance imposed on them in 1999 by the departing military wing of the oligarchy that has held Nigeria hostage since independence. They have waited, bidding their time for the day they would have gained the necessary experience, garnered the necessary will and wherewithal - or when it is finally insufferable, to shake off their yoke.

For if as stated by Rousseau: government is a social contract, and no citizen would willingly give up his liberty except by agreement, Nigerians would have to exercise their sovereign will come the Election Day. Thus the 2007 election has elicited the highest excitement among Nigerians, not necessarily because they expect it would necessarily reflect their sovereign will – Nigerians have since lost faith in the electoral process - but it presents an opportunity to throw off the PDP yoke.

Thus the sudden popularity of Alhaji Atiku Abubakar; not necessarily because he would make a better president, but there exists someone who would call the bluff of Baba and live to tell the tale. Others – Chuba Okadigbo, Bola Ige etc – have fared much worse.

The events over the weekend were depressing to say the least. What happened in the whole of the South-East and South-South was laughable. The gubernatorial and House Assembly elections conducted by the Independent National Electoral Commission are an insult to the sensibilities of Nigerians. The PDP arrogance is nauseating. Orji Uzor Kalu also demonstrated he knows the game. What passed for an election was a farce, a mirage and a shame: a challenge to the ordinary Nigerian to do his worst! There was simply no election. It has finally been demonstrated that Nigeria is incapable of conducting any credible election. We are simply not up to the task. The ineptitude of INEC and Professor Maurice Iwu is exposed.

The Inability/unwillingness of President Olusegun Obasanjo to let Nigerians to express their sovereign will is there for all to see. He views the Nigerians with contempt; he (Obasanjo) knows everything and simply knows what is best for all.

Per Rousseau: IN the elections of the prince and the magistrates, which are, as I have said, complex acts, there are two possible methods of procedure, choice and lot. Both have been employed in various republics, and a highly complicated mixture of the two still survives…If we bear in mind that the election of rulers is a function of government, and not of Sovereignty, we shall see why the lot is the method more natural to democracy. 

Obasanjo should spare us the insult, the humiliating arrogance. He should simply take us back 2000 years and listen to Rousseau; simply cast a lot among the several contenders! Better still - he is a mister-know-all, Let him simply appoint those he wants to succeed the present lot, it would be cheaper, simpler and more convenient. At least there would be no disruption of the lives of the ordinary Nigerians in the name of public holidays. There would no shooting and killing. No burning of Police stations. No kidnappings. No tear-gassing and Horse-whipping. There would be no power show from stern-looking soldiers and mobile policemen. Our impotence would not be rubbed on our faces. There would be no macabre dance of arrogant impunity

However, let all listen to Rousseau: Finally, when the State, on the eve of ruin, maintains only a vain, illusory and formal existence, when in every heart the social bond is broken, and the meanest interest brazenly lays hold of the sacred name of "public good," the general will becomes mute: all men, guided by secret motives, no more give their views as citizens than if the State had never been; and iniquitous decrees directed solely to private interest get passed under the name of laws. It is all a symptom of a Nation on its way to perdition.  

Let them stop this charade and spare us further agony and the derision of the international community.




RobotRobot is offline 
Villager

avatar
 # 1


“We hold these truths to be self-evident, that all men are created equal, that the...Read the full article.

Posted by Robot| 16.04.2007 05:42

Reply Quote



ikechukwuikechukwu is offline 
Villager

avatar
 # 2

Ha,ha, ha, ha. I told you so. I said the elections should never have been allowed, but people would never listen. I said INEC did not have a free and fair election on the table, but people who should know better said the fraudulent thing must go on. Well too bad, we have bungled it and criminals have been allowed in. EFCC will start shining again. We have brought ourselves back to a state of ignomy. Next four years is going to be terrible for us as a nation with the leaders brought up from this fraudulent elections. I beg nobody should claim he was expecting anything better from INEC that would be the height of unacceptable hypocrisy. THE REAL QUESTION IS WHY DID WE ALLOW INEC TO CONDUCT AN ELECTION WE ALL KNEW WOULD BE FRAUDULENT?.
One example, Just because PDP is not happy about Imo, they made a tactical withdrawal and inec cancelled the guber election and allowed the house of assembly elections where PDP won 26 out of 27 seats as if the elections were conducted sequentially and not simultaneously. Now they are planning another election where PDP will "participate" fully. Well, we all knew all these problems but just decided to allow them.
WELCOME TO FOUR UNINTERRUPTED YEARS OF INFAMY NIGERIANS. Ha, ha, ha.

Posted by ikechukwu| 16.04.2007 06:23

Reply Quote



felixfelix is offline 
Villager

avatar
 # 3

It is 2007! And here we are: We cant run a single hospital upto international standard....We cant biuld standard roads...We cant even maintain out stadia and national theater....Now we cant even conduct a descent election...From what we are reading, a war torn Liberia seems to have conducted a better general election than this "charade"......



What do fellow Nigerians suggest we do to arrest the situation??? .."Sit at home, criticise and pray,.....It will all get better as democracy matures"...Some cyber space intellectuals hellbent on vomiting their theoritical nonsense here wants all of us to be patient; "it will get better as it matures" ......But lets look at the facts: 1999 general elections were better than 2003 elections.....From all indications, 2003 general elections look better than 2007 and to think that the Akalas and the Ubas will be the ones to conduct and supervise that of 2011.....hmmm ,shock waves down my spine!......Do you see why we have to re examine Nigeria??? From all these facts , you can as well submit that Nigeria seems to be developing but ofcourse "developing BACKWARDS!".....By electing our worsts to stear the engine of state , we have inardvently signed Nigerias future away....If nothing seriously objective is done now to arrest these criminals from Aso Rock to the Local governments ....take my words ; It will be a matter of time before the worst starts to happen.....The stage looks set...I hope I am wrong...

Posted by felix| 16.04.2007 07:01

Reply Quote



felixfelix is offline 
Villager

avatar
 # 4

It is 2007! And here we are: We cant run a single hospital upto international standard....We cant biuld standard roads...We cant even maintain out stadia and national theater....Now we cant even conduct a descent election...From what we are reading, a war torn Liberia seems to have conducted a better general election than this "charade"......



What do fellow Nigerians suggest we do to arrest the situation??? .."Sit at home, criticise and pray,.....It will all get better as democracy matures"...Some cyber space intellectuals hellbent on vomiting their theoritical nonsense here wants all of us to be patient; "it will get better as it matures" ......But lets look at the facts: 1999 general elections were better than 2003 elections.....From all indications, 2003 general elections look better than 2007 and to think that the Akalas and the Ubas will be the ones to conduct and supervise that of 2011.....hmmm ,shock waves down my spine!......Do you see why we have to re examine Nigeria??? From all these facts , you can as well submit that Nigeria seems to developing but ofcourse "developing backwards!".....By electing our worsts to stear the engine of state , we have inardvently signed Nigerias future away....If nothing seriously objective is done now to arrest these criminals from Aso Rock to the Local governments ....take my words ; It will be a matter of time before the worst starts to happen.....The stage looks set...I hope I am wrong...

Posted by felix| 16.04.2007 07:14

Reply Quote



olootuolootu is offline 
Villager

avatar
 # 5

Atiku can contest. INEC Can't disqualify!!!

http://news.bbc.co.uk/1/hi/world/africa/6558801.stm

Posted by olootu| 16.04.2007 08:52

Reply Quote



busangabusanga is offline 
Villager

avatar
 # 6


=olootu;168845>Atiku can contest. INEC Can't disqualify!!!

http://news.bbc.co.uk/1/hi/world/africa/6558801.stm



where are the fake lawyers on NVS?

Posted by busanga| 16.04.2007 09:05

Reply Quote



ikechukwuikechukwu is offline 
Villager

avatar
 # 7

That Atiku can contest election has never been in doubt in my mind, because legally he is never encumbered. This has always been my arguement with Chief Gani and the gentleman from London Dr Gbenga Bamodu.
Unfortunately the political significance of that victory has been rubbished by the sham elections that happened on saturday. It was an election everybody knew was destined to be messed up by INEC, the curious thing about it was the insistence by people who should know better, that INEC must conduct an election they Knew abinitio was programmed to be rigged.
Like I said NIGERIANS WELCOME TO FOUR UNINTERRUPTED YEARS OF MISGOVERNANCE. I PRAY WE SURVIVE IT. Ha,ha,ha,ha

Posted by ikechukwu| 16.04.2007 09:29

Reply Quote



ikechijiikechiji is offline 
Villager

avatar
 # 8


=olootu;168845>Atiku can contest. INEC Can't disqualify!!!

http://news.bbc.co.uk/1/hi/world/africa/6558801.stm



Good case to repeat elections in Anambra, Delta, Adamawa, Kogi, etc where INEC
disobeyed court orders and "disqualified" candidates. Inch-by-inch, the Judiciary will rid us of these garbage ewu elections.

Now that a few legal issues have been resolved, my hope is that Atiku, Buhari and Utomi and get together and present a united front for the presidential elections.

Odego

Below is my analysis from a previous thread on INEC's right to disqualify


=ikechiji;167799>

...

Mark my words - The Supreme court will rule that INEC does not have the right to disqualify candidates that are validly nominated by their parties and have sworn affidavits stating that they are constitutionally eligible to contest the elections. The purpose of the sworn affidavits prescribed by the electoral act is to ensure constitutional eligibility. INEC cannot interpret whether a kangaroo "admin panel" is properly constituted, whether a court order quashing an indictment is valid or not, etc. That is for the courts.

...

The constitution does not confer any power or INEC to "qualify" or "disqualify" candidates. The electoral act does however provide a logical flow-through process.

32. (1) Every political party shall not later than 120 days before the date appointed for a general
election under the provisions of this Act, submit to the Commission in the prescribed
forms the list of the candidates the Party proposes to sponsor at the elections.
(2) The list shall be accompanied by an Affidavit sworn to by each candidate at the High
Court of a State, indicating that he has fulfilled all the constitutional requirements for
election into that office.
(3) The Commission shall, within 7 days of the receipt of the personal particulars of the
candidate, publish same in the constituency where the candidate intends to contest the
election.
(4) Any person who has reasonable grounds to believe that any information given by a
candidate in the Affidavit is false may file a suit at the High Court of a State or Federal
High Court against such person seeking a declaration that the information contained in the
Affidavit is false.
(5) If the Court determines that any of the information contained in the Affidavit is false the
Court shall issue an Order disqualifying the candidate from contesting the election.


The initial nominations with sworn affidavits occur 120 days before the elections. The electorate/political parties/INEC have ample time to go to the courts to "disqualify" candidates if they feel that the affidavits contain false information, i.e. the candidates perjured themselves (e.g. Obanikoro in Lagos).

What you have today is INEC playing hanky-panky up until the last minute (30 days to election) to publish the names of "qualified" candidates. "Excluded" candidates then do not have enough time to pursue their legal rights. That is not and cannot be the intent of the electoral act.

...

Odego


Posted by ikechiji| 16.04.2007 09:42

Reply Quote



felixfelix is offline 
Villager

avatar
 # 9

Is Gani interpreting the law from his nyansh these days?????? what has gone wrong with Gani?????:confused1 :confused1 :confused1 :confused1 :confused1 :confused1 :confused1

Posted by felix| 16.04.2007 10:18

Reply Quote



abdulmuminabdulmumin is offline 
Villager

avatar
 # 10

Can someone please tell General Buhari, Atiku Abubakar and all the other presidential contestants to step down? Their continous participation gives this charade some form of credibility!

Posted by abdulmumin| 16.04.2007 10:36

Reply Quote


Last Updated ( Thursday, 24 April 2008 )
 
< Prev   Next >