|
The claim by a retired Deputy Inspector General (DIG) of Police, Senator Nuhu Aliyu, that the National Assembly is riddled with fraudsters, reverberates around the country. Aliyu, who is Chairman, Senate Committee on Security and National Intelligence, had caused a stir in the Senate on Wednesday when he threatened to mention some lawmakers he had investigated for their involvement in Advance Fee Fraud (aka 419) while he was DIG in charge of Criminal Investigations Department (CID).
The statement is not only damaging to individuals legislators but the institution of the National Assembly. Such a disparaging comment made on the floor of the National Assembly is also damaging to the entire nation, as the National Assembly represents the entire country. As stated by the Speaker of the House of Representative, Dimeji Bankole; the allegation coming from no other person than a fellow lawmaker had called to question the integrity of people that populate the National Assembly.
But be lets be honest with ourselves, are we really surprised by such allegation? Yours sincerely could name at least 2 or three people, widely suspected to be popular 419ers in the National Assembly, who by the nature of our home brand democracy, are presently referred to as, honourable members. The case of the late (Honourable?) Morris Ibekwe - who was arrested and detained by the EFCC for alleged fraudulent activities and later died in detention - and (Honourable?) Paschal Adigwe - who had also been accused of collecting $25,000 from certain individuals under the pretext of organizing a seminar that never took place - easily come to mind.
A lot of people are disappointed though, that the Senate president, stopped Aliyu from mentioning names. That is the issue I am concerned about.
Some would argue that Senator Aliyu had merely abused his legislative immunity to make spurious allegations. As a senator, he is covered by Privilege, a defense enjoyed by legislators on the floor of the legislature. Such "Absolute privilege" has the effect that such statement cannot be sued on as defamatory, even if it were made maliciously; a typical example is evidence given in court.
In law, defamation in this case slander - is the communication of a statement that makes a false claim, expressively stated or implied to be factual, that may harm the reputation of an individual, business, product, group, government or nation. However, Aliyu if a private person -could also claim justification if his statement is a fact. It is surprising that some would crucify Aliyu in the spirit of convicium contra bonos mores. Which term proposes that when such defamatory and injurious statements made was made in a public manner - as in this case, such public proclamation is unwarranted. In essence, that the truth of the statements was no justification for the unnecessarily public and insulting manner in which they had been made.
In fact his other colleagues has accused him of unnecessary penchant for making spurious allegations and should not act like a coward but petition relevant agencies on such matters. Others assert that such fallacious reasoning tends to misguide the public.
The Senate President obviously displayed his experience and his maturity and did not allow Aliyu to call names on the floor of the senate for the simple reason that if he did so, he would be exposing the mentioned senators to public odium and ridicule, thereby killing their political career. This would be exploited by their political opponents to mount Pressure on the law enforcement agencies to prosecute them and weaken their political base. It might even be used to disparage certain parts of the country. These are people that have neither been indicted nor prosecuted and convicted. Therefore in the eyes of the law, they are innocent. When you tar someone with the brush of criminality or malfeasance, it would stick in the eyes and in the minds of the public.
But Nuhu Aliyu is a former Deputy Inspector General of Police, so he must be conversant with this set of people (fraudulent lawmakers). He is to be commended for reminding us of an allegation he has so far voiced out publicly for the third time; that we have as legislators, honourable gentlemen, who are without a modicum of honour. He claims to have investigated them but could not prosecute them in his days as a very senior police officer, a Deputy Inspector-General of Police, just a hair breath away from the Inspector -general the oga pata pata, because the police were handicapped. How frustrating that must have been for him!
One wonders though, since the formation of the EFCC in 2000 and Aliyu believes so much in the efficacy of that august body vis-à-vis the police Why he never documented his findings, (I know the present crop of the Police high command would oblige him Espirit de corps) and forward same to his EFCC all these 8 years.
More importantly, he is presently the Chairman, Senate Committee on Security and National Intelligence. 419 is a serious threat to the national integrity. Any presentation from his committee on the issue would be treated with all seriousness it deserves.
He is wrong is to hide behind his legislative immunity, and cast aspersions on the integrity of his colleagues. He should go on to do the right thing; present all the evidence he has accumulated during his policing career to the EFCC, and if necessary, investigate them again in his Senate committee. Let the law drag these shameless wannabes wailing and kicking, away from that law-making body. Only then would we take him seriously in this era of due process.

|
Posted by Robot| 25.01.2008 20:03