Home arrow Authors arrow Chris Odetunde arrow The crucifixion of the Rt. (Honorable) Patricia Olubunmi Etteh
The crucifixion of the Rt. (Honorable) Patricia Olubunmi Etteh Print E-mail
Written by Chris Odetunde, Ph.D.   
Thursday, 04 October 2007

The crucifixion of the Rt. (Honorable) Patricia Olubunmi Etteh
Christopher Odetunde, Ph.D.


The day I met one of the most powerful women in the world was on September 29th, 2007 during the 37th annual legislative conference of the Congressional Black Caucus in Washington, DC.  Nancy Pelosi was simple, and exposed her unadulterated brilliance.  She was gracious as well as dignified.  I was insignificantly exposed to what politics is all about – service to one’s nation and advocacy for human species.  For a moment, I stopped to think of our embattled speaker of the house.  These two women are lucky speakers of the house representative of their respective countries.  I was humbled in the presence of Ms. Pelosi but have never met Mrs. Patricia Olubunmi Etteh in person. 

 

It was just a few months ago that Nigerians rejoiced over the (s)election of Patricia Olubunmi Etteh as the first female speaker of the house of Assembly.  History was made even if the election was imperfect and not unanimous.  Undoubtedly, Mrs. Patricia Etteh’s election as the speaker of the House was influenced by OBJ and rightly or wrongly many would wish to rubbish OBJ by crucifying Mrs. Etteh.  The bible says that the sins of the father shall be visited unto the sons up to the seventh generation.  Mrs. Etteh ought to have treaded like a meek cat, at least at the initial stage of her speakership and ought to have vociferously defended herself of the malfeasance she was accused of.  But that was not to be the case.  Mrs. Etteh ought to have been a good student of history that those before her were impeached or attempted to be impeached.

 

Definitely, many men wanted to claim the coveted position of speaker of the House and may not be happy with the outcome.  These interested politicians may just be trigger happy to get rid of the speaker and secure the position for themselves.  Of course, these are pure speculations.  It has been written all over Nigerian news papers and on the Internet that there are damning evidences collated by Mrs. Etteh’s peers.  Because of the premature conclusions and the evidences, thereof, there are tails wagging as to her guilt in the N628 million contract scandals as such, the call for her resignation has since thickened beyond any measure of human imagination.  Is this because she is a female in the man’s world?  Is this because the foul stench of corruption in her perceived misconduct is spreading like wide fire and may be exposing those surrounding her?  Is it because the same people that wanted the position are crafting a latent coup to get rid of the only female speaker of the house in the history of our nation?  Was she set up for a failure by men and women of unconscionable character?  Are these legislators convinced that she committed the infraction she is accused of?

 

Whatever the issues at hand are, the rule of laws and due process must be followed to their conclusive end before we decide to nail her to the cross of corruption.  In law, there are always two sides to a story.  We’ve heard so far is from the side that claimed she is guilty and the sided that would like to see her out at all cost.  What are the benchmarks that we are basing the impeachment on?  We have even heard his Excellency, Alex Ekweme stated that since Honorable Alfonso Wabara’s sins were pail compared to Mrs. Etteh, she ought to be impeached.  Sir, this is not a simple ipso facto case.  For crying out loud, if there has been any parochial logic, this one is.  For an honorable gentleman such as his Excellency Ekweme, this type of conclusion stands logic on its head because the full investigation is not concluded?  In the case of Wabara and other Senate presidents and speakers, the sitting president wanted the leaders to be impeached for whatever reasons and he worked tirelessly to see it come to fruition.  If the investigation is not concluded, why are we putting emotion into issue of national importance?  Are we proud to be the impeachment capital of the world?  If so, many of these leaders are impeachable, so why not just throw all the rascals out and start all over again.  This is the simplest way of taking a decision but not the most prudent and thoughtful way for a nation.

 

Contrary to the report that is floating out there, the committee’s report is yet to get to the President’s desk for action.  President Yar ‘Adua has succinctly stated that he would like the wheel of law take, though slow, to take its course and for due process to be completed.  This president must at least stand by his people for a while and not just bail out for every trying situation.  Sign of a strong leader is standing by those working with him until such a time that the nation says she is tired.  No matter how agreeable or disagreeable one is with President Bush of the United States, one thing we can say is that when he believes in something, he stubbornly stands by his men and women.   This is one thing I’ll like President Yar ‘Adua to emulate.

 

Has the speaker been indicted and has the president accepted such an indictment?  Even if indicted, the nation may need to hear from the Speaker to either declare a mea culpa or declare her innocence.  The president stated that he wanted due process to be completed and decision made and that is, dear citizens, the issue that we need to face now.  In a case where there is inconclusive evidence, the benefit of doubt must to be on the side of Madam Speaker, Mrs. Patricia Olubunmi Etteh. 

 

Should the speaker escape the hangman’s snooze this time around, she ought to thread gently because she represents a leader of a nation that is perceived to be corrupt.  Being tagged as corrupt is like pouring gasoline on a body to be burnt.  If Mrs. Etteh is guilty, the law ought to research into her past to see if she had committed such an infraction in the past.  If she had, then she would be noted as having the propensity abuse her office.  If she hasn’t, maybe we ought to give her a second chance.  If she has character to abuse office, she is likely, sooner or later, commit such crime again before leaving office.  The story of the demise of Mrs. Patricia Olubunmi Etteh may be premature, it may just not be time to cry crucify her.

 

 


RobotRobot is offline 
Villager

avatar
 # 1

Posted by Robot| 04.10.2007 07:22

Reply Quote



JiggyJiggy is offline 
JJC

avatar
 # 2

Etteh is guilty, the law ought to research into her past to see if she had committed such an infraction in the past. If she had, then she would be noted as having the propensity abuse her office. If she hasn’t, maybe we ought to give her a second chance. If she has character to abuse office, she is likely, sooner or later, commit such crime again before leaving office. The story of the demise of Mrs. Patricia Olubunmi Etteh may be premature, it may just not be time to cry crucify her.


There is no need of wasting time in researching into Madam speaker's past or giving her any second chance.If she is found guilty in this case let her just go!

What is the rationale behind trying to make a bad case look otherwise? It is too late;Nigerians already know what this wowan's priorities are.

Posted by Jiggy| 04.10.2007 08:24

Reply Quote



Toku.AToku.A is offline 
Villager

avatar
 # 3


The story of the demise of Mrs. Patricia Olubunmi Etteh may be premature, it may just not be time to cry crucify her.



After all the rigmarolling the conclusion is that Madam speaker should be left to chop. How long do we need to wait before public officials like Etteh are held accountable till in 8 years time when their 'mandate' expires? When she goes for a tummy-tuck? When she jumps bail? When she stops being connected politically? When she jumps bail? or when she requests for a 'manicure machine' for 70million naira? Guys let's get serious and tidy our acts. The Etteh issue has been on for quite some time it is about time to get busy with other looters or future looters.

Posted by Toku.A| 04.10.2007 09:50

Reply Quote



datuouwadaberechidatuouwadaberechi is offline 
Villager

avatar
 # 4

mr odetunde
i beg to disagree with your views.
why shd one person out 140 million ppl get a second chance, when she thinks its right to spend 628 or is it 238 million to repair her house??? and i might add, after she herself, though not a builder, had bought a house, liveable and already built at less than N10million?
its this second/third/fourth/fifth chance syndrome that has led to the re-cycling of all our politicians and political jobbers.
its this syndrome, that has led to the nomination of Ali of PDP as an ambassador, having successfully recycled himself, political term after political term in office with ABSOLUTELY NO CONTRIBUTION that can be pointed at.
As a lot of writers have said about Etteh, since her "election" to the house about 8 years ago, what meaningful contribution has she made to the legislative house? NOT ONE.
so, please i ask:: what is the second chance for??
your defence of her in fact is "STANDING LOGIC ON ITS HEAD"!!!!!!!!

Posted by datuouwadaberechi| 04.10.2007 10:45

Reply Quote



ojembaojemba is offline 
Villager

avatar
 # 5


"For an honorable gentleman such as his Excellency Ekweme, this type of conclusion stands logic on its head because the full investigation is not concluded? In the case of Wabara and other Senate presidents and speakers, the sitting president wanted the leaders to be impeached for whatever reasons and he worked tirelessly to see it come to fruition. If the investigation is not concluded, why are we putting emotion into issue of national importance?"



Mr. Odetunde

I think you are the one standing logic on it's head here, should the standards for fighting corruption be contingent on the wishes of a maximum leader like Obasanjo? So I take it that you are of the opinion that if it is the wish of Yar Adua that Etteh be let off so be it, what then is the use of talking about anti corruption. This only goes to lend credence to those who have said the anti corruption fight is a farce and more of a tool of executive witch hunt.

To refresh your memory, Okadigbo was not even allowed to remain on seat while being investigated so talking about the conclusion of investigation when a panel has already returned a guilty verdict is a bit lame. Etteh should have long resigned if she had any intergrity.

Posted by ojemba| 04.10.2007 10:49

Reply Quote



JAGA-JAGAJAGA-JAGA is offline 
Villager

avatar
 # 6

Mr. Odetunde,
I'm really surprised at your conclusion. Are you saying that in States were you currently reside once a politician in the calibre of the speaker whom you visited is indicted for compromising her office that because that happens to be her first time of being indicted she should be allowed in office?

Please do not try to mislead Nigerians. Enough of all these half truths and measures. Are you not aware that the same speaker set up the committee which investigated her and indicted her in almost all counts. We should be mindful of making presentation that will continue to divide this country based on ethnicity which has never helped us since independence. As a matter of fact most indegenes of the speaker's state are very bitter with the shame she caused upon them.

The rule of law and due process you alluded in your report are they not already in place as well as being followed? Was it a third party that investigated her or was she not the one who supervised the composition of the committee after refusing to step aside as is required by law in advanced democracy? Yet you continue to parrot rule of law and due process. I'm really surprised that you could turn logic upside down based on what you understand concerning the current issue at stake.

Posted by JAGA-JAGA| 04.10.2007 11:21

Reply Quote



panalystpanalyst is offline 
Villager

avatar
 # 7

@Mr Odetunde

Ekwueme never said she ought to be impeached. He said this should not be swept under the carpet and that seeing how Wabara was impeached over 50million naira, PDP should not encourage this issue to disappear. That the best they should do is encourage a full investigation into the matter and give her a chance to explain her case. So you would have to tell me where u got your facts from. thanks.

Posted by panalyst| 04.10.2007 11:29

Reply Quote



britroyal1britroyal1 is offline 
Villager

avatar
 # 8

Rubbish, utter rubbish. You are essentially saying that this lady who saw it fit to appropriate an ungodly sum of 238 or 628 million naira to refurbish houses while a myriad of Nigerians are homeless should remain in office. Granted, many of her detractors are no less tawdry or charlatans but that doesn't mean that she should remain in office. She has been a poor example of a leader and my prayer is that her mis-leadership does not cast a negative shadow on the future of women as leaders.

Posted by britroyal1| 04.10.2007 11:59

Reply Quote



toshmanntoshmann is offline 
Villager

avatar
 # 9

i think we should dig into this oyetunde of a guy's past to know how much ette gave him. . . . ..cash or otherwise. nonsense.

Posted by toshmann| 04.10.2007 13:38

Reply Quote



FjordFjord is offline 
Villager

avatar
 # 10

See what havoc an evening and a photograph with Ms. Nancy Pelosi could accomplish? And we wonder why people stand logic, reason, and everything honourable on their heads once they emerge from a dinner at Aso Rock? Power corrupts, and right now, so does a dinner with a politician.

For shame!
.

Posted by Fjord| 04.10.2007 13:59

Reply Quote


Last Updated ( Thursday, 24 April 2008 )
 
< Prev   Next >