13 Sep 2008 |
|
When I was invited to be a presenter at the recently concluded World Refugee Day Awards in Dublin, little did I know the event will generate the kind of debate that it did. For the records, the World Refugee Day Awards is a United Nations event organised by key agencies in Ireland (and in other countries to mark refugee day which takes place in June every year) to celebrate the lives of refugees and those who have contributed to making their lives a little bit comfortable. The controversy generated in the media amid reports that a nominee was stripped of his award at the Awards ceremony in Dublin, because he would not shake hands with the female presenter on account of his beliefs; is indeed symptomatic of the increasing need to be clear as a society what is accepted modes of public conduct in a multicultural liberal democracy. As the female presenter in the category in question, I was inundated with calls from several media houses – print and electronic to ascertain what actually happened. The truth of the matter was that the decision to present a particular nominee with an award was entirely at the discretion of the judging panel which was independent of the organizers and award presenters. Like every other presenter, I was merely called upon to acknowledge the nominees in a particular category and then present the award to the successful person(s). I was not a member of the judging panel neither was I privy to the criteria used to determine successful candidates. In my opinion, this controversy clearly highlights the importance of living in a liberal multicultural democracy, where the basic fundamentals of equality and human rights are placed side by side and the need to accommodate diverse value regimes. It is healthy that we debate these issues, but I am convinced that where there is no consensus, we ere on the side of universal fundamental freedoms. As a person, I believe in respect for cultural, ethnic and religious diversity but this should not negate nor contradict the core principles and values of an indigenous community or society particularly when socializing in the public sphere. Since this issue has become a major topic of discussion in the last while, I have spoken to many Muslim friends who have confirmed that shaking hands with members of the opposite sex has no consensus. Indeed I have shaken hands with many Muslims of the opposite sex both at home in Nigeria and here in Ireland so we should not allow the interpretation of personal beliefs as tenets of a professed religion. Some people (men) have indicated that they do not shake hands with members of the opposite sex because they are considered inferior or unclean (for example when a woman is having her monthly period she is considered to be unclean). Absolutely ridiculous! Others have said they do not shake hands with women out of respect for them as that could alter the body chemistry which can lead to potential temptation. Personally, I will not succumb to the notion even for one second that women are inferior to men or that I was inferior to any man. From a biblical perspective (not sure what other religious teachings/non religious sects say or do not say on this), God made men and women to be biologically different, but equal nonetheless. Our roles are different with different responsibilities, but each one is vital to the whole. God created man and woman to be partners. Through women, God brought forth kings, leaders, prophets, pastors, etc. While some schools of thought do teach that women are inferior, the Bible says that God made both of the same flesh. Both male and female reflect His image. Without either sex, we could not fully understand the nature of God. If I may ask, humanly speaking, would women exist without men and vice versa? While I am not trying to preach here, there is no mention of spiritual gifts or salvation being different for men and women. God uses women in the ministry just as much as He uses men. Therefore, in God’s eyes, men and women are equal in importance and calling. Leadership, or headship, does not necessarily assume superiority. It is just a role. A husband and wife team is simply that: a team, after all they say two good heads are better than one. They are both vital to the health of the family but one has to be the head. God chose man to be the provider and protector and woman to be the comforter and nurturer. Both roles are equally important and complimentary. Although some modern feminist groups cause women to resent their role and to see it as subservient, I believe in a partnership approach, where men and women work hand in hand for the betterment of the entire society. I have no wish to become like a man (biologically we are different and I am happy with that) but to be seen as his equal in progress. If I may ask, if a man who believes he should not shake hands with a woman was at a job interview and the female employer extended her hand for a hand shake with him, will he refuse it? If he did, will he be given the job? Will he not expect to conform to the employer’s terms of employment? Just thinking aloud. As people, we owe each other respect first as human beings and then in terms of cultural, religious and ethnic diversity but to set this whole matter in as clear a light as possible, it will be necessary to clear our ideas from all that is muddled and confused, by separating the fictitious from the real, the obscure from the evident, the false from the true, supposition from matter of fact, seeming from entities, practice from principle, belief from knowledge, doubt from certainty, interest and prejudice from justice and sound judgment. To this end therefore we must examine, what the core values of a people or society are particularly when socializing in a public space. These we must respect at all times. It’s not weakness; it is called obligations and responsibility. That much we owe the indigenous people that we live in their local communities and countries after all integration is a two way street. It is give and take. Let the debate begin!
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||







Your Comments
Please make The Square an enjoyable experience for everyone by refraining from gratuitous ad-hominem contributions, defamatory comments and off-topic posting. Such posts will be removed.