29

Jan

2009

There Is Probably No God. Now Stop Worrying And Enjoy Yourself. PDF Print E-mail
By Adebowale Oriku

Adebowale Oriku

London transport – buses, trains – is often awash, busy really, with images and words of advertisement. Now you might be a poetry-reader to notice Poems on the Underground, and a poem-lover to bother perusing the few, often catchy, lines. But you don’t need to be a student of semiotics - signs - to notice the murals bedecking the red London buses. Often promotional adverts of newly released films, West End musicals, pictures captioned with blurbs, taglines and dates of release. Few months ago the London buses were pressed into service when ‘Africa came to London’ with a menagerie of contortionists, fire-eaters, dancers, drummers and sundry performers in wildlife costume.

As a subscriber to the New Humanist and a member of the British Humanist Association, I could not but notice the words picked out in tricolour against the side of the red bus, There is probably no God. Now Stop Worrying and Enjoy Yourself. I was pleased to glimpse this legend one afternoon a couple of weeks ago in Oxford Street, London. A chance, even serendipitous, sighting as I had not been to Oxford Street for more than year. I moved out of London almost four years ago but, even when I was living in the city, the commercial anthill that is Oxford Street had never held a draw for me. I had seen the promo picture carrying the words in a newspaper just before the advert went out, but I didn’t imagine I would run into it on the first day it came out.

As a humanist, this was like a minor epiphany, the New Year’s intellectual handsel.  Weeks before, the queasier and the more restless of the evangelical wing of Christians had objected to the advert running on London buses, as it was thought by this negligible fringe that it would cause offence.

The idea was mooted by Ms Ariane Sherine, a member of the British Humanist Association. She thought there was a vacuum to be filled with such an advert. Apart from immigrant groups like Nigerians, Ghanaians et al, the number of Christians is on the wane in the United Kingdom. Broadly speaking, religion has all but been wiped off the sociogeography of the British islands and their indigenous people. Only immigrants from the middle east and the South East Asia complement the wave of African religiosity in Britain with an Islamic variant of Abrahamism.

Aside from the highly contentious fact that bishops are still allowed to sit with other unelected peers in the House of Lords, there is a fairly vocal Christian lobby in the UK. It is this sort of groupings and their counterparts in Islam, Judaism and some other religions who often defend the existence of a few ‘faith schools’ in the UK. But in spite of all this, Britain is solidly a secular country, a modern western European nation in which religion has become a historical formality. Few of the British political leaders who have any belief would dare flaunt it in the public – it is simply not an election-winner. ‘We don’t do religion,’ former Prime minister, Tony Blair, once declared via his press secretary. Tony remained a closet Christian until he left office, and even now he is still a skulking rather than spiky High-Churchman. And the incumbent, Gordon Brown, has this diversionary and rather Freudian habit of quoting his clergyman father, he would never talk about his own faith or lack of it.

There are however certain Christian noisemakers whose relevance to British life is no more worthy than that of Muslims who fierily protested at the publication of Salman Rushdie’s The Satanic Verses or the Danish cartoon of their prophet. Such Christians had also protested at the broadcast of Jerry Springer the Opera, a parodic musical in which a Jesus-figure was infantilised, wearing nappies and so forth. The musical ran its course anyway, in spite of the Christian protesters.

These religious busybodies, in this instance curiously unsupported by their Islamic brethren, had again thought it was righteous to protest when Transport for London decided to take on the advert, There is Probably no God. The Christians, again playing martyrs, contended that the advertising campaign was offensive and derogatory to religious people, and that the advert would not meet the standards of substantiation and truthfulness.

The British Advertising Standards Agency (ASA) threw out the Christians’ case. The watchdog submitted that the British Humanist Association's campaign - There is Probably no God - did not breach the advertising code or mislead consumers. The ASA council asserted that the advert was an expression of the advertiser's view and that substantiation or lack of it had nothing to do with its message – not forgetting the word probably. The Advertising Standards Agency agrees that the content of the campaign would not gladden the hearts of many believers, but it was unlikely to mislead or to cause serious or widespread offence.

And it certainly did not cause an iota of offence. Before the advert was bannered on the side of the buses, discussions on blogs and newspaper columns had even proved that few people really cared whether the advert had gone the whole hog and hollered, There is no God. What had made Ms Sherine to hit upon the idea was what she considered the very haughtiness of religionists who were free to place adverts on and in most places, adverts spieling such clichés of belief and proselytization as ‘Jesus Lives,’ ‘Hell is Real.’  As well as wishing to give voice to atheists and non-believers, Ariane also wanted to provoke debate – and was there a debate! 

At first, Ariane had thought it would take months for the British Humanists to raise the money to place the advert in January of this year. But within a few hours of the media broaching the issue, thousands of pounds had been raised, people came down with money enthusiastically – with religious zeal, if you will.

This had also provided another opportunity for Professor Richard Dawkins, distinguished occupier of the Chair of Public Understanding at Oxford, to weigh in heavily on religion. For decades, Dawkins has been the most eloquent and vigorous exegete of his near-namesake Charles Darwin, the propounder of the Theory of Evolution - the yearlong bicentenary of whose birth was flagged off a couple of days ago. Professor Dawkins is perhaps the most influential antireligionist living today. He does not excuse his tetchiness, his impatience with, even his ridicule of religion and its defenders and practitioners. His last book, The God Delusion, is a piece of deicidal higher criticism in which Dawkins aims a smart, swingeing cosh at God, religion and people who are religious, whom he considers delusional, and in a lot of cases, dim. Having come down with a chunk of the advert fee, the professor could also be depended upon to provide a wordbite during the debate: “This campaign to put alternative slogans on London buses will make people think – and thinking is anathema to religion.”

Trust Professor Dawkins to deliver heavyhanded belabouring of religion at a wink. While it was refreshing and salutary to read, just as the words There is Probably no God might not overwhelmingly affect a long-fossilised belief in God, it hardly set me into any sort of rigorous mental callisthenics. For me, it is as likely as not that there is no God. Forget the simplexity of double negative equals positive, the crux-word here is the negative ‘no’. Probability – or probabilism in an analogous sense – is a potent word in philosophy, philology, theology, physics, mathematics and logic. The humanists knew better than to have written God is only a Probability. Now stop Worrying and Enjoy Yourself. This would have given believers in God a foothold, a ledge on which to stand and leap, headfirst, into the deep end of the murky viscid pool of God-argument, an argument no one wins easily – especially God-believers.

Of course this advertising campaign had turned the probability fallacy on its head to achieve its end. The conclusion is, just because something could not happen, it could not: Since the likelihood of God’s existence is dubious, his being is therefore dubious, if not nonexistent. Occam’s razor would cut atheists the bigger slack here. But beyond such devil’s advocacy, people in London and Britain, by and large, live their lives without the bugbear of God and his scapegoated fallen factotum, Satan, without the sanctions of religion, the elementary polestar of Wisdom Theology, they enjoy themselves without worrying about what God would think of fellatio or cunnilingus or ‘binge-drinking’ every Friday night. Generally, manmade laws and rules have supplanted the anachronisms of the Ten Commandments and hellfire – by the way, the first Hellfire Club which had rakes, sots, philanderers as members, was established in the 18th century in England. And certainly, fear or love of God has nothing to do with the relative transparency in governance and governing in Britain. Nor was it God who taught them how to queue, how not to drop litter with sublime carefreeness.  

I have wondered whether such an advert campaign could be launched in our beloved country, Nigeria, I mean in the best of all possible Nigerian worlds. Oh, but I shouldn’t wonder. Aren’t we a very religious country, with a very religious people, godly folks? If the British leaders are timid enough to mumble We don’t do God, Nigerian leaders shout from the housetops about how godly they are. They call on us often to pray for the nation, some of them even take on the role of imam and deacon to lead the prayer from the plush innards of their palaces. They bid us to fast for the betterment of the country. Wasn’t our former president, Olusegun Obasanjo, a born-again Christian? Isn’t the present head of state a devoted Muslim, a Godsend? Aren’t our leaders anointed by God to lord it over us, and that we must accept them no matter what? Don’t we depend on our relationship with God to pass exams, drive cars without fuel, heal the ailing, and prosper? Aren’t we all chaste, honest, morally ramrod-straight, our leaders the paragons of honour? Don’t we fear God so much so that we only enjoy moderately, satisfied with our missionary-position mindset. Aren’t we a nation of virginal female undergraduates, of modest men whose minds are sublimated with godly cares? Don’t we all live spare, spartan lives because of our fear of God?

We indeed do God, we overdo God, hyper-do him, we’ve almost done God to death.  



Your Comments

Please make The Square an enjoyable experience for everyone by refraining from gratuitous ad-hominem contributions, defamatory comments and off-topic posting. Such posts will be removed.

User Avatar
RobotRobot is offline

 # 1 | 29.01.2009 02:35

London transport – buses, trains – is often awash, busy really, with images and words of advertisement. Now you might be a poetry-reader to notice Poems on the Underground, and a poem-lover to bother perusing the few, often catchy, lines. But you don’t need to be a student of semiotics - signs - to notice the murals bedecking the red London buses. Often promotional adverts of newly released films, West End musicals, pictures captioned with blurbs, taglines and dates of release. The London buses were pressed into service when ‘Africa came to London’ with a menagerie of contortionists, fire-eaters, dancers, drummers and sundry performers in wildlife costume.
As a subscriber to the New Humanist and a member of the British Humanist Society, I could not but notice the words picked out in tricolour against the side of the red bus, There is probably no God. Now Stop Worrying and Enjoy Yourself. I was pleased to glimpse this legen...Read the full article.

User Avatar
IykeIyke is offline

 # 2 | 29.01.2009 04:28

by making such suggestion for Nigeria, i will probably say that you are courting a fatwa from our brothers in the north. the Jos palaver is still much fresh. therefore, let Londoners and their advert remain in london.

User Avatar
bharlowbharlow is offline

 # 3 | 29.01.2009 04:57

Don't mind all of them. Well, whosoever believe there is God is a theologian, for he has the knowledge of God and whosoever believes that there is no God is also a Theologians because he has a slight knowledge that there is a someone called God. No problem.

User Avatar
ikoyiesho1ikoyiesho1 is offline

 # 4 | 29.01.2009 05:05

Nice write up.....We super do God infact.....As a religious person myself, i still admit that we religious people have really mixed a great deal of delision with the being and originality God....

Its time we practice with openmindedness and conk originality

User Avatar
Law MeforLaw Mefor is offline

 # 5 | 29.01.2009 06:24

A good piece indeed, I must confess. But a humble advice: it is better to believe and behave as if God exists. Why? You have nothing to lose really if He does not exist. Believing in a supreme force being there for you, releases our inherent energy to even believe in ourselves and makes prayers possible.

But if you carry on as though He does not exist and it turns out He does, woe betide you!

Why should anybody be an atheist? To accept atheism is to say we are but animals, just that we walk on 2 legs. But this is not true. Man is a spiritual being.

Atheism is one of the campaigns of the perverts to whom the world owes her worst records. Think of gay marriage and gay priesthood; that have been justified?

Anybody who believes the universe created itself is sick. Something must be responsible for the beginning of creation and that is God!

The Big Bang? In my novel, ‘Dream Abuja’, I tried to answer that question. What caused the Bang? When the lion roars what do you understand him to say? If God commanded, ‘Let there be…’ and we see it as a bang, what difference does t make?

I think the problem has been that we all think of God as one old man sitting up there and looking down at us and saying in deep, gruffly voice , ‘it is well, my children!’ If we picture God as the conscious, Uncaused Cause’ behind the beginning and development and growth and the end of everything, we will probably have a better grip on Him.

In fact, God has no choice but to exist. Without God, there will be no love. Without God what will exist is anomie and nihilism – a run in the jungle, where human value will count for naught. I watch NatGeo Wild a lot and Discovery Channel. What the animals do to one another amaze me. Survival of the fittest! If we apply it for one day, there will be a sudden return to the Hobbesean era – life would have been brutish, nasty and short, and each and every one us living in constant fear of violent death.

Atheists are seeking a return to the jungle because they will to annihilate their own kind, as animals do.

And I know not of any atheist to whom the world owe anything meaningful discovery; does it surprise you? Why haven’t they? Because they spend the time they should use to key into the Lord of creativity to run away from Him.

Yet, each time they face life-threatening danger, they scream, ‘Oh my God!” Which God? The one you long denounced? In fact, there is no true atheist if you ask me!

User Avatar
ELAWALOELAWALO is offline

 # 6 | 29.01.2009 08:21

This might help to clarify things ...
http://www.moviesfoundonline.com/trouble_with_atheism.php

User Avatar
PalamedesPalamedes is offline

 # 7 | 29.01.2009 11:58


I have wondered whether such an advert campaign could be launched in our beloved country



Hello commuter and ex-Londoner! I am sure such advert would have been possible in Nigeria of the 70s and 80s with little or no controversy--before the current Nigerian religious plague.

On the subject of god, if he/she/it exist, I wish people would leave him/her/it alone.

I once watched Professor Richard Dawkins, on the telly, grab a handful of dirts and tell the viewer that in that one handful, there are billions of bacteria. Further, during President Obama inauguration, CNN showed its audiences the ant-size human attendants from satellite. Furthermore, our earth is like a grain of sand when compared to Arcturus, and Arcturus, in turn, is like a grain of sand when compared to Betelgeuse or the even larger Antares. The point is that, if there is a god , there are far bigger issues to worry about than the human race. We would probably command less concern than the concern we humans feel for bacteria and ants on our pavements or walk paths. We wouldn't even know when we step on them—as millions of us do daily.

What I cannot get round my head is the idea of the Christian/Muslim god and its implication or claim god created itself and created everything else. The “big question” is: How is this possible? Even if “ something” were to metamorphosize into a god, what is the origin of that “something?”

I think, the “concept god” is more understandable, that is to say, that our universe is just one of the many steps to (A hierarchy, if you prefer). And that, which ever is the higher step, immediate to us, is inhabited by a much superior intelligence, (and that in comparison to them, we would be what “artificial intelligence” is in relation to the human brains). This superior intelligence fits the concept god. But I doubt if even this superior intelligence, could explain the origin of the Christian/Muslim god.

The follow up from the concept god is the conjecture that our universe and everything in it is a laboratory and that humans are part of an experiment. Further, that we are an improvement over the dinosaur (The dinosaur was a mistake; the earth couldn't have sustained them in the long term, as they were gargantuan consumers and not producers—much like whales--, and therefore had to be replaced with one that is smaller and can produce it's own food).

The human race is an improvement in one importance sense, that is that, we are the only species that cultivates natural resources. And while we can claim that we are superior to all other species, we have the worst deal out of this arrangements—indeed, we are the only species (and maybe the ants) that slave away daily. Like every experiment, the human race will be discarded at some point—just like the dinosaur--or replaced with something more advanced than us (or we might evolve into this something) .

Sometimes I wonder what the other species think of us--our 9-to-5 jobs, farming, fishing, shopping, mortgage, taxes, misery, alienation etc, whereas they don't have to do any of these things. Now who should be praying and thanking god if not them? The believer should be most displeased with his god for getting a raw deal.

User Avatar
TruebelieverTruebeliever is offline

 # 8 | 29.01.2009 12:23

Allah is well aware of the Atheists, when He talk about them in the holy Qur,an sura 82.
In the Name of Allah,the Compasionate,the Mercilful.

1.When the sky is cleft asunder,When the Stars are scattered, and the Oceans are rolled together When the graves are overturned; each Soul shall know what it has done and what it has faild to do.
5. O man! what evil has enticed you away from your gracious Lord who created you, gave you an upright form,and well-proportioned you? In whatever shape He willed He could have surely moulded you.
9.No, you deny the last Judgement. Yet there are guadians watching over you, noble recorders who know of all what you do.
The righteous surely shall dwell in bliss.But the wicked surely shall burn in Hell; they shall enter it on the Day of Judgement. They shall not escape it. Would that you knew what the Day of Judgement is! Oh, would that you knew what the Day of Judgement is! It is the Day when every Soul can do nothing for another and Allah will then reign supreme.

User Avatar
aguabataaguabata is offline

 # 9 | 29.01.2009 13:51

so all this pain and suffering in nigeria and the world is just an accident? what folly

User Avatar
IspyIspy is offline

 # 10 | 29.01.2009 17:22


=Law Mefor;319275>A good piece indeed, I must confess. But a humble advice: it is better to believe and behave as if God exists. Why? You have nothing to lose really if He does not exist. Believing in a supreme force being there for you, releases our inherent energy to even believe in ourselves and makes prayers possible.

But if you carry on as though He does not exist and it turns out He does, woe betide you!

Why should anybody be an atheist? To accept atheism is to say we are but animals, just that we walk on 2 legs. But this is not true. Man is a spiritual being.

Atheism is one of the campaigns of the perverts to whom the world owes her worst records. Think of gay marriage and gay priesthood; that have been justified?

Anybody who believes the universe created itself is sick. Something must be responsible for the beginning of creation and that is God!


The Big Bang? In my novel, ‘Dream Abuja’, I tried to answer that question. What caused the Bang? When the lion roars what do you understand him to say? If God commanded, ‘Let there be…’ and we see it as a bang, what difference does t make?

I think the problem has been that we all think of God as one old man sitting up there and looking down at us and saying in deep, gruffly voice , ‘it is well, my children!’ If we picture God as the conscious, Uncaused Cause’ behind the beginning and development and growth and the end of everything, we will probably have a better grip on Him.


In fact, God has no choice but to exist. Without God, there will be no love. Without God what will exist is anomie and nihilism – a run in the jungle, where human value will count for naught. I watch NatGeo Wild a lot and Discovery Channel. What the animals do to one another amaze me. Survival of the fittest! If we apply it for one day, there will be a sudden return to the Hobbesean era – life would have been brutish, nasty and short, and each and every one us living in constant fear of violent death.

Atheists are seeking a return to the jungle because they will to annihilate their own kind, as animals do.

And I know not of any atheist to whom the world owe anything meaningful discovery; does it surprise you? Why haven’t they? Because they spend the time they should use to key into the Lord of creativity to run away from Him.

Yet, each time they face life-threatening danger, they scream, ‘Oh my God!” Which God? The one you long denounced? In fact, there is no true atheist if you ask me!



I have chosen to use this respondents response to the article as a basis for mine. The article/author i must say considering it is being posted on a Nigerian Forum must be very brave in deed but a good article all the same(though i'm sure most Nigerians will definitely not see it that way!!)

I personally believe that impression of God as depicted by most of the major religions is one i must confess i have always had a problem with and may also responsible for the numerous arguments against Gods existence. My feelings on the nature of God as presented in most religious texts is captured accuratly by a saying from the legendary TV nature documentary presenter Sir David Attenborough on his own perception of God as depicted in holy books.

"My response is that when Creationists talk about God creating every individual species as a separate act, they always instance hummingbirds, or orchids, sunflowers, basically beautiful things. But I tend to think instead of a parasitic worm that is boring through the eye of a boy sitting on the bank of a river in West Africa, that's going to make him blind. And , 'Are you telling me that the God you believe in, who you also say is an all-merciful God, who cares for each one of us individually, are you saying that same God created this worm that can live in no other way than in an innocent child's eyeball? Because that doesn't seem to me to coincide with a God who's full of mercy"


Having said this, i however do believe there seems to be a defined order to life that would suggest there just has to be a force behind the existence of life and of course in its creation, be it through the big bang as some believe or some other way but for me probably not in the exact or literary way or impression given by most religious texts.Some people in defense of religious texts however argue that these texts should actually not be taken literally as most people tend to do but rather figuratively. This i find a more plausible possibility.The seven days of creation may just not be seven days as we know it, it could just be seven billion years with one day being equivalent to a billion years in the eyes of God??, or could it be the time taken for the so called process of the big bang to occur or maybe it is the time taken for evolution to occur up to when man finally evolved e.t.c

On the respondents advise that one is better to assume there is God just incase it happens to be true i must say i do not agree with. Basically if God is the all knowng all seeing God as we are told dont you think he would know u've decided to play a game of chance with him?? or try your luck??? This is certainly not the way we are told we should believe in God and even if he does exist you just may have ended up wasting your time by playing 'kalokalo' with his existence. The way i think those who choose to believe in God should carry on is aptly described by a saying i once came across from a muslim woman called Rabia al Basri (717-801), it goes thus;


"O Allah! If I worship You for fear of Hell, burn me in Hell,

and if I worship You in hope of Paradise, exclude me from Paradise.

But if I worship You for Your Own sake,

grudge me not Your everlasting Beauty.”



The attitude of 'maybe', 'maybe not', i believe describes the attitude of most Nigerians to the issue of God as majority of Nigerians and indeed Africans remain Animistic by nature, believing more in African traditional beliefs than they are ready to accept. Most fear the Ifa priest or jujuman more than the God they profess to worship. Tie a funny looking object on anything in Nigeria and you can be sure nobody would steal it!!! This brought up the idea of having our leaders swear their oath of office in front of an ifa priest etc rather than the bible or qu'ran as they do which doesn't seem to stop them enriching themselves to the detriment of their countrymen.Gradually many Nigerians are also beginning to question a lot of things concerning religion and the way it is practiced, the recent cases of so called killing of witch children instigated by churches in Nigeria, the Imams that basically practice traditional religion in the name of Islam, the now almost daily news stories such as Imam caught defiling 9 yr old girl, or pastor impregnates members wife stories, Pastors being found to have buried fetish objects right under the pulpit, the open display of affluence by Pastors when the bulk of their congregation live in poverty. Or is it the now widespread killing of innocent souls by terrorists all in the name of God?? All these and more has led mostly in developed countries to question the existence of God as we have been made to believe he is.

On the recent advert by atheists in the UK, i will say i was very disappointing in it, however not for the same reasons religious people were.
The statement "There is probably no God" depicts a group of people who were still not themselves sure if God exists or not and this is not what atheists would have us believe so why not come out straight and say it as you believe it ie That there is no God, or are they also playing the 'what if' game or scared of someone or something???. I also do not agree they should have ended the statement by saying people should therefore go out and enjoy themselves as this could be misconstrued by many to mean go out and do as you please whether it offends or harms your fellowman or not and mind you, you dont have to break the law to offend or 'harm' your fellowman.So it was a rather loose and careless statement.

Finally I believe the argument should more rather be towards our understanding God as he truly is as against the way major religions portray him to be i.e. as a manlike form with great white beard that looks after each and every single individual and ensures no harm or misfortune comes their way, with everyone having a special place waiting for them when they die and so on which honestly is hard to reconcile with everyday happenings around the world, rather than whether God exists or not.
 

Services : E-mail news | RSS Feeds | Podcasts
Links:   About the NVS | Contact Us | Terms of Use | Privacy & Cookies | Advertise With Us
All Rights Reserved. NigeriaVillageSquare.com